[Firestarter]

There are different names for basically the same agenda, which these days is often called "the great reset", including technocracy, sustainable development and eugenics...
There are undeniable links to green technocrat Elon Musk, the so-called (second now) "richest man in the world".

British writers like Bertrand Russell, H.G. Wells, Aldous Huxley and George Orwell gave us glimpses of what this technocratic utopia would look like.
Technocracy overlaps with science fiction, and some of its stated objectives are just fiction to fool the masses (colonising Mars!).

Elon Musk's Jewish Canadian grandfather, Joshua Norman Haldeman, became a director for Technocracy, Inc. of Canada.
In June 2019, Elon Musk tweeted about his affinity with technocracy:

Accelerating Starship development to build the Martian Technocracy

.
In 1932, Howard Scott and Marion King Hubbert founded Technocracy Incorporated. Hubbert later developed the theory of peak oil that has been both used to inflate oil prices and implement the "sustainable development" eugenics agenda.
The American economist and sociologist Thorstein Veblen was associated to Scott Hubbert and promoted technocracy.

A 1930s movie, produced by Technocracy Inc., boasts about being backed by The Masonic Temple: https://silview.media/2022/04/12/elon-mu...kefellers/
(https://archive.ph/a7xPI)


The Trilateral Commission was founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski, to implement the New World Order based on Technocracy. Brzezinski described this in his 1970 book the “Between Two Ages: America’s Role In The Technetronic Era”: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewtop...6295#p6295


See James Corbett's video on (the evils of) technocracy.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/keIFf5bNbXI9/


Or see David Knight on technocracy.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/bUnFUILonBc8/

[Firestarter]

The following essay is the best I've read so far on the original technocracy plans, from back in the 1930s.
It's shocking how many of their plans overlap with the current green electricity agenda. While most of the plans in the 1930s were technically impossible, the “all-pervasive” surveillance state can now be achieved. To be completed with personal carbon footprint tracker, which can be used to decide if you are allowed to spend money in your bank account.

In technocracy, "peck-rights" could be earned by those with technical skills or natural ability to lead (or of course based on the status of your family). Through “energy certificates”, based upon the energy cost of production, it can be decided how much somebody can consume (of course in accordance with you peck rights), and would make human society as efficient as possible.
This requires a surveillance state to monitor and control the transactions of every citizen in the Technate.

About the “human animal” (or robot?) technocrats stated:

They can be conditioned not to use certain language, not to eat certain foods on certain days, not to work on certain days, not to mate in the absence of certain ceremonial words spoken over them, not to break into a grocery store for food even though they may not have eaten for days.

.
The “Sequence of Social Relations” would oversee law and order, create the “rules”, and its directors would pass judgement on those who wouldn't perform efficiently.
The "Sequence of Armed Forces" would enforce the "Social Relations" and act according to the strategic decisions of the "Foreign Affairs Sequence": https://expose-news.com/2022/12/08/techn...restraint/

[Firestarter]

Patrick Wood has been warning about the technocratic movement for more than a decade. He tracks technocracy from its inception at Columbia University in the 1930s, through the Trilateral Commission in the 1970s, and beyond.
In 1938, they defined Technocracy with:

Technocracy is the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism, to produce and distribute services to the entire population.

.
In the early 1930s, there was the Great Depression, and the technocrats at Columbia University decided that they had to do something about capitalism. They said there’s no reason for elections, but instead appoint technocrats to make all the decisions — unelected and unaccountable — based on “science”.
The Trilateral Commission was founded by Rockefeller to implement technocracy. They called their agenda “The New International Economic Order”. Six months later, in 1974, the United Nations passed general resolution 3201, called “Declaration on the Establishment of a New International Economic Order”.

Wood describes that when when you view society as a machine, to control it, you have to monitor everything. In a smart city sensors are embedded to control and monitor everything in the city. The current implementation and future technocratic dictatorship includes: mass surveillance, financial technology, smart cities, social credit system and tech spirituality.
In 1992, in a marketing ploy, they rebranded the technocratic agenda as “Sustainable Development”.

