[Steve]

FB Post (Contract Law, Commercial Liens and Controlling your Strawman)

What is MANDATORY? definition of MANDATORY (Black's Law Dictionary)
Definition of MANDATORY: 305, 47 N. E. 623; Atlanta v. Wright, 119 Ga. 207, 45 S. E. 004; State v. Lewis, 76 Mo. 370; Ex parte Crane, 5 Pet. 190, 8 L. Ed. 92; Marbury v. Madison,

What is mandatory?

Directly from the Black's Law 'legalese' dictionary. Illegitimate "authority" and man's "law" entrapment language 101:
Definitions taken from the attached link and key words
-----------
Mandatory
"The action of mandamus [Latin for mandatory, "We command"] is one, brought in a court of competent jurisdiction, to obtain an older of such court commanding an inferior tribunal, board, corporation, or person to do or not to do an act the performance or omission of which the law enjoins as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station. Where discretion is left to the inferior tribunal or person, the mandamus can only compel it to act, but cannot control such discretion."
----------
Did you read that correctly? By legalese definition, YOU are INFERIOR to the arbitrary "laws" of the state. I thought the government and it's agencies worked for us? I thought they're supposed to protect our sovereignty?

A mandate is a LEGAL act to compel, NOT LAWFUL and "CANNOT control such discretion"...
Discretion: "Individual choice or judgement"

Translation...
The state and their agencies can try to compel you to do something, but unless you give them consent, they CANNOT take further action, by their own definition.

Just because someone in "authority" tries to command you, you have a choice. A mandate isn't a law and doesn't require your participation. Wearing a mask or getting injected is a choice...

IT IS NOT LAW OR LAWFUL

Legal and lawful are NOT the same...

You are complying with arbitrary legal acts that have no power or lawful standing
Any police officer handing out fines, demanding to see your exemption, escorting you off the premises, holding you under duress or ANY other compelling act/command are all UNLAWFUL acts/commands and have NO real power

• You do NOT need to show exemption
• You do NOT need to pay unlawful fines
• You do NOT need to cooperate

Policing is supposed to be done via consent, so they can't do a anything without it... They only get away with what they do because you're ill informed and don't know how to deal with them...
As a sovereign citizen you do  not have to comply with unlawful acts of an unlawful government and unlawful police. It's always your choice should you wish to stop complying with anyone that is enforcing these policies or acts.
We are all considered equal under real common or natural law.
• Language matters
• Consent matters
• Constitutional and Common Laws matter
• Natural Law is the source of your rights and common law is the enactment and protection of your natural rights
• Rights matter
• Freedom matters
• Cherish it and fight for it...
• When you arm yourself with knowledge you can be brave to stop complying with tyranny...?

[Steve]

FB Post (Contract Law, Commercial Liens and Controlling your Strawman)


Had some amazing success lately  with the debts and challenging these fake corporate companies.

But please be aware and this something is see and read alot in various channels. The corporate companies and councils we are dealing with are not going to bend over backwards and say sorry they made a mistake they will continue to hassle you to try to ring you, send you letters, try to threaten with bailiffs and court action.
They will not stop  and will do everything in there sneaky deciptfull way to force you into creating joinder.
So please if you are going to challenge your debts then be prepared it will not end  with them saying we are sorry.

In my all my  cases they have refused to  send the most important document the Bill of Assignment under s136 property act 1925 and the original of this contract do not except  photocopies also ask for proof of a trilateral agreement with  Novation.

They try to prove the debt with a notice of assignment but take this as complete BS this is there own made up document to try and decipt you into uttering.

Just a side note dealing with  calls  when you hear in a telephone call "we are recording this for training purposes" what they should be telling you is 'we are recoding this to prove joinder has verbally been created" and so the trap is set against you they have snared you. Stop the call and write to them advising communication is only in written form and not email  text message or any online media like live chat.

Comments …

So what do we say when we hear that? Did you say anything?

- stop the call and write to them and advise them you  will only deal with  them in writing


I NEVER answer calls from numbers I don’t recognize ... ( could be talking to a criminal - and inadvertently creating joinder with them !!!)and for some reason have never had a voicemail ... I don’t answer unsolicited texts from entities I don’t know either 

[Steve]

Parking Charges? This is so much more! Consent of the Governed -

It started as a dispute over a parking ticket, it ended revealing the UK PLC  COLOSSAL CORRUPTION. 800 years of "Law" without the consent of the Governed.

https://youtu.be/otOvAymtO6M

[Steve]

GVP #196 - Peter Stone - The Sovereign Project -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5qYnSnV3Xs (removed)

https://www.spreaker.com/user/markdevlin...6-peter-st


Notes …

Personal sovereignty and standing in our God-given power as free, living men and women is back on the agenda this episode. These are eternal Truths that the demonic, demented control system have done everything they can to conceal from the masses, and have dressed up in all manner of snidey diversions and clever wordplay, because they understand how powerful they really are in the hands of the many.

Peter Stone, originator of the new Sovereign Project initiative, gives listeners an overview of these dynamics, touching on such factors as Common Law, Equity Law, contracts, mandates, the difference between “legal” and “lawful” and much more. 

More teachers are needed in these areas, to help get the word spread as widely as possible. Anyone wishing to get involved is invited to contact sovereignteam@protonmail.com

As this information is so vital, this show’s audio has been transcribed into written form for easy reference. The document can be downloaded from here - https://www.mediafire.com/file/poenin...

(Note - this task was done by AI, so will not be a perfect rendition, but should still do the job.)

