Full Version: Russian Defence Ministry: "UK Staged Syrian Chemical Attack!"
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
Here is some important background information regarding the Syrian conflict that just isn't mentioned in the mainstream media -

General Wesley Clark said in a television interview in 2007 about the Pentagon planning to attack and destroy the governments in seven countries in five years –Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran. Clark was describing a plan hatched during the Republican administration of George W Bush and yet exactly the same plan targeting the same listed countries has continued under Obama and now Trump in America’s one-party state.  

You just knew that eventually the claim would be made that Assad had used chemical weapons against civilians because these people are nothing if not predictable. The claim based on ‘evidence’ supplied by, yes, Britain and France, was duly made in the hope of justifying what they are aching to do; but then came an interview with Carla del Ponte, a member of a UN panel investigating in Syria, in which she said there were ‘strong, concrete suspicions’ that the Syrian rebels had used sarin nerve gas.

‘This was use on the part of the opposition, the rebels, not by the government authorities’, she told Swiss-Italian TV.

A CNN report in December 2012 revealed how the Pentagon was training Syrian rebels in the use of chemical weapons. It said:

The training [in chemical weapons], which is taking place in Jordan and Turkey, involves how to monitor and secure stockpiles and handle weapons sites and materials, according to the sources.

Some of the contractors are on the ground in Syria working with the rebels to monitor some of the sites, according to one of the officials. The nationality of the trainers was not disclosed, though the officials cautioned against assuming all are American. White House spokesman (propagandist) Jay Carney said they were ‘highly sceptical of any suggestions that the opposition used chemical weapons’ and they believed that Assad was responsible.

True to form the US announced again in June, 2013 (with no evidence) that Assad had used chemical weapons and Obama said that they would now supply weapons to the ‘rebels’ (officially and in greater number, that is, rather than covertly as up to that point).

At the same time the European Union dropped its ban on weapons supplies to the ‘rebels’ with Britain leading the way. All this happened as Assad troops were retaking locations held by the ‘rebels’ and the Elite plan was going pear-shaped.

Another point: why would Assad even think of using chemical weapons when he knew that it would give his global enemies just the excuse they wanted to destroy him? He would be crazy –and he isn’t.

Israel launched bomb attacks on Syria in May, 2013 in the hope that the Syrian army would be weakened and seeking a Syrian retaliation that could lead to all-out war. This was reported as a unilateral attack by the psychopaths of Tel Aviv, but it would have been sanctioned behind the scenes by the usual suspects –the US, Britain, Canada and NATO in general.

Obama confirmed as much after the attacks when he said that the US ‘coordinates closely’ with Israel. Israeli planes bombed locations around the Syrian capital Damascus in their second attack in three days and claimed to have destroyed stockpiles of Iranian-made guided missiles intended for the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah.

They produced no evidence of this and Lebanon is another target on the must-have list. Syria is not a war caused by ‘rebels’ within the country just as the Libyan ‘revolution’ was not. They are part of a systematic fake ‘Arab Spring’ takeover of the whole of Africa and the Middle and Near East by forces working through the United States, Israel and NATO.

The Military intervention in Mali was only one example of what is planned for country after country in Africa, orchestrated through the US AFRICOM network in league with NATO countries. Watch out South Africa because they want you, too. They want everything because they are insane. The French action in Mali was only the French arm of the Elite networks serving a global agenda and seeking to secure abundant natural resources including gold and uranium reserves. In another you-couldn’t-make-it-up moment the Elite French President Francois Hollande, who sent in the troops, was given a UNESCO peace prize for his ‘valuable contribution to peace and stability in Africa’ by going to war, making thousands of Malians homeless and, according to Amnesty International, imposing ‘serious human rights breaches’ including the killing of children.

The Elite networks usually manufacture a different excuse for each new country, although with Libya and Syria it was exactly the same. ‘Rebels’ funded and armed by the US and NATO (via Qatar, Turkey and Saudi Arabia) start attacking government targets and when the government returns fire the forces behind the ‘rebels’ scream through their compliant and ignorant media ‘Gaddafi/ Assad is killing his own people’.

They then use this ‘humanitarian’ excuse to send the boys in to slaughter the innocent and steal oil reserves and other assets. They did this in Libya and they have been desperate to do this in Syria but it has not been as easy as they thought and so they planned to covertly arrange a chemical attack to say ‘we have to send in NATO to stop Assad killing his own people with chemical weapons’. No wonder the Daily Mail article was removed so quickly.

