[Steve]

The Nuremberg Code and Ethics of Experimentation Regarding the Covid-19 Vaccine -


https://www.covidtruths.co.uk/2021/03/th...9-vaccine/

[Steve]

Telegram Post -


Brilliant letter..... Here's my letter to the Chief Exec of the MHRA -


Dr June Raine CBE
Chief Executive
Medicines and Health Care Products Regulatory Agency
10 South Colonnade
Canary Wharf
London
E14 4PU
14 Feb 2021

Ref: Nuremberg Physician Codes 1947

Dear Dr June Raine CBE,

I am sure you will be fully aware of the present bias media coverage pertaining to SARS-CoV-2/Covid-19, which has been clearly shown to be no more deadly than a normal flu virus.
The research is showing Covid-19 has an Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) of 0.14%, according to the Head of the Health Emergencies Programme at the W.H.O.

The Survival Rate:
Age 0-19 – 99.997%
Age 20-49 – 99.98%
Age 50-69 – 99.95%
Age 70+ - 94.6%

I would like to remind you about the responsibility you have taken on as the Chief Executive, MHRA.

A part of me is shocked at how you have allowed a ‘flu’ virus to take down the UK economy, using lies, deceit and mimetic programmed propaganda about our NHS being overwhelmed and used as a focal emotional brainwashed leverage, to allow docile citizens to acquiesce to ‘fake’ science before being scared then vaccinated!
I also believe your organisation has chosen to show some conflicts of interest, and has fast-tracked the approval of unscientifically, independently tested Covid vaccines, such as the Oxford/AstraZeneca and of course the Pfizer vaccine. 

We could have invested millions into making our ‘pride’ NHS fit-for-purpose, instead of wasting Taxpayers money on testing, just so a Coup UK Government could continue scaring unconscious citizens to docilly conform, wearing masks (Proven useless outsider a hospital setting - https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372), standing two metres apart and self-isolate healthy individuals. None of which has ever before been done successfully in ‘controlling’ or ‘containing’ a virus, whilst creating the illusion of a ‘fatal’ virus, you create the ‘cure’ – vaccine! It is like something out of a Hollywood Movie – Contagion.

The fact is all Covid vaccines are EXPERIMENTAL and have not undergone the usual time frames (Phase I through to Phase IV) and independent testing protocols and as a result have broken the Nuremberg Code of 1947.

It has also been brought to my attention that around £900,000 was ‘donated’ by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in 2017 to the MHRA. Can you please confirm this and or the true amount of funds you received from them?

No ‘Novel’ Covid Vaccine has been proven to be Independently Studied and identified as 1. Safe and 2. Effective (long term and with people already on Poly Pharmacy/Infirm/OAP’s or with comorbidities) and 3. You cannot even sue the manufacturer assuming you or family member was injured due to the ‘effects’ of the chemicals injected into your body.

If the above points I made are wrong, please could you kindly provide me with your evidence/science. Thank you.
Have you read this? 

https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425/rr-31

Covid-19: politicisation, “corruption,” and suppression of science
BMJ 2020; 371 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4425 (Published 13 November 2020) Cite this as: BMJ 2020;371:m4425
And were you aware of this?
https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n149

Covid-19: Norway investigates 23 deaths in frail elderly patients after vaccination
BMJ 2021; 372 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n149 (Published 15 January 2021) Cite this as: BMJ 2021;372:n149

I recently learned that, Denmark, Norway, France and Sweden were the latest European countries not to offer the AstraZeneca vaccine to individuals over the age of 65, citing a lack of data, while Poland has said the vaccine will only be used for people aged 18-60.
Dr Raine, could you please kindly provide me with the data, which explains why we in the UK have allowed our elderly (70+) to be vaccinated? How come other countries including S. Africa have ‘chosen’ not to, due to a “…lack of data”. Thank you.

https://t.me/officialcharliewardshow/13286



I find it interesting that if you die within 28 days of having had a ‘positive’ rt-PCR test, on your death certificate it will state “Covid”, even if you were run over by a bus or shot in the head (without any post-mortems!) and yet if a person dies within 28 days of having had the Bill & Melinda Gates’ Vaccine or Oxford AstraZeneca’s, you do not state, “Died of vaccine poisoning”, or “Vaccine related death”, etc.

