[awakened53]

In my opinion, both journalists ought to have been given the opportunity to defend themselves against all of the accusations made against them. That clearly didn’t happen in the film as the decision to not to even try to talk to them was made at the beginning.

Therefore, in my opinion, all the subsequent information provided needs to be seen in that light, much of which was not strong enough to reach any conclusions.

In the interests of balance, it would be good to see whether someone will actually give them an opportunity to defend themselves.

I agree that maybe they should be given a chance to defend themselves but judging by their responses on their tweets and the language used against people I doubt whether it would be able to be shown. I thought that Sibel said that they had been invited on but didn't respond.
For me, any journalist, activist, reporter, blogger or whatever other name they go by, once they start abusing people and threatening and demeaning people like that, I lose all respect for them.
Newsbud obviously show them in a bad light, as they have threatened them too.
I have always liked Sibel, I have seen her a lot on James Corbett, and I think she is very professional.
I think that what this film exposes more than ever, and we have all discussed it on here, is that it is getting harder to work out the truth, regardless of the source, as there are so many agendas out there.
I had never heard of the two women myself, I didn't know they had been on Richie's show, but if you were listening to them in the clips about the hospital for the first time, you could easily be sucked in to their story.
I still haven't made up my mind on their motives, whether it be financial or something more sinister.