09-10-2020, 03:52 PM
After all the films and conjecture have passed under the bridge, a couple of things have come to light that might be worth sharing.
Did you know at the time of the incident it was illegal to shoot down passenger planes, even with hijackers aboard, only could they do so at that time was if the country was in a state of war with a known enemy.
Also, a freind of ours ex front line pilot says, it is quite easy to ply passenger jets once they are in the air, it is the take off and landing that are the most difficult parts, thus someone with a modicum of fly time even in a small aircraft could have flow the planes into the buildings without many problems at all.
The plane that was supposdly shot down in the countryside would have left a huge debris field for all to see, even years later there would still be debris, as was extant in the Lockerbie dissaster, where another freind of ours was working on with the RAF Regiment and saw things as they really were.
Did you know at the time of the incident it was illegal to shoot down passenger planes, even with hijackers aboard, only could they do so at that time was if the country was in a state of war with a known enemy.
Also, a freind of ours ex front line pilot says, it is quite easy to ply passenger jets once they are in the air, it is the take off and landing that are the most difficult parts, thus someone with a modicum of fly time even in a small aircraft could have flow the planes into the buildings without many problems at all.
The plane that was supposdly shot down in the countryside would have left a huge debris field for all to see, even years later there would still be debris, as was extant in the Lockerbie dissaster, where another freind of ours was working on with the RAF Regiment and saw things as they really were.