As we move into the accountability and everyone’s part in this PlanDemic, under the Nuremberg Code of 1947, “Permissible Medical Experiments. The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession…”

The fact that many millions of people have been consistently scared through the actions of a Coup UK Government using medical mandate interventions, has clearly overstepped the Nuremberg Code 1947, by which we all live under. There are 10 vitally important points of which four I have highlighted below.

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.

Each patient should have been clearly informed as a statutory responsibility, that they are part of an experiment, which may also carry some serious ‘side-effects’. Just like Penicillin, not everyone can have this if required because of their immune system, which can lead to an anaphylactic shock. The same can be said about a basic food like peanut butter. Again, some people will receive an anaphylactic shock.

The bottom line is patients are not being provided with full informed consent. Would you agree Dr Raine?

4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

Further information can be obtained below.
http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/
https://www.bmj.com/content/313/7070/1448.1

I could share more of the real science showing that SARS-CoV-2/Covid-19 has NOT been isolated using the Kosh’s Postulates method (Golden Standard) and neither was SARS-CoV-1 (2002/3). And the fact that there are over 100 different types of rt-PCR tests, which were never created for ‘Medical diagnosis’ according to the creator Kary Mullis, who won a Nobel Prize in Chemistry ’93, but who unfortunately died in Aug 2019.

As one of several ‘Critical Thinkers’, we are bringing to account those in positions of authority that have ultimately led our country into genocide, and I don’t use that word lightly. Far more people will die due to the lockdowns and ‘tears’ system, and Covid Vaccines than from a ‘flu bug’ labelled as Covid-19/SARS-CoV-2.
I would appreciate your help in answering my questions above. As a former academic I would also love to receive the Independent Studies showing the Safety and Efficacy of each vaccine that you at the MHRA have approved. 

Who paid for the research? How was the research done – Double blind? What were the demographics? What animal studies were done prior using mRNA/DNA/Novel Vaccines? What were the age ranges and health status of the people involved in early testing?

I look forward to hearing back from you Dr Raine.
Many thanks for your understanding, time and efforts.
Yours in health, sincerely



https://t.me/officialcharliewardshow/13287

[Steve]

National Institutes of Health -

https://history.nih.gov/display/history/...TJXpRHRrzs





The Nuremberg Code ...

# The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

# The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

# The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

# The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

# No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

# The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

# Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

# The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

# During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end, if he has reached the physical or mental state, where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible.

# During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgement required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.


["Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10", Vol. 2, pp. 181-182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949.]

[Steve]

FB POST -

A public document available from the U.K. Commons Committee in Parliament.
A brilliant document showing breaches of The Nuremberg Codes, Human Rights, Patients rights, United Nations covenant on civil liberties and rights.
I’m printing this and sending it to my MP
Many laws are being broken.
Either they act to stop this or the people can lawfully act to stop them

https://committees.parliament.uk/written...2428/html/

[Steve]

W.H.O. and C.D.C. – The New Nuremberg Trials 2021 -

A team of over 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 medical experts lead by Dr. Reiner Fullmich have begun legal proceedings over the CDC, WHO, the Davos Group for crimes against humanity. Fullmich and his team present the faulty PCR test and the order for doctors to label any comorbidity death as a Covid death as fraud. The PCR test was never designed to detect pathogens and is 100% faulty at 35 cycles. All the PCR tests issued by the CDC are rated at 37 to 45 cycles. The CDC admits that any test over 28 cycles are not admissible for any positive reliable result. This alone invalidates over 90% of the alleged covid infections tracked by the use of this faulty test.
In addition to the flawed tests and fraudulent death certificates, the “experimental” vaccine itself is in violation of Article 32 of the Geneva Convention. Under Article 32 of the 1949 Geneva Convention IV, “mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not necessitated by the medical treatment of a protected person” are prohibited. According to Article 147, conducting biological experiments on protected persons is a grave breach of the Convention.

The “experimental” vaccine is in violation of all 10 of the Nuremburg Codes which carry the death penalty for those who seek to violate these International Laws.

The “vaccine” fails to meet the following five requirements to be considered a vaccine and is by definition a medical “experiment” and trial:

Provides immunity to the virus
This is a “leaky” gene-therapy that does not provide immunity to Covid and claims to reduce symptoms yet double-vaccinated are now 60% of the patients requiring ER or ICU with covid infections.

Protects recipients from getting the virus
This gene-therapy does not provide immunity and double-vaccinated can still catch and spread the virus.

