Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Trans Agenda can of worms
#1
[font=.SF UI Text][font=.SFUIText]With reference to the Labour Party's decision to have an all female shortlist to become the parliamentary candidate for the Rushcliffe seat in Nottinghamshire. The first issue here is one of positive discrimination, are there no males in the Rushcliffe area with parliamentary aspirations? If there are, can they not seek legal recourse in the UK equality act? Is it even legal for the Labour Party to discriminate against males in this way? I'm not an expert in the law but surely sex discrimination works both ways?[/font][/font]
[font=.SF UI Text][font=.SFUIText]Secondly, there is the issue of Labour allowing transgender woman Dr. Heather Peto to stand as a candidate, I have no thoughts on this persons identity one way or another, my thoughts are more general about the transgender agenda.[/font][/font]
[font=.SF UI Text][font=.SFUIText]The Labour Party are clearly happy to accept Dr. Peto as a woman, this has much wider connotations, the Party could be opening an enormous can of worms here. If we are to look at professional sport for example, do the Labour Party now believe that transgender women can go to the Olympics and compete against actual women? I do not consider it sexist to suggest that (in most cases) the top female athletes would struggle to compete with their male counterparts (although I suspect that some will see this as massively sexist). Let's imagine for a moment that a male amateur boxer aspires to win an Olympic Gold Medal, he's not quite at the level required to enter the men's event, but believes he could probably smash the living daylights out of everyone in the woman's event, his trainer then suggests that to achieve his Olympic Gold dream he could enter as a woman? You can probably see where I'm going with this. Could Phil Neville and his Lionesses be improved with a couple a men identifying as women? Women's Rugby teams? Athletics? Tennis? It's endless. [/font][/font]

[font=.SF UI Text][font=.SFUIText] Stop the madness now before it's too late![/font][/font]
#2
At the risk of repeating myself there is no such thing 'as positive discrimination' only discrimination! The term 'positive discrimination' is straight out of Oceania.
#3
There should not be any female only candidates or male only for that matter as it is discrimination simple as that, people should be judged on their abilities not wither they are male or female, as for transgender people it's very simple if you have a penis you are male and I know it's controversial but I believe that if you think you have the wrong body you have a psychological problem.
#4
(01-28-2018, 02:41 PM)terminal4u Wrote: At the risk of repeating myself there is no such thing 'as positive discrimination' only discrimination! The term 'positive discrimination' is straight out of Oceania.

Fair comment, I couldn't agree more, the term 'positive discrimination' was used in the original post to ensure the point was totally and utterly understood by anyone who may read it. Positive discrimination is a media term that everyone understands. I agree with your comment that it is just 'discrimination'. Thank you for your input.

Please feel free to comment on the actual content of the thread as there was a completely different point to be made without alluding to my unfortunate misuse of terminology.

I apologise now for any grammatical errors within this post!

(01-28-2018, 03:23 PM)jeff55 Wrote: There should not be any female only candidates or male only for that matter as it is discrimination simple as that,people should be judged  on their abilities not wither they are male or female, as for transgender people it's very simple if you have a penis you are male and I know it's controversial but I believe that if you think you have the wrong body you have a psychological problem.

I'm in full agreement with you jeff55, but the overriding issue here isn't  what 'we' really believe. We may see through their agenda, but just how many others actually see through governmental PC dog dirt?
#5
(01-28-2018, 07:43 PM)Yan Tan Tetherer Wrote:
(01-28-2018, 02:41 PM)terminal4u Wrote: At the risk of repeating myself there is no such thing 'as positive discrimination' only discrimination! The term 'positive discrimination' is straight out of Oceania.

Fair comment, I couldn't agree more, the term 'positive discrimination' was used in the original post to ensure the point was totally and utterly understood by anyone who may read it. Positive discrimination is a media term that everyone understands. I agree with your comment that it is just 'discrimination'. Thank you for your input.

Please feel free to comment on the actual content of the thread as there was a completely different point to be made without alluding to my unfortunate misuse of terminology.

I apologise now for any grammatical errors within this post!

(01-28-2018, 03:23 PM)jeff55 Wrote: There should not be any female only candidates or male only for that matter as it is discrimination simple as that,people should be judged  on their abilities not wither they are male or female, as for transgender people it's very simple if you have a penis you are male and I know it's controversial but I believe that if you think you have the wrong body you have a psychological problem.

