Free Speech - Printable Version

+- Forum (
+-- Forum: Community (
+--- Forum: General Discussion (
+--- Thread: Free Speech (/showthread.php?tid=394)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Free Speech - Steve - 03-31-2018

“I came to paint a mural which depicted the elite banker cartel, known as the Rothschilds, the Rockafellas, the Morgans, the Ruling Class, the Elite Few, the Wizards of Oz.

They would be playing a boardgame of monopoly on the backs of the Working Class with the symbol of the Freemason pyramid rising behind this group, and behind that is a polluted world of coal burning and nuclear reactors.

I'm creating this peice to inspire thought and spark conversation."

The artist who created it explains why he made the mural which has caused more outrage than the Telford scandal, the Salisbury poisoning & Brexit.

Artistic self expression is being attacked - whether it's Count Dankula or MEAR ONE - and if the Left doesn't defend against it, Free Speech will die.

RE: Free Speech - freelotus - 03-31-2018

(03-31-2018, 05:16 AM)Steve Wrote: which has caused more outrage than the Telford scandal, the Salisbury poisoning & Brexit.

exaggerating a bit there.

RE: Free Speech - Steve - 03-31-2018

(03-31-2018, 08:33 AM)Bfreelotus Wrote:
(03-31-2018, 05:16 AM)Steve Wrote: which has caused more outrage than the Telford scandal, the Salisbury poisoning & Brexit.

exaggerating a bit there.

The point being that the whole thing has been blown out of all proportion and has little to do with anti-Semitism.

RE: Free Speech - The Apprentice - 03-31-2018

And the way to blow the term and the instigators who use it right out of the water is not to mention the term, and it will immediately die from here on in, do not and it will be used by those who use it as their form of opiate against you.

Here is a short film of how it works for those who use the spoken word wrongly.

RE: Free Speech - Steve - 03-31-2018

Benjamin Freedman, a Jew who knew the top Zionists (Sionists, Sun cultists) of the 1930s and 40s, said that anti-Semitism should be eliminated from the English language. He went on: “Anti-Semitism serves only one purpose today. It is used as a smear word. When so-called Jews feel that anyone opposes their real objectives, they discredit their victims by applying the word “anti-Semite” or “anti-Semitic” through all the channels they have at their command and under their control

RE: Free Speech - The Apprentice - 03-31-2018

(03-31-2018, 11:57 AM)Steve Wrote: Benjamin Freedman, a Jew who knew the top Zionists (Sionists, Sun cultists) of the 1930s and 40s, said that anti-Semitism should be eliminated from the English language. He went on: “Anti-Semitism serves only one purpose today. It is used as a smear word. When so-called Jews feel that anyone opposes their real objectives, they discredit their victims by applying the word “anti-Semite” or “anti-Semitic” through all the channels they have at their command and under their control

There is one thing these confused followers or worshippers of the same sun cannot prevent, and that is the rays of that which they still worship, falls upon everyone and everything as well as them, and they will bloody well have to learn to share it equally.

RE: Free Speech - Steve - 03-31-2018

Benjamin Freedman speech in 1961 -

The Elite ambition during the First World War was to ensure the recognition by Britain of a Jewish homeland in what was then Arab Palestine. The political movement known as Zionism had been introduced to campaign for a Jewish homeland, but it is often misunderstood: all Jewish people are not Zionists and all Zionists are not Jewish. Zionism is not a religion or a race; it is a political movement consisting of people, Jews and non-Jews, who support the claim for a Jewish homeland. If you support that, you are a Zionist, too, no matter what your race or religious belief. To say that Zionism is the Jewish race is like saying the British Labour Party is the English race. Zionism was founded in the last century by an atheist, Theodore Herzl, and it is used as a front for the Global Elite and a means to dupe Jewish people as a whole. The offer to recognise a homeland in Palestine was designed both to persuade the United States to enter the war and later to create ‘managed conflict’ and a situation of ‘divide and rule’ in the oil-rich Middle East. More than twenty years after the First World War, on April 25th 1939, US Senator Gerald P. Nye of North Dakota revealed to the Senate some of the background to Britain’s recognition of a Jewish homeland and the First World War in general. He said he had been given some documents called ‘The Next War’. The title referred to the Second World War, which the writers of the documents already knew was going to happen. One volume, called ‘Propaganda in the Next War’, also discussed, in passing, how the American people had been tricked into fighting in World War I.

