[Steve]

Northampton county court admisson …

No judges or anyone legally trained. Shocking. What happened to a fair trial?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?fbclid=IwAR2...e=youtu.be

[Steve]

Peace Constables and Implied Right of Access -

https://youtu.be/1eNEDBki8MA


Template -


Notice of Removal of Implied Right of Access


NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

You are advised to read the following notice thoroughly and carefully. It is a lawful notice. It informs you. It means what it says. I hereby give notice that the implied right of access to the property known as and in situ, (YOUR FULL ADDRESS) and surrounding areas, has been removed, along with all associated property including, but not limited to, any private conveyance in respect of the following:

1. ANY employee, principal, agent, third party, trustee, representative or any other person acting on behalf of or under the instruction of any CORPORATE BODY (i.e. Company) howsoever named and,

2. ANY POLICE OFFICER who is acting for the CORPORATE POLICE and NOT acting as a Constable for and on behalf of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and her people as expressed in the Oath of Office of all POLICE men and women, that is as Public Servants, upon your Oath of Office to serve "with fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality, upholding fundamental human rights and according equal respect to all people; and that I will, to the best of my power, cause the peace to be kept and preserved and prevent all offences against people and property"

Any and all access to the above mentioned properties shall be by strict invitation only and shall be subject to terms and conditions, available by written request.


Case Law:

Davis v Lisle [1936], McArdle v Wallace [1964], Lambert v Roberts [1981], Knox v Anderton [1983], R. v Leroy Roberts [2003]
Any permission that you believe you may have from me is hereby withdrawn. If you believe that you have power of attorney to act on my behalf you are hereby fired, and any consent that you believe you may have, tacit or otherwise, is hereby withdrawn.

Please Note: If you violate this notice, then you agree to pay £10,000 (ten thousand Great British pounds) and are hereby notified that Castle Doctrine shall be invoked, and reasonable force, up to and including deadly force shall be used to defend this home, its inhabitants, and/or their property.
Case Law: R. v Robert White [2022]







Bailiff at the Door - guidance 

Ask the Bailiff the following questions:

Ask the caller to formally identify themselves – with card credentials. Without this, proceed no further – no further contact can be permitted.

Do NOT sign any document offered to you by the bailiff. Do not accept any paperwork. Do NOT confirm your name, identity or date of birth.

Do NOT admit the “debt”.

Questions / Statements

• What is their bailiff's certificate number?

• Which County Court certificated them?

• What their business name and address is?

• Ask for a full breakdown of their fees.

• Ask to see their warrant and take a photograph of it. Make a note of whether the warrant/order has a court stamp and/or the signature of an agent of the court. Remember - Court warrants do not show Bailiff fees – these are usually placed on a re-printed version of the warrant which is not lawful.

• Ask if they have a Walking Possession Order; if so, ask them to hold it for you while you take a photograph. (Again, do not accept it if he offers it to you! Just holding it is consent!)

• If their warrant did not have either a court stamp, the signature of a court official, or both, then tell them politely and kindly that the warrant is invalid, and why.

• Ask them to complete and sign for your records, the template letter confirming their attendance on your property. When completed, post it through your mailbox.

• Take a photograph of the bailiff with your front door in the background.

• Ask if they saw the notice at the front gate - the Notice of Removal of Implied Right of Access.

• Tell them politely and kindly that they have committed the statutory offence of trespass, because they have failed to comply with your notice and you will be pursuing damages in court.

• As they depart go with them and take photographs of them leaving your property (ideally with the notice in the background).
You then have the evidence to pursue them in the County Court and need to take a small claim against them. In the UK, follow this link for more information www.moneyclaim.gov.uk

Ask the Bailiff the following questions:

Here is the Case Law that goes with it (also note that a Bailiff CANNOT remove the "tools of your trade" OR "your means of transport" UNLESS it is the verdict of a Jury):

A debtor can remove right of implied access by displaying a notice at the entrance [see the link, above]. This was endorsed by Lord Justice Donaldson in the case of Lambert v Roberts [1981] 72 Cr App R 223 - and placing such a notice is akin to a closed door but it also prevents a bailiff entering the garden or driveway, Knox v Anderton [1983] Crim LR 115 or R. v Leroy Roberts [2003] EWCA Crim 2753

Debtors can also remove implied right of access to property by telling him to leave: Davis v Lisle [1936] 2 KB 434 similarly, McArdle v Wallace [1964] 108 Sol Jo 483

A person having been told to leave is now under a duty to withdraw from the property

with all due reasonable speed and failure to do so he is not thereafter acting in the execution of his duty and becomes a trespasser with any subsequent levy made being invalid and attracts a liability under a claim for damages, Morris v Beardmore [1980] 71 Cr App 256.

