[awakened53]

China announces another massive lockdown – this is all theatre by a fascist government that has contempt for the population that it hates as much as the Cult hates humanity in general

A Covid outbreak in Shanghai prompted Beijing’s swift response
Some 26 million residents of China’s economic capital of Shanghai will be confined to their homes as Beijing imposes a massive citywide lockdown starting on Monday in a bid to maintain a ‘zero-Covid’ policy.
The lockdown will be conducted in two phases. First, Shanghai’s Pudong financial district and nearby areas will be quarantined from Monday to Friday. Second, Pudong will pass the baton to the vast downtown area west of the Huangpu River, which will start its own five-day lockdown on Friday.
To control the growing outbreak, the lockdown will be accompanied by a new round of mass nucleic acid testing across the city, China’s Xinhua reported, citing Shanghai officials. Beijing recorded 3,500 cases of the infection on Sunday.
As all residents are required to stay at home and avoid any contact with the outside world, all public transport in the locked-down areas will be suspended.
Groceries will be delivered and left at checkpoints. All non-essential businesses in Shanghai will close their offices, making employees work from home.
The decision comes as Beijing continues to abide by its zero-tolerance policy towards Covid-19. In line with the policy, China’s authorities are free to use public health measures such as mass testing, contact tracing, and lockdowns in order to stop community transmission of the virus as soon as it is detected.
The goal is to get the area of an outbreak back to zero new infections and resume normal economic and social activities as soon as possible. The policy has been criticized by many, however, who argue that it takes too much of an economic toll.

Read More: China announces another massive lockdown

[awakened53]

People with a cold urged to ‘stay home and avoid contact’ under new guidance

People in England who have a cough or cold are to be urged to “stay home and avoid contact with other people” under new Government guidance on Covid-19.
Those who have a symptoms of a respiratory illness such as a high temperature or “who feel unwell” are being encouraged to stay home until they feel well enough to resume normal activities or when their temperature has subsided, under new guidance which will be issued on April 1.
The legal requirement to self-isolate after a positive Covid-19 test in England ended on February 24.
But ministers have issued fresh guidance to people who feel unwell as well as those who test positive for the virus.
After Friday, people who have a positive Covid-19 test are being advised to “try to” stay at home and avoid contact with other people for five days, which is when they are most infectious.
Those who are positive, or have symptoms, and need to leave home will be urged to wear masks, avoid crowded places and stay away from people with weakened immune systems.
Children who are unwell and have a high temperature are being advised to stay home and avoid contact with other people where they can.
They can go back to school, college or childcare when they no longer have a high temperature and they are well enough to attend, the Government said.

Read more: People with a cold urged to ‘stay home and avoid contact’ under new guidance

[awakened53]

Lockdown Backlog: NHS Waiting List Hits New High of 6.2 Million as Stroke and Heart Attack Victims Wait Over an Hour for Ambulance

The number of patients waiting for routine hospital treatment in England has soared to a new record of 6.18 million, as ambulance and emergency department waits also reach all-time highs.  MailOnline has the story.
NHS data show one in nine people were in the queue, often in pain, for elective operations such as hip and knee replacements and cataracts surgery by February – up from 6.1 million in January.
Separate data show A&E performance plummeted to its worst ever level in March, with a record 22,506 people waiting 12 hours to be treated, three times longer than the NHS target. Just seven in 10 patients in casualty units were seen within the four-hour threshold, marking the worst performance yet.
Ambulance figures reveal heart attack and stroke patients were left waiting for more than an hour for paramedics to arrive on average – another record.
Health bosses argue the NHS has faced its busiest ever winter and a slight drop among the longest waiters show it is tackling the backlog.
NHS leaders said the health service needs more cash to fill its 110,000 vacancies and ongoing problems in social care, despite receiving a record £136.1 billion this year to help it recover from Covid.
Ministers announced an elective recovery plan earlier this year, setting out how waiting lists will finally start to fall from March 2024, while two-year waits would be scrapped by the summer. But experts today warned “it is hard to imagine an end in sight, with lengthy waits for healthcare firmly here to stay”.
It comes as doctors today say record-high Covid infection are leading to operations being cancelled across England, despite daily admissions and the number of infected patients in hospital trending downwards.
How can this winter have been the “busiest ever” when excess deaths were trending below average throughout. Surely last winter, with the Alpha Covid wave in full swing, was much busier. Hard to sort the truth from the exaggeration in the messages coming out from the health service, particularly with health bosses lobbying for the return of restrictions.
Have they forgotten it’s the restrictions that got us into this mess, by telling people to stay at home when they’re ill, cancelling operations ‘because Covid’ and storing up the mother of all backlogs?.