 It said: 
“For some time the issue as to which side the United States would take hung in the balance, the final result was a credit to our British propaganda. There remain the Jews. It has been estimated that of the world Jewish population of approximately fifteen million, no fewer than five million are in the United States; 25% of the inhabitants of New York are Jews. “During the Great War we bought off this huge American Jewish public by the promise of the Jewish national home in Palestine, held by Ludendorf to be a master stroke of allied propaganda, as it enabled us not only to appeal to Jews in America, but to Jews in Germany as well.” 

The Americans entered the war in 1917. The Balfour Declaration came on November 6th of that year, when Arthur (Lord) Balfour (Comm 300), the British Foreign Secretary and member of the Round Table’s inner elite, officially recognised Palestine as a homeland for Jewish people. We need to look at this on many levels again. The propagandists may well have believed it was a ‘master stroke’ to bring America into the war, but what they didn’t know was that they were being manipulated to manipulate others. America was coming into the war anyway. A Jewish homeland in Palestine had been a long-time Elite strategy and the guise of bringing America into the war was used to encourage British politicians to accept it. The Balfour Declaration was a terrible blow to the Arabs who had, under the leadership and promises of the Englishman, T.E. Lawrence (‘ Lawrence of Arabia’), fought on Britain’s behalf against the Turks and they played a crucial role in winning the war. 

The Arabs were promised full post-war sovereignty and independence for their support and this was confirmed in official correspondence. Lawrence, a close friend of Winston Churchill (Comm 300), knew full well that he was lying to the Arabs he was leading. Some years later Lawrence said: “I risked the fraud on my conviction that Arab help was necessary to our cheap and speedy victory in the East, and that better we win and break our word, than lose… The Arab inspiration was our main tool for winning the Eastern War. So I assured them that England kept her word in letter and in spirit. In this comfort they performed their fine things; but, of course, instead of being proud of what we did together, I was continually bitter and ashamed.” 

While Lawrence and the British were promising the Arabs independence, they were in the process of making a commitment to give away Palestine as a Jewish homeland. Lawrence, Milner, and Victor Rothschild all knew each other. The Balfour Declaration was not an announcement by the Foreign Secretary to the House of Commons. It took the form, appropriately, of a letter between Arthur Balfour (Comm 300), of the Rothschild-funded Round Table, and Lord Lionel Walter Rothschild (Comm 300), the representative of the English Federation of Zionists, which was set up with Rothschild money. It was written by the leading voice in Lloyd George’s wartime cabinet, the Round Table’s most influential figure, Lord Milner (who was made chairman of Rio Tinto Zinc by Lord Rothschild). 

The Balfour Declaration was a decree by the Rothschilds/Global Elite and not part of any democratic process. Balfour’s letter to Lord Rothschild, believed by many to have been written by Lord Rothschild, in league with Alfred Milner, said:

 “I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty’s Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet: His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours for the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine [what a joke!], or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country. I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.” 

At the time less than one per cent of the population of Palestine was Jewish and yet this letter was to form the basis on which the post-war world was to be divided and Arab control of Palestine handed over. It had nothing to do with what was best for Jews, even though its architects, the Rothschilds, are Jewish if only in name. It was about the wider strategic oil and New World Order possibilities that a foothold in that part of the Middle East would offer.

Rabbi Marvin S. Antelman may well be correct when he links the House of Rothschild with the All-Seeing Eye clique which is seeking to destroy Judaism. Things may be done in the name of Jewish people as a whole, but they are not done for their benefit. Jewish people are used as fodder by the Elite and by many within the Jewish hierarchy. 

