Full Version: Vaccine Damage
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
The real reason for vaccine mandates ...

The argument made for denying a public education to children who are selectively vaccinated or unvaccinated is the risk they pose to the immune-compromised who can’t be vaccinated. It’s a heart-warming story motivated out of compassion for those children who are medically fragile. Or is it?
Fully Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated pt1

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has repeatedly asked CDC to create studies which explain, “How do child health outcomes compare between fully vaccinated and unvaccinated children?”

During a November 2012 Congressional hearing on autism before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Dr. Coleen Boyle, the Director of the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, gave evasive answers to lawmakers pressing her on this point. After considerable badgering, she finally stated, “We have not studied vaccinated versus unvaccinated [children].” That was perjury.

If you write to this "Parliamentary Group" please be careful -

This is a follow up to my brief article at the end of February British MPs are Front for Gates and the Pharmaceutical Industry

British MPs are front for Gates and Pharmaceutical Industry...

Facebook Owner Admits to Congress that They are Censoring Vaccine Safety Information ...
Bernice Eddy Warned of Defective Salk Polio Vaccine ...

Bernice Eddy was an American virologist and epidemiologist. In 1954-1955 Bernice Eddy discovered faulty batches of the Salk vaccine produced by Cutter Laboratories, Inc. of Berkeley, CA.She warned her superiors at NIH about the problem, urging that the polio vaccine’s licensing be delayed.

Eddy stated that when she tested the Salk vaccine it caused severe paralysis in monkeys. She photographed the diseased monkeys, took these photos to her boss—and was reprimanded as an alarmist. NIH director William Sebrell ignored Dr. Eddy’s warning and moved to recommend the licensing of the Salk vaccine.

About 400,000 people—mostly schoolchildren—in the U.S. were vaccinated with the Salk/Cutter vaccine during mid-April 1955. More than 200,000 of these children were injected with vaccines “in which the process of inactivating the live virus proved to be defective.”In other words, the children were given vaccines containing live poliovirus, causing 40,000 of the children to come down with polio. The Salk/Cutter vaccines severely paralyzed 200 of these children and killed 10 of them.

What happened is that the formaldehyde (a poison) used in the vaccine production process to kill the live poliovirus in the vaccines, which was supposed to make the polioviruses inactivate, did not do its job.

The scientists involved in the development, licensing and launch of the Salk vaccine in 1955 knew it posed a potential serious risk to children, but they opted to go ahead with fast tracking the vaccine to licensure just the same. Had they listened to Dr. Eddy, 40,000 children would not have been infected with polio, 200 would not have been severely paralyzed and 10 of them would not have died.

So what happened to Dr. Eddy? After she was proven to be right, NIH officials removed Dr. Eddy from her position as a polio researcher and re-assigned her to do research on influenza.
20 problems with vaccine science as exemptions are ripped from parents

Alvin H. Moss, MD, FACP, FAAHPM* 
*Dr. Moss has more than 40 years of medical practice, research, and teaching experience. His interest in vaccine safety and vaccine injury was first prompted by ethical concerns regarding conflicts of interest in vaccine research and in public policy. The opinions expressed here are his own and do not represent those of his employer.
1) No inert placebo-controlled studies with saline injection
2) Short duration of follow-up (as little as days to weeks)
3) No human or animal studies involving SC or IM injections of aluminum to establish the safety of injecting infants & children with aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate or amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate
4) One-size-fits-all. Newborns have 20% of the kidney function of a 2 year old (excretion of aluminum through the kidneys is the main route to remove systemic aluminum) yet both receive the same dose of aluminum-containing vaccines; the one-size-fits-all approach is in stark contrast to precision medicine, an emerging approach for disease treatment and prevention that takes into account individual variability in genes, environment, and lifestyle for each person.