China comes closest to the technocratic Utopia as already envisioned in the 1930s. So we can look to China to see where our society is headed. China already has installed 600 million cameras, equipped with facial recognition software, to monitor the herd. Their social credit scoring system uses an AI program to score every citizen.
Our silence gives them permission to continue their agenda: https://thefederalist.com/2021/05/13/wha...r-my-city/
(https://archive.ph/JUCdv)


Patrick Wood - Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation (2015): https://pdfcoffee.com/wood-patrick-m-tec...-free.html
(https://archive.ph/Bh88A)


Here's a 2019 lecture by Patrick Wood on (the dangers of) technocracy (before the plandemic was started to implement the technocratic Great Reset).
https://www.bitchute.com/video/FucwDyJoHDEi/

[Firestarter]

James Corbett interviews Iain Davis on the New World Order enabled by technocracy.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/EWJIb1qP6xMb/
https://www.corbettreport.com/davis-newworldorder/


It certainly is strange that governments worldwide have been taking away the last of our freedoms to implement the technocratic Great Reset, after the WHO (with only an advisory role) declared a "pandemic" in March 2020...

Technocratic legitimacy and political legitimacy seem to be intertwined in the WHO’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. For the world’s leading authority over global health issues, the importance of the WHO’s technocratic legitimacy is that “decision-makers consider the scientific nature of some problems to be beyond” political discussions. But if a decision that is supposed to be grounded in scientific evidence is susceptible to political pressure, then the expert-based legitimacy would necessarily be discounted.

https://www.californialawreview.org/weak...ority-who/


The following paper is an interesting discussion on technocracy (as opposed to democracy) during the plandemic...

One of the most prevalent misunderstandings is considering technocracy in opposition to politics: a widespread attitude initially supported by Habermas (1971) and other scholars such as Putnam (1977), Fischer (1990) and Esmark (2017). According to Habermas, the Second World War period saw a “new or second phase in the rationalization process” which Max Weber had already comprehended as the basis for bureaucratic domination, defined by the “scientization of politics”. In this technocratic model, the relationship between the professional expert and the politician appears to have effectively “reversed itself”, making the latter «a mere agent of a scientific intelligentsia, which, in concrete circumstances, elaborates the objective implications and requirements of available techniques and resources as well as optimal strategies and rules of control» (Habermas, 1971, p. 63).
(...)

At the top level, starting with the World Health Organization (WHO), such structures have just had an advisory role: “suggesting” and “monitoring”, rather than deciding, are their responsibilities. Different from structures like the ECB, they are weak technocratic institutions, depending on politics and its discretionary power. Nevertheless, their role has been fundamental in pushing governments towards stronger containment measures, including lockdown strategies and, at the same time, justifying them to the public on behalf of the science community.
(...)

If we consider the whole complex of socio-political effects emerging due to the lockdown situation and, in general, the way of managing the struggle against the virus, it is possible to identify some similarities between the traditional police state and current political configuration; particularly the relationship between the state and its citizens:
1. The re-organisation of the whole state activity towards the aim of protecting citizens and to directly assure their well-being,
2. The need to regulate every aspect of social life, including social, informal relationships,
3. The reduction of many civil rights, particularly the right of freedom of movement,
4. The need for discipline and self-discipline as well as a more cogent informal social control to implement the rule of law as well as to protect public and individual health,
5. A massive use of law enforcement agencies to control citizens’ behaviour.

http://rtsa.eu/RTSA_2_2020_Antonelli.pdf
(https://archive.ph/kb6SC)

[Firestarter]

The green depopulation technocrats all work together in the "non-profit industrial complex": United Nations, World Bank, Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation, We Mean Business (represented by co-founder Callum Grieve), 350.org (represented by co-founder Jamie Henn) Upworthy (co-founded by Avaaz co-founder Eli Pariser), Avaaz, Here Now (Purpose, sister for-profit arm of Avaaz), World Economic Forum, GCCA (TckTckTck), World Business Council for Sustainable Development (chaired by Unilever CEO Paul Polman), Greenpeace, Unilever, and The Climate Reality Project (founded by Al Gore).

In 2014, none other than Lynn Forester de Rothschild founded the Coalition for Inclusive Capitalism. Its Working Group includes such luminaries: as Sir Evelyn de Rothschild (of E.L. Rothschild, Lynn's husband and financial adviser to Queen Elizabeth), Dominic Barton (from McKinsey and Company), Ann Cairns (of MasterCard), Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles (of HSBC), and Paul Polman (of Unilever).
Speeches will be delivered by such green electricity advertisers as: Prince Charles, Bill Clinton, Mark Carney, Christine Lagarde (President of the ECB, and former managing director of the IMF), and Larry Summers (former US Treasury secretary).

