..... British Intelligence was formed by the reptilian bloodlines of the Babylonian Brotherhood and this formation would later create American Intelligence and similar networks throughout the expanding British Empire, which are still at work today. The CIA was created by Elite members of British Intelligence during the presidency of the 33rd degree Freemason, Harry S. Truman, the man who officially ordered the bombs to be dropped on Japan.
He took his advice from Bill Donovan, the head of the CIA’s predecessor, the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), which was peopled entirely by Knights Templar according to Bill Cooper, a former operative with US Naval Intelligence. Walsingham was posted as ambassador to France to expand the spy networks, so no surprise that British and French Intelligence are in fact the same organisation. It certainly makes the cover up of Princess Diana’s murder easier.
The intelligence agencies of the world, at their peaks, are esoteric, black magic secret societies working to the same Agenda, that of global control. John Dee was the Queen’s astrologer, a Rosicrucian Grand Master, a black magician, and a secret agent for the new intelligence network. He appears to have had a copy of the Book of Enoch from some source or other and he, and the psychic Edward Kelley, developed a written language they called ‘Enochian script or cipher’ from communications with the angels, the reptilians.
Dee signed his reports 007, the same, of course, as James Bond, the stories written by a 20th century agent of this same British Intelligence, Ian Fleming, a friend of the black magician, Aleister Crowley. Dee travelled throughout Europe manipulating, gathering information and oiling the networks. One of his haunts was Bohemia and he was closely associated with Emperor Rudolf II of the reptilian Habsburg dynasty, another occultist.
Dee was among the influential voices who were orchestrating a policy of British expansionism which became the British Empire. While in Prague, Dee gave Emperor Rudolph an illustrated manuscript written in code and claimed to be the work of Roger Bacon (Roger, not Francis), the 13th century Franciscan monk who upset the church authorities with his views and ideas. These included prophecies about the microscope, telescope, car, submarine, aeroplane and the belief that the Earth was a sphere and not flat.
In 1912, this same manuscript was bought by an American book dealer called Wilfred Voynich and became known as the Voynich Manuscript. When he sent copies to the experts of the day, they said that most of the hundreds of plants illustrated did not grow on this planet. Some of the illustrations looked like tissue seen under a microscope and others were of star systems and constellations.
The best code breakers available to United States Intelligence in both the First and Second World Wars tried to decipher what they called: “the most mysterious manuscript in the world”, but none of them could do it. William Romaine Newbold, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania, claimed to have decoded some of it in 1921. He said that part of the text read:
“In a concave mirror, I saw a star in the form of a snail between the navel of Pegasus, the girdle of Andromeda, and the head of Cassiopeia.”
What is described in the manuscript acquired by Dr John Dee is now known to be accurate and the illustration it contains of the Andromeda nebula is also correct, but it is depicted from an angle which cannot be seen from Earth! This manuscript is just one example of the level of knowledge the Brotherhood were working with hundreds of years ago while their other wing, the religions, were keeping the masses in the most basic ignorance.
In this John Dee-Francis Bacon circle were all the leading figures of Elizabethan society, including Sir Walter Raleigh. It may have been Francis Bacon who communicated some of the secret knowledge ‘for those who have ears’ in ciphers and symbolism in the works called the Shakespeare plays. He, like the writers of the Old and New Testaments and the King Arthur ‘Grail’ stories, was a high initiate of the secret mysteries communicating through code and hidden meaning.
Manly P. Hall says that Bacon indicated that he was the true author in a series of codes. His esoteric number was 33 and on one page in the first part of the ‘Shakespeare’ play, Henry The Fourth , the name ‘Francis’ appears 33 times. Bacon also used watermarks in paper to transmit his symbols, as did the Rosicrucians and secret societies in general.
These included the rose and the cross and bunches of grapes, the vine, the bloodlines. Bacon also used Tarot symbolism in his codes, including the numbers 21, 56 and 78, which are related to divisions in the Tarot deck. In a Shakespearean Folio of 1623, the Christian name of Bacon appears 21 times on page 56. The term Rota Mundi frequently occurs in the early manifestos of the Fraternity of the Rose Cross. Rearrange the letters in Rota and you get Taro, the ancient name for the tarot cards.
Shakespeare is known as the Bard. A Bard was a Druidic initiate of the secret knowledge and, the Concise Oxford Dictionary shows there is another definition of bard… “a slice of bacon placed on meat or game before roasting”. The famous Globe Theatre in London where the plays were performed was built according to the principles of sacred geometry and the last ‘Shakespeare’ play, The Tempest , included many Rosicrucian concepts.