Website: www.thesovereignproject.live

Facebook page: The Sovereign Project

Facebook group: The Sovereign Fraternity

General inquiries: thesovereignproject@gmail.com

Collaboration: sovereignteam@protonmail.com

[Steve]

FB Post (Contract Law, Commercial Liens and Controlling your Strawman)

Schools will be going back soon. I don't give legal advice but my feelings are strong on this matter.
If I had sons or daughters still of school age, I would NEVER allow them back into a government indoctrination camp.
Home schooling would be the only option. Things are going to start to get tougher very soon. I would recommend that people start to pragmatically prepare rather than panic.
I am attaching a document that revokes the contract of the birth certificate. If I had a son or daughter of school age I would be using that document to revoke that contract.
Then I would study gov.uk legislation on "Elective Home Education" it stated VERY CLEARLY that the school can not refuse you doing this. I have copied and pasted it here

"If your child is currently at school, you should tell the school if you plan to educate them at home. The school must accept if you’re taking your child out completely. They can refuse if you want to send your child to school some of the time."

I strongly suggest to protect your families in this time or true and real danger that you use social distancing guidelines. i.e. keep your sons and daughters at least 2 metres away from any governmental representative or institution.
You will only get 1 chance. If you believe for 1 second that those teachers will not coerce their pupils into doing something designed to create an entire population of mutant beings, then you and your family have no chance of surviving the next 18 months.
Not giving advice, just saying, IF I had a school aged son or daughter, ...... Just saying (Peter Wilson)

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R7-F...ue&sd=true



… 

Registrar General Abi Tierney
Certificates Service Section
General Register Office
PO BOX 2
Southport
PR8 2JD
                                                                                                                                                              :fred: of the Family Smith                            
                                                                           c/o 17 Smithy way,
                                                                       Smithtown
                                                                       Smithshire                                                                                                                [AB12 3CD]
                                                                                                                   
 
Ref: [Fraudulent act committed by the Registrar General upon the registration of my sons’ live births]

If a guardian behaves fraudulently to his ward, he shall be removed from the guardianship. Jenk. Cent. 39
[Bouvier’s Maxims of Law 1856]

Plain Simple English With Plain Simple Counting Systems:
 

Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal, Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent

Affidavit verified plain statement of facts    

                                                           

God and my right:
Job 32:21 KJ Bible 1611
Let me not, I pray you, accept any man's person, neither let me give flattering titles unto man.

Daniel 4:17
This matter is by the decree of the watchers, and the demand by the word of the holy ones: to the intent that the living may know that the most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will, and setteth up over it the basest of men.

The affiant :fred: hereinafter “I”, “me” “myself” “the man “:fred: of the family/bloodline:Smith: or any derivative thereof.

The repellent: Abi Tierney in both the capacity as ABI TIERNEY and in the woman Abi Tierney’s own private capacity: Hereinafter, “you” “your” “yourself” ABI TIERNEY, “Registrar General, CEO, or any derivative thereof.

I present this affirmation as a declaration and affidavit of truth as evidence of the facts for and on the record: I am of sound mind and competent to affirm the following to be true, correct, certain and complete: I reserve all rights and waive all privileges and present this truth in honour and in good faith, and not of the intent to deceive or mislead.

I, the man commonly known as :fred: a private sentient woman, come in peace, and in honour on this day, the Twenty Third Day of the Eighth Month of the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Twenty One.




Greetings Abi,
I do hope this affidavit of truth finds you in good health and spirits, I would like to thank you very much for your personal attention to the matter at hand and do trust that a cordial and mutual respect for the law is observed by all concerned.

• It is my understanding that when a thing becomes registered with the body, the body that it is registered to shall take ownership of said thing. It is my understanding, under non-full disclosure that in this case the things in question are my sons’ commonly known as :henry: and :herbert: 
  

• It is my understanding that when I was coerced into registering my sons’ via a birth certificate with the General Registrar, I unknowingly due to non-full disclosure consented to giving up ownership of my own flesh and blood to the State.
  

• It is my understanding that upon registration of my sons’ via the birth certificate, that the State created a corporate fiction via the capitalised names HENRY SMITH and HERBERT SMITH.
  

• It is my understanding that these corporate fictions HENRY SMITH and HERBERT SMITH grants the State the authority to declare my live flesh and blood sons’ commonly known as :henry: of the family/bloodline smith and :herbert: of the family/bloodline smith as dead entities, lost at sea even though they are actually live flesh and blood creations of God.
  

• It is my understanding that you are attempting to associate my sons’ :henry: and :herbert: who are living breathing, flesh and blood creations of God, with the All Caps spelling of their Christian names which are in fact trusts previously associated with a Public Office in the UK Government through a National Insurance number and/or birth certificate that is attached to it. The following information is to clarify and render Null and Void all Unlawful presumptions and deceitful consents that you may have.
  

May I make it clear that neither yourself nor any other government officer has any kind of Plausible Deniability and from this date forward The Record Will Be Set Straight.
My sons’ :henry: and :herbert: are living breathing, flesh and blood creations of God by fact; not:
[1] A Strawman
[2] A Vessel in Commerce
[3] A Legal Entity
[4] An Ens Legis
[5] A Transmitting Utility
[6] A Debtor
[7] A Vehicle, any part of a vehicle
[8] An instrument of Conveyance
of, for, by or to The United Kingdom Government, The United Kingdom Government Corporation, The Bank of England or any other privately owned central bank or any other Government or Corporate agency by whatever name may currently be known or be hereafter named, or any of their subdivisions including but not limited to Local, National, International or Multinational Governments, Corporations, Agencies, or sub Corporations, and any de facto corporate commercial nation contracting therein, or any other Government or Agency by whatever name may currently be known or be hereafter named.
Further, my sons’ named in this affidavit are not:
[1] A citizen within
[2] A citizen of
[3] Surety for
[4] Subject of
[5] An officer of

And does not owe
 
[a] allegiance,
fealty, bond,
[c] undertaking
[d] obligation,
[e] duty,
[f] tax,
[g] impost,
[h] or tribute
to  The United Kingdom Government, The United Kingdom Government Corporation, The Bank of England or any other privately owned central bank or any other Government or Corporate agency by whatever name may currently be known or be hereafter named, or any of their subdivisions including but not limited to Local, National, International or Multinational Governments, Corporations, Agencies, or sub Corporations, and any de facto corporate commercial nation contracting therein, or any other Government or Agency by whatever name may currently be known or be hereafter named.