Bailiffs cannot force their way into a private dwelling, Grove v Eastern Gas [1952] 1 KB 77

Otherwise a door left open is an implied license for a bailiff to enter, Faulkner v Willetts [1982] Crim LR 453 likewise a person standing back to allow the bailiff to walk through but the bailiff must not abuse this license by entering by improper means or by unusual routes, Ancaster v Milling [1823] 2 D&R 714 or Rogers v Spence [1846] M&W 571

Ringing a doorbell is not causing a disturbance, Grant v Moser [1843] 5 M&G 123 or R. v Bright 4 C&P 387 nor is refusing to leave a property causes a disturbance, Green v Bartram [1830] 4 C&P 308 or Jordan v Gibbon [1863] 8 LT 391

Permission for a bailiff to enter may be refused provided the words used are not capable of being mistaken for swear words, Bailey v Wilson [1968] Crim LR 618.

If the entry is peaceful but without permission then a request to leave should always be made first. Tullay v Reed [1823] 1 C&P 6 or an employee or other person can also request the bailiff to leave, Hall v Davis [1825] 2 C&P 33

A debtor can use an equal amount of force to resist a bailiff from gaining entry, Weaver v Bush [1795] 8TR, Simpson v Morris [1813] 4 Taunt 821, Polkinhorne v Wright [1845] 8QB 197. Another occupier of the premises or an employee may also take these steps: Hall v Davis [1825] 2 C&P 33.

Also wrongful would be an attempt at forcible entry despite resistance, Ingle v Bell [1836] 1 M&W 516

Bailiffs cannot apply force to a door to gain entry, and if he does so he is not in the execution of his duty, Broughton v Wilkerson [1880] 44 JP 781
A Bailiff may not encourage a third party to allow the bailiff access to a property (ie workmen inside a house), access by this means renders the entry unlawful, Nash v Lucas

Ask the Bailiff the following questions:

[1867] 2 QB 590

The debtor's home and all buildings within the boundary of the premises are protected

against forced entry, Munroe & Munroe v Woodspring District Council [1979] Weston- Super-Mare County Court

Contrast: A bailiff may climb over a wall or a fence or walk across a garden or yard provided that no damage occurs, Long v Clarke & another [1894] 1 QB 119

It is not contempt to assault a bailiff trying to climb over a locked gate after being refused entry, Lewis v Owen [1893] The Times November 6 p.36b (QBD)

If a bailiff enters by force he is there unlawfully and you can treat him as a trespasser.

Curlewis v Laurie [1848] or Vaughan v McKenzie [1969] 1 QB 557

A debtor cannot be sued if a person enters a property uninvited and injures himself

because he had no legal right to enter, Great Central Railway Co v Bates [1921] 3 KB 578

If a bailiff jams his boot into a debtors door to stop him closing, any levy that is subsequently made is not valid: Rai & Rai v Birmingham City Council [1993] or Vaughan v McKenzie [1969] 1 QB 557 or Broughton v Wilkerson [1880] 44 JP 781

If a bailiff refuses to leave the property after being requested to do so or starts trying to force entry then he is causing a disturbance, Howell v Jackson [1834] 6 C&P 723 - but it is unreasonable for a police officer to arrest the bailiff unless he makes a threat, Bibby v Constable of Essex [2000] Court of Appeal April 2000.

if the debtor strikes the bailiff over the head with a full milk bottle after making a forced entry, the debtor is not guilty of assault because the bailiff was there illegally Vaughan v McKenzie [1969] 1 QB 557, likewise R. v Tucker at Hove Trial Centre Crown Court, December 2012 if the debtor gives the bailiff a good slap.

If a person strikes a trespasser who has refused to leave is not guilty of an offence: Davis v Lisle [1936] 2 KB 434

License to enter must be refused BEFORE the process of levy starts, Kay v Hibbert [1977] Crim LR 226 or Matthews v Dwan [1949] NZLR 1037

A bailiff rendered a trespasser is liable for penalties in tort and the entry may be in breach of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights if entry is not made in accordance with the law, Jokinen v Finland [2009] 37233/07

If a police officer arrests a debtor after throwing a bailiff off the premises who had refused a request to leave, the officer is guilty of false arrest because no offence has been committed and the bailiff was there illegally: Green v Bartram [1830] 4 C&P 308.
A police officer must arrest a bailiff for breach of the peace if he places the debtor in fear of violence or harm if that offence is made in the presence of that officer: R v Howell (Errol) [1982] 1 QB 427.

Ask the Bailiff the following questions:

A person performing certificated work without a certificate commits an offence. Section 63(6) of the Tribunals Courts and Enforcement Act 2007.

