+- RichieAllen.co.uk Forum (https://forums.richieallen.co.uk)
+-- Forum: On Topic (https://forums.richieallen.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=13)
+--- Forum: Vaccination (https://forums.richieallen.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Thread: Covid testing scam. (/showthread.php?tid=1811)
Covid testing scam. - FemaleWarrior - 10-21-2020
Sorry if this is not about vaccines, but it is related. I have heard of some folk who have sent their covid tests off awaitng results without actually using the swab on ones person, instead using the swab in fruit or pets ect, I even heard of one woman who was asked by her workplace to have the test after returning from abroad, the woman went for her test but was kept waiting for ages so she went home, these people got results through the post of by email informing them they tested positive!!!! This is serious! The guy in the video below did his own experimant. ttps://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10164242483160246&id=734705245
RE: Covid testing scam. - The Apprentice - 10-21-2020
Corruption is so bad today that what we see happening is just the tip of the iceberg, covid was designed to close down society right across the board while the feeding frenzy or reset is finalised without anyone really noticing what is going on.
One thing I would advise being an ex military medic is, steer clear of any testes that are not carried out by the correct medical staff, one serious flaw and test are the roadside tesyer that we have all seen recently, as your funneled into the bays in your car, your already at risk of catching a plethora of different viruses and other diseases, why, >>>>
>>>> Because these stations cannot possibly be made sterile and or safe, for swabs or other tests to be carried out properly and safely the opertors would have to decontaminate each and every time they encounter a new patient, IE, the must change their gloves or any other garment each time, as things are they simply would not have the time to do this, If they touched your face with the gloves or the person being tested breaths on the gloves they are then contaminated.
There are lots of people will underlying ailments and your mor likey to catch something in such a situation, it is know that the doctors waiting room is one og the best places to catch something while everyone is sitting in close proximity on a busy day, these testing stations should be stopped forthwith, and the government held responsible for allowing their further use.
Did you know that after having a flu jab a day or so afterwards when your feeling off colour as the potions given start taking effect, tha you are then infective via airborne route to others in your own close proximity, see this factual video of how it works,
https://youtu.be/3-VWfp9n5IY
To break this false CV 19 farce the best way is to abstain, without willing patients it simply cannot go forward.
Keep these demons away from your children.
RE: Covid testing scam. - awakened53 - 01-29-2021
China Using Anal Swabs for ‘Covid’ Testing (This is partly confusion since the Chinese government talks through its arse, but also another stage of humiliation and deleting the self-respect of the population)
China is not giving up on nasal or throat testing, but the country has adopted a new method for detecting the coronavirus: anal swabs.
Anal testing is being used so far only on select groups, mainly high-risk cases and people in quarantine. Some people who have been subjected to anal testing include passengers arriving in Beijing and a group of more than 1,000 schoolchildren and teachers who were thought to have been exposed to the virus, Forbes reported.
The use of anal swabs is limited because it’s invasive and inconvenient. If a stool sample cannot be obtained, a saline-soaked cotton swab about 1-2 inches long is inserted into the anus, with the sample tested for active traces of the virus.
Li Tongzeng, deputy director of the respiratory and infectious diseases department at Beijing Youan Hospital, said in an interview with state media that anal swabs appear to be more accurate at detecting the coronavirus than nasal or throat testing.
The virus lives longer in excrement or the anus than in the respiratory tract, he said, meaning anal testing might have fewer false negatives.
Last summer, Future Medicine published research by Chinese scientists into a small number of COVID patients. In a few cases, people tested negative for COVID in throat and spit testing but tested positive with anal swabs.
“We propose anal swabs as the potentially optimal specimen for SARS-CoV-2 detection for evaluation of hospital discharge of COVID-19 patients,” the scientists wrote.
Read more: China Using Anal Swabs for ‘Covid’ Testing (This is partly confusion since the Chinese government talks through its arse, but also another stage of humiliation and deleting the self-respect of the population)
RE: Covid testing scam. - Debs - 02-01-2021
Too many 'unknowns' with testing & vaccination, so I will not be doing either. I came across this 1hour 55mins docu video about the breakdown of the covid tests. I don't know how accurate it is. But none the less interesting information & worth a watch https://www.bitchute.com/video/HAoUNhgzEVQC/
RE: Covid testing scam. - awakened53 - 05-24-2021
‘Covid’ PCR Test swabs ‘as dangerous as inhaling asbestos’
An experimental physicist and bio-materials researcher examined various PCR test swabs under a microscope and found that the fibres they contain are as dangerous for human beings as inhaling asbestos.