It is equally possible that the ‘Shakespeare’ plays were written by another initiate of Elizabethan society, Edward De Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford, who also fitted the bill and some believe even more so than Bacon. They were both bloodline, almost certainly Ramses-Piso-Bush, and so no wonder the ‘Shakespeare’ plays focussed on Brotherhood themes and bloodlines like Cleopatra and the Scottish King, Macbeth.
Brian Desborough, who has extensively researched this subject for a film script, says that De Vere was the head of a team of initiate writers, including Bacon, who put the plays together. One of De Vere’s 5th century ancestors, Richard De Vere, was head of the Royal Court of the Dragon and was known as Lord Draconis! Desborough has established that Edward De Vere fathered a son with Queen Elizabeth I, and the child was later known as the Earl of Southampton. De Vere was just 14 when this conception took place and three years earlier, as a child genius and brilliant writer, he was commissioned by the Queen to write a poem called Romeus and Juliet!
The idea that the world famous plays were written by an illiterate from Stratford-upon-Avon called William Shakespeare is patently ridiculous and, like so much accepted ‘truth’, does not survive the most basic research. Shakespeare, the ‘Bard’, grew up in Stratford, a town with no school capable of communicating such a high degree of learning. His parents were illiterate and he showed a total disregard for study. Yet the plays were written by someone with a great knowledge of the world which could be gleaned only from a fantastic range of books and personal experience through travel. Shakespeare had no such library, not that he could have used it if he had, and he is never known to have left the country.
Bacon had just such a library and travelled widely to many of the places featured in the plays. So did De Vere. Where did Shakespeare acquire his knowledge of French, Italian, Spanish, Danish and classic Latin and Greek? Answer, he didn’t. Ben Jonson, a close friend of Shakespeare, said that the ‘Bard’ understood: “small Latin and less Greek!” But Bacon and De Vere were learned in these languages.
Shakespeare’s daughter, Judith, was known to be illiterate and could not even write her name at the age of 27. It really makes no sense that a man who wrote so eloquently would have a daughter who could not write her signature. There are only six known examples of Shakespeare’s own handwriting, all signatures, and three of these are on his will. They reveal a man unfamiliar with a pen and a hand that was probably guided by another. His will included his second best bed and a broad silver gilt bowl, but nothing whatsoever to suggest that he wrote or owned a single work of literature! Nor is there one authentic portrait of Shakespeare. The differences in the depiction of him by artists confirm that no-one has any idea what he looked like. Yet the power of conditioning and accepting the official line attracts millions of people to Stratford from all over the world to see the home of the man who didn’t write the Shakespeare plays!
This is only one small example of how the official fairy story called ‘history’ is used to control current behaviour and perception. What else in history isn’t true? Just about everything. Behind the Shakespeare plays was the hidden hand behind most historical events of significance, the Brotherhood networks. And nothing sums up the attitude of this group better than the words of the witches in the play, Macbeth: “Fair is foul and foul is fair.” As Manly P. Hall, the Freemasonic historian, wrote of Bacon: “He was a Rosicrucian, some have intimated the Rosicrucian. If not actually the Illustrious Father C.R.C. referred to in the Rosicrucian manifestos, he was certainly a high initiate of the Rosicrucian Order… those enthusiasts who for years have struggled to identify Sir Francis Bacon as the true “Bard of Avon” might long since have won their case had they emphasised its most important angle, namely, that Sir Francis Bacon, the Rosicrucian initiate, wrote into the Shakespearean plays the secret teachings of the Fraternity of R.C. and the true rituals of the Freemasonic Order, of which order it may be discovered that he was the actual founder.”
The same, however, can be said of Edward De Vere. The rituals and symbols of Freemasonry can be traced back to ancient Egypt and beyond. In truth, its knowledge of sacred geometry, numbers and form, go back to before the last cataclysm. The Dionysiac Artificers or Architects, composed of initiates of the Bacchus-Dionysus (Sun) Mysteries whose role it was to design the public buildings and monuments, can be traced back at least three thousand years if not more.
It was these architect-initiates who designed the great buildings of Constantinople, Rhodes, Athens and Rome and it was this same stream who built the temple to the goddess Diana at the world centre for the Diana cult at Ephesus, which is remembered as one of the wonders of the ancient world. The Dionysiac Architects were connected with a secret society called the Ionians (hence the island of Iona in Scotland) who were apparently the people who commissioned the Temple of Diana. Under other names, the Dionysian Architects and initiates from the Frater Solomonis mystery school also built great Christian Cathedrals funded by the Knights Templar.