When their game is exposed they lose their cover stories. Conspiracies are so often dismissed in real time only to be confirmed with hindsight, but at the very moment a past conspiracy is being acknowledged any claims to real time conspiracies go on being dismissed. This is schizophrenic doublethink yet again.

It is now officially confirmed that when Egypt’s President Nasser seized and nationalised the Suez Canal in 1956 there was a conspiracy between Israel, Britain and France to take it back. The agreement, called the Protocol of Sèvres, was that Israel would invade Egypt and then Britain and France would say that if the fighting didn’t stop they would send troops to ‘save the canal’. This is precisely what happened, but anyone exposing the collusion at the time would have been called a loony conspiracy theorist.

Additionally, as the Israeli troops were withdrawing from Egypt after the ceasefire they destroyed roads, railways, telephone lines and the villages of Abu Ageila and El Quseima, and stole six railway locomotives.

Zbigniew Brzezinski, the Elite asset and co-founder of the Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller, admitted in a French magazine interview that when he was Jimmy Carter’s National Security Advisor from 1977 to 1981 he had trained and armed Afghan ‘rebels’ to fight the then Soviet-satellite regime in the capital Kabul to give the Soviet Union ‘their Vietnam’ . This was done in collusion with Britain’s MI6 and Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) had had close connections to 9/ 11 ‘terrorist leader’ Mohamed Atta, a man who was such an Islamic fanatic that he had an American girlfriend, took cocaine, drank heavily and his favourite food was pork.

Brzezinski’s plan was to make the Soviets invade to protect their Afghan satellite and then bog them down in a war they couldn’t win. The Brzezinski armed and trained Afghan ‘rebels’ later became known as the Mujahedeen/ Taliban/‘ Al-Qaeda’. During the Reagan- Bush regime that followed Carter’s, US Intelligence arranged for a man called Osama bin Laden to travel from Saudi Arabia to lead the Mujahedeen in the long and bloody war with the Soviets. The Bin Laden family were friends and associates of the Bush family, especially Bush senior, but when Bush junior was in the White House at the time of 9/ 11 the former CIA asset Bin Laden was used as the fake villain and the Taliban-Mujahedeen demonised to justify the US invasion.

There is no contradiction in this because there is a common theme, that being, whatever is best for the Elite agenda at the time. It suited the bloodline families for Bin Laden and the Mujahedeen to be heroes when they were fighting the Soviet Union through the 1980s after the Soviets invaded to shore up their regime in Kabul; but then it suited them after 9/ 11 to cast them as demons that American forces had to be despatched to trounce in the ‘war on terror’.

In the same way, the ‘war on terror’ was supposed to wage war against ‘Islamic terrorists’ and ‘Al-Qaeda’, but the ‘rebels’ in Libya and Syria were largely ‘Al-Qaeda’ fighting in the interests of the US-NATO campaign of terror and conquest together with the Muslim Brotherhood. This is the same ‘Al-Qaeda’ (‘ The Database’) which only really existed in any significant form after 9/ 11 because its recruits believed in its existence as a result of the Americans saying it existed! Even now it is more a name than a structure and exists to serve the interests of the Elite bloodlines even though virtually none of them will know that.

When ‘Al-Qaeda’ (Western-backed terrorists) gained access to Libya’s arms stockpile, including chemical weapons, they then had the chance to arm similar groups all over Africa and the Middle East which is just what the Elite families wanted to cause death, destruction and mayhem.

A sickening example of the mentality involved is the Syrian ‘rebel’ Abu Sakkar who was caught on video cutting out the heart of a dead soldier, taking a bite and saying: ‘I swear to God we will eat your hearts and your livers, you soldiers of Bashar the dog’. These are the sort of insane people that the US, Britain and NATO are arming and funding.

Once Gaddafi was dead and Libya was secured for the cabal many of the ‘Libyan rebels’ (mercenaries) just headed for Syria to do the same there. The leading ‘rebel’ group fighting the Assad regime in Syria is Al Nusra, an ‘Al-Qaeda’ offshoot to which nearly 30 US/ NATO-supported ‘rebel’ groups in Syria pledged allegiance.

The Muslim Brotherhood which is taking official control of countries vanquished by fake revolution and military attack has been a front for America, Britain and Israel for decades, and can also be used to stir up fears of an Islamic takeover when they are just stooges of the very forces saying that. They are a bunch of frauds.

