The Education System
Children and young people the world over are being prepared to be nothing more than a cog in a centrally orchestrated machine and we are seeing more and more group-based ‘education’ to teach children to concede individuality to groupthink and to put even more pressure on those in the classroom that have no wish to conform. This is presented as their lack of conformity (‘ supporting the consensus’) holding back the group. The emphasis is upon ‘group learning strategies’ and all children in a group must achieve the goals before the group may move on. One term for all of this is Outcome Based Education which means ensuring a single outcome for all –a programmed mind.
This group orientation makes Outcome Based Education a system for behaviour modification of the group, not education for the individual. It is a collective modification in which competition is discouraged and the individual learns that the group is more important than them. Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) was a British writer, social critic and aristocrat from the Archontic Russell bloodline. His grandfather was Prime Minister John Russell and his official parents were Viscount and Viscountess Amberley, although you never know with royalty and aristocracy. Bertrand Russell wrote in his 1951 book, The Impact of Science on Society:
Education should aim at destroying free will so that pupils thus schooled, will be incapable throughout the rest of their lives of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished ... Influences of the home are obstructive; and in order to condition students, verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective ... ... It is for a future scientist to make these maxims precise and to discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for more than one generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen.
You cannot divide the dumbed-down education system from food additives, fluoride in drinking water, vaccines, pharmaceutical drugs, electromagnetic influences and the brain-dead media because they all come together in the war on human perception and cognition and the mutation of the human vehicle.
Michael Gove, the dreadful former Secretary in the Cameron Conservative (Tory) Government in Britain, wanted to allow corporations to establish ‘for profit’ schools independent of elected accountability. This was promoted by a pressure group called ‘Bright Blue’ under the Orwellian name of ‘free’ schools to invert what was really being suggested. A book in support of the policy says: It will be important, of course, to convince the public that this does not stem from an ideological position: that somehow private is better than public and Tories are pursuing privatisation in awe of money-making. This is not true. This is a sensible, hard-headed policy which provides alternative funding sources to boost diversity and ultimately quality of education in this country, while –and this should be said time and time again –ensuring state education remains free at the point of use.
Children and young people the world over are being prepared to be nothing more than a cog in a centrally orchestrated machine and we are seeing more and more group-based ‘education’ to teach children to concede individuality to groupthink and to put even more pressure on those in the classroom that have no wish to conform. This is presented as their lack of conformity (‘ supporting the consensus’) holding back the group. The emphasis is upon ‘group learning strategies’ and all children in a group must achieve the goals before the group may move on. One term for all of this is Outcome Based Education which means ensuring a single outcome for all –a programmed mind.
This group orientation makes Outcome Based Education a system for behaviour modification of the group, not education for the individual. It is a collective modification in which competition is discouraged and the individual learns that the group is more important than them. Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) was a British writer, social critic and aristocrat from the Archontic Russell bloodline. His grandfather was Prime Minister John Russell and his official parents were Viscount and Viscountess Amberley, although you never know with royalty and aristocracy. Bertrand Russell wrote in his 1951 book, The Impact of Science on Society:
Education should aim at destroying free will so that pupils thus schooled, will be incapable throughout the rest of their lives of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished ... Influences of the home are obstructive; and in order to condition students, verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective ... ... It is for a future scientist to make these maxims precise and to discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for more than one generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen.
You cannot divide the dumbed-down education system from food additives, fluoride in drinking water, vaccines, pharmaceutical drugs, electromagnetic influences and the brain-dead media because they all come together in the war on human perception and cognition and the mutation of the human vehicle.
Michael Gove, the dreadful former Secretary in the Cameron Conservative (Tory) Government in Britain, wanted to allow corporations to establish ‘for profit’ schools independent of elected accountability. This was promoted by a pressure group called ‘Bright Blue’ under the Orwellian name of ‘free’ schools to invert what was really being suggested. A book in support of the policy says: It will be important, of course, to convince the public that this does not stem from an ideological position: that somehow private is better than public and Tories are pursuing privatisation in awe of money-making. This is not true. This is a sensible, hard-headed policy which provides alternative funding sources to boost diversity and ultimately quality of education in this country, while –and this should be said time and time again –ensuring state education remains free at the point of use.