Nor is it true that most Jewish people today have a genetic line back to ancient Israel, a claim used to justify the occupation of Palestine. For the same reason, the term ‘anti-Semitic’ is constantly misused. The colour and genetic line of a person’s physical body is not important as we are aspects of each other. But since many people use the genetics of their bodies to justify their actions, we might as well get the information right. 

The word Semitic comes from the race of peoples in ancient Sumer from whom the biblical Jews claimed to have emerged. Sem or Shem, one of the sons of Noah in the Bible stories, is said to be of this line and the origin appears to have been the legend of ‘Shemjaza’, the ‘heavenly son and guardian angel of God’. According to several Jewish writers, including Arthur Koestler in his book, The Thirteenth Tribe, very few Jews today can trace their genetic ancestry back to the Semite line of this period and/ or the Semitic line in Palestine and Israel at the time of Y’shua (Jesus). Instead, they are the genetic descendants of a people of Turkish-Mongolian-Nordic ancestry called the Khazars who converted to the Jewish religion in 740AD. 

The Khazars lived in lower Russia between the Black and Caspian Seas. They were between the Christian and Islamic worlds and their leader chose to accept the Jewish faith to avoid being swamped by the empires of the perceived alternatives. Most Jews today, Koestler says, originate from these people, not the Semitic line. In fact, to call someone ‘anti-Semitic’ is, more accurately, to call them ‘anti-Arab’, because more members of the old Semite race are Arab than are Jewish! After the breakup of the Khazar empire by the thirteenth century, the people who adopted the Jewish faith either stayed on in Russia or, in the case of the majority, moved on into what became the Balkans, Lithuania, Poland, and Germany. 

The language known as Yiddish emerged from these events. It is a mixture of Hebrew, Polish, and German. The name Rothschild came from the Red Shield, the symbol of the Khazar “Jews” in eastern Europe (German: rotes schild = red shield). The Rothschild family have no more an historic link to Palestine than an eskimo. The ‘Jewish’ hooked nose does not originate from the biblical Israel. It has its genetic origins in the Caucasus. The classic Jewish face of Y’shua (Jesus) is a myth. He would not have looked anything like that because he was not born in Lower Russia. 

As Koestler wrote, “Anthropology concurs with history in refuting the popular belief in a Jewish race descended from the biblical tribe”. The Jewish-born Christian bishop, Hugh Montefiore, said in the Church Times of January 24th 1992, that: “Anti-Semitism is built on a powerful racial myth, accepted by Jews and anti-Semites alike”. Yet it is members of the genetic stream which has no connection whatsoever with Palestine, Palestine, who were behind the creation of Israel and today’s continued suppression of Palestinian rights. 

The Jewish writer Alfred M. Lilienthal goes further. He says there is no such thing as a Jewish “race”. To be “Jewish” is to follow the Jewish religious faith and has nothing to do with race because, he says, people of endless races converted to the Jewish faith over thousands of years, so creating a vast cocktail of different genetic streams who called themselves Jewish. In his courageous book, What Price Israel?, Lilienthal points out: “The most persuasive argument the Jewish nationalist could advance for Zionism is based on the hypothesis of a ‘Hebrew-Semitic race’. But most members of such a ‘race’ would be found amongst the Arabic peoples of the Middle East, the overwhelming majority of whom do not profess the Jewish faith. 

The Arabs, bitter enemies of the Israelis who have returned to their reported ‘racial home’, most closely resemble those Jews who are indigenous to Palestine and the Middle East; for they are of poorer Hebrew-Israelite blood than most of those who have been ‘ingathered’… The allegation that Arabs are anti-Semitic is somewhat ludicrous. “… it is, in fact, the unanimous conclusion of all anthropologists, from Weissenberg, Hertz and Fishberg (themselves Jews), to Boas, Ripley, Mead, Pittard and others that wherever Jews are found, they closely resemble the people amongst whom they live. 

Even those of common family names supposedly traceable to the ancient Hebrew tribes, such as Levites (Levi) and Kohanim (Kohn, Coehn, Cohn) have little physical resemblence to one another. There is not one racial characteristic common to all who profess to be Jews.” 

