•  Previous
  • 1
  • 2(current)
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 16
  • Next 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Chemical Weapons and Syria
Reality Check: Syrian Gas attack connected to larger conflict?

Putin has made it clear an attack on Syria is an attack on Russia, if the US wants WW3 over Syria they shall get it, Russia shall not stand by and let a close ally like Syria be eliminated just to meet the terrorist agendas of US/Israel.

MIT expert claims latest chemical weapons attack in Syria was staged 
(April 2017)

Why Is It when Assad "allegedly" drops Chlorine Gas bombs on Moderate Rebel held areas that It only kills and Injures Women and children ??? and somehow has no effect on the Intended "Rebel" targets ! or Indeed the First Responder "Shite Helmets ?
There’s a Good Chance we’re being lied to about the Chemical Attack in Syria -

(04-12-2018, 06:57 AM)Steve Wrote: There’s a Good Chance we’re being lied to about the Chemical Attack in Syria -



The body language and inert abiguity of the two anchors was one of hidden greif, they both knew Peter Ford was correct and could not bend the BBC's lies to their oars any further, their smiles at the very end of this short interview clearly showed it.

Society is at the very cusp of freedom if they can simply hold their resolve together, only then will they see the lies for what they are, TPTB have milked the udder of humanity with their rhetoric too many times and are now on the lower rungs of the political ladders. What I would do now is hold all those sleeping giants of war in Parliament to book if they once again vote to go to war on another series of lies without first checking the evidences.
General Wesley Clark said in a television interview in 2007 about the Pentagon planning to attack and destroy the governments in seven countries in five years –Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran. Clark was describing a plan hatched during the Republican administration of George W Bush and yet exactly the same plan targeting the same listed countries has continued under Obama and now Trump in America’s one-party state.  

You just knew that eventually the claim would be made that Assad had used chemical weapons against civilians because these people are nothing if not predictable. The claim based on ‘evidence’ supplied by, yes, Britain and France, was duly made in the hope of justifying what they are aching to do; but then came an interview with Carla del Ponte, a member of a UN panel investigating in Syria, in which she said there were ‘strong, concrete suspicions’ that the Syrian rebels had used sarin nerve gas.

‘This was use on the part of the opposition, the rebels, not by the government authorities’, she told Swiss-Italian TV.

A CNN report in December 2012 revealed how the Pentagon was training Syrian rebels in the use of chemical weapons. It said:

The training [in chemical weapons], which is taking place in Jordan and Turkey, involves how to monitor and secure stockpiles and handle weapons sites and materials, according to the sources.

Some of the contractors are on the ground in Syria working with the rebels to monitor some of the sites, according to one of the officials. The nationality of the trainers was not disclosed, though the officials cautioned against assuming all are American. White House spokesman (propagandist) Jay Carney said they were ‘highly sceptical of any suggestions that the opposition used chemical weapons’ and they believed that Assad was responsible.

True to form the US announced again in June, 2013 (with no evidence) that Assad had used chemical weapons and Obama said that they would now supply weapons to the ‘rebels’ (officially and in greater number, that is, rather than covertly as up to that point).

At the same time the European Union dropped its ban on weapons supplies to the ‘rebels’ with Britain leading the way. All this happened as Assad troops were retaking locations held by the ‘rebels’ and the Elite plan was going pear-shaped.

Another point: why would Assad even think of using chemical weapons when he knew that it would give his global enemies just the excuse they wanted to destroy him? He would be crazy –and he isn’t.

Israel launched bomb attacks on Syria in May, 2013 in the hope that the Syrian army would be weakened and seeking a Syrian retaliation that could lead to all-out war. This was reported as a unilateral attack by the psychopaths of Tel Aviv, but it would have been sanctioned behind the scenes by the usual suspects –the US, Britain, Canada and NATO in general.

Obama confirmed as much after the attacks when he said that the US ‘coordinates closely’ with Israel. Israeli planes bombed locations around the Syrian capital Damascus in their second attack in three days and claimed to have destroyed stockpiles of Iranian-made guided missiles intended for the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah.