Many of the other people cast as Islamic terrorists to justify military intervention are actually people fighting to retain their lands from the Elite locusts. The term ‘terrorists’ is just a label to demonise people when it suits, and to be ditched when it doesn’t.

This technique was plain to see when the Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization (MKO) which has been responsible for the deaths of thousands in Iran was removed from the US Government list of terrorist organisations ... because it commits terrorism against the US target regime in Iran.

Major General Amos Yadlin, former head of Israel Military Intelligence and military attaché to Washington, called in February 2013 for Israel to cement closer ties with al-Qaeda-linked ‘rebels’ (terrorists) in Syria for a united assault on ‘the big enemy, which is Iran’.

Divisions between Sunni and Shiite Muslims (the division stems from some irrelevant disagreement long, long ago) were being exploited by Israel and the West to divide and rule the Arab world and set it at war with itself. This is what Yadlin was talking about here when he said that ties should be strengthened with Sunni forces for a joint attack on Shiite Iran.

Eric Draister, founder of, was right when he said that Israel and al-Qaeda are ‘two sides of the same coin’ creating instability and provoking violence in Syria:

‘Israel and al-Qaeda are two sides of the US-dominated imperial system which has waged war on the independent nation of Syria attempting to destroy that country.’

Major General Yadlin said that the ongoing destructive violence in Syria had brought about strategic benefit for Israel. But, of course, that is why it happened. The leader of the foreign backed Syrian opposition, Ahmed Moaz al-Khatib, an engineer and manager for major oil companies, including Royal Dutch Shell’s Syrian division, pledged allegiance to the Israeli regime if Assad is overthrown.

Israel has taken advantage of the violence and chaos in Syria to give a US energy company a license for oil exploration in the Syrian Golan Heights which Israel has illegally occupied since the Six Day War in 1967. Israeli political analyst Yaron Ezrahi said that this was ‘mostly an Israeli ploy to deepen its commitment to the occupied Golan Heights’. Israel has no intention of returning occupied land, only further expansion.
I see the Wesley Clarke interview as a put up job, he was allowed to come out with this knowledge knowing full well that nobody would collect and clean him from within the running.
This is how belligerent the Cabal has become, they are all but immune to suit today and basically untouchable in ever so many ways and will never be brought to book for their hienous crimes on which they thrive and we are excepted to do or die.

The following sums up these dooers of the living gods pretty well.

King Lear act 4

I' th' last night's storm I such a fellow saw,
Which made me think a man a worm. My son
Came then into my mind, and yet my mind
Was then scarce friends with him. I have heard more
As flies to wanton boys are we to th' gods,
They kill us for their sport.

If the majority had more real life outlook and skills, the same skills as our forefathers once held proudlt then the take over or reality would not be so easy to achieve, and we would then cherish our fellow brothers and sisters as human beings, not as columns of eneergy for those in the annals of power.

They are themselves devoid of any worthy skills and why they are so easy to control also.

I opt for a peaceful self pelf reaction to the problems we have been continually offered, it is the smart move.
PETER HITCHENS: Our 'noble' cause? Dropping bombs on behalf of Al Qaeda
This is Peter Hitchens' Mail on Sunday column - Sunday, Apr 15th 2018

Now we have definitely moved from being a post-war world to being a pre-war world. Madness and folly are loose again.

Consider first that early on Friday morning the United States Navy launched 59 cruise missiles on behalf of Al Qaeda.

If this is not bad enough for you, note that the President of the United States did not even bother to pretend that he was seeking United Nations cover for what he did.

Note next that in the same week our Prime Minister, Theresa May, made a duty visit to pay homage to the medieval despots of Saudi Arabia, who kindly buy our warplanes and bombs, and are currently using them to savage effect in Yemen.

And President Trump was playing host at the White House to the head of Egypt’s military junta, General el-Sisi, whose security forces undoubtedly massacred at least 600 protesters (probably many more) in the streets of Cairo in August 2013.

And then mark that the pretext for this bizarre rocket attack was an unproven claim that President Assad of Syria had used poison gas.

Yes, unproven. The brutality of Sisi and the Saudis is beyond doubt. They didn't use gas, but our leaders' outrage at Assad’s alleged gas attack looks a little contrived if they keep such company.

