HIV tests unreliable
I’ve found an interesting literature review that has a lot of information on AIDS from AIDS-whistleblowers.
It includes information that shows that HIV tests aren’t reliable…
In 1996, Johnson reported more than 60 factors that can cause a false-positive HIV-positive test result.
No fewer than 5 different criteria have been used by different groups in the US to decide if somebody is HIV-positive. The criteria for a HIV-positive test are p41 and p24, protein–antigens that are found in the blood of “healthy individuals
”. This means that criteria used to “flag” the presence of HIV aren’t “specific to HIV or AIDS patients [and] p24 and p41 are not even specific to illness
”. In other words, healthy victims can test HIV-positive but without ever being “infected” by HIV...
There are significant differences worldwide in how the test results are interpreted. If someone tests positive for p160 and p120 he/she would be sentenced as HIV-positive in Africa, but not in Britain. On the other hand a test reaction to p41, p32, and p24 would be considered HIV-positive in Britain, but negative in Africa.
Celia Farber comment cynically:
Quote:… a person could revert to being HIV-negative simply by buying a plane ticket from Uganda to Australia.
In 2010, the scientist Etienne de Harven added to the debate that none of the images of particles supposedly representing HIV ever show HIV-particles coming from an AIDS-patient.
Kay Mullis, who won the 1993 Nobel Prize for chemistry for inventing PCR for detecting DNA, explained that PCR couldn’t be used to test for HIV:
Quote:these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to HIV. The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.
According to Mullis, AIDS is caused by “system overloads”, maybe the result of a “chain reaction”. His hypothesis assumes that AIDS is caused by: “
Quote:an overwhelming number of distinct organisms, which causes the immune dysfunction. These may individually be harmless.
Patricia Goodson – Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent
(archived here: http://archive.is/sOXts
A lot of information in this thread is hard to read because of its “scientific” language. The following article on the HIV/AIDS sham from December 2016 is more of a journalistic piece so much easier to read…
Just like for vaccines, new AIDS therapies are exempted from proper placebo controlled trials.
Antiretroviral trials are usually performed without a placebo for controls.
Matt Irwin explained the unreliability of HIV-tests:
Quote:When [the viral load tests] are done on the serum of people considered HIV-negative, 3% to 10% of them commonly have positive viral loads, and the highest reported rate of false positive results is a remarkable 60% (HIV surrogate marker coll. group 2000). Although most cases reported have false viral loads of 10,000 or less, there have been reports of false positive viral loads as high as 100,000 copies per milliliter.
In the United States, where the prevalence of HIV is about 1 in 250 people (0.4%), a false positive rate of only 2% would still mean that random screening of the population would result in 5 false positives for every true positive, and a false positive rate of 10% would result in 25 false positives for every true positive. The most likely explanation for this high false positive rate is that HIV-RNA assays commonly react with non-HIV RNA, such as that produced by normal human cells and other microbes.
In 2015, nearly 16 million HIV-positive people were treated, compared to 9.7 million in late 2012 (worldwide)! This isn’t caused by a huge increase in the number of HIV-positive people, but by the efforts of health authorities to poison the victims from the first time they have been sentenced to HIV-positive status.
A 2005 study showed that HIV-positive victims poisoned with HAART therapy suffered from:
Quote:deaths related to end stage liver disease were more common than deaths from opportunistic infections… Hospitalizations for lactic acidosis, reconstitution syndromes and late stage complications related to HAART were becoming more apparent. Some authors also noted an increase in mortality and hospital admission rate as the HAART era progressed.
It’s highly likely that at least some of these “symptoms” were the direct result of the HAART therapy.
Bertrand, who was sentenced to be HIV-positive 7 years earlier, refused AIDS-treatment. They tried to make him paranoid by telling him that his “viral load” was around 250,000 copies which caused him to “freak out”. Despite the unfavourable forecasts of the doctors his “viral load” spontaneously fell to 11,500; it has never stabilised, oscillating around a “load” of some 40,000 copies.
Bertrand also noted variations in his T-cell (CD4) count:
Quote:Over the tests, I was able to notice significant variation in my count, without an apparent link to my health. It had already gone down to 220 CD4, and then it rose up naturally. On average, it would yo-yo around 350, without ever exceeding 500.