A person not a certificated bailiff conducting levy is trespass, Hawes v Watson [1892] 94 LT 191 ;[1890] 29 LJ 556; contrast Varden v Shread [1890] 36 EG 449 or 25 LJ 363, Harker v Browne [1890] 36 EG 59, [1892] 40 EG 402, Thomas v Millington [1894] 2 PMR 472, Bray v Naldred [1894] 2 PMR 227 and Rodgers v Webb [1912] 20 PMR 186, Bray v Naldred [1894] 2 PMR 227
The constable must check the bailiff's certificate and his Warrant and if he is unable to show both documents then the constable is required to remove the Bailiff from site under section 125b of the County Courts Act 1984 or for a Traffic related debt, arrest him under Section 78(7) of the Road Traffic Act 1991 or Section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006 as he is required to carry them in an intelligible form when attending a debtors address. Buller's Case [1587] 1 Leonard 50 or Andrews v Bolton Borough Council [2011] HHJ Holman, Bolton county court, June 2011

[Authority924]

UCC GROUP FB POST -

This fragment is excerpted from his book “Brief History of the Future”, published in France in 2006:
“In the future it will be a question of finding a way to reduce the population. We will start with the old
man, because once he is over 60-65 years old, man lives longer than he produces and it costs society
dearly.

Then the weak and then the useless who do not contribute anything to society because there will be
more and more, and especially finally the stupid.
Euthanasia directed at these groups; euthanasia must be an essential instrument of our future societies,
in all cases.

Of course, we will not be able to execute people or organize camps. We will get rid of them by making
them believe that it is for their own good.

Too large a population, and for the most part unnecessary, is something economically too expensive.
Socially, it is also much better for the human machine to stop abruptly rather than gradually deteriorate.
We won’t be able to pass intelligence tests on millions and millions of people, you can imagine!
We will find something or cause it; a pandemic that targets certain people, a real economic crisis or not,
a virus that will affect the old or the elderly, it does not matter, the weak and the fearful will succumb.
The stupid will believe it and ask to be treated. We will have taken care of having planned the
treatment, a treatment that will be the solution.

The selection of idiots will therefore be done by itself: they will go to the slaughterhouse alone.


………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………


May be of interest.


GAS, ELECTRICITY, WATER and a little bit more ...
No one ever pays for Gas/Elec. All these providers do not provide Gas/Elec. They are a Government Billing Company. That is all. This is WHY They never sign a Letter.

They have a Government Licence and they CANNOT turn off the Service. The British National Grid is a Piping Service and No Judge has the Authority to tell the National Grid to cut off the Supply. Find out the facts first. Paul Websat made the Judge throw out the case. This is why they want to get INTO your House to fit a PAYG meter. They CANNOT cut off the supply and they NEVER make a claim for Breach of Contract. That would be simple. But not so simple when you dont have a valid contract. If they could cut off the supply this would be hapenning all the time. It dosent.

Forced entry into your home. Rented or Private it dosent matter.
No one under any conditions can force entry into your Home.

So lets Keep this simple. Are you at War? No. Has there been a declaration of War? No.

So this is a civil matter? No Force can be used in a Civil matter. That would be an Act of terrorism. 

Can a utility Company force entry into your Home? NO. This is a cival matter. This is a cival matter. NO force can be used in a cival matter. Anyone using force in a Civil Matter is a TERRORIST by default. 

The Police soon back away when you say this. They cannot use force in a Civil matter. You cannot be held in contempt of Court in a Civil matter. The Judge or Justice of the piece can go swivel. This is a civil matter and NO force can be used as it is an act of terrorism to do so. 
It's that simple. Just keep your cool.

The Police cannot adjudicate either. The police cannot argue that the paper is real they cannot adjudicate. 

So if the Locksmith opens the door. You stand your ground and if the Monkey from the utility company pushes past you. Then THAT is the use of force which is a wilful and belligerent act of terrorism. At that Point the police officer has got to arrest and charge the utility company Monkey-boy.

The utility company never make a claim for breach of contract do they? Think about that. Circa 65 million people do not have a valid contract with any of the utility companies. Keep thinking. This is a shitload of fraud country wide by every utility company. Gas, Electric, Water. An Englishman’s Home is his castle and any use of force is an act of War.

So the piece of paper they are waving around with a claim under an Act.... IS the valid material evidence that there is NO VALID CONTRACT. 

The application In Court is vexatious and fraudulent claim. There is no Contract where the claim under the Act can be implemented. No One has a Contract with a utility company.

There was a Guy in Bolton Paul Webster. He defended in court and the Judge threw the case out because the applicant cannot present a valid Claim or contract.

Is this getting big now? All the Utility Companies Guilty of fraud By default as there is no Valid Contract. 

WE would think That 350,000 Police officers and Gold Commanders would be interested in this FACT because they are getting screwed as well.

What about the Banks? Is that a civil matter? Yes.

Do the Banks ever make claim in court for Breach of Contract? No

You CANNOT be held in Contempt of Court in a Civil Matter. If they did then they would have to arrest you for Contempt of Court and that would be the use of force in a cival matter which would be an act of terrorism by default.

You CANNOT be held in contempt of Court in a Civil matter. The Court Judge would be guilty of an Act of terrorism by default.

Here is the cool part. Listen very carefully. The office of the police Cannot adjudicate. The role of the police is to use force... "Police FORCE" The Police have Jurisdictional Boundaries to comply with as well. 