5) No safety studies on entire vaccine schedule, especially as vaccines are added
6) Predominant monitoring only for pre-specified adverse events in clinical trials leading to vaccine approval
7) No active post-marketing surveillance (VAERS is passive and voluntary)
8) No vaccinated versus unvaccinated studies by CDC to learn true adverse events of vaccines
9) No research to identify those with preexisting susceptibilities to vaccine injury
10) Small sample sizes in clinical trials that do not allow detection of less frequent severe adverse events.
11) No incentive to improve vaccine safety because vaccine makers cannot be sued (and consequently no changes to improve safety in a particular vaccine during the 17-year life of the patent)
12) Underreporting of vaccine injuries—less than 1% (Harvard 2010 study)—so no good way to assess balance of benefits versus harms
13) No studies for carcinogenicity, mutagenicity and infertility
14) No adequate research base to evaluate vaccine safety—Institute of Medicine concluded there was insufficient science to accept or reject a causal relationship for 135 adverse events reported with vaccines—“The absence of evidence is not the same as evidence of absence.” IOM 2012 report, Adverse Effects of Vaccines: Evidence and Causality.
15) Excessive reliance on observational retrospective studies in which confounding variables cannot be examined (weak science).
16) No accounting for healthy user bias in observational retrospective and prospective studies.
17) Scientific misconduct in which there is selective reporting of results or omission of conflicting data to arrive at a desired conclusion
18) Scientific misconduct in which there is deceptive reporting of results to omit important limitations to generalizability of results (e.g., vaccination status of groups are not comparable) or in which groups are deceptively misrepresented as “unvaccinated” when they had received a number of vaccines
19) Conflicts of interest of those conducting the studies (“investigator determined that deaths associated with vaccine were not vaccine-related”; no Data Safety Monitoring Boards) and those approving the vaccines (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices) See OIG 2009 report.
20) No safety testing of vaccines and vaccine ingredients in pregnant women even though CDC recommends vaccines to pregnant women
Babies died in vaccine tests
(The Sunday Post May 28, 2000)

Parents were never told of experiments 50 years ago...

Mary Heads (79), from Gateshead, has spent the last 50 years caring for her son Michael. Despite being fit and healthy until he was 20 months old, just hours after being given a whooping cough vaccine he became feverish and started to have convulsions.

Doctors said it was unlikely Michael would survive but after eight days in a coma he pulled through. He was left paralysed down his right side, severely brain damaged and with epilepsy.

Mrs Heads said, "I have never been given so much as l0p to help look after Michael. Now we are told the drug hadn’t been tested properly and our children were part of an experiment."

Parents were never told of experiments that took place 50 years ago

The Government moved to reassure parents after it was revealed more than 20 babies died or were brain damaged in secret whooping cough vaccine tests.

Thousands of babies were used in the NHS experiments in the late 40s and early 50s without their parents’ consent.

The vaccine had not been tested before and health chiefs have only now admitted the trials took place, between 1948 and 1956.

The discovery was made after the Vaccine Victims Support Group called for a Government inquiry into damage caused by vaccinations.

An all-party parliamentary group, led by Eccles MP Ian Stewart, compiled information on all vaccines used in Britain. Reports of the 1950s trials were among these documents.

Mr Stewart said, "It appears a trial was being conducted without parents’ consent. Families should have been warned the drug was in early stages."

Families hope this new evidence will help in their fight for compensation to help look after loved ones.

Olivia Price, the support group’s North East representative, said,

"Children were used as guinea pigs."

A spokesman for the Department of Health said he did not think bringing the issue up was "beneficial".

Via Liz Watkins Barton

Court Awards $137,500 After 8 Vaccines Kills Infant In Just 12 Hours -

Through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) and Special Master’s “Vaccine” Court, it was proven the DTaP, Hib, Hepatitis B, PCV, IPV, and Rotavirus vaccines killed her daughter...
Sacrificial Virgins - The Dangers of the HPV Vaccination/ Full Documentary  ....

Japan Leading the World in Exposing Fraud with Gardasil HPV Vaccine Injuries and Deaths...
Healthy Triplets All Autistic within Hours of Vaccination... (removed)
Forced Flu Shots at Golden Globes....

Family of ‘perfectly fit and healthy’ man, 39, who died three days after flu and whooping cough vaccines to sue after blaming his death on the immunisations ...
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25