Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Facebook Users Who Whine About Data Breaches Are Monumental Muppets.
#1
Comment on Facebook Users Who Whine About Data Breaches Are Monumental Muppets.. Post away!
#2
(03-24-2018, 10:13 AM)Front Page Posts Wrote: Comment on Facebook Users Who Whine About Data Breaches Are Monumental Muppets.. Post away!

This piece was a hit piece in its entirity, its like the old addage, OH well they have everything on us what can you do, go back to sleep and dream of a brighter future where we can all share our thoughts for free with uncle Tom Cobley and all and sleep safe knowing they will not bendeth our own oars and use them to deliver the boat in which we sit like being served on a platter to a hungry wolf in sheeps clothing.

The onus lies in the word, FREE, how come our thoughts are worth something to another who watched and then reorganized them for nepharious reasons, here is where the guile and deceit run amuck with our very constitution.

We have been textured, pummelled beyond repair if we think saying sorry from the lips of a vile frontsman is going to repair the damage done by using our own thoughts against us to further their outcome, Zuckerberg and his minnions should be made to pay all they have made from everyones thoughts and share it all out with those who gave them freely.

What Facebook have done is a form of indirect violence upon the people, they have gathered our thoughts in order of regime changing our outlook towards a body and hidden hand, that is a mentally ill entity holding an electronic whip, and simply want to control and make net gains so their NET remains full of our thoughts for their feeding frenzy.

Here is their ultimate Thoughts crime.
#3
Internet giants such as Google, Facebook and Microsoft are creations of the bloodline Elites. They are government surveillance and data-gathering agencies under another name and Facebook uses software to scan private communications for what it calls ‘key words’ that can cause them to alert the authorities. Facebook posts are censored, and algorithms ruthlessly used to negatively affect the traffic to and from pages that challenge a particular view. Their carefully contrived image of ‘we’re your friend’, ‘it’s all cool, man’ is a blatant cover.

The Electric Frontier Foundation says of Internet surveillance:

There are almost no restrictions on what can be collected and how it can be used, provided a company can claim it was motivated by ‘cybersecurity purposes’. That means a company like Google, Facebook, Twitter, or AT& T could intercept your emails and text messages, send copies to one another and to the government, and modify those communications or prevent them from reaching their destination if it fits into their plan to stop cybersecurity threats.

Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg was caught on a live microphone at the United Nations discussing with German Chancellor Angela Merkel the censorship of posts opposing mass immigration of migrants into Germany.

‘Are you working on this?’ Merkel asked him. ‘Yeah’, he said before the microphone was cut.

So, anyone who dares to question the unending influx of migrants into towns and countries that cannot cope is branded racist and xenophobic, or censored altogether even though in among genuine refugees, there are some very unpleasant people. This is how political correctness is used to silence those who are only making valid points about obvious consequences. Political correctness is always black and white with no shades of grey. While Germans were initially welcoming and applauding migrants the cameras were running, but when the mood changed with the effects of the sheer numbers, as it was always going to, suddenly they were racist.

There is a war against the alternative media. Google, YouTube (Google) and Facebook are all censoring material The System doesn’t want people to see. They also manipulate visitor numbers and listings to suppress traffic and, in the case of Google/ YouTube, remove advertising revenue from videos challenging their masters. This has happened in the case of what is really happening in Syria which has prevented thousands / millions of people knowing the truth. Most alternative media researchers and bloggers accept a meagre income to do their work full-time and the little they were getting from Google/ YouTube advertising revenue (based on video views) was essential for many to continue. This is why Google/ YouTube have been targeting that.

These giant corporations and their controllers might seem all-powerful, but they are themselves worried, as can be seen in the fear they have of exposure and that a gradual realisation by the many as to their alterior motives will ultimately be laid bare. Why would they feel the need to undermine people often working out of their bedrooms? For all their arrogance, they are truly pathetic and immature.

Another plan is to stop people linking to articles on other websites without permission. This is designed to stop the flow of information on alternative sites that link to mainstream articles while putting them into their true context. Overwhelmingly, the alternative media links to the site concerned and cumulatively sends enormous amounts of traffic, and subsequent advertising revenue to these mainstream websites. But crushing the alternative media is far more important to these terrified people than even money. The case of Google/ YouTube is an example of a recurring sequence and technique of the takeover.

Elite corporations first destroy the opposition, secure a monopoly or virtual monopoly, and then dictate who can do what. Amazon, for example is in the process of doing precisely this, in terms of books and publishing. It is vital that alternative information sources do not become dependent on these corporations and find distribution and circulation systems of their own.