This is where it gets really exciting. The office of the police FORCE is not only crime prevention but it is also to use FORCE to suppress a wilful and belligerent act of terrorism UNDER their Jurisdictional boundaries. That would include the office of the Judiciary. Any Government officer. Any Third party company by way of licence by HM Parliaments and Governments.

The office of the Police FORCE has full and unconditional discretionary powers to use FORCE where needed which falls under their Jurisdiction. However we do not fall under their Jurisdiction. We are not on the public Parole. We are NOT members of the Public ON the public Payroll. We are in the Private at all times by this fact and the office of the Police FORCE Jurisdiction Does NOT extend into the private. 

Knowledge is power. A civil Matter is a Civil matter. The County Court District Judge who grants a warrant for repossession to the Banks can go Swivel. You cannot be in contempt of court in a Civil Matter.

How many more times do we use the words... CIVIL MATTER before the penny drops and the light goes on. 

Yes I can hear the screams. The Police are compartmentalised Brain dead. OK. I here you. So you draft this up. 

Copy and Paste. Then email all the Chiefs of police. Some below may have changed. Job done. Now they are de-compartmentalised times a thousand times by email.

How simple is that?
Well if you don’t. Then you deserve to get screwed over don’t you.

Email: andy.marsh@No one ever pays for Gas/Elec. 

All these providers do not provide Gas/Elec. They are a Government Billing Company. That is all. This is WHY Then never signe a Letter. 

They have a Government Licence and they CANNOT turn off the Service. 

The British National Grid is a Piping Service and No Judge has the Authority to tell the National Grid to cut off the Supply. 

Find out the facts first son. Paul Websat made the Judge throw out the case. 

This is why they want to get INTO your House to fit a PAYG meter. They CANNOT cut off the supply and they NEVER make a claim for Breach of Contract. That would be simple. But not so simple when you dont have a valid contract. If they could cut off the supply this would be hapenning all the time. It dosent., 

simon.byrne@cheshire.pnn.police.uk, ian.dyson@cityoflondon.pnn.police.uk, iain.spittal@cleveland.pnn.police.uk, jerry.graham@cumbria.pnn.police.uk, acpo@derbyshire.pnn.police.uk, shaun.sawyer@devonandcornwall.pnn.police.uk, debbie.simpson@dorset.pnn.police.uk, michael.barton@durham.pnn.police.uk, simon.prince@dyfed-powys.pnn.police.uk, stephen.kavanagh@essex.pnn.police.uk, suzette.davenport@gloucestershire.pnn.police.uk, ian.hopkins@gmp.pnn.police.uk, gary.shewan@gmp.pnn.police.uk, jeff.farrar@gwent.pnn.police.uk, andy.marsh@hampshire.pnn.police.uk, andy.bliss@Herts.pnn.police.uk, justine.curran@humberside.pnn.police.uk, alan.pughsley@kent.pnn.police.uk, steve.finnigan@lancashire.pnn.police.uk, simon.cole@leicestershire.pnn.police.uk, neil.rhodes@lincs.pnn.police.uk, andrew.j.cooke@merseyside.pnn.police.uk, baileysr@norfolk.pnn.police.uk, mark.police@nthwales.pnn.police.uk, dave.jones@northyorkshire.pnn.police.uk, simon.edens@northants.pnn.police.uk, george.hamilton@psni.police.uk, steve.ashman@northumbria.pnn.police.uk, chris.eyre4011@nottinghamshire.pnn.police.uk, phil.gormley@scotland.pnn.police.uk, bernard.higgins@scotland.pnn.police.uk, peter.vaughan@south-wales.pnn.police.uk, david.crompton@southyorks.pnn.police.uk, jane.sawyers@staffordshire.pnn.police.uk, chiefofficer@jersey.pnn.police.uk, gareth.wilson@suffolk.pnn.police.uk, surreychiefconstable@surrey.pnn.police.uk, giles.york@sussex.pnn.police.uk, francis.habgood@thamesvalley.pnn.police.uk, martin.jelley@warwickshireandwestmercia.pnn.police.uk, anthony.bingham@westmercia.pnn.police.uk, david.thompson@west-midlands.pnn.police.uk, dee.collins@westyorkshire.pnn.police.uk, mike.veale@wiltshire.pnn.police.uk

If you cant copy and paste or use Email then find a good 10 year old to help,Enjoy!


………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Thanks for the invite. I hope to be of value to the group.



Here's some of my research to date. Always happy to hear comments, questions and corrections.

I have lived in the jurisdiction of Common Law for about a decade.

I never reply to any unsolicited communication from the government, or other agencies. I pay no tax, water or electricity.

I never get any POST from the government or the agencies.

What I do get though is INTERNAL MAIL, which is wrongly delivered to me.

What appears to be Census, Council Tax, Water Rates, Credit Card Bills in the UK and anything else that comes in an envelope with a clear window showing your, or your address, details are not what they seem.

All this MAIL appears to have your contact details.

But with MAIL, the details shown through the clear window on the envelope are not a real name and address, even though they seem like it.