Parents thought they could outsmart big pharma and stopped poisoning their HIV-positive son with the ARV. Suddenly their son got better and his CD4 and viral loads became much better according to the medical quacks.
One day the medical “doctors” found out that the boy had no “medication” in his blood. The parents were reported to the Child Protection Court and their parental rights were restricted. From then on they were controlled by a doctor, who kept poisoning the child.
There are no reliable statistics on the number of HIV-positive victims, who refuse triple therapy. This makes it impossible to know how many HIV-positive victims stay healthy without the “benefit” of antiretroviral therapy: http://pryskaducoeurjoly.com/actu/2447/h...hy?lang=en
(archived here: http://archive.is/gZLA0
In one study 50 out of 75 children in Uganda in 1972/1973 were reported HIV-positive (67%).
Saxinger et al. – Evidence for exposure to HTLV-III in Uganda before 197
You’d expect at least the same percentage of HIV-positive adults at that time (and since 1972/1973 exponentially rising). If this is true and AIDS (and certain death) is the result of HIV, you’d expect humanity to be near extinction by now...
Medicine for AIDS – multivitamins
Nutritional supplements with multivitamins are not only an effective medicine against AIDS, but are also known to have beneficial effects on other diseases, while multivitamins have no major adverse side effects (although the effects of Vitamin A in HIV-positive pregnant women needs to be studied) and are cheap.
In the following 2 year study, HIV-positive adults (without AIDS) were given multivitamins, selenium or placebo (so they didn’t get the AZT or ARV). With multivitamins only 8% progressed to worse health, while on selenium 12% and placebo 15% deteriorated.
Baum et al. - Effect of Micronutrient Supplementation … Botswana
In the following study, 1078 HIV-positive pregnant women infected with HIV in Tanzania, were given either multivitamins, vitamin A or placebo. Multivitamins resulted in less progression to stage 4 of AIDS or death: multivitamins 67 of 271 (24.7%); multivitamins/vitamin A 70 of 268 (26.1%); vitamin A 79 of 272 (29.0%); placebo 83 of 267 (31.1%).
Multivitamins also had positive effects on CD4 and CD8 cell counts (higher); viral loads (lower); oral and gastrointestinal manifestations, dysentery, fatigue, rash, and acute upper respiratory tract infections (reduced). The beneficial effects of multivitamins are still noticeable after 4 years.
Fawzi et al. – A trial multivitamin …
In the following study, the efficacy of micronutrients (including vitamins) was tested in sick AIDS-victims that had been poisoned with ARV.
The death rate was significantly lower in the micronutrients group 8 (of 242) as compared to the placebo group 15 (of 239). There were less hospital admittances in the micronutrients group 16, while 20 in the placebo group. There were less minor adverse effects in the micronutrients group 64, compared to 73 in the placebo group.
Jiamton et al. – Micronutrient supplementation … Bangkok
According to the state propaganda, the magical HIV virus (also) causes HIV-associated dementia (a.k.a. AIDS dementia complex).
It’s even claimed that highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) prevents dementia: http://www.natap.org/2005/HIV/112905_05.htm
I didn’t find information that confirms that AIDS-therapy causes dementia...
It’s an established “fact” that (in the “developed” world) heavy drug users are at a high risk to get AIDS.
I’ve found some lists on causes of dementia, this includes drugs and alcohol, and:
Anti-anxiety and Sleeping-Pill Medications; Anticholinergics; Anticonvulsants;
Antidepressants; Antihistamines; Antiparkinson Drugs;
Cardiovascular Drugs; Chemotherapeutic Agents; Cortiosteroids;
Non-benzodiazepine Sedatives; Statins: https://www.brightfocus.org/alzheimers/a...c-dementia
It’s also “established” that many Africans suffer from AIDS (that multivitamins have beneficial effects on AIDS-victims seems to confirm that AIDS can be caused by malnutrition).
In Africa a relatively large amount of people suffer from malnutrition. Nutritional deficiencies can also cause dementia, in particular:
Thiamine (a.k.a. vitamin B-1), deficiency is common in alcoholics;
Basic water: https://www.dementia.org/diet-induced-de...ficiencies
The following study shows that vitamin B9 (a.k.a. folate, folic acid and folacin) significantly reduces the risk of dementia.
