Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A history of infertility vaccines – until COVID-19
#1
From the start of this pandemic, I’ve thought that the main purpose of the corona vaccines is to make women infertile in the latest depopulation scheme.
If these experimental mRNA-vaccines indeed permanently alter the DNA, this infertility would also be for life.


The short story is that the COVID-19 vaccine learns the immune system to fight against spike proteins, including syncytin-1, which is essential for the formation of the human placenta.
An immune response against the spike protein, could also attack synctin-1, which would cause infertility in women: https://2020news.de/en/dr-wodarg-and-dr-...-petition/
(https://archive.is/e9yHJ)


From the petition of German doctor Wolfgang Wodarg and British doctor Michael Yeadon.
Quote:XI. Several vaccine candidates are expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Syncytin-1 (see Gallaher, B., “Response to nCoV2019 Against Backdrop of Endogenous Retroviruses” - http://virological.org/t/response-to-nco...iruses/396), which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses.
There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile. To my knowledge, Pfizer/BioNTech has yet to release any samples of written materials provided to patients, so it is unclear what, if any, information regarding (potential) fertility-specific risks caused by antibodies is included.

According to section 10.4.2 of the Pfizer/BioNTech trial protocol, a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and is using an acceptable contraceptive method as described in the trial protocol during the intervention period (for a minimum of 28 days after the last dose of study intervention).
This means that it could take a relatively long time before a noticeable number of cases of postvaccination infertility could be observed.
https://healthimpactnews.com/wp-content/...hibits.pdf
(http://web.archive.org/web/2020120515113...hibits.pdf)


The UK has already approved the genocidal Pfizer coronavirus vaccine, with the first victims to be poisoned as early as next week. The official documents confirm that the vaccines haven’t been properly tested.
Because side effects of the vaccine on pregnant women aren’t known, the vaccine shouldn’t be given to pregnant women.
Quote:There are no or limited amount of data from the use of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2. Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy.
For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination. In addition, women of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose.
http://web.archive.org/web/2020120500003...accine.pdf
Donald Trump is very cozy with the Rothschild crime syndicate: www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1038&start=40#p4587
#2
The following article is the most “informative” I’ve found on the hypothesis that the COVID-19 vaccines will sterilise women by mobilising the immune system against syncytins.
It’s not a “good” article because the writer ignores all of the evidence against the coronavirus “pandemic” and the vaccine trials, with the following conclusion.
Quote:In short, the claim that the vaccines for COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 will cause infertility because of some kind of crossreactive immune response between the spike protein antigens and syncytin proteins is baseless.
https://archive.is/7Bmc2


What the writer of the previous propaganda piece forgets to take into account is that the vaccine trials were/are a complete charade, so that it’s far from “baseless” to assume that these vaccines cause severe harm.
Basically these experimental mRNA vaccines have been approved without knowing their efficacy or adverse effects.

By staging the pandemic these psychopaths have effectively bypassed doing any form of decent study into the efficacy and adverse effects of these experimental mRNA-vaccines.
With the result that big pharma can directly start their sick experiments on the population. Human experiments like these are in violation of the Nuremberg code.
It can’t be seen as voluntarily “consent”, if people get misinformed about these vaccines, and on top of that will be forced to take them, because it is required for work (besides for travelling, or doing “normal” things like going to a bar or restaurant).


The following confirms that we’re talking about an experiment on humans on a massive scale, which involves “tracking systems” to “ensure that patients each get two doses of the same vaccine and to monitor them for adverse health effects”.
Maybe somebody should point out that these health effects should be monitored BEFORE everybody gets poisoned with the vaccines in an independent scientific trial…

Official OWS show that the vaccine human guinea pigs will be monitored for 24 months after the first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine through a “pharmacovigilance system” (what?!?).
OWS describes one of its “four key tenets” as “traceability” to: 1) “confirm which of the approved vaccines were administered regardless of location (private/public)”; 2) to send a “reminder to return for second dose”; and 3) to “administer the correct second dose”.

Despite claims that the “pharmacovigilance surveillance system” would intimately involve the FDA. In September, top FDA officials complained they were barred from attending OWS meetings and could not explain the operation’s organisation because it is essentially a top-secret Pentagon program: https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/...two-years/
(https://archive.is/HwRgJ)
Donald Trump is very cozy with the Rothschild crime syndicate: www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1038&start=40#p4587
#3
Vaccinations with the DNA-altering corona vaccines have begun in the UK…


Most people will quickly dismiss the “conspiracy theories” that the not properly tested corona vaccines will sterilise women, because we are too smart to be fooled like that.
There is hard evidence that the same psychopaths that make a nice profit from shoving the sustainable development down our throats, are very concerned with the problem of overpopulation and consider vaccines (and health care in general) as the solution to too much useless eaters.