They are the  details of a government run trust fund.

Mail has no Post Office stamp of value on it. It just has a printed image where a stamp normally goes and a window in the envelope where the details pertaining to a trust fund can be seen.

These trust fund details are deliberately similar to your contact details to fool you.

If you check all the MAIL you receive, you will note that different organisations, bank accounts, gas bills, credit card, council tax etc. all have subtly different details showing through the window.

This difference may be as simple as a full stop after an initial, or capitalisation of the details.

To a human these are not noteworthy, but a computer recognises that these differences are very important and refer to completely separate financial trust funds.

The numerical details on the documents inside the envelopes are just statements. Like ‘It’s a nice day’ is a statement. It isn’t a fact.

They look like invoices, which require payment, but they aren't invoices and you don’t need to pay a penny.

They are just requests for a voluntary contribution.

You don’t have to pay them as they are issued in a different jurisdiction of law from the one that applies to you.

It’s like getting a bill from Japan, when you’ve never left this country. It's a con.

Sometimes they simply send an envelope, enclosing a form of some type with your address details, as a phishing scam.

These are commonly addressed to the Licence Payer, the Occupier and The Householder (the latter in the case of the census), or some such anonymous person.

They can all be ignored.

I’ve been ignoring these for years now, with no problem.

Even a summons to court is simply internal MAIL, referring to a trust fund. It can just as well be ignored.

A summons is a request that can be accepted or turned down. It’s just another one of their sharp practices aimed at taking more money from you

If you accept the invitation, you are then likely to accept any fine imposed.

POST (as opposed to mail) will always have an address written on the envelope, not showing from a document inside it.

POST will also have a postage stamp of the appropriate value affixed to it, not printed on the envelope in place of a proper postage stamp.

If postal workers were correctly educated, they would deliver the MAIL straight to the PO BOX on the back of the envelope.

Although it is designed to get to you, to deceive you, it is not addressed to you.

So you see, in reality you never get any bills.

No bills means Nesara / Gesara is here.

You may think we should pay for these services, but we already have.

A portion of our slice of ownership of the country’s resources (this is from the Bible) is turned into money when we enter into any transaction with a company.

There is no need to pay a second time.

On the other side of this madness, when we have won the real bills will be a fraction of what we are asked for now.

If you mistakenly open some internal Royal Mail. Don't worry, it’s not a crime.

Historically I'd just bin, but now we need to show them that their game is up.

What everyone needs to do with all MAIL is:

1 reseal it, if opened

2 cover the window exposing the details

3 write 'undelivered - the game is up' on it

4 pop it back in a post box

The more people that do this, the sooner the madness ends. The trusts will become worthless.

In the meantime write a letter to the organisation that sent you the letter, enclosing this information. It will probably be a surprise to them that this fraud has finally been discovered after so many years.



More useful links below:

This document Post vs Mail:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bo8c...sp=sharing

(Un)Funny Money

https://docs.google.com/document/d/18IDx...sp=sharing

The STRAWMAN:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GhpT...sp=sharing

Trusts

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gBTa...sp=sharing

An end to corporate greed and unaccountability

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Gkfv...sp=sharing

The Gilded Cage

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jbHg...sp=sharing

Get back to Common Law:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Q1nk...sp=sharing

Why you never need pay a bill again:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bo8c...sp=sharing

Vehicles, not VEHICLES

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KIEh...sp=sharing

More on Common Law:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qT9k...sp=sharing

For information about how we got into this mess and ways how to get out, The Red Pill: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tQE4...sp=sharing

See this for excellent info about the various legal jurisdictions done by Brian Guignard https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1...EIm20ZLceZ

Santos Bonacci - Reclaiming Dominion Part 1 - video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zz77ZKOasv0

Peter Wilson - 2021 Return To Democracy - video

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCne3h6d...VCg/videos

Romley Stewart - Deception in legal wordings - text

https://justiniandeception.wordpress.com/

Stacey Grace Evans - Contract deceptions - FB page

https://www.facebook.com/staceyofthefamily.evans.9

For more detailed info about the history (ongoing research) of the global madness created by UK legislative Statutes:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jAtu...sp=sharing

I have some doubts regarding a Locksmith's work. Could a qualified locksmith south east london unlock your door without any of your permission? even if a policeman is requesting that. A locksmith is not in charge, and as far as I can understand this can be treated like a violation of the law but I could be wrong

[Steve]

Telegram - https://t.me/utility_meters_replaced/12041

The Utility Bill Scam 

[Steve]

Confirmation - baliffs CANNOT force entry for any civil matter -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wm3vHtpjy24

(https://bailiffadviceonline.co.uk)

[Steve]

FB POST - Contact Law / Private Trusts / Law Common to Man / PMAs

I cancelled my direct debit in December and then paid my Council Tax by online payment up to the end of the last year to 1 April. In January I started the Notice Process to the Chief Executive as follows:

1. DSAR including Notice of Processing of Personal Data, and Removal of Implied Right of Access.

- They sent a template letter.