Such subtleties evaded Lloyd George (Comm 300), who was a passionate advocate of a Jewish homeland in Israel. When you look at what he wrote on the subject in the 1920s, either he was trying to mislead the populace or he himself was being seriously misled. In his book, Is It Peace?, he accepts without question that Jewish people had an historical right to Palestine. He says that only with their brilliance and commitment could it become a ‘land of milk and honey’ again because, basically –if you put his words in simple terms –the Arabs were too stupid to do that. But it is when he outlines Zionist intentions for Palestine that his claims can be shown to be breathtakingly naïve or calculated to mislead. Even more likely, the endless means through which he could have been blackmailed over his private life and personal corruption acted to ‘focus’ his mind. As they say, “When you have got someone by the balls, their hearts and minds will follow”. 

Lloyd George condemns the opponents of the Balfour Declaration for suggesting that the Zionist leaders were seeking to establish “a Jewish oligarchy in Palestine that will reduce the Arab inhabitant to a condition of servitude to a favoured Hebrew minority”. The best answer to that charge, he said, was to be found in a memorandum submitted by the Zionist Association to the League of Nations. With the hindsight of more than seventy years, It’s doubtful if even Lloyd George would now quote that memorandum as confirmation that the opponents were wrong. 

It said: “The Jews demand no privilege, unless it is the privilege of rebuilding by their own efforts and sacrifices a land which, once the seat of a thriving and productive civilisation, has long been suffered to remain derelict. They expect no favoured treatment in the matter of political or religious rights. They assume, as a matter of course, that all the inhabitants of Palestine, be they Jews or non-Jews, will be in every respect on a footing of perfect equality. They seek no share in the Government beyond that to which they may be entitled under the Constitution as citizens of the country. They solicit no favours. They ask, in short, no more than an assured opportunity of peacefully building up their National Home by their own exertions and of succeeding on their merits.” 

The Jewish and Arab populations of Israel will be in every respect on a footing of perfect equality? They expect no favoured treatment in the matter of political or religious rights? Really? 

Chaim Herzog, the President of Israel, had a rather different view some years later, when he said that the Arabs cannot be “participants in any way in a land that has been consecrated to our people for thousands of years. To the Jews of this land there cannot be any partner”. There, that’s more like it! Jewish people as a whole (the faith) have been victims of Zionism (the political movement), which is controlled by the Global Elite. It is time Jewish people (who are innocent and unaware of the background) realised how they, their minds and their emotions are being used in ways that serve a longer-term plan for centralised control, and not themselves and their children. 

This is certainly true of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith which was formed in the United States in 1913. From that time to this, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) has operated as an intelligence unit which brands as “anti-Semitic” anyone who challenges or questions the Global Elite. But was it set up for the benefit of Jewish people? No, no. It was formed to protect the New York gangsters! 

In the early years of the last century, Thomas Bingham, the New York City Police Commissioner, began a determined challenge to the mobsters. Among them was Arnold Rothstein, the mentor of Meyer Lansky who would later be the godfather of the organised crime syndicate which helped to fund and arm the Jewish terrorist underground in Palestine and later did the same for the State of Israel itself. Lansky was also a key player in the assassination of President Kennedy. The New York mobsters responded to Bingham’s investigation by branding him an anti-Semite. This character demolition was so successful that it forced him out of office and ended the investigation of the mob. 

These attacks were coordinated by a committee set up by an attorney called Sigmund Livingston. In 1913 this committee was given a formal title –The Anti-Defamation League. Today it is an arm of the Israeli/ Global Elite intelligence agency, Mossad, and has been at the heart of some horrific events, including the Kennedy assassination. The ADL is there to help the Global Elite and the terrorists who have controlled Israel, not to protect Jewish people from prejudice. Anything but, in fact.

RE: Free Speech - Steve - 04-01-2018

The First World War ended in 1918 with tens of millions of dead and injured on all sides, after the bloodiest conflict in known human history. It was a war that was planned and created by the Elite using the power and money of the banking and secret society network. It would not otherwise have happened. It was not the work of human nature, but manipulated human nature.