There were many Rosicrucian and Masonic emblems to be seen in the carvings of the Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris and numerous depictions of compasses, squares and building tools before they were destroyed during the French Revolution. The Bacchus-Dionysus architects were divided into communities headed by Masters and Wardens, just as Freemasonry is today, and they settled in Israel where some researchers link them with the Essenes, the Egyptian sect who produced the Dead Sea Scrolls. Bacchus-Dionysus (two names for the same deity) was a symbol of the Sun who was said to have been born to a virgin on December 25th. The foundation of Freemasonic legend and ‘history’ centres on the building of the symbolic King Solomon’s Temple in Jerusalem.
The Freemasonic hero is Hiram Abiff, the ‘son of the widow’ in their folklore. This is more symbolism. In Egypt, Horus (Tammuz) was the son of the widow, Isis. The creation of Freemasonry in the 16th and 17th centuries pulled together many of the various themes, agendas and organisations throughout history to the present day.
It connected the Rosicrucians and Templars in England, like Bacon, with the story of the Templars after their arrival from France at the time of Philippe the Fair, and their subsequent return to France as the Scots Guard. It also connects this group with the Priory of Sion. The figure which encapsulated these connections was James VI of Scotland (Ramses-Piso-Bush), who succeeded Elizabeth I and became James I of England and Scotland. He was the only child of Mary Queen of Scots. The Stuart bloodline with its connections to the reptilian Merovingians (Ramses-Piso-Bush) was now on the throne of both England and Scotland. Under James’s patronage, the Scottish and Templar knowledge and the Rosicrucian knowledge of Francis Bacon and others could merge and become united under the name, Freemasonry.
So could the knowledge of the reptilian House of Lorraine, another bloodline of King James. He had the whole set! For this reason, and others, you find the names ‘James’ and ‘St James’ appear many times in the titles of Brotherhood companies, organisations and their locations. The American ambassador to London is known as the Ambassador to the Court of St James. Close to the Houses of Parliament in London you find St James’s Square and here is the headquarters of the Conservative Party; the biggest British trade union, the Transport Union; a building owned by the Scottish reptilian bloodline, the Keswicks; and in the centre is a massive round church dedicated to St John (Nimrod).
One of his first acts as King James I of England and Scotland (Ramses-Piso-Bush) was to award a knighthood to Bacon, and James would later appoint him Solicitor-General, Attorney-General, Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and, in 1618, Lord Chancellor and Baron Verulam. Later Bacon was prosecuted on corruption charges and retired from official public life.
In those early years under James I, there was a wonderful opportunity to circulate the suppressed knowledge of the ancient world if that was really the motivation of the James-Bacon esoteric underground. But again we have the contradiction. The very opposite happened. James employed Bacon to edit the King James version of the Bible and launched a vicious condemnation of ‘witches and wizards’ - those among the general population who used and communicated the esoteric knowledge.
More than that, he embarked on a vicious slaughter of them, killing thousands, and he even wrote a book explaining how they should be identified and dealt with. Why do that if, as claimed, the motivation of this underground stream was to protect and eventually circulate such information? Because that was never the idea. It helps if people whose support you need think that is your motivation, but when it comes to the crunch you walk the other way.
The hierarchy of these groups do not want to make the knowledge available, rather they want to hoard it and use it to gain power on a global scale. How does one explain how the Freemasons, Templars, Rosicrucians, Bacon and others, have been protectors of the knowledge when every time the climate has been right to make it public, including today, the opportunity is spurned. Their real motive is that they know that knowledge is power, as long as you have it and others do not. The last thing their hierarchy wants is an informed population.
Throughout Europe, the wizards and witches, the sensitives and psychics in other words, were burned, drowned, jailed and tortured, on the orders of people like King James and Martin Luther. Yet these were initiates using the same knowledge the ‘wizards and witches’ were using and communicating. There were two esoteric undergrounds and still are. The one among the people which passed on the knowledge in secret, myth and fairy tale, to avoid the wrath of the religious and political establishment; and the Babylonian Brotherhood underground which wanted that knowledge for itself to control and manipulate the religious and political establishment.
In other words, the peoples’ underground was, and is, constantly attacked and pursued by the Brotherhood underground. Some 250,000 were murdered for being ‘wizards and witches’, 30,000 of them in the British Isles alone. Incidentally, it was the Piso family who wrote the Gospel stories and Constantine the Great turned them into the religion we know today. Their bloodline became the Merovingians who were related to James I, the sponsor of the most used version of the Bible to this day!
