[Firestarter]

First a draft EO was leaked, but the final Executive Order was substantially altered and includes the following troubling policy proposals:

The Attorney General should judge whether any websites receiving advertising money from the government are “problematic vehicles for government speech” because of “viewpoint discrimination”
The Federal Trade Commission should investigate websites for deceptive advertising based on their terms of service

This could very well be the main reason for this EO, as this gives Donald’s AG William Barr the authority to decide which websites will receive money from the government. This could be especially important in an election year!

This appears to be THE main part of the bill (new legislation to be entered into Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934)...

‘’(3) GOOD FAITH.—For the purposes of this subsection, a provider of an interactive computer service—
‘‘(A) acts in good faith if the provider acts with an honest belief and purpose, observes fair dealing standards, and acts without fraudulent intent; and

‘‘(B) does not act in good faith if the provider takes an action that includes—
‘‘(i) the intentionally selective enforcement of the terms of service of the interactive computer service, including the intentionally selective enforcement of policies of the provider relating to restricting access to or availability of material;
‘‘(ii) enforcing the terms of service of the interactive computer service, including enforcing policies of the provider to restrict access to or availability of material, against a user by employing an algorithm that selectively enforces those terms, if the provider knows, or acts in reckless disregard of the fact, that the algorithm selectively enforces those terms;

‘‘(iii) the intentional failure to honor a public or private promise made by, or on behalf of, the provider; or
‘‘(iv) any other intentional action taken by the provider without an honest belief and purpose, without observing fair dealing standards, or with fraudulent intent.’’;

https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_a...ns_Act.pdf

So now the crooked courts can decide when Donald Trump is “selectively” insulted…


On Friday, Attorney General Bill Barr unexpectedly announced that Geoffrey S. Berman, US attorney for the Southern District of New York was stepping down to be replaced by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Jay Clayton.
After Geoffrey Berman publicly refused to step down, today Barr sent him a letter that he was fired by President Donald because you have “chosen public spectacle over public service.
Because you have declared that you have no intention of resigning, I have asked the President to remove you as of today, and he has done so.”


After this letter, Berman stepped down...
Donald Trump has denied that he was involved in firing Berman.

Berman, who contributed to Donald´s election campaign, has worked for the same law firm as Rudy Giuliani before being appointed by then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions in January 2018, months after U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara was fired.

Geoffrey Berman appears to have been fired for investigating Trump cronies a little too serious...
Berman has prosecuted or brought charges against: 1) Trump's former lawyer Michael Cohen; 2) Rudy Giuliani associates Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman. Berman also investigated Giuliani himself.
Berman's office also brought charges against Michael Avenatti, the lawyer who is best known for representing porn actress Stormy Daniels but has also advised the notorious Clare Bronfman.

It was also Geoffrey Berman, who charged Trump’s paedophile buddy Jeffrey Epstein, who was then arrested and died in prison of a supposed suicide under the responsibility of AG William Barr.
Maybe the most damaging is that Berman continued the investigation after Epstein was suicide and declared that Epstein’s close friend Prince Andrew had “provided zero co-operation” in his investigation (despite promising to do so). His office even formally requested that the US Department of Justice would ask the British Home Office so Randy Andy could be questioned as a witness: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article...erman.html


For more on Jeffrey Epstein and Bronfman: https://forums.richieallen.co.uk/showthr...p?tid=1369