From 2007 to 2010, Gillian Caldwell was Executive Director for 1Sky (Rockefeller incubator NGO), which merged with 350.org: https://www.wrongkindofgreen.org/2017/08...s-part-ii/
(https://archive.ph/tZGcx)


350.org was founded by Rockefeller and the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) is a key financier. The CGI also financed Step It Up that was renamed 1Sky, which then merged with 350.org in 2011: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewtop...707#p72707


Biden’s USAID climate chief, Gillian Caldwell, was CEO of Global Witness (from 2015 to 2019), which covers up crimes against humanity under the guise of tackling climate change.
Before that, in 2007-2010, she started and led 1Sky, that lobbies in the US to implement climate crisis legislation: https://archive.ph/Js0ym


Global Witness is (of course) a British non-governmental organisation founded in 1993, and headquartered in London, England, which makes Caldwell another Crown agent.
In 2016, Global Witness received millions of dollars from the George Soros Open Society Foundation, Pierre Omidyar’s Omidyar Network, Ford Foundation and NATO governments: https://www.wrongkindofgreen.org/2018/03...-of-truth/


Pierre Omidyar is the founder of eBay, his foundation is involved with the "usual suspects" of charity aimed at population control (including sustainable depopulation).

Google, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, ModusBox, Omidyar Network, Coil and the Rockefeller Foundation have started the Mojaloop Foundation, a non-profit aimed at advancing the Mojaloop open source software project: https://philanthropynewsdigest.org/news/...-nonprofit


In 2012, The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Citibank, Ford Foundation, Omidyar Network, UN Capital Development Fund (UNCDF), US Agency for International Development (USAID), and Visa Inc. launched the Better Than Cash Alliance, to use electronic payments so that people living in poverty can be better monitored (than through cash): https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/me...h-alliance

[Firestarter]

Here's another interesting essay on technocracy, see some excerpts (even Elon Musk appears)...
.

This essay introduces the concept of convergence as developed by Henry Jenkins and explores how the practice has expanded in the current global pandemic milieu wherein the interests of a technocratic elite converge to cultivate a general acceptance of the digital tools of a new socioeconomic order. Alongside this analysis stands the historical development of computing tools and the development of data as tools of social control.
(...)

we suggest that emerging technologies not only “integrate [people] into the institutional structures of the larger society” (p. 1), but also into the so-called free market. We analyze the persuasive communications that serve this emerging order of the market working to integrate human beings into the forthcoming Internet of Things (IoT) where all organic and inorganic objects are prepared for sale and purchase.
(...)

In the wake of 9/11, the power elites have steadily tightened control over press freedoms and free speech on digital platforms in accordance with the oppressive mandates of the USA PATRIOT ACT and, as presently witnessed, the COVID-19 pandemic. Corporate and state power converge, here, to control public perception. In the United States, for example, a study by Gilens and Page concludes that the wishes of the people have “a non-significant [or] near-zero level” (Gilens and Page, 2014) impact on the creation of laws that improve policies for the public good.
(...)

If humans want to continue to add value to the economy, they must augment their capabilities through a merger of biological intelligence and machine intelligence. If we fail to do this, we'll risk becoming ‘house cats’ to artificial intelligence (Musk, 2017).
(...)

Beyond battling everybody in a “war of all against all,” the body politic, observes Miller, has been effectively dismembered,
—society balkanized by race-and-gender, as well as ‘blue’ and ‘red’, so that the necessary solidarity of the have-nots has come to seem impossible. While this development was hastened, if not initiated, by the CIA from the late'60s, it's now been universalized by social media, which offers the illusory solace of a fierce sense of belonging, and enables each of us to vent ferociously against ‘Trump’, ‘Putin’, ‘Killary’, the ‘fascists’, ‘homophobes’, ‘anti-vaxxers’, ‘anti-semites’ or whatever other tribe we have to hate. Thus, Social Media transforms each one of us into prolific war-propagandists; and now that we're all ‘sheltering in place’, most of us have little else to do except flip out on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, 24/7 (Miller, personal communication).
(...)