This is now a matter of Public Record.

I a man :fred: now tendering this affidavit, having hereinabove declared :henry: and :Herbert: proper legal status and relation to the United Kingdom and to the said de facto (Corporate) commercial United Kingdom or by whatever name it may be currently known or hereafter named, does hereby state that the declarations and statements made herein are the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth to the best of Fred Smith©’s knowledge.
Acknowledged by the binding contract of silence is acquiescence, therefore the silence and acquiescence of the Registrar General Abi Tierney, also but not limited to any public officers, agents, contractors, assigns, employees, and subsidiaries of said office, regarding this “Affidavit”, is therefore accepted and agreed to be the truth.

With silence of Corporate Office the Registrar General Abi Tierney ratifies severance of any nexus or relationship between :henry: :Herbert: and the said Bank of England and the de facto corporate commercial United Kingdom Government; being fraudulently conveyancing and operating under “Colour of Authority”. Let this be known by the [b]“Good Faith (Oxford) Doctrine” to all men and women.

I :fred:, sovereign in fact, a living flesh and blood man of God until proven otherwise, do hereby rescind and revoke for cause of failure to disclose risks, perils, and responsibilities all signatures executed in my natural and representative capacity, without exception on this date Twenty Third day of the Eighth month of the year of our Lord Two Thousand and twenty One in the matter of birth certificates for [HENRY SMITH] no.xxxxxxxxx and for [HERBERT SMITH] no.xxxxxxxx hereby rescinded, revoked, with the exception of anything for the purpose of accepting for value any such offers and/or documents, all such offers, proceedings, documents, or instruments are hereby accepted for value and returned for full credit, all such acceptance signatures whether expressed or implied remain in full force and effect.
I hereby Rescind All Signatures Nunc Pro Tunc, Tunc Pro Nunc. I hereby Revoke all Contracts Nunc Pro Tunc, Tunc Pro Nunc




Failure to respond with a point for point rebuttal to this affidavit within 7 [seven] days from the date of issuance, shall be deemed and accepted as full agreement, acceptance of all facts herein, in perpetuity with no further notification.


No entity other than the respondent has any consent to respond to this lawful affidavit of truth. Any response by any other entity shall be deemed as non-response, full acceptance by acquiescence, and shall not be acknowledged.

This Affidavit of Truth is not a letter, any response claiming it to be so is hereby rebutted in advance. Any response must be supported by an affidavit with a full legible name, title, wet ink signature, signed under oath and attestation, by the  addressed respondent only, under her full commercial and private liability and under threat and penalty of perjury, and delivered by recorded delivery in a non-windowed envelope to the mail collection point c/o-17 Smithy Way, Smithtown, Smithshire [AB12 3CD] no later than 7 [seven] days from the date from the service of this Affidavit of Truth. Disclosure must be full and non-misleading in :plain simple English: with :plain simple counting systems:

If no reply in the correct manner is received within 7 [seven] days of delivery of this Affidavit of Truth, it shall thereby be taken as your assent, agreement, confession and full acceptance of all attested to herein.

All words herein are as the man :fred: defines them.

“I, a man :fred: on my own unlimited liability, certify that I have read the above affidavit and do know that the facts contained are true, correct, certain and complete, not misleading, the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth”.
The truth is expressed in the form of an affidavit:
Further affiant sayeth nought.
Do unto others as one would have done to you:
Without prejudice,
All mistakes accepted,
With all rights reserved in peace and good faith,
Leviticus 19:15
Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honour the person of the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour.

Exodus 23:1
Thou shalt not raise a false report: put not thine hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness.  


Autographed and sealed on this Twenty Third day of the Eighth month, of the year of our lord, Two Thousand and Twenty One.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before god by :fred:

Witnessed by The Father, The Son, and The Holy Ghost

Date:                                           Autograph:
[/b]

[Steve]

FB Post (Contract Law, Commercial Liens and Controlling your Strawman)

Birth Certificate Fraud

In essence, when you were born and far too young to understand, a company with your name was created through your birth certificate. When your parents registered your birth, they actually created a company and handed ownership of that company and you over to the State (Federation/Country/Corporation/Company...all means Vessel).

It is important to remember that your parents were tricked and had no idea this was happening. This is why the State can take children from their families and it’s not be classed as kidnapping. They own your sons and daughters.

They own one tenth, because they registered the child. They have nine attempts possession. It's nine attempts at the law but there's one tenth floating about somewhere and the government have claimed that one tenth. So because I've had it from social workers many at least now three social workers on separate occasions have come out of audiences and actually said to me you you're writing what you're saying is because we have to get the birth certificate within 48 hours of taking the child. If they can't get the birth certificate, they have to reapply to be able to get the birth certificate. They have to get it because that is proof of who the slave is what the slave is and actually in legal terms they're actually only entitled to the birth certificate and not the child.

To take the child on the pretence that they are this legal personality is theft. So in legal terms, it's kidnapping. But social services can use legal kidnapping because everything is okay as long as it has the stamp legal applied to it that includes war, genocide, anything is okay as long as it's legal.

The same thing also happens when you register your car you get a document back saying "you are the registered keeper" and not the registered true-proprietor.

So obviously just spoken about registering children and the other thing like a house that we register. Though it is our vehicles and obviously either of those can allegedly be taken off you at some point in time which is quite interesting the two registered items are the things that can be taken.

You're the registered keeper of your car, you're not the proprietor, you're the keeper, you are Registered Title (paper) Proprietor of your house, not the proprietor of your house in their eyes. Now they'll argue that point and a lot of people will argue that point but it's quite easy to quell this argument and say okay if you don't put tax on the car then they'll come and take your car. Now in the legal world, taking anything from someone without a legal mechanism to do so is theft.