Reduces deaths from the virus infection
This gene-therapy does not reduce deaths from the infection. Double-Vaccinated infected with Covid have also died.

Reduces circulation of the virus
This gene-therapy still permits the spread of the virus as it offers zero immunity to the virus.

Reduces transmission of the virus
This gene-therapy still permits the transmission of the virus as it offers zero immunity to the virus.

The following violations of the Nuremberg Code is as follows

Nuremburg Code #1: Voluntary Consent is Essential

No person should be forced to take a medical experiment without informed consent. Many media, political and non-medical persons are telling people to take the shot, it’s safe and offer no information as to the adverse effects or dangers of this gene-therapy. Countries are using lockdowns, duress and threats to force people to take this vaccine or be prohibited to participate in free society under the mandate of a Vaccine Passport or Green Pass. During the Nuremberg trail, even the media was prosecuted and members were put to death for lying to the public amongst many of the doctors and Nazis found guilty of Crimes Against Humanity.

Nuremburg Code #2: Yield Fruitful Results Unprocurable By Other Means

As listed above, the gene-therapy does not meet the criteria of a vaccine and does not offer immunity to the virus. There are other medical treatments that yield fruitful results against Covid such as Ivermectin, Vitamin D, Vitamin C, Zinc and boosted immune systems for flu and colds.

Nuremburg Code #3: Base Experiments on Results of Animal Experimentation and Natural History of Disease

This gene-therapy skipped Animal testing and went straight to human trials. In mRNA research that Phizer used a candidate study on mRNA with rhesus macaques monkeys using BNT162b2 mRNA and in that study all the monkeys developed pulmonary inflammation but the researchers considered the risk low as these were young healthy monkeys from the age of 2-4. Israel has used Phizer and the International Court of Law has accepted a claim for 80% of the recipients having pulmonary inflammation from being injected with this gene-therapy. Despite this alarming development Phizer proceeded to develop their mRNA for Covid without animal testing.

Nuremburg Code #4: Avoid All Unnecessary Suffering and Injury

Since the rollout of the experiment and listed under the CDC VAERS reporting system over 4,000 deaths and 50,000 vaccine injuries have been reported in America. In the EU over 7,000 deaths and 365,000 vaccine injuries have been reported. This is a grievous violation of this code.

Nuremburg Code #5: No Experiment to be Conducted if There’s Reason to Think Injury or Death Will Occur

See #4, based on fact-based medical data this gene-therapy is causing death and injury. Past research on mRNA also shows several risks that have been ignored for this current trial gene-experiment. A 2002 study on Sars-Cov spike proteins showed they cause inflammation, immunopathology, blood clots and impede Angiotensin 2 expression. This experiment forces the body to produce this spike-protein inheriting all these risks.

Nuremburg Code #6: Risk Should Never Exceed the Benefit

Covid-19 has a 98-99% recover rate. The vaccine injuries, deaths and adverse side-effects of mRNA gene-therapy far exceed this risk. The use of “leaky” vaccines were banned for agriculture use by the US and EU due to the Marek Chicken study that shows ‘hot-viruses’ and variants emerge making the disease even more deadly. Yet, this has been ignored for human use by the CDC knowing fully the risk of new deadlier variants emerge from leaky vaccinations.

Nuremburg Code #7: Preparation Must Be Made Against Even Remote Possibility of Injury, Disability or Death

There were no preparations made. This gene-therapy was approved under an Emergency Use only act, skipped animal and human trials and forced on a misinformed public.

Nuremburg Code #8: Experiment Must Be Conducted by Scientifically Qualified Persons

Politicians, media and actors claiming that this is a safe and effective vaccine are not qualified. Propaganda is not medical science. Many retail outlets such as Walmart, drive-through vaccine centers are not qualified to administer experimental medical gene-therapies to the uninformed public.

Nuremburg Code #9: Anyone Must Have the Freedom to Bring the Experiment to an End At Any Time

Despite the outcry of over 85,000 doctors, nurses, virologists, epidemiologist the experiment is not being ended. In fact, more attempts to change laws to force vaccine compliance, mandatory and forced vaccinations are being pushed through, and experimental ‘update’ shots are planned for every 6 months without any recourse to the surmountable amount of deaths and injuries already caused by this experiment. Hopefully this new Nuremberg Trial will put an end to this crime against humanity.

