[Firestarter]

I thought that the biggest flaw in the theory that nuclear bombs do not exist, is that hundreds of planes would have been needed to bomb Nagasaki and Hiroshima with firebombs. I couldn't quite think of a good way how they could cover that up.
The following gives a reasonable explanation.

On 6 August 1945, a squadron of 66 bombers were launched to bomb the municipality of Imabari.
The squadron could have fire-bombed Hiroshima instead, as Hiroshima was only 55 kilometers away. How would American pilots know the difference?

Reportedly Imabari had already been wiped out in 2 firebombing raids on 26 April and 8 May 1945, which would make it ever more likely that Imabari wasn't the target of the August 1945 bombing campaign: http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/...1470675654




The following book does a good job at describing the official story on nuclear weapons and explaining why the "facts" don't add up.
It's a similiar "technical" look at the atomic hoax as Anders Bjorkman's...

It's got more information on the fire-bombing campaign of of 5/6 August 1945 in the area of Hiroshima. Apparently there were more than 600 B-29's carrying out bombing campaigns in the area.

To divert attention, a major effort by the 20th AF was conducted on the night of 5/6 August 1945 by 602 B-29’s striking a variety of targets including the urban areas of: Saga, Maebaski, Nishinomiya, Imabari, the oil refinery at Ube and various mining targets. The biggest effort by 250 planes was against Nishinomiya, a town close to the Inland Sea and about 140 miles east of Hiroshima. This effort was in lieu of the initial request by the Corps of Engineers to Gen. LeMay for 1000 B-29’s to accompany the atomic bomb to the Empire.

.
Akio Nakatani - Death Object: Exploding the Nuclear Weapons Hoax (2017)
https://archive.org/details/death-object...-z-lib.org