They produced no evidence of this and Lebanon is another target on the must-have list. Syria is not a war caused by ‘rebels’ within the country just as the Libyan ‘revolution’ was not. They are part of a systematic fake ‘Arab Spring’ takeover of the whole of Africa and the Middle and Near East by forces working through the United States, Israel and NATO.

The Military intervention in Mali was only one example of what is planned for country after country in Africa, orchestrated through the US AFRICOM network in league with NATO countries. Watch out South Africa because they want you, too. They want everything because they are insane. The French action in Mali was only the French arm of the Elite networks serving a global agenda and seeking to secure abundant natural resources including gold and uranium reserves. In another you-couldn’t-make-it-up moment the Elite French President Francois Hollande, who sent in the troops, was given a UNESCO peace prize for his ‘valuable contribution to peace and stability in Africa’ by going to war, making thousands of Malians homeless and, according to Amnesty International, imposing ‘serious human rights breaches’ including the killing of children.

The Elite networks usually manufacture a different excuse for each new country, although with Libya and Syria it was exactly the same. ‘Rebels’ funded and armed by the US and NATO (via Qatar, Turkey and Saudi Arabia) start attacking government targets and when the government returns fire the forces behind the ‘rebels’ scream through their compliant and ignorant media ‘Gaddafi/ Assad is killing his own people’.

They then use this ‘humanitarian’ excuse to send the boys in to slaughter the innocent and steal oil reserves and other assets. They did this in Libya and they have been desperate to do this in Syria but it has not been as easy as they thought and so they planned to covertly arrange a chemical attack to say ‘we have to send in NATO to stop Assad killing his own people with chemical weapons’. No wonder the Daily Mail article was removed so quickly.

When their game is exposed they lose their cover stories. Conspiracies are so often dismissed in real time only to be confirmed with hindsight, but at the very moment a past conspiracy is being acknowledged any claims to real time conspiracies go on being dismissed. This is schizophrenic doublethink yet again.

It is now officially confirmed that when Egypt’s President Nasser seized and nationalised the Suez Canal in 1956 there was a conspiracy between Israel, Britain and France to take it back. The agreement, called the Protocol of Sèvres, was that Israel would invade Egypt and then Britain and France would say that if the fighting didn’t stop they would send troops to ‘save the canal’. This is precisely what happened, but anyone exposing the collusion at the time would have been called a loony conspiracy theorist.

Additionally, as the Israeli troops were withdrawing from Egypt after the ceasefire they destroyed roads, railways, telephone lines and the villages of Abu Ageila and El Quseima, and stole six railway locomotives.

Zbigniew Brzezinski, the Elite asset and co-founder of the Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller, admitted in a French magazine interview that when he was Jimmy Carter’s National Security Advisor from 1977 to 1981 he had trained and armed Afghan ‘rebels’ to fight the then Soviet-satellite regime in the capital Kabul to give the Soviet Union ‘their Vietnam’ . This was done in collusion with Britain’s MI6 and Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) had had close connections to 9/ 11 ‘terrorist leader’ Mohamed Atta, a man who was such an Islamic fanatic that he had an American girlfriend, took cocaine, drank heavily and his favourite food was pork.

Brzezinski’s plan was to make the Soviets invade to protect their Afghan satellite and then bog them down in a war they couldn’t win. The Brzezinski armed and trained Afghan ‘rebels’ later became known as the Mujahedeen/ Taliban/‘ Al-Qaeda’. During the Reagan- Bush regime that followed Carter’s, US Intelligence arranged for a man called Osama bin Laden to travel from Saudi Arabia to lead the Mujahedeen in the long and bloody war with the Soviets. The Bin Laden family were friends and associates of the Bush family, especially Bush senior, but when Bush junior was in the White House at the time of 9/ 11 the former CIA asset Bin Laden was used as the fake villain and the Taliban-Mujahedeen demonised to justify the US invasion.

There is no contradiction in this because there is a common theme, that being, whatever is best for the Elite agenda at the time. It suited the bloodline families for Bin Laden and the Mujahedeen to be heroes when they were fighting the Soviet Union through the 1980s after the Soviets invaded to shore up their regime in Kabul; but then it suited them after 9/ 11 to cast them as demons that American forces had to be despatched to trounce in the ‘war on terror’.