At the same time, the Elite had sown the seeds for the capitalist/ communist v fascist (Second) World War and the capitalism v communism Cold War by arranging and financing the Russian Revolution. The Elite had won the revolution and the war. Now they prepared for their most important ambition –winning the peace.

They had the nation states of Europe exactly where they wanted them. The war had left Europe devastated and submerged in debt to the Elite’s bankers, who had made loans to both sides.

The name J.P. Morgan (Comm 300) was at the heart of this. The Morgan Guaranty Trust and the Elite’s American International Corporation made loans to finance German espionage and covert operations in the United States and South America during the war. This was revealed by the Overman Committee of the US Senate in 1919.

Among the other names involved were the Rothschilds’ Kuhn, Loeb, and Co, and Morgan’s Chase National Bank. The committee also established that the Guaranty Trust which was making loans to the Allies during the war, was covertly arranging other loans for Germany on the London money markets!

This money was channelled to Germany via South America. In 1915, while all this was happening, the same J.P. Morgan was named by the British government as its sole agent for the purchasing of Britain’s war supplies from the then ‘neutral’ United States, and for all loans from private banks in the US. Britain also became the guarantor for all goods and loans from America by the French, Italians, and Russians.

By the end of the war, Britain, once the most powerful country in the world, was on its knees. Again, this was not accident, but design. At the time of the Versailles Peace Conference in 1919, Britain owed the United States $ 4.7 billion in war debts. The British national debt had increased by 924% between 1913 and 1918, while the profits of the Global Elite companies soared. According to the Austrian writer, Gertrude Elias, the capital of DuPont (Comm 300) alone increased from $ 83 million to $ 308 million during the years of the First World War.

The ‘victorious’ leaders of the Allies at Versailles were Woodrow Wilson, Lloyd George, and Georges Clemenceau. They met with their ‘advisors’ to decide the reparations that Germany would pay to the victors and the terms of the peace settlement. Versailles and its offshoots would also give birth to the League of Nations, the Elite’s first attempt at a covert world government, and the World Court in The Hague, Netherlands.

It would further confirm Israel as a Jewish homeland, giving control of Palestine to the British in the meantime, and return the world economy to the gold standard, the process by which currencies are linked to gold. Who controlled the gold? The Rothschilds and some other Elite financiers.

The Elite also controlled the events and decisions at Versailles. Woodrow Wilson was ‘advised’ there by Colonel House (Comm 300) and Bernard Baruch, both Rothschild-Elite representatives; Lloyd George (Comm 300) was advised by Lord Milner (Comm 300) of the Round Table and Sir Phillip Sassoon, a direct descendant of Mayer Amschel Rothschild; Clemenceau had Georges Mandel, his Minister for the Interior, whose real name was Jeroboam Rothschild.

Also in the American Commission to Negotiate Peace were the Dulles brothers; the Warburgs (Max from Germany and Paul from the US); Thomas W. Lamont from J.P. Morgan; the Secretary of State, Robert Lansing, an uncle of the Dulles’s; and Walter Lippman (Comm 300) who (with House and others) was one of the main architects of the League of Nations and founder of the American branch of the Fabian Society.

Their host in France was Baron Edmund de Rothschild, a leading campaigner and manipulator for a Jewish State in Israel. The three leaders (stooges) at Versailles set up two committees to work on the details of the post-war policies. One was called the Economic Section and the other was the Financial Committee.

Woodrow Wilson appointed Bernard Baruch to represent the US on the Economic Section and Thomas W. Lamont of J.P. Morgan articulated US (Elite) interests on the Financial Committee. Baruch’s group decided that Germany should pay $ 12 billion in reparations and, together with other limitations on the German economy, this was a death sentence for the new German Republic, known as the Weimar Republic.

It would ensure the conditions that would lead to Adolf Hitler’s rise to power. The Financial Committee met later in Brussels to decide on a return to the gold standard. The effect of this on currencies made it impossible for Germany to pay her reparations.