Read More : Lockdown Backlog: NHS Waiting List Hits New High

[Steve]

"Engineered supply chain shutdowns are "clot shots" against the global economy"

It's fascinating that the globalists, in their desire to tear down human civilization and achieve mass extermination on a global scale, have resorted to the exact same practice at both the nanotechnology (biological) scale as well as the global macro scale.
Meanwhile, the International Energy Agency is calling for "climate lockdowns" to reduce fossil fuel usage, apparently realizing that since the covid lockdowns didn't exterminate enough people or crush the economy with the desired level of carnage, they need a whole new excuse for yet more lockdowns.
It's all about destroying the global economy and exterminating the human population.

If you think of shipping containers as red blood cells, the jamming up of these containers at the locked-down ports in China is the equivalent of blood clots in the human body. For an individual or a society to survive and thrive, resources must smoothly flow and be distributed across the system. Clot shots (covid vaccines) kill people by blocking that flow, just as deliberate shutdowns of port cities creates an economic arterial blockage with devastating effects.

https://ce-publicdy.naturalnews.com/ct.a...VfeQ%3d%3d

[awakened53]

The Truth About Partygate That Everyone Seemingly Ignores




 


If you believe the mainstream media—which, unfortunately, it seems most people do—you could be forgiven for imagining that the most pressing issue surrounding so-called Partygate is that the Government "broke the rules". Irksome though this rule-breaking is, however, it is neither unexpected nor unusual.

Throughout history, politicians have been caught breaking the rules they set, and the laws they enact, on innumerable occasions. For such a small group of people, they have always had among them a disproportionate number of individuals who consider themselves above the law. This kind of behaviour is quite normal for the political class.

Many of those who attended these gathering, such as UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, Chancellor of the Exchequer (British finance minister) Rishi Sunak and the then Health Secretary Matt Hancock, were instrumental in enforcing the nationwide lockdown of everyone else. Millions of citizens were placed under effective house arrest while this particular gaggle of Conservative politicians, advisors and Whitehall bureaucrats ignored their own regulations.

Neither the mainstream media nor any politician has gone anywhere near discussing the the real issues. There has been a collaborative wall of silence ensuring that a majority of the people never realise the true nature of the wrongdoing. The objective is to exclude those who do speak about the most obvious implication of Partygate from the conversation.



Partners In A Cover-Up
While we might expect people to be angry about the rank hypocrisy that Partygate revealed, the mainstream media have created an associated narrative which entirely obfuscates the real issues. To sell the preferred storyline, the mainstream media were quick to exploit emotional accounts of people who couldn't visit dying loved ones or those who lost their jobs as the businesses they worked in collapsed, all of whom "obeyed the rules".

The mainstream media talked about nothing but the inherent "unfairness" of the party-goers rule breaking: how it is one rule for them and another for everyone else.

Politicians on both sides of the house rattled off exactly the same story. Following payment of a fixed penalty notice for his rule-breaking, Boris Johnson reinforced the official narrative with his apology. He told Parliament:

It did not occur to me, then or subsequently, that a gathering in the Cabinet Room just before a vital meeting on Covid strategy could amount to a breach of the rules. [...] I repeat that was my mistake and I apologise for it unreservedly.

Later, the Labour leader, Sir Keir Starmer, gave an apparently impassioned response. Thick with emotional messaging, he too completely ignored the most salient issues. Like Johnson and the entire mainstream media, his only stated concern was the demonstrable lack of fairness and respect:

This morning, I spoke to John Robinson [...] I want to tell you his story. [...] When his wife died of Covid, John and his family obeyed the Prime Minister's rules. [...] He followed the Prime Minister's rules; rules that we now know the Prime Minister blithely, repeatedly and deliberately ignored. If the Prime Minister had any respect for John or the millions like him who sacrificed everything to follow the rules, he'd resign.

Telling stories in an attempt to unseat his opponent was the full extent of Starmer's response. As the leader of Her Majesty's Opposition, he didn't—despite the apparent barrage—ask any searching questions of Johnson's government. He simply reiterated the same story that the government and their mainstream media partners were peddling. Starmer was just as eager as Johnson to maintain the deception.

In any event, it appears that Starmer was also guilty of the same rule-breaking he berated Johnson over. At a time when he was pressing for even more stringent lockdowns, he was photographed drinking beer at a constituency "meeting".