If imprisonment and slavery, therefore, began with the Auschwitz inmate tattooed with an analog Hollerith number (as Black's research reveals), the new slavery will end with a concentration camp prisoner microchipped in the global matrix with a digital number. The tools of the matrix are, at present, appearing everywhere, the smart cameras and sensors of the real world augmented by the goggles of virtual reality in the Internet of Things (IoT). They are pushed upon the people in clever marketing campaigns by the power elite. This inexorable march toward voluntary slavery in a new order of global economics should arrive as no surprise to those who have watched with unease the tools of big data applied to all products and commodities, both organic and inorganic.
(...)

As of this writing, we see in the present COVID-19 Pandemic a clear path toward the “Brave New World” of “Big Digital”—the planned disappearance of hard currency and its replacement implanted in people mandated to be socially distant, the Microchip as big-tech savior resurrected by the “super-predators, [with] no conscience, no empathy [aiming to] bring [all] to heel” (Clinton, 1996).

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10....00037/full
(https://archive.ph/HHsVN)

[Firestarter]

The green agenda's objective isn't to save nature or prevent climate change, but to implement technocracy. There isn't even a objective to reduce energy consumption, but to replace fossil fuel energy with electric energy, which is more polluting because it requires highly toxic batteries.
So the inflating energy and food prices are in line with this strategy, but they do not want to inflate electricity, because electric machines feed the technocratic beast. Electricity prices in Europe increased almost 10 times in one year.

So now psycho president of the technocratic European Commission Ursula von der Leyen wants to break the link between gas and electricity prices, so that fossil fuel prices can continue to skyrocket, with electricity prices remaining constant (even though fossil fuels are used to generate electricity).

Von der Leyen described her plans:

We have to develop an instrument which makes sure that the gas price no longer dominates the electricity price. We’re seeing now with these exorbitantly high gas prices that we must decouple.
We will have to develop an instrument, that will happen in the next days and weeks, which ensures that the gas price will no longer dominate the electricity price.
Skyrocketing electricity prices are now exposing, for different reasons, the limitations of our current electricity market design

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...wer-prices


In April 2019, green technocratic psycho Mark Carney wrote that “If some companies and industries fail to adapt to this new [anti-carbon] world, they will fail to exist”.
So now after the forced lockdowns, the hyperinflation of energy and food will make sure this happens. Should we praise or blame Putin for implementing the technocratic agenda?!?

Carney, in his opening speech at the City of London’s 2020 Green Horizon Summit, said that total net zero transition represents “the greatest commercial opportunity of our time” and “our objective for COP26 is to build the framework so that every financial decision can take climate change into account”.
So while the poor have to get second jobs to make ends meet, the billionaires will laugh all the way to the bank...

In 2010, Carney founded FSB’s Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosure (TCFD), with green psycho Michael Bloomberg for chairman, to classify companies on their “climate risk level”.
The TCFD has included executives at BlackRock, Barclays Bank, HSBC (City of London), Swiss Re; and Al Gore’s partner David Blood.
In January 2016, the City of London Corporation with the UK government founded the Green Finance Initiative (GFI) was founded to implement “green bonds”.

In April 2021, the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ) was launched to “transform” the global financial system. by: Mark Carney, John Kerry (him again, US Special Presidential Envoy for Climate Change); Janet Yellen (US Secretary of the Treasury and former chair of the Federal Reserve). GFANZ is co-chaired by Carney and Bloomberg, while its "principals" include executives from the big banks and investment funds (that will profit from the green transition), including BlackRock CEO Larry Fink.

More than 450 firms representing $130 trillion of assets now belong to the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero, almost double the roughly $70 trillion when GFANZ was launched in April.

https://expose-news.com/2022/08/30/carne...n-finance/

[Firestarter]

The "right wing" FOX news has accused famous "left wing" actor Leonardo DiCaprio of funding "government" climate change lawsuits through the dark money Resources Legacy Fund (RLF).

The dark money RLF funded law firm Sher Edling with more than $5.2 million from 2017 to 2020, which has brought "government" lawsuits against oil companies.
2017 emails show green "philanthropist" Dan Emmett discussing with Ann Carlson on funding the litigation. Emmett writes that the Sher Edling law firm has been supported by the Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation (LDF).
How much Leonardo DiCaprio donated is unknown, but on its website it was announced that $20 million in grants would be contributed to various environmental causes.