Sophie Lefèvre-Arbogast et al – Dietary B Vitamins and a 10-Year Risk of Dementia in Older Persons
Regular physical activity (sports) also reduces the risk of dementia: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3258000/
Gary Null – AIDS a second opinion
This is my last post with information on this topic that I had collected earlier. I expect that in the future I’ll only post sporadically in this thread.
The following book by Gary Null is a good overview of the available information on AIDS in 2002. The big advantage of this book is that it´s very “readable” (almost without “scientific” language). The book is too long though at 618 pages, with appendices, references and index 750 pages.
In my opinion it doesn´t add much to the massive amount of information already in this thread. Following are some of the interesting topics adressed in the book.
EIS member Donald Francis, already 11 days after the first report of AIDS, called a mentor to tell him “the new syndrome must be caused by a retrovirus
Another member of the EIS at the NIH, Robert Biggar, also “helped mobilize the huge federal institute behind the retrovirus hunt
The correlation between HIV and AIDS has never been other than 80%. In other words, people can get AIDS without HIV. This is especially common in malnourished Africa. Bizarrely many Western “scientists” claim that 85% of the population in some African countries is HIV positive.
A flu vaccine can cause a positive HIV test.
Even Robert Gallo only found HIV in 26 out of 72 AIDS-victims (only 36%) and HIV-antibodies in only 88% of 49 AIDS-victims.
Steven Epstein analysed “scientific” reports from 1984 to 1986 that referenced Robert Gallo’s 1984 “seminal” article.
In 1984, only 2 out of 59 called HIV the cause of AIDS (3%).
In 1985, 26 out of 106 called HIV the cause of AIDS (25%).
In 1986, already 49 out of 79 called HIV the cause of AIDS (62%).
So in only 3 years; the same article was considered proof from only 3% to 62%!
In 1993, the “definition” of AIDS in the USA was simply changed to boost the amount of AIDS-cases. They even added pulmonary tuberculosis. As TB by itself causes a depletion of T-cells this sort of made anybody with TB an AIDS-patient. That´s besides assuming a much larger amount of AIDS-patients using extrapolation.
Insurance companies forced people to get HIV-tests, forcing gays to have no health care.
According to Rasnick, at one time there were 100,000 scientists and doctors working on AIDS; more than the annual number of AIDS patients in the US.
In Britain there were actually more nurses and doctors providing care than the amount of AIDS-victims they mistreated.
In the US the huge amount of money spent on AIDS was taken away from other health care.
Killer viruses are rare, for the simple reason that killing the host is not efficient.
An organism must already be weak before it can be seriously harmed by a (retro)virus.
The data suggests that HIV isn´t transmitted through vaginal intercourse. Only 5-10% of the female prostitutes in the US are HIV-positive. But 50% of the lowliest of prostitutes that use IV-drugs are HIV-positive. This suggests that IV-drugs, malnutrition, or being homeless causes them to become “HIV-positive”.
It was in the 1980s, after the 1979 “oil shock”, that many African countries got into “debt slavery” and were put under control of the IMF and World Bank. This suggests that “poverty” caused the “AIDS epidemic” in Africa.
The 1980s were also the decade when the Reagan-Bush White House had black communities in the US flooded with crack cocaine.
Several sexually transmitted diseases cause immune deficiency, including: cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex viruses, Epstein-Barr virus, hepatitis B virus, Mycobacteria species, Mycoplasma species and candida.
Starting in the 1970s gay bathouses became drug-infested.
Promiscuous gays also regularly used antibiotics for sexually transmitted diseases.
Because other possible causes of AIDS (than HIV) are ruled out in medical “research” from the start, the true cause will never be found.
First the incubation period for the magical HIV virus was considered 1 year, it quickly expanded to 3, 5, 10 to 15/25 years (in 2002).
Gary Null also presents information on some “alternative” treatments for AIDS.
Gary Null – AIDS a second opinion
, 23 MB (2002): http://www.whale.to/c/aids_a_second_opinion.html
One of the known causes of immune deficiency are pesticides.
The information in this post shows that DDT and Kelthane made the polio virus much more virulent. It is reasonable to that they would also increase the replication of other viruses.
Technically speaking this isn't "immune deficiency" but the effects would look the same.
In 1972, in the US DDT was prohibited, but instead they continued to produce “dicofol” (a.k.a. Kelthane), which is really DDT in disguise.