Nuremburg Code #10: The Scientist Must Bring the Experiment to an End At Any Time if There’s Probable Cause of it Resulting in Injury or Death

It is clear in the statistical reporting data that this experiment is resulting in death and injury yet all the politicians, drug companies and so called experts are not making any attempt to stop this gene-therapy experiment from inflicting harm on a misinformed public.

What can you do to help put an end to this crime against humanity? Share this information. Make your politicians, media, doctors, nurses informed that if they are complicit in this crime against humanity they too are subject to the laws set forth in the Geneva Convention and Nuremburg code and can be tried, found guilty and put to death. Legal proceedings are moving forward, evidence has been collected and a large growing body of experts are sounding the alarm.

Visit the Covid Committee website at: [link to corona-ausschuss.de and if you have been affected by this crime, report the event, persons involved, and as much detail to the following website:

[link to www.securewhistleblower.com
Crimes against humanity affect us all. They are a crime against you, your children, your parents, your grandparents, your community and your country and your future.

https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/geopol...rials-2021

https://tinyurl.com/yhllmzho

[Steve]

CRIME OF THE CENTURY & THE CODE OF CONDUCT OF NURSES- LEAVE OUR CHILDREN ALONE!

https://www.bitchute.com/video/qUJ71hgGfSWP/

[Steve]

Telegram Post - No Informed Consent Provided for the Covid Vaccine ...

Went to get my "vaccine", today at the vaccination centre... only it didn't quite go how the "Doctor", thought it would.


I'll upload it later!

https://t.me/thefreds/242

[Steve]

Telegram Post - 

They just outright deleted this video as soon as I posted it on Instagram. Must be truth. Too much truth for them. Assholes.
 
@DismantlingTheCabal


https://t.me/officialcharliewardshow/26441

[Steve]

Telegram Post -

TOTALLY SHOCKING: My "vaccine" appointment at a 'medical centre', only this was an appointment the doctor never anticipated. I wasn't anticipating her to be absolutely clueless on the matter either. 

Listen to her as she mutters and stutters in total disbelief at the facts, and yet they're happily injecting people without any proper research. Just WOW! #PandorasVax #PathogenPrimer #AntibodyDependencyEnhancement #mRNA #StingOperation #MilitantActivist #DoctorsExposed


https://t.me/thefreds/3433

[awakened53]

Australia’s Nuremberg-Bound Medicine Regulator has never seen Pfizer ‘Covid Vaccine’ study data despite deeming it safe for Australians

A freedom of information request made to Australia’s drug regulator has revealed they have never seen the extremely limited study data for the Pfizer / BioNTech vaccine despite giving it emergency approval and deeming it safe to be injected into the arms of Australians.
The freedom of information request (FOI) request was made by a doctor who is a part of the ‘Doctors for Covid Ethics’ group, who were recently censored on Twitter for quoting a Daily Expose article in which we confirmed two WHO whistle-blowers had given testimony to Dr Reiner Fuellmich of the Investigative Corona Committee.
The doctor wrote to the TGA (Therapeutic Good Administration), Australia’s version of the UK’s MHRA, in February 2021 asking three simple questions –
1 – Did the TGA request the raw data from Pfizer
2 – Did any of the committees approving the vaccine look at the raw data and/or discuss it
3 – What were the “studies” referred to in the approval document relating to teratogenicity (risk of harm to a foetus)
The reason for the request was due to concern over the validity and verifiability of Pfizer’s data given its legal history, a concern also shared by Peter Doshi in the BMJ in February, as well as the proven concerns over fraudulent data relating to Covid-19 as seen in the “Lancetgate” scandal of June 2020.
The TGA originally attempted to surpress the FOI request by requesting a 6-month extension in view of the amount of work required to respond satisfactorily. The doctor complained to the Office of the Information Commissioner who instructed the TGA to respond by the 26[sup]th[/sup] May, however they still failed to meet that deadline.
Eventually the TGA responded producing a heavily redacted single study showing that the only investigation into the effects on the foetus was performed on 44 rats with no long-term data on the offspring.
Their response also confirmed that they had never seen or requested the patient data from Pfizer and simply accept Pfizer’s report of their study as fact, despite their proven history of fraudulent claims.
Read More: Australia’s Medicine Regulator has never seen Pfizer Covid Vaccine study data despite deeming it safe for Australians