In 1972, the United Nations, World Health Organization (WHO) and World Bank collaborated on the “Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP)” to “coordinate, promote, conduct, and evaluate research in human reproduction”.
In 1972, the WHO founded the “Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation” to produce an hCG-laced anti-fertility vaccine.
This has continued to produce vaccines for “fertility regulation”, see the following report from 1991: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1874951
(http://archive.is/HG8pN)


In 1973, Stevens and Chrystle published a report on anti-fertility vaccines, which showed that hCG can be used to sterilise women.
Here’s the abstract of “Effects of Immunization with Hapten-Coupled HCG on the Human Menstrual Cycle” (1973): http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Abs..._on.1.aspx


In 1976 another study on hCG was published by A. Pala et al “Immunization with hapten-coupled hCG-β subunit and its effect on the menstrual cycle” (1976), only the abstract: http://www.contraceptionjournal.org/arti...0009-3/pdf


And then there’s the infamous 1974 National Security Council Document 20506: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests. Written by none other than Nobel Prize winner for peace, Henry Kissinger...
They identified India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Columbia as problematic:
Quote:29. While specific goals in this area are difficult to state, our aim should be for the world to achieve a replacement level of fertility, (a two-child family on the average), by about the year 2000. This will require the present 2 percent growth rate to decline to 1.7 percent within a decade and to 1.1 percent by 2000.
(…)
In less developed countries growth rates average about 2.4 percent. For the People's Republic of China, with a massive, enforced birth control program, the growth rate is estimated at under 2 percent. India's is variously estimated from 2.2 percent, Brazil at 2.8 percent, Mexico at 3.4 percent, and Latin America at about 2.9 percent. African countries, with high birth as well as high death rates, average 2.6 percent; this growth rate will increase as death rates go down.
(…)
Steady increases in the number of acceptors at family planning facilities indicate a likelihood of some fertility reduction in Thailand, Indonesia, the Philippines, Colombia, and other countries which have family planning programs. On the other hand, there is little concrete evidence of significant fertility reduction in the populous countries of India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, etc.1
(...)
concentrating on the education and indoctrination of the rising generation of children regarding the desirability of smaller family size.
(…)
Considerable reduction in infant and child mortality is possible through improvement in nutrition, inoculations against diseases, and other public health measures if means can be devised for extending such services to neglected LDC populations on a low-cost basis. It often makes sense to combine such activities with family planning services in integrated delivery systems in order to maximize the use of scarce LDC financial and health manpowder (sic.) resources (See Section IV). In addition, providing selected health care for both mothers and their children can enhance the acceptability of family planning by showing concern for the whole condition of the mother and her children and not just for the single factor of fertility.
(…)
Research indicates that female wage employment outside the home is related to fertility reduction. Programs to increase the women's labor force participation must, however, take account of the overall demand for labor; this would be a particular problem in occupations where there is already widespread unemployment among males. But other occupations where women have a comparative advantage can be encouraged.
(…)
d. Sterilization of men and women has received wide-spread acceptance in several areas when a simple, quick, and safe procedure is readily available. Female sterilization has been improved by technical advances with laparoscopes, culdoscopes, and greatly simplifies abdominal surgical techniques. Further improvements by the use of tubal clips, trans-cervical approaches, and simpler techniques can be developed. For men several current techniques hold promise but require more refinement and evaluation. Approx. Increased Cost $6 million annually.
https://archive.is/ay8aG


The Gates Foundation is heavily involved in vaccinating the world.
In the following 29:32 video Bill Gates, in a presentation for the TED 2010 conference, explains that we need “solutions” that will make the “miracle” of zero CO2 emission happen. By 2050 we must realize an 80% reduction in CO2 emission...
Gates explains that “people” (P) are at the basis of this “problem” (4:00-4:55)
It includes the following notorious quote: “The world today has 6.8 billion people … that’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaF-fq2Zn7I
Donald Trump is very cozy with the Rothschild crime syndicate: www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1038&start=40#p4587
#4
The GAVI Alliance was founded in 2000 with the help of the Gates Foundation, other donors include: the Rockefeller foundation, UNICEF, World Health Organization (WHO), and World Bank.
GAVI has the goal of vaccinating the entire Third World.
Obviously part of the plan is to reduce fertility for depopulation purposes.