Quote:DDT was/is used in the United States to control insects in crops and livestock and to combat insect-borne diseases. It was introduced as a pesticide during WWII. In the United States, the general use moratorium took place in 1972, but there is another pesticide dicofol, which is made and sold by Dow AgroSciences and carries the trademark KELTHANE® , is in fact DDT. In China dicofol is produced by the Yangzhou Pesticide Factory, which reports production quantities of 4 million pounds of dicofol per year.
This class of insecticide (organochlorine) impacts the electrical activity in the body, so it affects brain and heart, but also there are other organs that use electrical current, including the lungs. It clearly affects the immune system and causes cancer, and the best part is that it doesn’t break down in the environment other than to become DDE (and DDD).
K. Paul Stoller – AD, AFP, ALS, and DDT
(archived here: http://archive.is/QmJa7
Stoller refers to a paper describing research by the US Army Medical Research and Development Command (with MIT) that shows that at the 20 and 40 μg levels of DDT, the yield of polio virus per cell was increased 37 and 90%, respectively.
Also look for Kelthane (that replaced DDT) which increases the yield of the polio virus with a whopping 430%...
Quote:insecticidal compounds DDT, chlordane, Kelthane , Dipterex malathion, and Karathane at subtoxic concentrations inhibited vaccinia virus replication in human Chang liver cellq. Under the same experimental conditions, the replication of poliovirus was inhibited only by chlordane and malthion, whereas Kelthane increased the virus yields 4 and 18 times, respectivaly, and DDT exhibited a slight stimulatory effect.
The studies described in the Annual Progress Report of 1965 indicated that human HeLa cells exposed to subtoxic concentrations of the insecticidal compounds, CygonR, DipterexR, DI-SystonR, chlordane and Karathane for 84 days were more susceptible to poliovirus infection than the corresponding control cells (1,2).
As it is recognized that residues of some agricultural insecticides persist in the body and that cells are continuously exposed to their metabolites, we investigated the possibility that these chemicals may alter certain physiological activities of cells and subsequently influence the susceptibility of hosts to virus infections.
The effects of organophosphorus, organochlorine and dinitrophenol insecticidal compounds on the replication of polio and of vaccinia viruses were studied in human Chang liver cells, using purified or analytical grade comnounds obtained from their manufacturers.
In the poliovirus test the cell response was not uniform. In comparison to the controls, the virus yield in the DDT-treated cultures was slightly increased; the yield in the chlordane and malathion cultures was reduced (32 and 18% of the controls); and the yield in the Kelthane and Karathane cultures was greatly increased (430 and 1800% respectively).
The stimulatorv effect by DDT, Kelthane, and Karathane on poliovirus replication suggests a possibility that these compounds may have some specific effects on the mechanisms of viral biosynthesis. This possibility is supported by the results of our previous report which indicated an increased yield of poliovirus in HeLa cells exposed to Karathane for 77 days(2).
Appendix Number 1
EFFECTS OF INSECTICIDAL COMPOUNDS ON THE REPLICATION OF JACCINIA AND POLIO VIRUSES IN HUMAN CHANG LIVER CELLS
To investiqate the effects of insecticidal comuounds on viral virus replication, we tested six insecticidal compounds in human liver cells infected with vaccinia and poliovirus.
In the presence of 20 and 40 μg levels of DDT, poliovirus yield per culture was comparable to that of the control. However, when the yield of infectious virus released is expressed per individual cell or per ig of cell protein, as shown in Figure 3, it is evident that at the 20 and 40 μg levels of DDT, the yield of virus per cell was increased 37 and 90%, respectively. Similarly, the yield per μg of protein was also increased 15 and 47%, respectively
In contrast to the inhibitory action of these two insecticides, the Kelthane-treated cultures produced about four times more virus, and the Karathane-treated cells 18 times more virus than the corresponding controls.
The stimulatory effect by DDT, Kelthane, and Karathane on poliovirus replication suggests a possibility that these compounds may have some specific effects on the mechanisms of viral biosynthesis, and the state of some latent viruses may also be altered. This possibility is supported by the results of our previous report which indicated an increased yield of poliovirus in HeLa cells, chronically exposed to Karathane for 77 days (7,8).
J. Gabliks – Studies of Biologically Active Agents in Cells and Tissue Cultures
(archived here: http://archive.is/b7CDg
11-09-2019, 06:48 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-09-2019, 06:51 AM by Steve.)