The legal system cannot deal with Living-Man. It can only deal with pieces of paper, the legal entity- the fiction. It only exists on paper. Only common law can deal with the Living-Being so at your birth, they created a piece of paper with "your" name on it using capital letters just like any other corporation.

This is done to dupe you later in life into thinking that you are the legal entity and not you then imaginary penalties and cost are imposed on the strawman and thinking you are it (the strawman), and pay them.

And it's a kind like an overcoat this this legal fiction.
As soon as you put it on, as soon as they invite you to put this overcoat on, and you do so, now they can grab-hold of the overcoat and throw it in jail with you in it.

But and until you put that overcoat on, they can't do anything to you because you are not that name.

You taught you are, but you're not.

The deception is done through the manipulation of words and language. They use legalese jargon that no one really understands it.

We basically have a discussion that everybody is taught incorrect, but because everybody's taught is incorrect, they believe it's correct.
Legalese is a whole language of its own. It's a complete legal jargon that's not really designed for anybody to understand it other than those that are supposedly to be enforcing it. It's something that's so complicated that not even police officers understand what they're saying.
What is wonderful is that they create their own language called legalese and it has a completely different interpretation from English. We're supposed to have this of understanding that we were within the law, and yet they don't even using the same language as we are.

The easiest way to understand legalese is to realize that there are many English words that have more than one meaning depending on whom you are talking to.

If I were to ask you what a "person" was, you'd probably say a Living-Man, a Living-Woman, or Living-Children, that's you or I.
If you were talking to someone in the law society, i.e. a police officer, lawyer, judge, banker, the government, etc... they have a different dictionary to you or I and "person" could mean company or corporation, i.e. the legal fiction (strawman). That's why they ask for "your" paper when talking to you, the proof of ID... But in Common Law, common to us, the Living-Soul, the proof for what we are is our Living-mind and our Living-body, not dead signs nor symbols of any language on paper or online.

You know if you tell a lie often enough, it becomes true or certainly the perception of truth. It's a legalese jargon that nobody understands other than those who actually come up with a jargon that really deeply understand it and even police officers don't understand it or magistrates or even judges for that matter.

[Steve]

FB Post (Contract Law, Commercial Liens and Controlling your Strawman)


Hi All

I’ve noticed that Council Tax seems to be quite a revolving issue on the group. Mainly because it’s basically fraud, and these corporations are not adhering to due Process of Law when addressing “non-payment”. They appear to be making up their own rules as they go along, to try and force men and women into involuntary servitude, who then face the nuisance of more threats and fines for non-compliance.

Having been researching and pondering on possible contents for a practical Notice for CT for a few days, I believe I’ve come up with a very powerful tool in the fight against these corrupt corporations. My latest Notice/DSAR is packed with legal and lawful questions that I believe will get any Council on the back foot. Now as a disclaimer, I’m not claiming victories for you before you even start. But read it carefully, and use the contents to your advantage - there’s some dynamite in there. I’ve structured it so that it can be utilised if you’ve received an apparent Council/Court Summons; if the Council are harrassing you for late/non-payment; or even if you’ve been paying, and you fancy asking the Council for validation of proof of claim for the payments you’ve been making.

To get the best from the Notice, you will need to obtain the D-U-N-S Number of your local District Council. This confirms that they are a run-for-profit business, and we need to use this fact against them. You can find a company’s D-U-N-S Number here:

https://www.dnb.co.uk/duns-number/lookup.html

I’ve drawn on my own due diligence and also researched a few pointers from others that I hope will make this Notice as potent as it feels to me. It doesn’t require much adjustment, but I’ve posted a Word version in the Files Section. So before you send it off, do your own due diligence and check it for errors, and make any other changes that you deem necessary. And as the title says, edit the red parts and replace them with your own details.

Finally, if this Notice helps you in any way at all, please let me know. It always fantastic to hear about success stories from within the group. I’ve a lot more posts to come that will hopefully assist at least a few of you as we go along.

Have a great Sunday ?❤️





NAME OF CEO/CFO Council Name Council Street Council District Council Town Council Postcode
Your c/o Address Your Street
Your District Your Town
Your [Postcode]
INSERT DATE Universal Postal Union Special Delivery/Signed For® Delivery Number XX XXXX XXXX XXX
Your unaccepted reference: [placed in square brackets here] Plain Simple English with Plain Simple Counting Systems:

Notice of Conditional Acceptance

Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal, Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent
F.A.O: (INSERT COUNCIL CFO/CEO NAME) acting as Chief Financial Officer for XXXXXX District Council:

This is a lawful notice. Please read it carefully. If you are in any way unsure of its meaning, we strongly recommend you seek advice from your legal department.
To reiterate, this is not a letter. Do not treat it as such. It is a notice, served under the Doctrine of Notices. This correspondence is also pursuant to Data Protection Act (DPA) 1998/2018, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) 2018, and the Freedom of Information Act 2000. As a man at law, it shall be assumed that you are sufficiently aware of your lawful/legal obligations pertaining to DPA/GDPR. Your response is required within one (1) calendar month (28 days) from the date of our Data Subject Access Request (DSAR), as required under Article 12, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). We also refer you to PD51U, and your Duty of Disclosure.

We would advise that failure to comply with our Data Subject Access Request may be construed as concealment, pursuant s.173 (3) DPA 2018, which states it is a criminal offence to alter, deface, block, erase, destroy or conceal information with the intention of preventing disclosure.

Should you, (INSERT COUNCIL CFO/CEO NAME), Chief Financial Officer at XXXXXX District Council, need advice on dealing with our request, The Information Commissioners Office (ICO) can assist. Its website is www.ico.org.uk, or they can be contacted by telephone on 0303 123 1113.
(INSERT COUNCIL CFO/CFO NAME), acting as Head of Finance for XXXXXX District Council:
I, a wo/man, :xxxxxx:, interested third party and Beneficiary for MR/MRS FULL NAME IN CAPS (trust), inform you, COUNCIL CEO/CFO, acting as Section 151 Officer for XXXXXX District Council, that it must be noted I am NOT a legal fiction person.

