07-25-2019, 04:11 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-25-2019, 04:17 PM by Firestarter.)
Greg D Wrote:You may be interested in this you may not. I just get a little peeved when Christian teachings are compared with Satanic fabrications.
I don't want to offend you but the New Testament was written by the "scribes and pharizees" that Joshua of Nazareth despised so much (Jesus wasn't even his name!).
If you want to follow Joshua's teachings you won't learn it from going to your Church listening to some false preacher, who probably doesn't even have a clue about what Joshua stood up for in the first place (that got him executed by the Romans that ruled what is now called Israel)...
Greg D Wrote:Yes you are correct a great percentage of religious worship is of pagan origin, that is because it's author is Satan. The Satanic version of the bible is written backwards because it is an alternative version of truth.
The official story is that all of the books of the New Testament were written in the 1st century AD...
How could Emperor Constantine discover these scriptures as Emperor Diocletianon in 23 February 303, in the edict of Diocletian, ordered the destruction of all the scriptures of the followers of Joshua of Nazareth (were they already called Christians)?
Do we have to believe that these “Christians” trusted the Mithras, sun worshipping Emperor Constantine; and that they turned over their guarded holy texts only a couple of years after many of them were executed for not turning them in!
A few years later, Roman Emperor Constantine enlisted the help of Eusebius, to create 50 copies of the entire Bible.
So these could only have been texts that were written by the Roman slavedrivers: http://www.bible.ca/b-canon-diocletians-...ipture.htm
In the 8th century, the story was that Roman Emperor Constantine the Great converted to Christianity after he had been cured of leprosy.
In the 21th century, our wonderful history falsifiers think that it’s wise, as Constantine didn’t suffer from leprosy, to push another story...
This story now reads, that in 312 Constantine was commanded in a dream on the eve of the battle to place the sign of Christ on the shields of his soldiers. So in one of those strange coincidences he chose the sign of Mithras – the cross?!?
Arius, a priest in Alexandria, taught that there was a time when Christ did not exist, so wasn’t co-eternal with the Father, and that the Son was subordinate to the Father and that the Trinity - Father, Son, and Holy Spirit – are 3 different hypostaseis (if you believe in this "Trinity" you´ve been fooled by the Devil).
Constantine then summoned the First Ecumenical Council of the church at Nicaea that started on 20 May 325. The council formulated the Nicene Creed, including the Trinity and that the Bible is “God’s word”.
St Nicholas of Myra (on who supposedly Sinterklaas and Santa are based) hit Arius in his face to stop him from talking at the First Council of Nicaea: http://homepages.rpi.edu/~holmes/Hobbies...06_195.htm
According to the Roman Satanist that wrote the New Testament in Latin, the young baby Jesus was visited by an unspecified amount of “magi” from the East.
The Latin magi doesn´t mean “wise men” at all but magicians, witches (is there anything more “Satanic” than witches?).
Mithras is always pictured wearing a red Mithras cap...
See a picture of the 3 supposed witches visiting baby Jesus (Balthasar, Melchior and Caspar) wearing the Mithras cap.
I am not offended, as for the Church I attend I am the Pastor and preacher there. The only former Pharisee who was involved in the writing of the New Testament was Paul. Yes Jesus name in Hebrew is Joshua, he lived in Nazareth but was born in Bethlehem. Yes, the the early Church manuscripts were a collection of letters written to the early Churches. The gospels, two of which were eyewitness accounts, Matthew and John and two were accounts collected by second generation converts Luke and Mark, from eyewitness accounts of Jesus ministry. Before the manuscripts were colated the gospel spread by the common experience, Speaking in other tongues and miracles, which continues to the present day. The early Church manuscripts were written in Greek and it is no surprise that it was a Satanist that translated them to Latin and added 4 more books. Constantine is the forefather of the pagan Catholic church, which has never been Christian. The wise men in the 'ancient photo' are astrologers, the Bible doesn't mention that there were 3 by the way, they did come to Bethlehem seeking the messiah. The reason for that was, the first coming virgin birth, the death on the cross and the second coming message is contained in the star signs. The cross as a symbol was embraced by Constantine but not by the early Church as to them it was and is, a Roman weapon of torture, not a Holy object. The Bible doesn't mention a trinity but does speak of a Godhead, this is a principle that I am now part of, thanks to Jesus sacrifice.
Strangely enough many of the translators of the latin writings of the Bible during the middle ages, were put to death by the Catholic church. Many of the people you mentioned and their concil edicts were Catholic teachings, not Christian ones.
I personally am a present day eyewitness of the early Church teachings, not the latter Satanic alternative. I am not easily offended because as a former soldier, I have been insulted by experts.
At the time I first heard the gospel, I was an atheist, hard drinking, drug taker and seller who was working as a night club bouncer. The man who spoke to me was an ex army mate who had gone religious' he told me I could have a personal relationship from God. I thought what have I got to loose, so I got Baptized by full emmersion and after I spoke in other tongues, that was thirty years ago. I have witnessed signs and miracles ever since, including the healing of my three year old dying son, before my eyes.