US National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden has even revealed documents that confirm British and American intelligence operations are employing people to post comments on social media, forums and YouTube to discredit researchers and use psychological manipulation on their audience to disrupt and ‘promote distrust’. That’s how terrified they are of the truth coming out. Labelling people as domestic terrorists to bring them under terrorist censorship laws is the logical next step. Or logical to a fool, that is.
#4
(03-24-2018, 04:26 PM)Steve Wrote: Internet giants such as Google, Facebook and Microsoft are creations of the bloodline Elites. They are government surveillance and data-gathering agencies under another name and Facebook uses software to scan private communications for what it calls ‘key words’ that can cause them to alert the authorities. Facebook posts are censored, and algorithms ruthlessly used to negatively affect the traffic to and from pages that challenge a particular view. Their carefully contrived image of ‘we’re your friend’, ‘it’s all cool, man’ is a blatant cover.

The Electric Frontier Foundation says of Internet surveillance:

There are almost no restrictions on what can be collected and how it can be used, provided a company can claim it was motivated by ‘cybersecurity purposes’. That means a company like Google, Facebook, Twitter, or AT& T could intercept your emails and text messages, send copies to one another and to the government, and modify those communications or prevent them from reaching their destination if it fits into their plan to stop cybersecurity threats.

Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg was caught on a live microphone at the United Nations discussing with German Chancellor Angela Merkel the censorship of posts opposing mass immigration of migrants into Germany.

‘Are you working on this?’ Merkel asked him. ‘Yeah’, he said before the microphone was cut.

So, anyone who dares to question the unending influx of migrants into towns and countries that cannot cope is branded racist and xenophobic, or censored altogether even though in among genuine refugees, there are some very unpleasant people. This is how political correctness is used to silence those who are only making valid points about obvious consequences. Political correctness is always black and white with no shades of grey. While Germans were initially welcoming and applauding migrants the cameras were running, but when the mood changed with the effects of the sheer numbers, as it was always going to, suddenly they were racist.

There is a war against the alternative media. Google, YouTube (Google) and Facebook are all censoring material The System doesn’t want people to see. They also manipulate visitor numbers and listings to suppress traffic and, in the case of Google/ YouTube, remove advertising revenue from videos challenging their masters. This has happened in the case of what is really happening in Syria which has prevented thousands / millions of people knowing the truth. Most alternative media researchers and bloggers accept a meagre income to do their work full-time and the little they were getting from Google/ YouTube advertising revenue (based on video views) was essential for many to continue. This is why Google/ YouTube have been targeting that.

These giant corporations and their controllers might seem all-powerful, but they are themselves worried, as can be seen in the fear they have of exposure and that a gradual realisation by the many as to their alterior motives will ultimately be laid bare. Why would they feel the need to undermine people often working out of their bedrooms? For all their arrogance, they are truly pathetic and immature.

Another plan is to stop people linking to articles on other websites without permission. This is designed to stop the flow of information on alternative sites that link to mainstream articles while putting them into their true context. Overwhelmingly, the alternative media links to the site concerned and cumulatively sends enormous amounts of traffic, and subsequent advertising revenue to these mainstream websites. But crushing the alternative media is far more important to these terrified people than even money. The case of Google/ YouTube is an example of a recurring sequence and technique of the takeover.

Elite corporations first destroy the opposition, secure a monopoly or virtual monopoly, and then dictate who can do what. Amazon, for example is in the process of doing precisely this, in terms of books and publishing. It is vital that alternative information sources do not become dependent on these corporations and find distribution and circulation systems of their own.

US National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden has even revealed documents that confirm British and American intelligence operations are employing people to post comments on social media, forums and YouTube to discredit researchers and use psychological manipulation on their audience to disrupt and ‘promote distrust’. That’s how terrified they are of the truth coming out. Labelling people as domestic terrorists to bring them under terrorist censorship laws is the logical next step. Or logical to a fool, that is.

Like any kind of plantation it eventually needs as many slave drivers or helpers as it has slave workers, and grows rapidly and then eventually collapses under its own weight, this will eventualy happen with the internet, and when it does the slaves are normally let free.

This is why I urge those in the positions who are currently helping the deepest darkest avenues of control to cease what they are doing and re-join with the rest of society and put their clever energy into it instead.
#5
nah. can't agree with anything that let's them off the hook, richie. i'm surprised you would say such things.

i do think EVERYONE should have gotten off there 9 or 10 years ago when the tracking beacons in the cookies were exposed.

(and i never understood why anyone wanted to be on it in the 1st place. it's a craptastic looking site and inconvenient to use. nor why people would use their real names and photos and let it rake their contacts from elsewhere.)

however, claiming everyone should have known from the beginning is just excusing their abuse and exploitation (and fraud, frankly) and victim blaming. creating privacy options does give people the impression they have some degree of privacy - at least from that company itself. instead it's actually a branch of the government and in collusion with (at least, corporate) hackers and bad actors.

every single person working there should go down.

and you should still get off of there! along with everyone else.
  


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)