Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The AIDS hoax – pseudoscience, virus hunters and toxic AZT
HIV tests unreliable

I’ve found an interesting literature review that has a lot of information on AIDS from AIDS-whistleblowers.
It includes information that shows that HIV tests aren’t reliable…

In 1996, Johnson reported more than 60 factors that can cause a false-positive HIV-positive test result.
No fewer than 5 different criteria have been used by different groups in the US to decide if somebody is HIV-positive. The criteria for a HIV-positive test are p41 and p24, protein–antigens that are found in the blood of “healthy individuals”. This means that criteria used to “flag” the presence of HIV aren’t “specific to HIV or AIDS patients [and] p24 and p41 are not even specific to illness”. In other words, healthy victims can test HIV-positive but without ever being “infected” by HIV...

There are significant differences worldwide in how the test results are interpreted. If someone tests positive for p160 and p120 he/she would be sentenced as HIV-positive in Africa, but not in Britain. On the other hand a test reaction to p41, p32, and p24 would be considered HIV-positive in Britain, but negative in Africa.
Celia Farber comment cynically:
Quote:… a person could revert to being HIV-negative simply by buying a plane ticket from Uganda to Australia.

In 2010, the scientist Etienne de Harven added to the debate that none of the images of particles supposedly representing HIV ever show HIV-particles coming from an AIDS-patient.

Kay Mullis, who won the 1993 Nobel Prize for chemistry for inventing PCR for detecting DNA, explained that PCR couldn’t be used to test for HIV:
Quote:these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to HIV. The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.

According to Mullis, AIDS is caused by “system overloads”, maybe the result of a “chain reaction”. His hypothesis assumes that AIDS is caused by: “
Quote:an overwhelming number of distinct organisms, which causes the immune dysfunction. These may individually be harmless.

Patricia Goodson – Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent (2014):
(archived here:

A lot of information in this thread is hard to read because of its “scientific” language. The following article on the HIV/AIDS sham from December 2016 is more of a journalistic piece so much easier to read…

Just like for vaccines, new AIDS therapies are exempted from proper placebo controlled trials.
Antiretroviral trials are usually performed without a placebo for controls.

Matt Irwin explained the unreliability of HIV-tests:
Quote:When [the viral load tests] are done on the serum of people considered HIV-negative, 3% to 10% of them commonly have positive viral loads, and the highest reported rate of false positive results is a remarkable 60% (HIV surrogate marker coll. group 2000). Although most cases reported have false viral loads of 10,000 or less, there have been reports of false positive viral loads as high as 100,000 copies per milliliter.

In the United States, where the prevalence of HIV is about 1 in 250 people (0.4%), a false positive rate of only 2% would still mean that random screening of the population would result in 5 false positives for every true positive, and a false positive rate of 10% would result in 25 false positives for every true positive. The most likely explanation for this high false positive rate is that HIV-RNA assays commonly react with non-HIV RNA, such as that produced by normal human cells and other microbes.
In 2015, nearly 16 million HIV-positive people were treated, compared to 9.7 million in late 2012 (worldwide)! This isn’t caused by a huge increase in the number of HIV-positive people, but by the efforts of health authorities to poison the victims from the first time they have been sentenced to HIV-positive status.

A 2005 study showed that HIV-positive victims poisoned with HAART therapy suffered from:
Quote:deaths related to end stage liver disease were more common than deaths from opportunistic infections… Hospitalizations for lactic acidosis, reconstitution syndromes and late stage complications related to HAART were becoming more apparent. Some authors also noted an increase in mortality and hospital admission rate as the HAART era progressed.
It’s highly likely that at least some of these “symptoms” were the direct result of the HAART therapy.

Bertrand, who was sentenced to be HIV-positive 7 years earlier, refused AIDS-treatment. They tried to make him paranoid by telling him that his “viral load” was around 250,000 copies which caused him to “freak out”. Despite the unfavourable forecasts of the doctors his “viral load” spontaneously fell to 11,500; it has never stabilised, oscillating around a “load” of some 40,000 copies.
Bertrand also noted variations in his T-cell (CD4) count:
Quote:Over the tests, I was able to notice significant variation in my count, without an apparent link to my health. It had already gone down to 220 CD4, and then it rose up naturally. On average, it would yo-yo around 350, without ever exceeding 500.