In the same way, the ‘war on terror’ was supposed to wage war against ‘Islamic terrorists’ and ‘Al-Qaeda’, but the ‘rebels’ in Libya and Syria were largely ‘Al-Qaeda’ fighting in the interests of the US-NATO campaign of terror and conquest together with the Muslim Brotherhood. This is the same ‘Al-Qaeda’ (‘ The Database’) which only really existed in any significant form after 9/ 11 because its recruits believed in its existence as a result of the Americans saying it existed! Even now it is more a name than a structure and exists to serve the interests of the Elite bloodlines even though virtually none of them will know that.

When ‘Al-Qaeda’ (Western-backed terrorists) gained access to Libya’s arms stockpile, including chemical weapons, they then had the chance to arm similar groups all over Africa and the Middle East which is just what the Elite families wanted to cause death, destruction and mayhem.

A sickening example of the mentality involved is the Syrian ‘rebel’ Abu Sakkar who was caught on video cutting out the heart of a dead soldier, taking a bite and saying: ‘I swear to God we will eat your hearts and your livers, you soldiers of Bashar the dog’. These are the sort of insane people that the US, Britain and NATO are arming and funding.

Once Gaddafi was dead and Libya was secured for the cabal many of the ‘Libyan rebels’ (mercenaries) just headed for Syria to do the same there. The leading ‘rebel’ group fighting the Assad regime in Syria is Al Nusra, an ‘Al-Qaeda’ offshoot to which nearly 30 US/ NATO-supported ‘rebel’ groups in Syria pledged allegiance.

The Muslim Brotherhood which is taking official control of countries vanquished by fake revolution and military attack has been a front for America, Britain and Israel for decades, and can also be used to stir up fears of an Islamic takeover when they are just stooges of the very forces saying that. They are a bunch of frauds.

Many of the other people cast as Islamic terrorists to justify military intervention are actually people fighting to retain their lands from the Elite locusts. The term ‘terrorists’ is just a label to demonise people when it suits, and to be ditched when it doesn’t.

This technique was plain to see when the Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization (MKO) which has been responsible for the deaths of thousands in Iran was removed from the US Government list of terrorist organisations ... because it commits terrorism against the US target regime in Iran.

Major General Amos Yadlin, former head of Israel Military Intelligence and military attaché to Washington, called in February 2013 for Israel to cement closer ties with al-Qaeda-linked ‘rebels’ (terrorists) in Syria for a united assault on ‘the big enemy, which is Iran’.

Divisions between Sunni and Shiite Muslims (the division stems from some irrelevant disagreement long, long ago) were being exploited by Israel and the West to divide and rule the Arab world and set it at war with itself. This is what Yadlin was talking about here when he said that ties should be strengthened with Sunni forces for a joint attack on Shiite Iran.

Eric Draister, founder of stopimperialism.com, was right when he said that Israel and al-Qaeda are ‘two sides of the same coin’ creating instability and provoking violence in Syria:

‘Israel and al-Qaeda are two sides of the US-dominated imperial system which has waged war on the independent nation of Syria attempting to destroy that country.’

Major General Yadlin said that the ongoing destructive violence in Syria had brought about strategic benefit for Israel. But, of course, that is why it happened. The leader of the foreign backed Syrian opposition, Ahmed Moaz al-Khatib, an engineer and manager for major oil companies, including Royal Dutch Shell’s Syrian division, pledged allegiance to the Israeli regime if Assad is overthrown.

Israel has taken advantage of the violence and chaos in Syria to give a US energy company a license for oil exploration in the Syrian Golan Heights which Israel has illegally occupied since the Six Day War in 1967. Israeli political analyst Yaron Ezrahi said that this was ‘mostly an Israeli ploy to deepen its commitment to the occupied Golan Heights’. Israel has no intention of returning occupied land, only further expansion.

Great information from UK Column
Israel is mowing down unarmed protesters in Palestine. Saudi Arabia is bombing & starving the people of Yemen. Republicrats keep funding the Israeli & Saudi militaries. But an alleged gas attack in Syria & Republicrats suddenly want to intervene to save Arab lives? 

Dr Jill Stein.
Why Treason May should be impeached


Who is pulling the strings? By Craig Murray

  •  Previous
  • 1
  • 2(current)
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 16
  • Next 

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)