2. DSAR 2.

- They acknowledged receipt but did not respond.

3. Notice of Conditional Acceptance.

- They acknowledged receipt but did not respond.

4. Notice of Default & Opportunity to Cure.

- They acknowledged receipt but did not respond.

5. Letter Before Action - threatening court action and complaint to ICO and LGO due to failure to respond to DSARS.

- They sent a bill which I returned to sender.

6. Notice of Termination with Cease & Desist - including the following documents as proof of our standing as the living woman and Secured Party Creditor and not the presumed legal fiction:

• UCC Debtor Information Search Report of Firstname Lastname as a Secured Party Creditor

• Lawful Notice & Demand

• Living Testimony in the form of an Affidavit of Standing

• Security Agreement between Ms FIRSTNAME LASTNAME (debtor) and :Firstname: (creditor).

• Limited Company Certificate

• Oath to the Barons under Article 61

Then, a week later I received a letter to ‘the occupier’ requesting registration for council tax. Which I’m obviously not going to fill-in pursuant to the 2019 Court of Appeal ruling that there is no legal obligation for us to provide any personal details to the council.

Does this mean I’ve won? Does this mean they’ve stopped pursuing me? Anyone else experienced this?

Comments - 

Well done, be prepared for more letters from them, they do not give in, i stopped them last year after they failed to respond to my request for a commercial true bill, they passed on to a debt collector who was sent a DSAR they bottled and passed back, now they are starting their games all over again

In their own handbook it states Form A for council tax liability order was withdrawn from law in October 2003 and has never been replaced since and all future enforcement action would be jeopardized

Hi, I admire your courage to fight this corrupt system we're living in. I cancelled this week but I have no idea where to start with writing a DSAR. Did you use a template?


I'm also learning about the Trust fund and am wondering where to start with that. Any advice on the best way to go about it? Or who to contact please?

I started with water and utilities then Ct. ignore the trust until you’ve done the basics.

… thank you so much. I did utilities last June, my water is abit more tricky as it's automatically joint to my rent. I've cancelled my council tax DD last week and not sure what steps now. Do you have tips on how to write a DSAR or who to gi to for help please?

[Steve]

Telegram - https://t.me/utility_meters_replaced/13866

Some useful info here 

Dig  much deeper because the Vatican make billions if the birth goes ahead  and banning abortions was just a agenda so that those with invested interest would NOT lose money.

Whether we realized it or not,  until recently, we were all ‘legally’ debt or ‘labor’ slaves, as were  our parents, our grandparents and great grandparents before us.

Since 1933 every new child born was required to be ‘registered’, thereby  creating a Corporate Person, effectively denying that child any rights  as an owner of Real Property.

The act of registering a child  contracted them as chattel, and the birth record was a deceptive legal  way of getting the parents to sign the baby away. The birth record was  in fact a promissory note that was converted into a slave bond, which  was then sold to a private reserve bank effectively giving ownership of  the child to the bank.

Each new baby’s contract was sealed by  either a drop of their blood or by an ink impression of their foot onto  the birth record. This ‘signature’ was used to create their lifetime value, evidenced by their labor and the taxes and costs of that labor as  monetized currency – all designed to keep people in servitude for their  entire lifetime.

The banks have been the modern slave owners and  as the saying goes, “He who owns the debt owns the people.” The way the  Slavery System was imposed on us meant that even if we did end up  paying off our house or our car, we never actually owned it, because our  right to any Real Property ownership was given away at the registration  of our birth.

This has been legal process since 1540 via  something called a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust, and this was still in effect  until the recent UCC Rulings changed the legal landscape and reinstated  the un-rebuttable fact that no-one can own our ‘selves or own our  bodies.

The slavery system remained intact for so long because of  educational doctrines, the influence of our community at large and  because so many people accepted and embraced their slavery by waiting  for others to help them or to tell them what they should/could or  should/could not do. Enforcers like the police and courts made sure we  stayed within the slavery system and incarcerated us if we chose to live  as FREE individuals.

In fact, the slavery system was imposed on  us all (and maintained for centuries) by building walls in our minds  through propaganda and conditioning, creating the false belief that we  did not deserve better, that we were not part of a greater plan and that  we should instead be happy with the handouts, crumbs and ‘indulgences’  given to us by the Powers That Were (PTW), while the system itself  reaped in millions of dollars/Pounds every year, directly from the sweat and blood of our labor.

[Steve]

FB Post (Contract Law / Private Trusts)

The Wizard of Oz = the Crown Temple.

This is not a mere child’s story written by L. Frank Baum.

What symbol does “Oz” stand for? Ounces…Gold, what is the yellow brick road? Bricks or ingot bars of gold.

The character known as the Straw Man represents that fictitious ALL CAPS legal fiction – a PERSON – the Federal U.S. Government created with the same spelling as your Christian birth name.