The financial consequences of a return to the gold standard for every nation were pointed out to the committee by Professor Gustav Cassel of Sweden, but to no avail. All these decisions were coordinated to create the circumstances in Europe which would lead to the next war and an advancement of the New World Order.

Eventually the gold standard caused such chaos and suffering that it had to be abandoned, but by then the damage was done. Colonel House wrote the first draft of what became the covenant of the new League of Nations and President Wilson’s famous fourteen points for the Versailles Conference were largely decided by a group convened by Colonel House.

This group was known as ‘The Inquiry’. These were all New World Order manipulators, people like John Foster Dulles, the future US secretary of state, and his brother, Allen, future head of the CIA. House had written a novel years before called Philip Dru: Administrator, which he later admitted was fact presented as fiction. In the book he outlined his New World Order philosophy.

President Wilson’s biographer, George Sylvester Viereck, said that: “The Wilson Administration transferred the Colonel’s ideas from the pages of fiction to the pages of history”. In his novel, published anonymously two years before the First World War had even begun, he proposed “… a League of Nations”.

Seven years later, that very same name was used for an organisation designed to impose its will on nation states under the pretext of ending the wars which its architects had started! Create the problems, then offer the solutions.

The Rockefellers donated the money to build the headquarters of the League of Nations in Geneva, Switzerland, and they would later donate the land which the United Nations headquarters now occupies in New York. The League of Nations failed, despite the best efforts of the One Worlders, because they could not persuade quite enough representatives in the US Congress to support it. If the United States would not support the idea, it was doomed to fail.

It could be that the Second World War had been planned to increase the power of the League of Nations and turn it into a fully fledged world government. This setback meant, instead, that the Elite had to use the next war to introduce the successor to the League. Even as the League of Nations folded, the United Nations of today was already in their sights.....

RE: Free Speech - The Apprentice - 04-01-2018

Did anyone know that the land that the UN building in New York now stands upon was once one of the largest Kosher slaughter house in America, donated by the Rockafella's, the blood from it went straight into the Hudson.

RE: Free Speech - Steve - 04-01-2018

(04-01-2018, 06:05 PM)The Apprentice Wrote: Did anyone know that the land that the UN building in New York now stands upon was once one of the largest Kosher slaughter house in America, donated by the Rockafella's, the blood from it went straight into the Hudson.

The UN is but a ‘Trojan Horse’ for the global fascist/ communist tyranny known as the New World Order. It is the vehicle through which the world government and world army are being manipulated into place and through which public opinion is being softened up, by conflicts and propaganda, to accept this policy as the only way to bring peace and stability to human affairs. 

All seven of the UN secretary generals since 1945 have promoted such thinking. Dr Boutros Boutros-Ghali, began his career under the Egyptian dictator, Gamal Abdel Nasser. Boutros-Ghali called for a permanent UN Army (world army) and for the UN to have the right to levy taxation (world government). His successor, Kofi Annan, wanted the same. 

The original United Nations has given birth to a stream of connected organisations which coordinate the New World Order plan in areas like health (World Health Organisation), population control or –more accurately –eugenics, (the UN Population Fund –UNFPA), economic development and environment (the UN Environment Programme –UNEP), education, science and culture (UNESCO), and the list is getting longer all the time. 

These are organisations which are designed to globalise control of all areas of our lives and we urgently need to wake up to this. The UN is a front for the Elite/Freemasonic hierarchy. 

In a speech in 1970, Robert Welch, the founder of the John Birch Society in America, predicted with remarkable accuracy what the United Nations would become:

“The United Nations hopes and plans –or, more accurately, the insiders, the conspiratorial bosses above it, hope and plan for it –to use population controls, controls over scientific and technological developments, control over arms and military strength of individual nations, control over education, control over health, and all the controls it can gradually establish under all of the different excuses for international jurisdiction that it can devise. These variegated separate controls are to become components of the gradually materialising total control that it expects to achieve by pretense, deception, persuasion, beguilement, and falsehoods, while the enforcement of such controls by brutal force and terror is also getting under way.” 

That is what the United Nations, along with organisations such as the WHO, were always intended to do; that is what they were created to do; that is what it is now doing.