Starmer said the group was "working" and therefore there was no technical "breach of rules". This highly implausible account was enough for him to avoid a police investigation. It seems swigging beer and polishing off canapés while he is "working" is standard practice for the Labour Party leader.

A cursory delve into social media or an overheard conversation is enough to appreciate how successful this distraction propaganda has been. People are understandably furious about the discovery that the rule-makers were rule-breakers. They have vented their anger online, bitterly complaining when faced with the stark reality of a political class that evidently sees them as little more than subjects to be ruled.

While the exasperation and disappointment are perhaps justified, in following the approved mainstream media script, the general population are also ignoring the real issues. It seems many of us have collectively been bamboozled into arguing over minutiae while remaining blind to the magnitude of the crime that has actually been committed.



The Real Partygate Crimes
Their behaviour demonstrates that those who attended the Downing Street parties did not believe that there was a pandemic. Irrespective of their words, their actions revealed that they were not concerned either about transmitting or contracting any disease. For them, there was no pandemic risk; there was no pandemic.

In a real pandemic or epidemic, people are fearful—for good reason: there is a risk that social activities could prove to be lethal. That was not the case during the World Health Organisation's (WHO) alleged Covid-19 pandemic, just as it wasn't the case in the WHO's 2009 H1N1 flu pandemic.

In both instances, pandemic mortality was only found in the computer models and spurious test-based attributions of cause of death, not in the real data. Covid-19 was another pseudopandemic.

Instead, people were convinced to be fearful by a government propaganda, censorship, and applied psychology operation. Some of those leading the terror campaign were the same members of the political establishment who enjoyed the offending drinks parties. They did so on the implicit understanding that they were at no risk themselves. Why else would they attend or even organise these gatherings in the first place?

They were among the people who supposedly had direct access to the best scientific advice. No one had a better opportunity to be fully briefed on the dangers of Covid-19 than the Partygate and Labour Party "meeting" attendees. Yet they were not remotely concerned.

They weren't the only Covid rule-makers who saw no risk from the disease they told everyone else to fear. Other nonchalant individuals included leading scientists, scientific advisors and numerous MPs—all of whom pushed the Covid fear agenda.

Professor Neil Ferguson, whose dire predictive models were a leading cause of the initial alarm, didn't bother maintaining the protective familial bubble that everyone else was told to observe. He ignored the risks, proffered in his own paper, to continue his affair. Thus supposedly he risked infecting himself, his family and his lover with what he alleged to be an incredibly dangerous disease. Obviously, this was not a danger he took seriously.

In response to Ferguson's faux pas, Partygate attendee and then Health Secretary Matt Hancock immediately said that the rules were "deadly serious" and "there for everyone". Again, obeying the rules was the only issue discussed. That Ferguson couldn't see any preventive health benefit to following the rules was a detail studiously ignored.

Hancock then misled the nation by publicly declaring that it was "not possible" for Ferguson to remain a government advisor. However, Ferguson did continue to advise Hancock and other government ministers as a member of the New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group (NERVTAG).

Hancock didn't believe that there was any risk either. Not only did he party with his friends during lockdown; he also ignored social distancing rules to continue his extramarital affair. Like Ferguson, Hancock had no problem breaking the regulations. He wasn't in the least but worried about a pandemic.

Scotland's Chief Medical Officer, Dr Catherine Calderwood, resigned after it emerged she had taken her children on holiday during lockdown. She, too, was admonished by the police after urging every resident of Scotland to "stay at home to protect the NHS and to save lives". Not only was she in practice unconcerned about saving anyone's life; she was seemingly happy to expose her own children to the allegedly lethal disease. Dr Calderwood clearly didn't recognise any pandemic health threat either.

Bournemouth MP Tobias Ellwood (Chairman of the UK Defence Select Committee and a serving 77th Brigade officer) spoke in June 2020 about people gathering in the sunshine on Bournemouth beach. Ignoring the fact that Vitamin D is essential to tackle respiratory viruses, he said:

[S]ocial distancing went out the window and that's why a major incident was declared. [....] We need to learn from this and recognise that if we're going to be serious about tackling this pandemic then we need to be swifter in being able to provide support to local authorities. [...] I would hate to see Bournemouth or any seaside resort become that place where the second spike is the first to appear.

A few months later, Ellwood attended a Christmas party during lockdown hosted by the Iraq-Britain Business Council. Like Starmer, he brushed aside the fact that he had broken the intent of the social distancing and lockdown rules—by claiming the knees-up somehow constituted work. He certainly didn't appear to be "serious about tackling this pandemic".