On 6 June 2019, I posted about Judy Mikovits , for some reason the “longer” interview I posted was deleted by Youtube: https://forums.richieallen.co.uk/showthr...59#pid6559
Here’s another interview with Judy Mikovits (1:15:35).
Viruses do not cause Disease by Dr Stefan Lanka
08-07-2020, 04:41 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-07-2020, 04:41 PM by Firestarter.)
If you want to know who really are the “deep state” you don’t have to look any further than the “swamp creatures” appointed by President Donald.
In March 2018, President Trump appointed Robert Redfield to head the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
In 2002, President George Bush Jr. had rejected Redfield for the same position because his scientific fraud on AIDS vaccines was still too fresh.
On 7 June 1994, two doctors from Public Citizen, Peter Lurie and the Sidney M. Wolfe, wrote a letter to chairman of the House Subcommittee on Health and the Environment, Congressman Henry Waxman to complain about the fraudster Lt. Col. Robert Redfield, who had blatantly manipulated data in support of the GP160 AIDS vaccine…
Some gullible fools have noted that the scientific fraud committed by Redfield should have destroyed his career, but of course in our Brave New World this is all the more reason to have a long and successful career (although in general it isn’t advisable to do it in such an obvious manner as Robert Redfield did)
See 2 excerpts from the letter...
Quote:We are writing to request that your Subcommittee hold a hearing, as soon as possible, to investigate charges of grave impropriety committed by U.S. Department of Defense’ AIDS researchers. We have obtained Internal memoranda, not previously made public, from the Department of Defense that allege a systematic pattern of data manipulation, inappropriate statistical analyses and misleading data presentation by Army researchers in an apparent attempt to promote the usefulness of the GP160 AIDS vaccine.
The Phase I and Phase II studies in which this alleged misconduct occurred were conducted by researchers at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR), led by Lt. Col. Robert Redfield, M.D., Chief of the Department of Retroviral Research, and misleading results from these trials were reported in…the New England Journal of Medicine in June 1991, the Journal AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses in June 1992 and the annual International AIDS Conference in Amsterdam on 21 July 1992. In addition, overstated conclusions have been presented on two occasions at hearings before your Subcommittee.
The following was written by Peter Lurie after CNN had done some weak reporting on Robert Redfield.
Redfield and his colleagues misrepresented the results to ultimately secure $20 million for a Phase III study of GP160 by the military.
The following explains the scientific fraud.
Redfield presented the following “smoothed out” figure to show the efficacy of the AIDS vaccine.
The previous graph looks like impressive evidence that the “responders” to the vaccine had much higher CD4 counts than other AIDS-victims.
In reality the “smoothing” had manipulated the data beyond all recognition. See the raw data.
Researchers from his own group questioned Redfield on why he had reported on only 15 of the vaccinated while the group had consisted of 26 AIDS-victims.
Military statisticians tried all the possible combinations of 15 subjects, of the 26, but none reproduced Redfield’s results.
Challenged directly, Redfield admitted internally several times that his presentation in 1992 in Amsterdam had been misleading.
But then made another public presentation with similar misleading claims.
Redfield also reported that, whereas only 16% of the “natural history” group had an about 66% decrease in their viral DNA, a full 60% of the vaccinated did.
These findings were reported to be statistically significant (but of course there was no such significant effect).
In February 1993, Col. Dangerfield completed his “informal investigation” of Redfield’s fraud, concluding that the "evidence does not support the allegations of scientific misconduct".
In July 1994, Peter Lurie and the Public Citizen Health Research Group requested disclosure of the records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
In 1997, Lurie had won his lawsuit against the military to get most of the (uncensored) report he had requested. But at this time nobody seemed interested in this anymore.
In 1996, Redfield had left the military and joined the Institute for Human Virology at the University of Maryland with another fraudster in AIDS research: Robert Gallo.
Gallo had become so controversial because of several scientific frauds that the Nobel Prize for the invention of the AIDS virus was awarded to Luc Montagnier (who has since admitted that HIV is quite harmless for people with a good functioning immune system): https://cspinet.org/news/beyond-the-curv...t-redfield
Jon Rappoport is one of the very few that writes intelligent comments on the current coronavirus “outbreak”.
The following PDF, book from 1988 (with an introduction from 2003) is a good collection on the AIDS “scandal of the century”. The shocking thing is that just about all of the evidence that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS was already known more than 30 years ago...