We conditionally accept your offer of contract, and promise to pay all monies proven to be owed by us to XXXXXX District Council, upon COUNCIL CFO/CEO under his/her full commercial liability, with clean hands in equity, provides us with, in substance, and in full and complete non-misleading disclosure, truthful clarity by way of Sworn Affidavit under penalty of perjury on the following matters, which are numbered in ascending order, one (1) through to fourteen (14):

1.Provide evidence that there is any obligation upon us, the Beneficiary of the trust, to XXXXXX District Council;
2.Provide evidence in law that I, a wo/man, am required to pay any taxes;
3.Provide evidence in law that what appears to be a private run-for-profit company, XXXXXX District Council with a D-U-N-S number of XXXXXXXXX, is lawfully permitted to set and demand payment of taxes;
4.Provide evidence that the Section 151 Officer as Trustee to the Privately Expressed Trust, does not have a Duty to Perform pursuant to the laws of Trust and Equity for the benefit of the Principal Creditors; that is, the county’s inhabitants, as per
5. Provide evidence and a copy for my records of XXXXXX District Council’s Certificate of Incorporation, which should be available on and for the public record. As per the following paragraph, Section 79 of The Local Government Act 1888 refers to the Incorporation of County Council as such:

• LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1888
Section 79 - Incorporation of county council.
(2) “All duties and liabilities of the inhabitants of a county shall become and be duties and liabilities of the council of such county”.

Please confirm or deny that XXXXXX District Council is exempt from Section 79 of The Local Government Act 1888. I have included an online reference to the Government Legislation website relating to Section 79 for your own records:

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vic...section/79

Further, in the court case The Attorney General v De Winton 1906, it was established that:
“the Treasurer is not merely a servant of the authority, but holds a fiduciary responsibility to the local taxpayer.”

6. Provide a proper bill which fulfils all the requirements of a lawful bill as per the Bills of Exchange Act 1882, with special attention to the following:
Provide evidence that there is any obligation upon us, the Beneficiary of the trust, to XXXXXX District Council;
Provide evidence in law that I, a wo/man, am required to pay any taxes;
Provide evidence in law that what appears to be a private run-for-profit company, XXXXXX District Council with a D-U-N-S number of XXXXXXXXX, is lawfully permitted to set and demand payment of taxes;
Provide evidence that the Section 151 Officer as Trustee to the Privately Expressed Trust, does not have a Duty to Perform pursuant to the laws of Trust and Equity for the benefit of the Principal Creditors; that is, the county’s inhabitants, as per the following:

LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE ACT 1972, Sec.151 clearly states that:

“every local authority shall make arrangements for the proper administration of their financial affairs, and shall secure that one of their officers has responsibility for the administration of those affairs...”

• Your registered company name, number and address.
• A full description of the goods or services supplied or provided specifically to
(INSERT YOUR ADDRESS/CARE OF ADDRESS) and the cost thereof i.e., what of value
has been exchanged? (The CONSIDERATION).
• Account for Value Added Tax, be this at zero percent (0%) or otherwise, and show
your company's VAT registration number. If you are exempt from VAT, state this
clearly on the invoice.
• The invoice document must be titled 'Invoice' and bear a legible wet ink signature of
an Officer of the company.
7. As XXXXXX District Council appear to be a private run-for-profit company who offer services for a fee, we trust that you, (CFO/CEO NAME), Chief Financial Officer at XXXXXX District Council, will make it abundantly clear to all concerned that if a Notice of Liability Order is made against us, the fees for servicing the said Order will be non-negotiable and applied in accordance with the enclosed Fee Schedule. The Notice of Liability Order will be physically presented to us;
8. In compliance with Article 22 of GDPR, I uphold our right to have a man or woman involved in the processing of my bill;
9. Provide evidence that we must pay taxes to XXXXXX County Council, who have been registered under D-U-N-S number XXXXXXXXX. If what appears a private run-for- profit company has a claim upon us, then a proper invoice must be presented to us, along with a lawful contract;
10. Please provide evidence that we must pay taxes to XXXXXX Police & Crime Commissioner, D-U-N-S number XXXXXXXXX. If what appears to be a private run-for- profit company has a claim upon us, then a proper invoice must be presented to us, along with a lawful contract;
“Affirmati, non neganti incumbit probation”. The proof lies upon him who affirms, not on him who denies.

We would like to turn your attention to the following paragraph:
• LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1888
Section 78 - Construction of Acts referring to business transferred.
(2) Provided that the transfer of powers and duties enacted by this Act shall not authorise any county council or any committee or member thereof—
(a) to exercise any of the powers of a court of record; or
(b) to administer an oath; or
© to exercise any jurisdiction under the Summary Jurisdiction Acts, or perform any judicial business, or otherwise act as justices or a Justice of the Peace;

11. Provide proof of the existence of a lawful contract between us and XXXXXX District Council which has not obtained by any deceptive means whatsoever, and which shows all the requirements of a lawful contract; the considerations of the exchange; the wet ink signatures of both parties; and witnessed by a third party.

12. THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE ACT 1992 has 200 provisions. As you, XXXXXX, CEO/CFO of XXXXXX District Council can surely appreciate, two hundred provisions is a rather extensive list of provisions to sift through.
For my own records, and on and for the record under penalty of perjury, can you, XXXXXX, CEO/CFO of XXXXXX District Council, please inform us which provision of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 have XXXXXX District Council utilised to raise the Council Tax bills that have been sent to us at our care of address;
13. Provide evidence that XXXXXX District Council is exempt from:

• The Local Government Act 1888;
• The Local Government Finance Act 1972;
• The Local Government Finance Act 1992;
• The Data Protection Act (DPA) 1998/2018;
• The Freedom of Information Act 2000; and
• General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) 2018;

14. Provide evidence under penalty of perjury that the D-U-N-S Number XXXXXXXXX does NOT indicate that XXXXXX District Council are a run-for-profit company who provide services for a fee;

We would also like to remind (INSERT COUNCIL CFO/CFO NAME), acting as Head of Finance for XXXXXX District Council, that Halsbury’s Laws of England is quite clear on the fact that all administration courts are unlawful. No administration court can ever be made lawful on the land mass of England due to the constraints placed on Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II at the time of her Coronation, and as such, no County Court or Magistrates Court has ever been sanctioned by The Queen and Parliament. This was confirmed by Lord Denning during the debates on the European Communities Amendment Bill, HL Deb 08 October 1986 vol 480 cc246-95 246 at 250.

Any attempt to hear our name in an administrative court setting would be an act of treason, and we shall require the names of every entity involved for the levelling of criminal charges.
Further, we will not allow a plea to be entered in our absence regarding this matter in any administration hearing. Nor allow this matter to be dealt with by any bulk handling centre, nor any other place of business operating without a true judge under an oath, who is presiding over a court de jure with a trial by a jury of 12 of our living peers, in a court of record.
Anyone entering a plea without our written permission will be considered the defendant and will be responsible for any and all costs incurred.
In peaceful, civilised peoples, it is established practice that if an order for a product or service is placed, the individual or company making the order must expect to pay for the servicing of that order. No reasonable man or woman ever expects to place orders and have them serviced free of charge. Even your good self, if you have a superior, and carry out said superior’s orders or wishes, you do so on the basis that you are paid a salary for doing so;

the same also holds true with us. In general, the mass population are not aware that they have the right to decline a contract and/or submit a Fee Schedule for their own appearance/performance of that contract; but any other situation is untenable, dishonourable, constitutes business malpractice, and flouts all natural human rights. Therefore, we herein offer our Fee Schedule for your acceptance before contract commences. Fee Schedule enclosed is not conclusive and is subject to change with no prior notice. Complete Fee Schedule available on request]

Fee Schedule (non-negotiable) to be settled in full within 7 days of invoice in Pounds Sterling:

Returning unacceptably marked correspondence

Receiving/reading acceptably marked correspondence

Any further direct threats of harm, injury or loss

Any further breach of personal data

Trespass against INSERT FULL NAME or property (proper-to-me)

Requirement of my presence in connection with this matter

Any unverified claim laid upon INSERT FULL NAME

Any non-pre-arranged callers in connection with this matter

Any decision/harm, injury or loss resulting in the detention of

INSERT FULL NAME

In our learned opinion, the assertion that XXXXXX District Council provide
two grounds:

£2000.00 £2000.00 £50,000 £50,000 £1,000,000 £100,000 £1,000,000 £2000
£1,000,000

a ‘service’ fails on
1. A lawful contract, not obtained by any deceptive means whatsoever, needs to exist, and this to be proved to exist showing the agreement to exchange, the considerations of the exchange, and intent to contract by both parties.
2. The considerations must be equal as both sides consider them to be, and they must come entirely from the resources of each Party. Neither party has to ability to dictate the consideration of the other; as such, any situation where a unilateral demand is made upon one party is unlawful, since the said party has not been able to determine their own consideration. Any such contract is thus void in law.
You are again reminded that under the Data Protection Act 1998/2018 and GDPR 2018, you are hereby required by law to address and answer all questions within this Notice/DSAR, and provide all requested information to us, within twenty-eight (28) days, or one calendar month.

If no response to our Data Subject Access Request is received within the 28 days given to XXXXXX, CEO/CFO of XXXXXX District Council, it shall be assumed that your acquiescence is tacit agreement and your confession of guilt, and that it is fully accepted at law and with all parties concerned, that due Process of Law was not followed correctly in this case. As such, any claims XXXXXX District Council has levied against us shall be rendered null and void, and compensation by way of a financial redress becomes due to us, along with the commencement of my Fee Schedule.

We now turn your attention and require your adherence to the following Notice:
Notice Issued Pursuant to Section 10 of The Data Protection Act 1998
Notice to agent is Notice to Principal, Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent.
This Notice is not to be treated as a complaint.

Until such time whereby the XXXXXX District Council prove legitimate interest and provide full disclosure as originally required of your Office, recognise my fundamental Human Rights, and the correction of the Agency Relationship, take note of the below:
Notice Issued Pursuant to Section 10 of the Data Protection Act 1998. Served with Immediate effect.
We write pursuant to our rights granted by Section 10 of the Data Protection Act 1998. We hereby give you notice that you must, within the time periods prescribed below, permanently cease, processing all personal data of which we are the data subject.

If you do not normally handle Data Protection notices for your organisation, under Doctrine of Office Found, please pass this notice to your Data Protection officer or another appropriate official.
The Meaning of This Notice
For the avoidance of doubt, this notice requires you to do all the following: (1) within 3 days of receipt of this letter to cease or not to begin to:
(a) obtain;
(b) record; or
© hold, any personal data of which we are the data subject (“our personal data”); and
(2) with immediate effect to cease or not to begin to carry out any operation or a series of operations involving our personal data including operations that would amount to the:
(a) organisation, adaption or alteration;
(b) retrieval, consultation, or use;
© disclosure by transmission, dissemination or otherwise making available; or (d) alignment or combination, of information or data.
Grounds For Notice
Our grounds for giving you this Notice are:

(a) the processing of our personal data by you is causing or is likely to cause substantial damage to our private estate and any family member / legal person residing with us;
(b) the processing of our personal data by you is illegal as you do not have our express written authorised consent.
© the processing of our personal data is illegal as we do not have a valid established contract.
(d) the processing of our personal data is illegal as we have no legal obligation that applies to your organisation.
(e) the processing of our personal data is illegal as it is not necessary for you to protect our vital interests.
(f) in any case the damage and / or distress is unwarranted.
No Exemption from The Provisions of Section 10 of The Data Protection Act 1998

You are not excused compliance with this Notice under the provisions of Section 10(2) of the Data Protection Act by virtue of the reasons set out below:
(1) We have not given you our consent to process our personal data.
(2) we are not party to a contract with you.
(3) You have no legal obligation with which you must comply, and which would permit you to process our personal data.
(4) No processing undertaken by you could be undertaken to protect our vital interests.