The truth has to exist somewhere, otherwise why are there so many lies created to hide it .
It was actually Jesus who said first, the truth will set you free, not David Icke.
07-26-2019, 02:33 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-26-2019, 02:36 PM by Firestarter.)
Greg D Wrote:Constantine is the forefather of the pagan Catholic church, which has never been Christian. The wise men in the 'ancient photo' are astrologers, the Bible doesn't mention that there were 3 by the way, they did come to Bethlehem seeking the messiah. The reason for that was, the first coming virgin birth, the death on the cross and the second coming message is contained in the star signs. The cross as a symbol was embraced by Constantine but not by the early Church as to them it was and is, a Roman weapon of torture, not a Holy object. The Bible doesn't mention a trinity but does speak of a Godhead, this is a principle that I am now part of, thanks to Jesus sacrifice.
Thanks for the explanation. I expected that we would become sworn enemies, but it looks like we share some believes.
Please not that the “wise men” translation is wrong; the Latin “magi” means (male) witches ("MAGA" means a female witch by the way).
I don’t see much difference between Catholic or Protestant churches.
It strikes me as odd that sometimes Anglo-Saxon protestants are so vehemently against the Catholic church...
Greg D Wrote:At the time I first heard the gospel, I was an atheist, hard drinking, drug taker and seller who was working as a night club bouncer. The man who spoke to me was an ex army mate who had gone religious' he told me I could have a personal relationship from God. I thought what have I got to loose, so I got Baptized by full emmersion and after I spoke in other tongues, that was thirty years ago.
This isn’t the first time that I’ve heard a story on somebody getting out of the problems of a drug addiction by becoming “Christian”.
Greg D Wrote:It was actually Jesus who said first, the truth will set you free, not David Icke.
I’m no fan of David Icke, as I think that his “conspiracy theories” on the Reptilian, alien Annunaki is a distortion of the truth. Enki and Enlil were the “Annunaki” sons of “the father” Anu (that's a Trinity...).
David Icke has claimed that he is a son of “the Godhead”...
There is also a religious aspect to David Icke’s philosophy that’s close to New Age.
The elite, “noble” bloodlines in private claim that they are Annunaki and (bizarrely) that they descend from Jesus Christ (from the South of France)!
According to the official story, the lion in all of these coat of arms, represents the lion of Judah (because they claim to descend from King David).
I think that it’s really the lion of Mithras (although I’m still not quite sure what this lion stands for).
See the winged lion of Mithras (you probably know that the 4 evangelists are often pictured with wings); also note the serpents.
Just to make a comment about my past, I didn't see myself as having a problem with drugs at the time that I was told about God. In fact I was just playing the warrior tuff guy, bikie lifestyle, that suited me at that time. Regardless of my outward appearance, the words he spoke, talked to my soul, that is why I had to find out for myself what he was saying.
You are spot on with your observations about modern Protestants and Catholics having alot in common, as they are in the process of reuniting under the leadership of the pope. Who by the way goes by 18 titles that have a numeric value of 666.
Rev 13:16-18/ 16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: 17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. 18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it (is the number of a man); and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
The pope is called holy father which is a title that belongs to God alone.
The mark of the beast is not a micro chip, it is the sign of the cross, which was something you had to do, to buy and sell goods in middle age Catholic Europe. The Catholic church put to death over a million people during the inquisition, who wouldn't convert to Catholisism.
Jesus is the lion of Judah, no he didn't start some French natural bloodline, the bloodline he began is a Spiritual one.
Likewise David Ickes reptilions, do follow after the old reptile from the garden, as most are Satanists, their bloodlines do have their origins in ancient times, the only 'shape shifting' they are capable of is appearing to be something they are not. That's politics by the way.
Leo in the prophetic story in the stars is the returning king of the second coming. Virgo is the virgin birth of the first coming, the crucifixion and subsequent crushing of the serpents head is in the middle section.
Finally yes, there are many pagan versions of that story found in idol artifacts.
Jesus coming is foretold in Ezekiel ch 1, the vision Ezekiel saw contained a lion, an ox, a eagle and the face of a man. Contained inside eternal wheels with in wheels.
The lion represents a king.
The ox carrys our burdens, is our servant.
Eagle represents divine.
The face of a man is Jesus, who came as a man.
A Testament is also a will, the new testament required the death of the parent to inherit the promises of the old testament.
The Godhead was broken on the cross, that is why Jesus said his body was broken at the last supper, though his bones weren't on the cross.
Thanks to those events people can now inherit the promises, even David Icke.
This is pretty deep Spiritual stuff, I hope you find it interesting.
11-28-2020, 07:20 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-28-2020, 07:21 AM by Steve.)