In January 2021, Ann Carlson became Biden's chief counsel to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article...group.html


The following shows that the same cabal in control of big oil and big pharma is also financing "climate lawsuits"...

Harvard’s Emmett Environmental Law Clinic was created by a $5 million grant from Dan Emmett. Harvard University’s Law Clinic has helped in staging climate change liability lawsuits, including supplying amicus briefs to give credence to the “Exxon Knew” narrative.
In May 2016, the Law Clinic partnered with the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) on a climate workshop with La Jolla alumni like Harvard's Naomi Oreskes, UCS' Peter Frumhoff, and former chief counsel for the US Department of Justice in the tobacco litigation, Sharon Eubanks.
The Emmett Institute also hosted the “Suing Over Climate Change Damages: The First Wave of Climate Lawsuits” with founding Sher Edling partner, Vic Sher.

In 2017, Oreskes and Geoffrey Supran published a manipulated study accusing ExxonMobil of misleading the public on climate change. The Rockefeller Family Fund was one of the funders of the Oreskes-Supran study. ExxonMobil was of course originally founded by Rockefeller, but the family has now gone full "woke" in support of the green electricity technocratic agenda.

In 2015, the Los Angeles Times published articles on ExxonMobil by graduate fellows in the Columbia University School of Journalism’s Energy and Environment Reporting Project.
This project was funded by the Rockefeller Brothers Fund (RBF), Rockefeller Family Fund (RFF), Energy Foundation, and Open Society Foundation (of the Anglo-Dutch royals favourite court Jew George Soros).

Andrew Sabin also generously supports UCLA’s Emmett Institute and Columbia Law School’s Sabin Center for Climate Change Law.
Sabin is closely affiliated with the Rockefeller family and funds academics at Yale, Columbia, and UCLA – 3 of the most prestigious institutions in climate litigation: https://mfgaccountabilityproject.org/wp-..._final.pdf
(https://archive.ph/KCJpx)

[Firestarter]

It would be foolish to think that mobile phones with their highly polluting batteries, are against "sustainable development", as its objectives have nothing to do with protecting the environment or preventing global warming...
As the main objective of "sustainable development" is actually implementing the technocratic agenda, they want more people to walk around with the ultimate surveillance equipment, the energy consuming, polluting smart phones, to build an "inclusive planet" (please don't ask me to explain?!).

In September 2022, the GSMA released the report "2022 Mobile Industry Impact Report: Sustainable Development Goals":

Being connected is only the first step. Unlocking the full transformative power of mobile requires the online experience to be affordable, relevant and secure. It also requires consumers to have the necessary skills to realise the full benefits *) of digital technology.

*) The "full benefits" are of course Big Brother knowing all, so that the herd can be easily controlled.

The COVID-19 plandemic has: 1) increased poverty rates and food insecurity, and; 2) decreased the level of education, gender equality and health care.
The technocratic psychos are of course pleased that with the brutal lockdowns the fools became even more dependent on the surveillance equipment calles smart phones, so even more people used them.

Especially more poor people started using smart phones, of the poorest 40% of the world population (that sometimes cannot afford primary goods), 1.2 billion people now spend their time and money on smart phones, more than double the 560 million in 2015.
Of these poor people, already 42% have access to internet through this ultimate surveillance equipment, while overall 55% of all people let smart phones control our lives: http://web.archive.org/web/2022092217211...22-web.pdf

[Firestarter]

In January 2021, green technocracy King Charles unleashed the Terra Carta to implement the green electricity sustainability that is really technocracy, sort of like an inverted magna carta...

The Terra Carta aims to provide an integrated roadmap towards an inspiring, inclusive, equitable, prosperous and sustainable future for the sake of present and future generations; one that will harness the power of Nature combined with the transformative power, innovation and resources of the private sector.

.
The Terra Carta calls for companies to sign on to implement technocracy, for which they will be awarded the green Terra Carta seal...
The Bank of America, AstraZeneca, HSBC, Heathrow Airport, and BP have already signed on.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have earlier started a similar technocratic climate change initiative, while the sickos continue to tour in their private jets: https://www.greenmatters.com/p/princes-c...erra-carta
(https://archive.ph/UkVF0)


Corporations supporting Charles' Terra Carta also include BlackRock, Fidelity International, State Street, Schroders, Refinitiv, and Unilever: https://www.esgtoday.com/investors-compa...s-charter/