What You Must Do Next
In any event you must, within 28 days of receiving this Notice, give us notice in writing stating:

(1) you have complied with the provisions of this Notice in full; or
(2)(a) you have complied with the provisions of this Notice in part, stating which parts; and (2)(b) as to the parts not so complied with, your reasons for not doing so, including evidence that you can substantiate.

Warning: Consequences of Failure to Comply with This Notice

Should you fail to comply with the provisions of this notice, we retain absolutely the rights to obtain without further reference to you, a High Court Order to compel you to comply with this Notice together with an order that you pay our associated legal costs in full, and for us to make an application for damages associated with your unlawful processing of Personal Data.
To the best of my knowledge, all the legislative measures mentioned within this Notice and Data Subject Access Request are binding on your organisation, and as an employee of your organisation, they are also binding on you.

Please address any future correspondence in the matter to a direct living flesh and blood Self, 

namely :John-Henry of the family oe, as commonly called.
Without ill-will, vexation, or frivolity; Without prejudice;
All rights reserved;
Errors and Omissions Excepted; Without Recourse, Non-assumpsit

[Steve]

The Birth Certificate

Did you Know?

When you are Born, your Parents Register you with the Government as a Corporation by Receiving and Signing a Birth Certificate. In a few years, your cooperation will receive a Taxpayer ID# called a Social Security Number. This is so you can be used as Collateral for the Government to Acquire Debt. That’s Right, You and your Labour, Time and Energy is what Backs Up the National Debt. You are a Stock.


Stand In Your Power website ... https://www.standinyourpower.org.uk/?fbc...NIWMXGOkPc

[Steve]

FB Post -

Hi All

Here’s a ‘Lunchtime Snippet’ for the newer members...

“Statutes Explained” is a very short pdf which links nicely to yesterday’s post entitled “Living in the Private”. In fact, my writing for this post is probably longer... Lol.

As a brief overview, Government statutes, codes, legislation and acts apply to “persons” - i.e., your legal personality - but they do not apply to men and women, unless we consent to being the ALL CAPS/corporation name on our Birth Certificate, which is the name of our person/corporation on paper. This is also the fictional entity sometimes referred to as ‘The Strawman’... However, these statutes, acts etc. are binding on all corporations - hence the fact that they can be used against them.

For example, no matter what an employee or store manager says, The Equality Act 2010 is binding on any commercial public premises which denies you entry to their shop, restaurant etc for not wearing a mask... and you do not have to tell them why you’re not wearing one of you don’t wish to. After all, it’s private information - and as a private man or woman, you’re now comprehending the difference between the ‘public’ commercial realm, and the private, sovereign, living flesh-and-blood image of our Creator....

We were not given a choice as to whether we agreed with these statutes etc., but your acquiescence is taken as agreement. Fret not - you’re free to withdraw from this tacit agreement at any time, by making our feelings known in writing to whoever needs to know. Having a stand-up argument or confrontation is not the Sovereign way - emotions can sometimes get the better of us, but try to refrain from being in dishonour by arguing. Always be AS-KING by asking questions. Would a King or Queen ever argue? No, as there’s never a need. And remember, as a man or woman you are much, much more than that Royalty title they’re wearing like a jacket.

Giving these businesses and “authorities” a thousand paper cuts when appropriate can be a very fruitful endeavour, and a much more beneficial way to go.

Happy coffee time ☕️ and and always, Much Love to all
???❤️




Statutes Explained

Statutes

A Statute is nothing more than "A Legislated Rule of a Society".
And a Society is nothing more than "A group of like-minded individuals who come together to deliberate, determine, and act towards common goals".
A Society must, therefore, have:

1. A Name, such that – for “legal purposes” - it can be
distinguished from all other Societies & individuals;
2. Published its "common goals" - such that individuals can determine whether or not they are "like-minded" - and, if so, to join the Society (become Members, and thus bound by the Society's Legislated Rules i.e. Statutes);
3. A set of determined Legislated Rules (which may always be under review, extension, repeal – as deliberations continue);
4. A defined Membership – such that individuals bound by its Legislated Rules can be distinguished from all others. Including: A method of application to join, with a corresponding method for resignation – whenever an individual may feel that he or she can no longer support the “common goals”. “Applications to join” cannot be under duress, or any kind of deception. Similarly “Resignations” must be free from any recrimination, otherwise questions about the integrity of the Society are raised.

To reiterate: Individuals who become Members must have applied to join without duress, and without deception. Members so joined are bound by the Society’s Legislated Rules. Members can – by their own free will – resign at any time, without recriminations.

Thus, before attempting to apply a Statute to any individual i.e. before considering any individual is bound by any Society’s Legislated Rules, it must be shown that:

A. The Society who’s Legislated Rules are being imposed, has a distinct Name.
B. The Society has published its “common goals”;
C. The individual had joined under said individual’s own free will, without any duress imposed, and without any deception
imposed. By this means the Member has decided to TRUST the Society, and has CONSENTED to the AUTHORITY of the Society’s Disciplinary Body e.g. a Court;
D. The individual has not subsequently resigned, and thus remains a current Member.

If it is not possible to show (A) through (D), above, and action is taken against an individual, then such action is a CRIMINAL TRESPASS upon said individual’s SOVEREIGNTY, and an abuse said individual’s Natural, Inalienable, Rights - under the Common Law of the Land.