I'm in full agreement with you jeff55, but the overriding issue here isn't  what 'we' really believe. We may see through their agenda, but just how many others actually see through governmental PC dog dirt?
Totally agree with you Yan Tan.
This is exactly what the agenda is about. Everyone is talking about it. Families are arguing about it. Husbands and wives are disagreeing with each other, work colleagues are arguing over it. Friends will fall out over it. But that is all that we are doing... Talking and arguing about it.
Meanwhile the agenda is going to be pushed through regardless and all we as people are doing is arguing and falling out with each other. that is exactly what they want.
Divide and Rule.
I don't know what the answer is but all I can think is that we are falling into their trap.
They want to break up families, groups and communities as together these can be strong.
I know we are mostly all of the same sort of thinking on here but I can't help thinking that they, the powers that be, are sitting in their chairs laughing at what is going on because the public is doing exactly what they want...arguing and distancing themselves from each other
#6
Societal pressure towards collectivism and consensus of view (including political correctness) is connected to a transfer of perception from the individual and unique expression to the hive-mind collective of transhumanist ‘assimilation’.

So, too, is the war against a sense of individuality which includes the merging of male and female under titles like ‘the end of gender’ and ‘transphobia’ with transgender education at the earliest ages to prepare people for the transhumanist AI former human that would be neither male or female and not reproduce.

Extreme and expanding bias against heterosexuality in favour of same-sex relationships is all part of the conditioning. What is occurring in terms of sexual bias is preparation for a world where there will be no sexuality, and straight, gay, binary, non-binary, black, brown, minority, ethnic and whatever else will all be imprisoned and absorbed in the same AI assimilation.

They won’t have a choice about being binary then because 0 and 1 will be who they are. Observe all that is being thrown at the human body, mind and emotions; the controls, limitations, impositions and deletions of basic freedoms that increase by the day. There’s a deliberate and blatant plan to merge and assimilate humans with Artificial Intelligence technology that would become our intelligence. Is there anyone still naive enough to believe that this is all to protect us?

The agenda is designed to make us sub-human and eventually to be assimilated by the non-human.
#7
AI know you’ll all hate me for saying it but oddly enough I got sucked into watching celebrity big brother & im glad I did in a way because I tend not to watch much tv because it pisses me off to the core but I was pleasantly surprised at the housemates and how they dealt with the Transgender issues with India Willoughby!
Basically she went in there ready to ‘defend trans rights’ blah de blah de blah and everyone was sick of it in the end! They just told her to basically shut up and she’ll be accepted!
Same with Shane ‘J’ the gay drag queen who insists on quoting LGBTQ.. rights, blah blah.. constantly and trying to incite others to gang up on anyone who has a differing opinion and they all just said ‘shut up and let everyone have their opinions’ it was great!
Goes to show that the MSM are perpetuating this agenda not society! Sadly some of the lgbt community have got swept up in it & indoctrinated (imo) into this aggressive form of forced acceptance for all or else!
#8
If that is what is on T.V. I'm glad I turned mine off (2008) Can't begin to comment on the T.V.shows.
Charlotte, you are one tough gal, to sit through that mess. ;>)
I play a little game when I go to the beauty shop. I pick up a People magazine, and see how many celebs,that I have no clue who they are.
The less I recognize, the better I feel.
It's not just T.V. It's film, billboards, magazines. Down your throat 24/7.
My neighbor who is 15, told me there were 40 genders a person could be. WOW! This is taught in school now. My tax dollars at work!
As for me, I'm done with this mess. There are 2 genders, male, female. You can imagine yourself to be whatever you like, it's called mental illness.
Carolinabeve
#9
There was a female MP the other day banging on about the lack of female MPs, and that parliament is still male dominated. A simple solution would be for half the male MP's to now identify themselves as women, lesbian women so they can remain married to their respective partners, (of course straight women if their male versions are gay). They could still dress exactly the same as they do now. Job done. A fair and balanced parliament.
#10
(02-02-2018, 02:37 PM)Splodge Wrote: There was a female MP the other day banging on about the lack of female MPs,  and that parliament is still male dominated.  A simple solution would be for half the male MP's to now identify themselves as women,  lesbian women so they can remain married to their respective partners,  (of course straight women if their male versions are gay). They could still dress exactly the same as they do now. Job done. A fair and balanced parliament.

I can see them all now, a 50/50 split and a right

https://youtu.be/CPJ_PsCcDW4

Stock.
  


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)