He took his advice from Bill Donovan, the head of the CIA’s predecessor, the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), which was peopled entirely by Knights Templar according to Bill Cooper, a former operative with US Naval Intelligence. Walsingham was posted as ambassador to France to expand the spy networks, so no surprise that British and French Intelligence are in fact the same organisation. It certainly makes the cover up of Princess Diana’s murder easier.
The intelligence agencies of the world, at their peaks, are esoteric, black magic secret societies working to the same Agenda, that of global control. John Dee was the Queen’s astrologer, a Rosicrucian Grand Master, a black magician, and a secret agent for the new intelligence network. He appears to have had a copy of the Book of Enoch from some source or other and he, and the psychic Edward Kelley, developed a written language they called ‘Enochian script or cipher’ from communications with the angels, the reptilians.
Dee signed his reports 007, the same, of course, as James Bond, the stories written by a 20th century agent of this same British Intelligence, Ian Fleming, a friend of the black magician, Aleister Crowley. Dee travelled throughout Europe manipulating, gathering information and oiling the networks. One of his haunts was Bohemia and he was closely associated with Emperor Rudolf II of the reptilian Habsburg dynasty, another occultist.
Dee was among the influential voices who were orchestrating a policy of British expansionism which became the British Empire. While in Prague, Dee gave Emperor Rudolph an illustrated manuscript written in code and claimed to be the work of Roger Bacon (Roger, not Francis), the 13th century Franciscan monk who upset the church authorities with his views and ideas. These included prophecies about the microscope, telescope, car, submarine, aeroplane and the belief that the Earth was a sphere and not flat.
In 1912, this same manuscript was bought by an American book dealer called Wilfred Voynich and became known as the Voynich Manuscript. When he sent copies to the experts of the day, they said that most of the hundreds of plants illustrated did not grow on this planet. Some of the illustrations looked like tissue seen under a microscope and others were of star systems and constellations.
The best code breakers available to United States Intelligence in both the First and Second World Wars tried to decipher what they called: “the most mysterious manuscript in the world”, but none of them could do it. William Romaine Newbold, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania, claimed to have decoded some of it in 1921. He said that part of the text read:
“In a concave mirror, I saw a star in the form of a snail between the navel of Pegasus, the girdle of Andromeda, and the head of Cassiopeia.”
What is described in the manuscript acquired by Dr John Dee is now known to be accurate and the illustration it contains of the Andromeda nebula is also correct, but it is depicted from an angle which cannot be seen from Earth! This manuscript is just one example of the level of knowledge the Brotherhood were working with hundreds of years ago while their other wing, the religions, were keeping the masses in the most basic ignorance.
In this John Dee-Francis Bacon circle were all the leading figures of Elizabethan society, including Sir Walter Raleigh. It may have been Francis Bacon who communicated some of the secret knowledge ‘for those who have ears’ in ciphers and symbolism in the works called the Shakespeare plays. He, like the writers of the Old and New Testaments and the King Arthur ‘Grail’ stories, was a high initiate of the secret mysteries communicating through code and hidden meaning.
Manly P. Hall says that Bacon indicated that he was the true author in a series of codes. His esoteric number was 33 and on one page in the first part of the ‘Shakespeare’ play, Henry The Fourth , the name ‘Francis’ appears 33 times. Bacon also used watermarks in paper to transmit his symbols, as did the Rosicrucians and secret societies in general.
These included the rose and the cross and bunches of grapes, the vine, the bloodlines. Bacon also used Tarot symbolism in his codes, including the numbers 21, 56 and 78, which are related to divisions in the Tarot deck. In a Shakespearean Folio of 1623, the Christian name of Bacon appears 21 times on page 56. The term Rota Mundi frequently occurs in the early manifestos of the Fraternity of the Rose Cross. Rearrange the letters in Rota and you get Taro, the ancient name for the tarot cards.
Shakespeare is known as the Bard. A Bard was a Druidic initiate of the secret knowledge and, the Concise Oxford Dictionary shows there is another definition of bard… “a slice of bacon placed on meat or game before roasting”. The famous Globe Theatre in London where the plays were performed was built according to the principles of sacred geometry and the last ‘Shakespeare’ play, The Tempest , included many Rosicrucian concepts.