What was called “AIDS” was a variety of states of immune suppression, with a large number of causes (not including HIV). The only way to cure immune deficiency is rebuilding the health and removing the cause of their health problems.
One of the causes of immune deficiency, especially in the Third World, is malnutrition or starvation (which also happens in junkies) - the single largest source of immune-suppression in the world.
AIDS in the Third World is diagnosed by 3 symptoms: weight-loss of 10% or more, chronic diarrhoea, and chronic fever. These are (also) signs of chronic malnutrition.
According to the UN infant mortality has risen considerably (in 1988). Of 416,000 children born in Angola each year, about 60,000 die in before they’re 1 year old and 100,000 die before the age of five. According to the World Bank, more than a third of the people in Zaire die of malnutrition.
A 1985 paper by Chlebowski indicates:
Quote:In studies of children in developing countries, mortality rates progressively increased from less than 1% in well-nourished children to as much as 18% in the severely malnourished population, with most deaths resulting from infections. Malnutrition-associated adverse effects on the cellular immune system, include a decrease in the total number of T lymphocytes... demonstrating a significant reduction principally of the T-helper lymphocyte population.
Based on observations of pneumocystis carinii pneumonia infections in malnourished children in Haiti, Gondsmit proposed that malnutrition with concomitant herpes virus infection could give rise to symptoms that are indistinguishable from AIDS.
In Uganda, the story pushed by big pharma is that in 1985 a new disease called slim (AIDS) appeared; whose primary symptom is weight-loss. Some scientists noted that “slim” is nothing new.
In 1986, E.H. Williams reported an analysis of 30,129 patients from 1951 to 1978 at a Ugandan hospital. Diarrhoea was the sixth most common cause of admission (1041 patients). Did the "new slim disease" already start way before 1978?
Also in Brazil there is severe malnutrition. Throughout the country, there are high levels of malaria, TB, polio, leprosy, VD, yellow fever and even the bubonic plague was found in 41 villages
Malaria can produce false-positive results on AIDS blood tests.
Another apparent cause of immune deficiency (conveniently labelled AIDS) is pesticides.
In Brazil, people working with pesticides get severely ill from the deadly nerve toxins.
In 1985, the widely banned pesticides aldrin and dieldrin were widely used in Africa and Latin America, powerful nerve toxins whose effects can cause “AIDS”. In the 1970s, another pesticide banned in the US, phosvel, was still distributed in the Third World and may still be sold in Latin America.
Parathion was developed first by Nazi scientists as a weapon during WWII. Parathion is widely used as a pesticide in the Third World; 60 times more toxic than DDT.
According to the WHO, aldrin, dieldrin, lindane and DDT; result in 5000 deaths per year and 500,000 got poisoned in those areas of the world where they were used in 1972.
Big pharma also sells highly toxic drugs to the Third World that can suppress the immune system – later called AIDS.
In 1983, John Beldekas and Jane Teas made a strong case that at least some of the AIDS cases were caused by African Swine Fever (ASF). They even found the Swine Fever in the blood of AIDS patients.
It was already known that in the same areas with a high concentration of AIDS (Africa, Brazil, Haiti), there were Swine Fever outbreaks in herds of pigs.
In the gay community, the drug poppers (nitrites) is responsible for immune deficiency – AIDS.
In 1982, Sue Watson wrote in a (rejected) letter to the largest gay publication in America "Advocate":
Quote:Our studies show that amyl nitrite strongly suppressed the segment of the immune system (cellular immunity) which normally protects individuals against Kaposi's sarcoma, Pneumocystis pneumonia (the number one defining AIDS-disease), herpes virus, Candida, amebiasis, and a variety of other opportunistic infections. The upshot of this research is that persons using nitrite inhalants may be at risk for development of AIDS.
Vaccines can and also cause (hidden) immunosuppression.
Vaccines can also cause a false positive on the HIV test!
Burroughs-Wellcome marketed the highly toxic AZT with $80 million, which adversely affects bone marrow and causes serious anaemia – or AIDS.
In 1980, the first 5 “AIDS patients” in Los Angeles were misdiagnosed. They suffered from pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and several other infections. Pneumocystis occurs when there is immune suppression for virtually any reason.
They quickly called this a new “syndrome”, but forgot to mention that all of these gay men were heavy users of nitrites and other drugs.