And this must apply equally to all individuals without fear or favour, because everyone is equal under the Common Law of the Land.
If you are having any kind of trouble with these concepts, they are easily resolved. Just consider your Solicitor and your Doctor.
Your Solicitor consented, of his or her own free will, to be bound by the Rules & Regulations of the Law Society, when he or she studied and became one.
Your Doctor consented, of his or her own free will, to be bound by the Rules & Regulations of the British Medical Association (another ‘society’ ... see the “soc” within the word), when he or she studied and became one.

Trying to apply the Rules & Regulations of the BMA to your Solicitor is not possible. He or she will say: “The Hippocratic Oath, and those Rules don’t apply to me ... I’m not a Doctor, and only bound by the Rules & Regulations of the Law Society”. (And the Common Law, of course ... but they forget that).
Trying to apply the Rules & Regulations of the Law Society to your Doctor is not possible. He or she will say: “The Law Society’s Rules & Regulations don’t apply to me. I’m not a Lawyer, I’m a Doctor. I’m only bound by my Hippocratic Oath, and the Rules & Regulations of the BMA”. (And the Common Law, of course ... but they forget that).

Unless, and until, it can be shown that one has consented to obey ANY set of Rules & Regulations, by one’s own free will, not under duress, or any kind of deception, ANY and ALL so-called ‘Disciplinary action’ is disreputable, despicable, and dishonourable. Because the 'Disciplinary Body' has not been given any AUTHORITY to do so. And those who perpetrate this kind of activity are simply CRIMINALS – in the true and absolute sense of that word.
This applies to Parliamentary Statutes as much as to any other Society.

The only 'law' that does not require 'consent' is the Common Law, the Law-of-the-Land.

PLEASE FEEL ENTIRELY FREE TO RUN THIS EXPLANATION PAST ANYONE IN THE “LEGAL” PROFESSION.

[Steve]

FB Post (Contract Law, Commercial Liens and Controlling your Strawman)

Birth Certificate Fraud

In essence, when you were born and far too young to understand, a company with your name was created through your birth certificate. When your parents registered your birth, they actually created a company and handed ownership of that company and you over to the State (Federation/Country/Corporation/Company...all means Vessel).

It is important to remember that your parents were tricked and had no idea this was happening. This is why the State can take children from their families and it’s not be classed as kidnapping. They own your sons and daughters.

They own one tenth, because they registered the child. They have nine attempts possession. It's nine attempts at the law but there's one tenth floating about somewhere and the government have claimed that one tenth. So because I've had it from social workers many at least now three social workers on separate occasions have come out of audiences and actually said to me you you're writing what you're saying is because we have to get the birth certificate within 48 hours of taking the child. If they can't get the birth certificate, they have to reapply to be able to get the birth certificate. They have to get it because that is proof of who the slave is what the slave is and actually in legal terms they're actually only entitled to the birth certificate and not the child.

To take the child on the pretence that they are this legal personality is theft. So in legal terms, it's kidnapping. But social services can use legal kidnapping because everything is okay as long as it has the stamp legal applied to it that includes war, genocide, anything is okay as long as it's legal.

The same thing also happens when you register your car you get a document back saying "you are the registered keeper" and not the registered true-proprietor.

So obviously just spoken about registering children and the other thing like a house that we register. Though it is our vehicles and obviously either of those can allegedly be taken off you at some point in time which is quite interesting the two registered items are the things that can be taken.

You're the registered keeper of your car, you're not the proprietor, you're the keeper, you are Registered Title (paper) Proprietor of your house, not the proprietor of your house in their eyes. Now they'll argue that point and a lot of people will argue that point but it's quite easy to quell this argument and say okay if you don't put tax on the car then they'll come and take your car. Now in the legal world, taking anything from someone without a legal mechanism to do so is theft.

The legal system cannot deal with Living-Man. It can only deal with pieces of paper, the legal entity- the fiction. It only exists on paper. Only common law can deal with the Living-Being so at your birth, they created a piece of paper with "your" name on it using capital letters just like any other corporation.

This is done to dupe you later in life into thinking that you are the legal entity and not you then imaginary penalties and cost are imposed on the strawman and thinking you are it (the strawman), and pay them.

And it's a kind like an overcoat this this legal fiction.
As soon as you put it on, as soon as they invite you to put this overcoat on, and you do so, now they can grab-hold of the overcoat and throw it in jail with you in it.

But and until you put that overcoat on, they can't do anything to you because you are not that name.

You taught you are, but you're not.

The deception is done through the manipulation of words and language. They use legalese jargon that no one really understands it.

We basically have a discussion that everybody is taught incorrect, but because everybody's taught is incorrect, they believe it's correct.
Legalese is a whole language of its own. It's a complete legal jargon that's not really designed for anybody to understand it other than those that are supposedly to be enforcing it. It's something that's so complicated that not even police officers understand what they're saying.
What is wonderful is that they create their own language called legalese and it has a completely different interpretation from English. We're supposed to have this of understanding that we were within the law, and yet they don't even using the same language as we are.

The easiest way to understand legalese is to realize that there are many English words that have more than one meaning depending on whom you are talking to.

If I were to ask you what a "person" was, you'd probably say a Living-Man, a Living-Woman, or Living-Children, that's you or I.
If you were talking to someone in the law society, i.e. a police officer, lawyer, judge, banker, the government, etc... they have a different dictionary to you or I and "person" could mean company or corporation, i.e. the legal fiction (strawman). That's why they ask for "your" paper when talking to you, the proof of ID... But in Common Law, common to us, the Living-Soul, the proof for what we are is our Living-mind and our Living-body, not dead signs nor symbols of any language on paper or online.

You know if you tell a lie often enough, it becomes true or certainly the perception of truth. It's a legalese jargon that nobody understands other than those who actually come up with a jargon that really deeply understand it and even police officers don't understand it or magistrates or even judges for that matter.