It is equally possible that the ‘Shakespeare’ plays were written by another initiate of Elizabethan society, Edward De Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford, who also fitted the bill and some believe even more so than Bacon. They were both bloodline, almost certainly Ramses-Piso-Bush, and so no wonder the ‘Shakespeare’ plays focussed on Brotherhood themes and bloodlines like Cleopatra and the Scottish King, Macbeth.
Brian Desborough, who has extensively researched this subject for a film script, says that De Vere was the head of a team of initiate writers, including Bacon, who put the plays together. One of De Vere’s 5th century ancestors, Richard De Vere, was head of the Royal Court of the Dragon and was known as Lord Draconis! Desborough has established that Edward De Vere fathered a son with Queen Elizabeth I, and the child was later known as the Earl of Southampton. De Vere was just 14 when this conception took place and three years earlier, as a child genius and brilliant writer, he was commissioned by the Queen to write a poem called Romeus and Juliet!
The idea that the world famous plays were written by an illiterate from Stratford-upon-Avon called William Shakespeare is patently ridiculous and, like so much accepted ‘truth’, does not survive the most basic research. Shakespeare, the ‘Bard’, grew up in Stratford, a town with no school capable of communicating such a high degree of learning. His parents were illiterate and he showed a total disregard for study. Yet the plays were written by someone with a great knowledge of the world which could be gleaned only from a fantastic range of books and personal experience through travel. Shakespeare had no such library, not that he could have used it if he had, and he is never known to have left the country.
Bacon had just such a library and travelled widely to many of the places featured in the plays. So did De Vere. Where did Shakespeare acquire his knowledge of French, Italian, Spanish, Danish and classic Latin and Greek? Answer, he didn’t. Ben Jonson, a close friend of Shakespeare, said that the ‘Bard’ understood: “small Latin and less Greek!” But Bacon and De Vere were learned in these languages.
Shakespeare’s daughter, Judith, was known to be illiterate and could not even write her name at the age of 27. It really makes no sense that a man who wrote so eloquently would have a daughter who could not write her signature. There are only six known examples of Shakespeare’s own handwriting, all signatures, and three of these are on his will. They reveal a man unfamiliar with a pen and a hand that was probably guided by another. His will included his second best bed and a broad silver gilt bowl, but nothing whatsoever to suggest that he wrote or owned a single work of literature! Nor is there one authentic portrait of Shakespeare. The differences in the depiction of him by artists confirm that no-one has any idea what he looked like. Yet the power of conditioning and accepting the official line attracts millions of people to Stratford from all over the world to see the home of the man who didn’t write the Shakespeare plays!
This is only one small example of how the official fairy story called ‘history’ is used to control current behaviour and perception. What else in history isn’t true? Just about everything. Behind the Shakespeare plays was the hidden hand behind most historical events of significance, the Brotherhood networks. And nothing sums up the attitude of this group better than the words of the witches in the play, Macbeth: “Fair is foul and foul is fair.” As Manly P. Hall, the Freemasonic historian, wrote of Bacon: “He was a Rosicrucian, some have intimated the Rosicrucian. If not actually the Illustrious Father C.R.C. referred to in the Rosicrucian manifestos, he was certainly a high initiate of the Rosicrucian Order… those enthusiasts who for years have struggled to identify Sir Francis Bacon as the true “Bard of Avon” might long since have won their case had they emphasised its most important angle, namely, that Sir Francis Bacon, the Rosicrucian initiate, wrote into the Shakespearean plays the secret teachings of the Fraternity of R.C. and the true rituals of the Freemasonic Order, of which order it may be discovered that he was the actual founder.”
The same, however, can be said of Edward De Vere. The rituals and symbols of Freemasonry can be traced back to ancient Egypt and beyond. In truth, its knowledge of sacred geometry, numbers and form, go back to before the last cataclysm. The Dionysiac Artificers or Architects, composed of initiates of the Bacchus-Dionysus (Sun) Mysteries whose role it was to design the public buildings and monuments, can be traced back at least three thousand years if not more.
It was these architect-initiates who designed the great buildings of Constantinople, Rhodes, Athens and Rome and it was this same stream who built the temple to the goddess Diana at the world centre for the Diana cult at Ephesus, which is remembered as one of the wonders of the ancient world. The Dionysiac Architects were connected with a secret society called the Ionians (hence the island of Iona in Scotland) who were apparently the people who commissioned the Temple of Diana. Under other names, the Dionysian Architects and initiates from the Frater Solomonis mystery school also built great Christian Cathedrals funded by the Knights Templar.
