09-09-2020, 07:09 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-09-2020, 07:15 PM by The Apprentice.)
(09-09-2020, 02:05 PM)Firestarter Wrote:(09-04-2020, 04:02 PM)Steve Wrote: Again, 94% of US Covid deaths, were NOT CovidThis means that many of the 94% of the 161,392 reported “COVID-19 fatalities” could have died from other causes.
[b] - CDC’s own figures ignored by media[/b]
The 6% that died of COVID-19 alone amounts to a total of 9684 deaths in the whole USA of more than 328 million.
This “pandemic” could be seen as crashing the complete economy for 1 American dying in a town of 34,000 COVID-19 in 5 months...
I’ve seen some estimates that about 3% of the whole population has been infected with COVID-19.
If that is correct the COVID-19 death rate is a very low 0.1% (in the USA).
According to the CDC, a 50% effective corona vaccine is acceptable.
This would (hypothetically) mean that 68,000 people have to be poisoned with the corona vaccine to prevent a single death.
I can guarantee that more than 1 out of 68,000 people will die from being injected by the experimental, DNA-altering vaccines.
That’s not even counting that it isn’t even hypothetically possible to make a vaccine to prevent an infection with a mutating virus. The best they could (hypothetically) make is a vaccine that will prevent an infection from last year’s strain of the virus (with the 0.1% death rate?).
The following doesn’t come from some obscure conspiracy site but from the “reputable” New York Times, who admit that a whopping 90% of supposedly “positive” weren’t currently infected...
Quote:In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, [b]up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.https://archive.is/oTiRH
(...)
Tests with thresholds so high may detect not just live virus but also genetic fragments, leftovers from infection that pose no particular risk — akin to finding a hair in a room long after a person has left, Dr. Mina said.
Any test with a cycle threshold above 35 is too sensitive, agreed Juliet Morrison, a virologist at the University of California, Riverside. “I’m shocked that people would think that 40 could represent a positive,” she said. A more reasonable cutoff would be 30 to 35, she added. Dr. Mina said he would set the figure at 30, or even less.[/b]
The (other) COVID-19 test kits are even more unreliable than PCR!
10% of the 161,392 reported “COVID-19 fatalities” is a mere 16,139 in the US...
I wouldn’t know how this correlates to the only 6% that died of COVID-19 alone but 6% of this number is a total of 968 deaths.
Of course this is nothing new, Kary Mullis (who died on 7 August 2019 before the “pandemic” was started), who was awarded the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR test, has repeated over and over again that as PCR can’t be used for quantitative analysis, it can’t be used to diagnose any virus as the cause of a disease.
Please don’t think about this, because when you do you can only conclude that as the PCR test was initially used to claim a coronavirus “epidemic” in Wuhan, China, the whole “pandemic” is complete BS...
All of this won’t prevent that a “second wave”, of the even deadlier COVID-20, will be staged.
Just in time to get the sheeple running around in a paranoid frenzy to get the vaccine!
One thing that has not been adereesed is, if you have taken any medication, IE, antibiotics, flu jabs etc, you cannot have a full blood test done until you are at least a couple of months clear after the course/s has ended, if you have any tests you cannot deciefer what reactions are taking place as the mediction over runs the gut flora and body.
This is the first time in history that a virus sellects its victims,
coroni confused by apprentice 01, on Flickr
More confusion for covy who has not left the EU after all, open borders for migrants are ongoing but we cannot visit our families an freinds.
eu dev fund by apprentice 01, on Flickr
What is going to happen next I wonder?