Remember what the Straw Man wanted from the Wizard of Oz? A brain! No legal fiction has a brain because they have no breath of life! What did he get in place of a brain? A Certificate. A Birth Certificate for a new legal creation. He was proud of his new legal status, plus all the other legalisms he was granted. Now he becomes the true epitome of the brainless sack of straw who was given a Certificate in place of a brain of common sense.

What about the Tin Man?

Does Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) mean anything to you? The poor TIN Man just stood there mindlessly doing his work until his body literally froze up and stopped functioning. He worked himself to death because he had no heart nor soul. He’s the heartless and emotionless creature robotically carrying out his daily task as if he was already dead. He’s the ox pulling the plow and the mule toiling under the yoke. His masters keep him cold on the outside and heartless on the inside in order to control any emotions or heart he may get a hold of.

The pitiful Cowardly Lion was always too frightened to stand up for himself. Of course, he was a bully and a big mouth when it came to picking on those smaller than he was. They act as if they have great courage, but they really have none at all. All roar with no teeth of authority to back them up. When push came to shove, the Cowardly Lion always buckled under and whimpered when anyone of any size or stature challenged him. He wanted courage from the Grand Wizard, so he was awarded a medal of “official” recognition. Now, regardless of how much of a coward he still was, his official status made him a bully with officially recognized authority. He’s just like the Attorneys who hide behind the Middle Courts of the Temple Bar.

What about the trip through the field of poppies? They weren’t real people, so drugs had no effect on them. The Wizard of Oz was written at the turn of the century, so how could the author have known America was going to be drugged? The Crown has been playing the drug cartel game for centuries. Just look up the history of Hong Kong and the Opium Wars. The Crown already had valuable experience conquering all of China with drugs, so why not the rest of the world?

Who finally exposed the Wizard for what he really was? Toto, the ugly (or cute, depending on your perspective) and somewhat annoying little dog. Toto means “in total, all together; Latin in toto.” Notice how Toto was not scared of the Great Wizard’s theatrics, yet he was so small in size compared to the Wizard, no-one seemed to notice him. The smoke, flames and hologram images were designed to frighten people into doing as the Great Wizard of Oz commanded. Toto simply went over, looked behind the curtain – the court – (see the definition for curtain above), saw it was a scam, and started barking until others paid attention to him and came to see what all the barking was about. Just an ordinary person controlling the levers that created the illusions of the Great Wizard’s power and authority. The veil hiding the corporate legal fiction and its false courts was removed. The Wizard’s game was up. It’s too bad that people don’t realize how loud a bark from a little dog is. How about your bark? Do you just remain silent and wait to be given whatever food and recognition, if any, your legal master gives you?

Let’s not forget those pesky flying monkeys. What a perfect mythical creature to symbolize the Bar Association Attorneys who attack and control all the little people for the Great Crown Wizard, the powerful and grand Bankers of Oz – Gold. What is it going to take to expose the Wizard and tear down the court veil for what they really are? Each of us needs only a brain, a heart and soul, and courage. Then, and most importantly, we all need to learn how to work together. Only “in toto,” working together as one Body of the King of Kings, can we ever be free or have the freedom given under God’s Law.




Telegram - https://t.me/MaHoneyTV/382



The Wizard of Oz = Ounces of Gold. The Yellow Brick Road = Bricks or Gold Ingot. 



The Straw Man represents that fictional ALL CAPS legal fiction — PERSON. The Straw Man wanted a Brain but got a Certificate — the  Birth Certificate for a new legal creation & he was proud of his new legal status, plus all these other legalisms he was granted. 



The Tin Man — (TIN) Taxpayer Identification Number, a robotic avatar, who worked tirelessly until his body literally froze up & stopped functioning. The heartless & emotionless robot creature who worked himself to death because he had no heart or soul. He wanted a HEART.



The Cowardly Lion was a bully, but was a true coward when someone stood up to him. He lacks true courage. That was what he wanted — Courage. At the end, the Wizard gave him an Official Recognition Award — Authority & Status.



The Wizard of Oz — uses magic, smoke, flames & holograms, but all of it were tricks & illusions to push fear & compliance into doing what he commanded. — The TRUTH is the Wizard have NO real power & only uses illusions to create FALSE power & authority.



The Wicked Witch — pushed fear through intimidation. She was after Toto. She controlled the flying monkey police — the policy enforcers— the mischievous demons, which also represents the BAR Association attorneys who attack & control all the little people for the Great Crown Wizard, the crooked Bankers of Oz - Gold.



In the field of poppies, they were not REAL humans, so drugs had no effect on them, but Dorothy was drugged. The Wizard of Oz was written at the time when the Rockefeller & pharmaceutical begin to take over the medicine & education — the DRUGGING of America. The Crown was the largest drug dealers & after their take-over of drug distribution in China, they began to expand all around the world.