There were many Rosicrucian and Masonic emblems to be seen in the carvings of the Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris and numerous depictions of compasses, squares and building tools before they were destroyed during the French Revolution. The Bacchus-Dionysus architects were divided into communities headed by Masters and Wardens, just as Freemasonry is today, and they settled in Israel where some researchers link them with the Essenes, the Egyptian sect who produced the Dead Sea Scrolls. Bacchus-Dionysus (two names for the same deity) was a symbol of the Sun who was said to have been born to a virgin on December 25th. The foundation of Freemasonic legend and ‘history’ centres on the building of the symbolic King Solomon’s Temple in Jerusalem.
The Freemasonic hero is Hiram Abiff, the ‘son of the widow’ in their folklore. This is more symbolism. In Egypt, Horus (Tammuz) was the son of the widow, Isis. The creation of Freemasonry in the 16th and 17th centuries pulled together many of the various themes, agendas and organisations throughout history to the present day.
It connected the Rosicrucians and Templars in England, like Bacon, with the story of the Templars after their arrival from France at the time of Philippe the Fair, and their subsequent return to France as the Scots Guard. It also connects this group with the Priory of Sion. The figure which encapsulated these connections was James VI of Scotland (Ramses-Piso-Bush), who succeeded Elizabeth I and became James I of England and Scotland. He was the only child of Mary Queen of Scots. The Stuart bloodline with its connections to the reptilian Merovingians (Ramses-Piso-Bush) was now on the throne of both England and Scotland. Under James’s patronage, the Scottish and Templar knowledge and the Rosicrucian knowledge of Francis Bacon and others could merge and become united under the name, Freemasonry.
So could the knowledge of the reptilian House of Lorraine, another bloodline of King James. He had the whole set! For this reason, and others, you find the names ‘James’ and ‘St James’ appear many times in the titles of Brotherhood companies, organisations and their locations. The American ambassador to London is known as the Ambassador to the Court of St James. Close to the Houses of Parliament in London you find St James’s Square and here is the headquarters of the Conservative Party; the biggest British trade union, the Transport Union; a building owned by the Scottish reptilian bloodline, the Keswicks; and in the centre is a massive round church dedicated to St John (Nimrod).
One of his first acts as King James I of England and Scotland (Ramses-Piso-Bush) was to award a knighthood to Bacon, and James would later appoint him Solicitor-General, Attorney-General, Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and, in 1618, Lord Chancellor and Baron Verulam. Later Bacon was prosecuted on corruption charges and retired from official public life.
In those early years under James I, there was a wonderful opportunity to circulate the suppressed knowledge of the ancient world if that was really the motivation of the James-Bacon esoteric underground. But again we have the contradiction. The very opposite happened. James employed Bacon to edit the King James version of the Bible and launched a vicious condemnation of ‘witches and wizards’ - those among the general population who used and communicated the esoteric knowledge.
More than that, he embarked on a vicious slaughter of them, killing thousands, and he even wrote a book explaining how they should be identified and dealt with. Why do that if, as claimed, the motivation of this underground stream was to protect and eventually circulate such information? Because that was never the idea. It helps if people whose support you need think that is your motivation, but when it comes to the crunch you walk the other way.
The hierarchy of these groups do not want to make the knowledge available, rather they want to hoard it and use it to gain power on a global scale. How does one explain how the Freemasons, Templars, Rosicrucians, Bacon and others, have been protectors of the knowledge when every time the climate has been right to make it public, including today, the opportunity is spurned. Their real motive is that they know that knowledge is power, as long as you have it and others do not. The last thing their hierarchy wants is an informed population.
Throughout Europe, the wizards and witches, the sensitives and psychics in other words, were burned, drowned, jailed and tortured, on the orders of people like King James and Martin Luther. Yet these were initiates using the same knowledge the ‘wizards and witches’ were using and communicating. There were two esoteric undergrounds and still are. The one among the people which passed on the knowledge in secret, myth and fairy tale, to avoid the wrath of the religious and political establishment; and the Babylonian Brotherhood underground which wanted that knowledge for itself to control and manipulate the religious and political establishment.
In other words, the peoples’ underground was, and is, constantly attacked and pursued by the Brotherhood underground. Some 250,000 were murdered for being ‘wizards and witches’, 30,000 of them in the British Isles alone. Incidentally, it was the Piso family who wrote the Gospel stories and Constantine the Great turned them into the religion we know today. Their bloodline became the Merovingians who were related to James I, the sponsor of the most used version of the Bible to this day!