Parents thought they could outsmart big pharma and stopped poisoning their HIV-positive son with the ARV. Suddenly their son got better and his CD4 and viral loads became much better according to the medical quacks.
One day the medical “doctors” found out that the boy had no “medication” in his blood. The parents were reported to the Child Protection Court and their parental rights were restricted. From then on they were controlled by a doctor, who kept poisoning the child.

There are no reliable statistics on the number of HIV-positive victims, who refuse triple therapy. This makes it impossible to know how many HIV-positive victims stay healthy without the “benefit” of antiretroviral therapy:
(archived here:
Donald Trump is very cozy with the Rothschild crime syndicate:
Multivitamins, dementia

In one study 50 out of 75 children in Uganda in 1972/1973 were reported HIV-positive (67%).
Saxinger et al. – Evidence for exposure to HTLV-III in Uganda before 197 (1985):

You’d expect at least the same percentage of HIV-positive adults at that time (and since 1972/1973 exponentially rising). If this is true and AIDS (and certain death) is the result of HIV, you’d expect humanity to be near extinction by now...

Medicine for AIDS – multivitamins
Nutritional supplements with multivitamins are not only an effective medicine against AIDS, but are also known to have beneficial effects on other diseases, while multivitamins have no major adverse side effects (although the effects of Vitamin A in HIV-positive pregnant women needs to be studied) and are cheap.

In the following 2 year study, HIV-positive adults (without AIDS) were given multivitamins, selenium or placebo (so they didn’t get the AZT or ARV). With multivitamins only 8% progressed to worse health, while on selenium 12% and placebo 15% deteriorated.
Baum et al. - Effect of Micronutrient Supplementation … Botswana (2013):

In the following study, 1078 HIV-positive pregnant women infected with HIV in Tanzania, were given either multivitamins, vitamin A or placebo. Multivitamins resulted in less progression to stage 4 of AIDS or death: multivitamins 67 of 271 (24.7%); multivitamins/vitamin A 70 of 268 (26.1%); vitamin A 79 of 272 (29.0%); placebo 83 of 267 (31.1%).
Multivitamins also had positive effects on CD4 and CD8 cell counts (higher); viral loads (lower); oral and gastrointestinal manifestations, dysentery, fatigue, rash, and acute upper respiratory tract infections (reduced). The beneficial effects of multivitamins are still noticeable after 4 years.
Fawzi et al. – A trial multivitamin … (2004):

In the following study, the efficacy of micronutrients (including vitamins) was tested in sick AIDS-victims that had been poisoned with ARV.
The death rate was significantly lower in the micronutrients group 8 (of 242) as compared to the placebo group 15 (of 239). There were less hospital admittances in the micronutrients group 16, while 20 in the placebo group. There were less minor adverse effects in the micronutrients group 64, compared to 73 in the placebo group.
Jiamton et al. – Micronutrient supplementation … Bangkok (2003):

AIDS dementia
According to the state propaganda, the magical HIV virus (also) causes HIV-associated dementia (a.k.a. AIDS dementia complex).
It’s even claimed that highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) prevents dementia:

I didn’t find information that confirms that AIDS-therapy causes dementia...

It’s an established “fact” that (in the “developed” world) heavy drug users are at a high risk to get AIDS.
I’ve found some lists on causes of dementia, this includes drugs and alcohol, and:
Anti-anxiety and Sleeping-Pill Medications; Anticholinergics; Anticonvulsants;
Antidepressants; Antihistamines; Antiparkinson Drugs;
Cardiovascular Drugs; Chemotherapeutic Agents; Cortiosteroids;
Non-benzodiazepine Sedatives; Statins:

It’s also “established” that many Africans suffer from AIDS (that multivitamins have beneficial effects on AIDS-victims seems to confirm that AIDS can be caused by malnutrition).
In Africa a relatively large amount of people suffer from malnutrition. Nutritional deficiencies can also cause dementia, in particular:
Thiamine (a.k.a. vitamin B-1), deficiency is common in alcoholics;
Vitamin B-6;
Vitamin B-12;
Basic water:

The following study shows that vitamin B9 (a.k.a. folate, folic acid and folacin) significantly reduces the risk of dementia.
Sophie Lefèvre-Arbogast et al – Dietary B Vitamins and a 10-Year Risk of Dementia in Older Persons (2016):

Regular physical activity (sports) also reduces the risk of dementia:
Donald Trump is very cozy with the Rothschild crime syndicate:
Gary Null – AIDS a second opinion

This is my last post with information on this topic that I had collected earlier. I expect that in the future I’ll only post sporadically in this thread.