Toto the Dog — was what the Wicked Witch was after. Toto in Latin means ‘in total, all TOGETHER’. Toto was the One who exposed the Wizard of Oz. Toto had no fear & was very small compared to the Great Wizard so no one noticed him. Toto pulled the curtain on the Wizard & his magical scams. ‘Curtain’ also means the End of an Act or scene — The End. He pulled the curtain & started barking until others paid attention & Red Pill the others.



The curtain ‘VEIL’ that hides the corporate legal fiction & its false courts is exposed. The jig is up. No matter how small your bark is — it can be heard. ???



THE REAL MEANING OF THE WIZARD OF OZ
https://youtu.be/oP16eTGB8Qs

[Steve]

The Reason you are already Debt Free - It’s all about Trusts -

In this video I explain why and how YOU create the currency that you believed was lent to you...you are NOT a Debtor, you are a Beneficiary. It's all about Trusts and in this video I break it all down! You are already debt free guys and you owe NOTHING to any Debt Collection Agent, Utility Provider and even the Council for your Council Tax. NOTHING. Let's lose that fear. Let go of that stress. They are powerless against you, when you know the law!

https://youtu.be/T5iSI-X0QAA


Notes -

0 min   introduction to Sovereign Empowerment  - we create the currency
1 min    the credit agreement for a loan
2 min   once credit agreement is signed, it is securitised, meaning there’s no debt
3 min   car loan example, the keeper, equity and trusts book refers, payment / repayment 
4 min   trusts - the basics, dealing with debt collectors, we are the beneficiaries 
5 min    We are the beneficiaries of the trust we’ve created, Basic Trust Structure diagram 
6 min   Settlor / Beneficiary / Trustee, trust law
7 min   3 elements - sets law, absolute title to properly 
8 min   it’s settled on creation of the trust, we sign and securitise the trust, trust res
8 min    The 3 Certainties of a Trust - Certainly of Objects / of Subject Matter / of Intent
9 min    Original note - object, trustee is legal title
9 min   Legal Title vs Equitable Title - you hold Equitable Title as you are the Beneficiary
9 min    the power of the beneficiary 
10 min  you are the beneficiary and have all the rights - how this translates to loans 
11 min  the beneficiary - you control the Trustee to carry out the terms of the Trust
11 min  the credit agreement- the debtor, they hide the fact that there’s a trust - 
12 min  the deed of assignment / the existence of the trust has to be produced 
12 min  legal title / equitable title - why we can’t be heard, a recap as per diagram
13 min  so, settlor/sign agreement, securitised - trust res, 3 certainties of trust - object
13 min  - subject matter - intent, trust created, appointee, beneficiary, equitable interest
13 min  - booking a call for further explanation and expertise 
14 min  - express trusts - Sec 53.1 Of The Law Of Property Act - to become familiar with
14 min  - we are the beneficiaries of these trusts, example - NHS Trust
15 min  - Equity video is coming soon explaining how this works, understanding/learning 
15 min    the truth, the matrix film was a documentary - Keanu Reeves




If you wish to speak with us, please book a call here. There's a small donation for our time. 

https://sovereignempowerment.setmore....



Join the telegram group here: https://t.me/YRNID. 

Chat group (where the action is): https://t.me/+oZCb3bw8hVFlNjA0



Watch the Strawman video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ME7K6...



For any debt related matters that doesn't concern Utilities or Council Tax please visit: https://empowerthepeople.earth?aff=Ga...



If you are struggling with Debt Collections Agents and you would like to speak to me about your matter, use this link: https://go.oncehub.com/YouAreNOTInDebt


#Debtfree #DebtFreeJourney #HowToPayOffDebt #DebtCollector #DebtConsolidation #IVA #HowToGetOutOfDebt #ShouldYouGetAnIVA #AwakeningNation #TheStrawman what is an iva debt free journey debt consolidation insolvency

[Steve]

How To Easily Win Against A Debt Collection Agent -

In this video I show you live interaction I had with a Debt Collection Agent recently, who simply gave up once they they realised I knew they have no claim. None of us owe anything and it is easy to prove. It's time to own who you are and fight back against the system that enslaves you. WE ARE ALL READY DEBT FREE. 

https://youtu.be/5j2Aqu7_uPU

Notes -

0 min    intro - how you can win via Data Subject Access Request / DSAR process
1 min   we own our personal data, and we owe them nothing
2 min   the debt collector passed his case back to their client, their weak points
3 min   Shire Recoveries letter example, threatening letter
4 min   follow civil procedure rules, their discounted debt trick - they have no legal claim 
5 min   it’s intimidation over money you don’t owe - send a response referencing the DSAR
6 min   their reply - it’s full of irrelevant info / repetition, bs, another threat / intimidation 
7 min  sending a further response, implicating them in data breaches
8 min   it is an offence to conceal our data / withholding our information 
9 min   counter claims, stating the facts - their response, they haven’t succeeded
9 min   all possible under data subject access request, Pursuant the Data Protection Act 2018
10 min  they have committed an offence under this act, everything is a trust / you’re  protected 
11 min  if you need help, book a call for assistance, there is a charge for this service 
12 min  credit scores