Professor Antonietta Gatti examined various PCR test swabs and analysed their ingredients. The results showed that they are made of tough materials and contain a large number of nano-particles including silver, aluminum, titanium, and glass fibres. All of which are not declared on the PCR test package insert.
According to the Professor if these fibres get stuck in the mucous membranes they can cause severe wounds and inflammation. Mucous membranes that are no longer intact can no longer fulfill their role of fending off viruses, bacteria and fungi before they reach the airways. The germs penetrate the respiratory tract without any immune filter. This isn’t good news for those who have been compliant with the authorities rules since the start of the alleged pandemic and take part in regular testing and mask wearing. This is because face coverings are the ideal breeding ground for all types of germs.
In the laboratory, Professor Gatti used electron microscopy (ESEM and EDS) to analyse various types of swabs, which are used to collect human organic material for PCR diagnostics, in order to check the morphology and chemical composition.
With a “cotton wool” stick made by Biocomma in Shenzhen, China, it was not possible for Prof. Gatti to determine whether it was made of carbon or cotton. The dirt in the product consisted of calcium corbonate, stainless steel and silicates.
Read more: ‘Covid’ PCR Test swabs ‘as dangerous as inhaling asbestos’
RE: Covid testing scam. - awakened53 - 06-09-2021
Registered Nurse & Certified Medical Investigator on the cancer-causing, sperm and fertility-destroying, DNA-changing, ethylene dioxide used in ‘Covid test’ swabs. So keep getting tested and test the kids at least three times a week – it obviously can’t do them any harm
Quote:You Guys See The Registered Nurse & Certified Medical Investigator Talk About The Test Swabs?Pathetic government Freedom of Information reply about cancer-causing ethylene dioxide used in ‘Covid’ test swabs
She Says The Swabs Are Coated With Ethylene Oxide…
A Known Carcinogen That Could F You Up…
Why Would The Swabs Be Coated With A Cancer Causing Agent? pic.twitter.com/8UmUXh2rk4
— Covid-1984 (@Covid_1984_) June 8, 2021
Thank you for your enquiry of 25 March 2021 relating to the safety of ethylene oxide (EO) and its use to sterilise the swabs used in lateral flow tests being used across schools in the UK. Please see our replies below.
Information as to what, if any, independent tests have been carried out to check for any residues of ethylene oxide on a random sample of swabs
The manufacturer is responsible for testing the amount of ethylene oxide left on the device after sterilisation to ensure that the residue is below the allowable limit. The allowable limit of residual EO is set by the international standard ISO 10993-7:2008.
The sterilisation process, including residual testing, is documented by the manufacturer. This documentation is reviewed by an independent third-party body called an ‘Approved Body’ (in Europe these are called ‘Notified Bodies’), before the manufacturer is allowed to manufacture swabs for the UK market. Testing on random samples of swabs by the approved body once market approval has been given is unusual. However, the ‘Approved body’ carries out periodic audits of the manufacturer’s process to ensure continued compliance.
Each approved body has a unique identifying number that appears next to the CE (or UKCA) mark symbol on the packaging of the swab. An internet search using this number with the words ‘notified body’ should give the name and contacts for the Notified or Approved body. The MHRA audits these Approved Bodies to make sure they are fulfilling their obligations. European Notified Bodies are audited by their relevant Competent Authority.
Read More: Freedom of Information request about the safety of ethylene oxide
RE: Covid testing scam. - awakened53 - 01-20-2022
Latest insanity: X RAYS could replace PCR tests for ‘Covid’ after scientists claim breakthrough is able to give result within minutes and is 98% accurate
Scientists have developed a groundbreaking Covid diagnosis test using X-rays that are able to give a result within minutes and are 98 per cent accurate.
Experts at the University of the West of Scotland (UWS) pioneered the Artificial Intelligence programme to help healthcare staff during times ‘when PCR tests are not readily available’.
The programme is able to detect the virus faster than a PCR test – which typically takes around two hours to return a result.
X-ray technology is used to compare the scans to a database of close to 3,000 images belonging to patients suffering with Covid, healthy individuals and patients with viral pneumonia.
An AI process then uses an algorithm to analyse visual imagery and make a diagnosis. The technique was found to be 98 per cent accurate.
It is hoped that this technology could be used to aid medical staff in Accident and Emergency departments across the UK.
Professor Naeem Ramzan, Director of the Affective and Human Computing for SMART Environments Research Centre at UWS, led the three-person team behind the project, which also involved Gabriel Okolo and Dr Stamos Katsigiannis.
Read more: Latest insanity: X RAYS could replace PCR tests for ‘Covid’ after scientists claim breakthrough is able to give result within minutes and is 98% accurate