The following book by Gary Null is a good overview of the available information on AIDS in 2002. The big advantage of this book is that it´s very “readable” (almost without “scientific” language). The book is too long though at 618 pages, with appendices, references and index 750 pages.
In my opinion it doesn´t add much to the massive amount of information already in this thread. Following are some of the interesting topics adressed in the book.

EIS member Donald Francis, already 11 days after the first report of AIDS, called a mentor to tell him “the new syndrome must be caused by a retrovirus”.
Another member of the EIS at the NIH, Robert Biggar, also “helped mobilize the huge federal institute behind the retrovirus hunt”.

The correlation between HIV and AIDS has never been other than 80%. In other words, people can get AIDS without HIV. This is especially common in malnourished Africa. Bizarrely many Western “scientists” claim that 85% of the population in some African countries is HIV positive.
A flu vaccine can cause a positive HIV test.
Even Robert Gallo only found HIV in 26 out of 72 AIDS-victims (only 36%) and HIV-antibodies in only 88% of 49 AIDS-victims.

Steven Epstein analysed “scientific” reports from 1984 to 1986 that referenced Robert Gallo’s 1984 “seminal” article.
In 1984, only 2 out of 59 called HIV the cause of AIDS (3%).
In 1985, 26 out of 106 called HIV the cause of AIDS (25%).
In 1986, already 49 out of 79 called HIV the cause of AIDS (62%).
So in only 3 years; the same article was considered proof from only 3% to 62%!

In 1993, the “definition” of AIDS in the USA was simply changed to boost the amount of AIDS-cases. They even added pulmonary tuberculosis. As TB by itself causes a depletion of T-cells this sort of made anybody with TB an AIDS-patient. That´s besides assuming a much larger amount of AIDS-patients using extrapolation.
Insurance companies forced people to get HIV-tests, forcing gays to have no health care.

According to Rasnick, at one time there were 100,000 scientists and doctors working on AIDS; more than the annual number of AIDS patients in the US.
In Britain there were actually more nurses and doctors providing care than the amount of AIDS-victims they mistreated.
In the US the huge amount of money spent on AIDS was taken away from other health care.

Killer viruses are rare, for the simple reason that killing the host is not efficient.
An organism must already be weak before it can be seriously harmed by a (retro)virus.

The data suggests that HIV isn´t transmitted through vaginal intercourse. Only 5-10% of the female prostitutes in the US are HIV-positive. But 50% of the lowliest of prostitutes that use IV-drugs are HIV-positive. This suggests that IV-drugs, malnutrition, or being homeless causes them to become “HIV-positive”.

It was in the 1980s, after the 1979 “oil shock”, that many African countries got into “debt slavery” and were put under control of the IMF and World Bank. This suggests that “poverty” caused the “AIDS epidemic” in Africa.
The 1980s were also the decade when the Reagan-Bush White House had black communities in the US flooded with crack cocaine.

Several sexually transmitted diseases cause immune deficiency, including: cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex viruses, Epstein-Barr virus, hepatitis B virus, Mycobacteria species, Mycoplasma species and candida.
Starting in the 1970s gay bathouses became drug-infested.
Promiscuous gays also regularly used antibiotics for sexually transmitted diseases.

Because other possible causes of AIDS (than HIV) are ruled out in medical “research” from the start, the true cause will never be found.

First the incubation period for the magical HIV virus was considered 1 year, it quickly expanded to 3, 5, 10 to 15/25 years (in 2002).

Gary Null also presents information on some “alternative” treatments for AIDS.

Gary Null – AIDS a second opinion, 23 MB (2002):
Donald Trump is very cozy with the Rothschild crime syndicate:

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)