Also what happened to the rules of evidence? Many people have written, spoken – and now acted – as if the charge was proven. Why the hurry?

Now, Mr Assad is not a nice person. I have been writing rude things about his bloodstained and wicked regime for years.

But he is not insane. He knows that the use of poison gas is the one thing that will make the USA intervene against him.

They have said so. He is currently winning his war against Islamist fanatics, with conventional weapons. He had even finally got the USA to stop demanding his dismissal.

Five days before the alleged attack – five days! – America’s UN ambassador, Nikki Haley, announced: 'Our priority is no longer to sit there and focus on getting Assad out.'

So why would he do such a thing, and throw away all his victories in a few minutes? It makes no sense of any kind. As you ponder this, can I explain something about the place where the gas attack is said to have happened?

No independent Western journalist could go there. He or she would be killed or kidnapped within hours.

Any report which comes from that region is filtered through people who you never see in the film that does get out. I have met men like them on my travels. I would not want to offend them.

These are the Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, alias the Al-Nusra Front, alias Al Qaeda, the Syrian 'opposition' which we in the West have been supporting for several years.

Yes, that's right, the people we have been helping are not Liberal Democrats or Girl Guides or Quakers.

No, they are the same movement which destroyed Manhattan's Twin Towers.

The only big difference between them and Islamic State is that we drop bombs on Islamic State. And we drop bombs on behalf of Al-Nusra/Al Qaeda.

I've noted here before how these people have publicly kidnapped, killed and even sunk their teeth into the entrails of dead enemies. But in this case, another small detail may make you wonder about what you are being told.

In some reports of the alleged atrocity, a supposed 'British doctor', Shajul Islam, was quoted or shown on the spot, described as a 'volunteer treating victims in hospital'.

Actually, he shouldn't really be called a British doctor.

He was struck off the British medical register for 'misconduct' in March 2016.

The General Medical Council won't say why. And in 2012 Shajul Islam was charged with terror offences in a British court.

He was accused of imprisoning John Cantlie, a British photographer, and a Dutchman, Jeroen Oerlemans.

Both men were held by a militant group in Syria and both were wounded when they tried to escape. Shajul Islam, it was alleged, was among their captors.

Shajul Islam's trial collapsed in 2013, when it was revealed that Mr Cantlie had been abducted once again, and could not give evidence.

Mr Oerlemans refused to give evidence for fear that it would further endanger Mr Cantlie. Mr Oerlemans has since been killed in Libya. So the supposedly benevolent medical man at the scene of the alleged atrocity turns out to be a struck-off doctor who was once put on trial for kidnapping.

Does this change your view at all? It takes a couple of minutes to find this out if you look. But only one major Western news outlet, The Times, has put two and two together. Why is that?

It’s for the same reason that we are in this mess. We wish to fool ourselves and are good at it.

The once-wealthy and powerful West is falling to bits.

It is bankrupt and increasingly at the mercy of people who have begun to demand something in return for their trade and their loans.

It is all very sordid, and bodes ill for the future, but I would mind it less if we admitted what we were doing, rather than pretending these wretched events were some sort of noble act.

PETER HITCHENS: Our 'noble' cause? Dropping bombs on behalf of Al Qaeda
The West began falling apart when its hand to eye coordination began taking itself to slumber and redistributing that labour for nothing and the wares for free, and will only rise again when its hands take to creating instead of destruction, this is how both sides are encouraged to create and destroy themselves when they cease working for and by themselves.

Hitchens ansd many others never observe nor promote these facts, because they are only thinkers and talkers and not true creator.
Does anyone knows what were weather conditions that day? If it was windy thousands of people would have been exposed, right?

British intelligence is behind Russiagate
Bolivian actress Carla Ortiz exposes White Helmets in video
I've just been over to England for two weeks and I can't believe how many people are falling for all this Russia nonsense and believe that Assad is gassing his own people. Are they mad? And it is so difficult to try and debate with some of them. They are sort of on the lines of "so you think you know better than the BBC". Well it's not that the BBC and others don't know the truth it's that they are not allowed to veer off the agenda.

I went to see David Icke while I was over there but not in Leicester where I had originally booked to see him. The local police warned off the local theatre with David Icke being a dangerous terrorist and all. The British police ignore grooming gangs, elite paedophilia and abuse in children's homes for decades and yet go after someone who has never done anyone any harm. By the way David Icke was very good, well worth going to see.
Pages: 1 2