I suggest that you rename, extend the “lib” in the thread title...
See an excerpt from the infamous 1974 National Security Council Document 20506: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests. Written by none other than Nobel Prize winner for peace, Henry Kissinger (Nelson Rockefeller became Vice President in December 1974, after Richard Nixon had been Watergated by Kissinger)...
They identified India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Columbia as problematic.
Quote:concentrating on the education and indoctrination of the rising generation of children regarding the desirability of smaller family size.
(…)
Considerable reduction in infant and child mortality is possible through improvement in nutrition, inoculations against diseases, and other public health measures if means can be devised for extending such services to neglected LDC populations on a low-cost basis. It often makes sense to combine such activities with family planning services in integrated delivery systems in order to maximize the use of scarce LDC financial and health manpowder (sic.) resources (See Section IV). In addition, providing selected health care for both mothers and their children can enhance the acceptability of family planning by showing concern for the whole condition of the mother and her children and not just for the single factor of fertility.
(…)
Research indicates that female wage employment outside the home is related to fertility reduction. Programs to increase the women's labor force participation must, however, take account of the overall demand for labor; this would be a particular problem in occupations where there is already widespread unemployment among males. But other occupations where women have a comparative advantage can be encouraged.
http://schillerinstitute.org/strategic/NSSM200.htm
Over 50 years of feminism, was blown out of the water. When Germaine Greer, made fun of Australia's then Prime Minister Julia Gillard's choice of jackets that she wore in parliament because it made her look fat, on the TV programe Q@A. The fact that she was Australia's first and only Prime minister, who was to be judged on her merits, not on her appearance, didn't come into her ultra feminist thinking. It made me laugh though.