Then chief strategy adviser to the Prime Minister, Damian Cummings, also broke the intent of the lockdown and social distancing restrictions when he took his family on a 540-mile round trip to County Durham. While he suspected that he had previously been exposed to Covid and that his wife was potentially ill with Covid, they bundled their young son into a car and, sitting in the tiny enclosed environment, embarked upon the four-and-a-half-hour drive.

Again, Cummings used the "no technical breach" argument in his defence. This point is a practical irrelevance. Presumably, neither Cummings nor his wife was bothered about exposing their young son, or the rest of his family, including his parents, to what they both supposedly believed to be Covid-19. Bluntly, they did not perceive any genuine pandemic risk.

The list goes on: Robert Jenrick MP (Housing and Communities Minister), Stephen Kinnock MP (Shadow Minister for Asia and the Pacific and husband of former Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt), Margaret Ferrier MP (Rutherglen and Hamilton West), and Bob Seeley MP (Isle of Wight) have all been accused of "breaking the rules".

Whether they did or not, regardless of whatever technical defence they offer, by their actions all of these people have illustrated that they did not believe that there was ever any serious risk from a pandemic disease. Yet all have persistently maintained that this threat existed.

The real crime exposed by Partygate is not that some of the rule-makers became rule-breakers. It is that some of the leading architects of the lockdown and social distances policies that destroyed the economy—and instilled fear in nearly every citizen—did not, for one moment, believe that there was ever any public health justification for doing so.

It is quite remarkable that not a single Member of Parliament or a single mainstream media report has even mentioned the glaringly obvious. The establishment, both political and journalistic, has steadfastly maintained this obfuscation for nearly two years. The apparent collusion between Parliament, the political establishment and the media has effectively reframed the Partygate debate to exclude the most serious consequences from public attention.

If those who designed and advocated the lockdown rules weren't even moderately concerned about the public health risk of an alleged pandemic, then what were these policies intended to achieve? If these people understood that there was no public health justification for disastrous lockdown policies, why did they promote them—knowing they would lead to enormous economic and social costs?

Who are these people, and who do they represent?

[awakened53]

Another day and more lying politicians breaking lockdown rules they imposed on others. Leaked memo demolishes Labour leader’s Beergate story showing curry WAS pre-planned and Angela Rayner was ALWAYS on guestlist – before whistleblower from bash reveals he will tell police NO work was done after and guests were ‘pissed’

Keir Starmer has been plunged into a full-scale leadership crisis after The Mail on Sunday obtained a secret Labour Party document which appears to shatter his version of events over ‘Beergate’.
An operational note drawn up ahead of Sir Keir’s notorious visit to Durham, where he was filmed enjoying a late-night beer with activists, reveals the gathering had been planned in advance.
The bombshell document, marked ‘private and confidential’, also calls into serious doubt Sir Keir’s claim that he returned to work after the beers and takeaway curries.
After the entry recording the ‘dinner in Miners Hall’ – which includes a note to ‘arrange takeaway from Spice Lounge’, a local curry house – the document simply says: ‘End of visit.’
Now a witness present at the gathering is reportedly set to tell Durham Constabulary – which announced on Friday it was opening a fresh investigation into the event on April 30 last year, which took place when indoor socialising was illegal – that the event did indeed break rules at the time.
Referencing the meet-up with Durham MP Mary Foy and her staff, the source told the times the group ‘were not working and I have not got a problem telling that to the police.
‘They were just getting p****d. They were just there for a jolly. It’s not something that I am prepared to defend.’
Read more: Another day and more lying politicians breaking lockdown rules they imposed on others. Leaked memo demolishes Labour leader’s Beergate story showing curry WAS pre-planned and Angela Rayner was ALWAYS on guestlist – before whistleblower from bash reveals he will tell police NO work was done after and guests were ‘pissed’

[awakened53]