The research by Jurriaan Maessen, is an important source for information on anti-fertility vaccines.
There are not only vaccines to reduce fertility, but pregnant women are forced to get vaccinated, which has caused abortions in Thailand and the Philippines: http://www.oldthinkernews.com/2010/09/04...reduction/


Jurriaan Maessen noted, that Rockefeller had already conceived sterilisation vaccines way back in the 1930s:
Quote:Rockefeller Foundation minion Max Mason, who acted as president in the mid-1930s, on multiple occasions expressed his master’s desire for an “anti-hormone” that would reduce fertility worldwide. Now keep in mind, this is more than 35 years before the Foundation actually mentioned funding “anti-fertility vaccines” in subsequent annual reports from 1969 onward.
.
In 1973, the Mexican birth rate was unashamedly described as a “Population Bomb” in the state media.
[Image: 0808f2026c3827fec85d6aba92c29480a33f83c1.jpg]

In 1974, a group of Mexicans found out (or at least suspected) that a group disguised as inoculation teams “who looked like foreigners” gave shots at schools to sterilise their children. The teams were escorted by the police.
Vaccination was never done at Mexican schools, so the parents had a good reason to be suspicious.

The “rumours” began in the north in Nuevo Leon, and then reached Mexico City, where thousands of angry parents “in slum areas” stormed and barricaded schools, and removed their children from them. Some 35-40% of elementary kids were absent Wednesday of that week.
According to the National Action party: “The rare vaccine, until now never used, much less as part of a campaign which appears to cover many parts of the republic, is given to each child in three places: the umbilicis, the chest, and the spinal column”.
The government denied the “rumours”, claiming that sterilisation vaccines don’t exist.
[Image: de9961fca057d31f9d91181596e9ebec0a82baa6.jpg]

Coercive sterilisations under the banner of “family planning” were taking place all over the globe in 1974. In April 1974, it was reported that the government had sterilised some 1,204 girls and boys under the age of 21 at federally funded clinics across the country. This included a ten year old, an eleven year old, and ten 13 year olds.
The US government had funded sterilisations on: poor women, the mentally ill, deaf, blind, with Epilepsy, and others who were considered “unfit” to have babies: http://archive.is/zxQ34
Donald Trump is very cozy with the Rothschild crime syndicate: www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1038&start=40#p4587
#5
A 2010 study conducted by the Philippine Medical Association (PMA) indicated that Philippine women were “unwittingly vaccinated against their own children”.
By linking hCG with tetanus antigens in a vaccine, researchers fool a woman’s immune system into producing antibodies against hCG, which makes her allergic to her own embryo.
Once her immune system is sufficiently stimulated against hCG, the pregnant woman will spontaneously abort the embryo: https://www.pop.org/bad-blood-in-the-philippines/


The following report shows that influenza vaccination causes abortions in lab animals; Ayoub & Yazbak “Influenza Vaccination During Pregnancy: A Critical Assessment of the Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)” (2006). [Image: pregna1.jpg]
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/ayoub.pdf


The 1978 WHO task force “Evaluating the safety and efficacy of placental antigen vaccines for fertility regulation”, shows initiatives to use vaccines for reduced fertility.
It even shows that they already knew then that hCG can cause abortions.
Quote:Although substantial progress has been made over the last few years in the provision of family planning services to many of the World's populations, there is still an urgent need for a greater variety of safe, effective and acceptable methods of fertility regulation to meet widely differing personal, cultural and service requirements.
Immunization as a prophylactic measure is now so widely accepted that it has been suggested that one method of fertility regulation which might have wide appeal as well as great ease of service delivery would be an anti-fertility vaccine.
(…)
In principle, anti-fertility vaccines may: (a) prevent sperm transport and/or fertilization; (b) prevent or disrupt implantation; and © prevent blastocyst development.
(…)
Several potential complications have to be considered upon immunization of humans with immunogenic conjugates of HCG-derived antigens. Some of these hazards are related to potential disruption of the endocrinological balance and maternal-embryonal relationships; others are related to the possible autoimmunity induced with human-derived material as an autoantigen. Consideration of these potential hazards should provide guidelines for design and evaluation of animal and human studies.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article...5-0170.pdf
Donald Trump is very cozy with the Rothschild crime syndicate: www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1038&start=40#p4587
  


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)