The HIV test, for a virus that caused nothing, was very deceptive. It could read falsely positive for that irrelevant virus. They supposedly detect the antibodies, with no reason to think that all of these HIV-positives would become severely ill later.
The efficiency rates of the Elisa HIV were exaggerated at 93.4% true positives and 99.78% true negatives. If hypothetically speaking 3 out of 10,000 people in the US were infected with the HIV virus, the Elisa test in 100,000 people, would correctly find 28 HIV-positives with 220 falsely positive test results.
If you also do the Western blot HIV test, at best this would lower the false positives to 25%.
In the Third World medical care is scarce and good labs for testing are very rare.
HIV-test facilities in Uganda have a false-positive rate of 17-40%, which means that they shouldn’t be used!
In various states in the US, Justice Departments train doctors that the only acceptable treatment for AIDS is poisoning with AZT.
One AIDS clinician told Rappoport that AIDS patients are sometimes diagnosed as having full-blown AIDS because of a positive HIV test, without any symptoms. Or even without an HIV-test but with only a low T-cell count and being gay.
Out of the 55,000 reported AIDS cases in the US, 91% are men, and 9% are women. This means that it can’t be caused by a sexually transmitted virus.
While the first AIDS-case were reported in the gay communities of San Francisco, New York, and LA, American gays from all over the US visited the gay bathhouses in these cities, and returned to where they lived. The HIV virus should have been transported back to Des Moines, Atlanta, Sandusky, Salt Lake City, etc.
There were about 20,000 haemophiliacs in the United States, with estimates of 50% to 80% being HIV-positive. In January 1987, the CDC reported (only) 543 cases of AIDS among haemophiliacs (or only 4 to 5% of those estimated to be HIV-positive were diagnosed as having AIDS).
The haemophiliac population in Germany and Central Europe is about 7,000. Among them was not a single AIDS-case reported.
Between 1978 and 1983, there were millions of transfusions in the U.S., when the blood supply was not screened. In February 1988, the CDC reported a total of (only) 1466 transfusion AIDS cases in the US. Or about 0.005% of those who received transfusions in the past 10 years were diagnosed with AIDS...
In 1985, roughly 360,000 Haitians were estimated to be on the road to AIDS. In 1988, there were only 920 reported cases of AIDS in Haiti.
Surveys in Kenya and Uganda predicted millions of AIDS cases. Later it seemed obvious that these high numbers were caused by false positive HIV-tests.
According to Rappoport, we should demand jail terms for pharmaceutical executives who market and sell dangerous, immunosuppressive drugs and pesticides to the Third World.
Jon Rappoport – AIDS INC.; Scandal of the Century
The brilliant and honest late Kary Mullis, who said his PCR test being used to test for ‘Covid’ cannot detect infectious viruses, here demolishes the ‘HIV causes AIDS’ hypothesis as he would today demolish the ‘SarsCov2 causes Covid-19’ hypothesis – the parallels are exactly the same
‘In 1634 Galileo was sentenced to house arrest for the last eight years of his life for writing that the Earth is not the center of the universe but rather moves around the sun. Because he insisted that scientific statements should not be a matter of religious faith, he was accused of heresy. Years from now, people looking back at us will find our acceptance of the H.I.V. theory of AIDS as silly as we find the leaders who excommunicated Galileo.
Science as it is practiced today is largely not science at all. What people call science is probably very similar to what was called science in 1634. Galileo was told to recant his beliefs or be excommunicated. People who refuse to accept the commandments of the AIDS establishment are basically told the same thing: “If you don’t accept what we say, you’re out.”
It has been disappointing that so many scientists have absolutely refused to examine the available evidence in a neutral, dispassionate way. Several respected scientific journals have refused to print a statement issued by the Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of the H.I.V./AIDS Hypothesis simply requesting “a thorough reappraisal of the existing evidence for and against this hypothesis.”
I spoke publicly about this issue for the first time at a meeting of the American Association for Clinical Chemists in San Diego. I knew I would be among friends there. It was a small part of a much longer speech—at most I spoke for 15 minutes about AIDS. I told the audience how my inability to find a simple reference had sparked my curiosity. The more I learned, the more outspoken I became. As a responsible scientist convinced that people were being killed by useless drugs, I could not remain silent.’
Read full PDF.