Canadian Pastors Who Refused to Close Church During Lockdown Win in Court

The Crown has dropped 24 tickets totalling $55,200, issued in connection with COVID-19 public health orders to three pastors.
The Justice Centre represented Pastor John Koopman of Chilliwack Free Reformed Church, Pastor James Butler of Free Grace Baptist Church, and Pastor Timothy Champ of Valley Heights Community Church, who have all received tickets for holding services during the pandemic.
“For participating in worship in accordance with their religious beliefs, while implementing the same safety measures applicable to other in-person settings that were legal in BC, such as indoor gatherings in stores, restaurants and gyms, Pastor Koopman was facing charges on 23 tickets totaling $52,900, Pastor Butler on 25 tickets totalling $57,500, and Pastor Champ on 18 tickets totalling $41,400,” a Justice Centre statement reads.
On May 4 and May 6, 2022, approximately one year after the last tickets were issued, the Crown directed a stay of proceedings of the charges against the pastors as follows: Pastor Koopman saw seven tickets dropped; Pastor Butler saw 11 tickets dropped; and Pastor Champ saw six tickets dropped, for a total of 24 tickets withdrawn.
According to the Justice Centre, there are still more than 20 tickets issued against pastors and churches in the Fraser Valley that remain outstanding. “The Justice Centre will vigorously defend pastors and churches against these charges in future appearances in Provincial Court,” the statement continues.
To date, the Crown has dropped more than four dozen tickets issued to BC churches represented by the Justice Centre.
Read More: Canadian Pastors Who Refused to Close Church During Covid Lockdown Win in Court

[awakened53]

Lockdowns Killed Hundreds of Thousands of Children, Says the UN

The  reports by Ofsted, NFER and by the head of the Speech and Language Unit in Northern Ireland highlighted the devastating impact of Covid policy on the education and development of children in the U.K.
This article addresses the damage to children beyond education and the impact on children across the world and poses the question, “Was it worth it?”
As I address here, here and here, school closures and mask wearing are responsible for the appalling damage to children’s education and development, but the damage goes beyond this.
There is a huge amount of evidence about the damage caused by COVID-19 restrictions to children’s mental health. The impact has been alarming.
In a report by Collateral Global, eight out of ten children and adolescents report an increase in negative feelings due to the COVID-19 pandemic. School closures contributed to increased anxiety, loneliness and stress; negative feelings due to COVID-19 increased with the duration of school closures.
The Hart Group’s detailed research reported:
One in six children were reporting significant mental health problems and, by winter, one in four young people felt ‘unable to cope’. In autumn 2020, Ofsted (the schools inspectorate in England) identified a worrying increase in self-harm and eating disorders, while lockdowns evoked an ‘explosion’ of children with disabling tic disorders. This surge in mental health problems led to record numbers of children being prescribed antidepressants. The cumulative mental health consequences of 18 months of pandemic restrictions was summarised in a recent comprehensive review of the research evidence, carried out by Collateral Global, which concluded that the impact on children and adolescents was ‘severe’, with 80% of young people reporting a deterioration in their emotional wellbeing.
In a letter during the second lockdown in January 2021, ten of the U.K.’s top experts in child health said anxiety, depression, self harm and suicidal thoughts reached frightening levels among children as they struggled to cope with school closures.
The letter, signed Professor Claire Hogg, Dr. Ian Balfour Lynn and Professor Sejal Saglani and others, added: “As in the first lockdown, we are witnessing an acute and rapid increase in mental health and safeguarding cases affecting children and parents alike.”
Read More: Lockdowns Killed Hundreds of Thousands of Children, Says the UN – Was it Really Worth It?

[Steve]

The controlled demolition of food and energy infrastructure is now under way


The global destruction of food and energy infrastructure is accelerating by the day. The goal is rather obvious at this point: To destroy human civilization and starve as many people to death as possible by any means necessary.

Those who don't yet realize this is happening will be destroyed by it.

Today we bring you an astonishing list of sabotage against refineries, the deliberate takedown of the power grid, the shuttering of fertilizer manufacturers and even new attacks on lithium, the battery storage element powering the "green" economy.

Globalists are trying to starve and kill billions.



Get the full story in today's feature podcast here.

https://www.brighteon.com/07ba2e4a-a3e0-...53a56dee49

[Steve]

Red Alert - Entire U.S. supply of diesel engine oil may be wiped out in 8 weeks -


As if we all needed something else to add to our worries, a potentially catastrophic situation is emerging that threatens to wipe out the entire supply of diesel engine oil across the United States, leaving the country with no diesel engine oil until 2023.

According to information you'll see here (and explained in more detail in today's podcast, below), chemical manufacturers of diesel engine oil additives have declared force majeure and have ceased supply operations to the diesel engine oil manufacturers.

Without a miraculous solution, the current supply of diesel engine oil will likely be gone in 4-8 weeks. After that, unless a solution is quickly found, there will be no diesel engine oil available until some time in 2023.
All transport trucks, farm tractors, construction machinery and transport trains run on diesel engines. A shut down of diesel engine oil would grind all transportation to a halt.
No food for grocery stores, no coal for power plants, no hardware inventory, no crops being harvested, nothing.

Get the shocking full details in today's feature podcast here.

https://www.brighteon.com/aeef8f40-6235-...4ce428e3f2