06-23-2018, 10:27 PM
You swrite really intelligently and yet your post has contradictions and ends up being pious and self aggrandising.. So he "walked into a trap" but "must have know this or been told by his lawyer " not to "do a live stream" from outside the court room? - Unwise with a suspended sentence for previous hanging over his head under ANY circumstances?
I should do "research" instead of "polling"- well YOU don't seem to know if Tommy Robinson has a history of interest in Sexual exploitation of women judging by qgat tou DID post you certainly would have said so, and I presume you wouldnt criticise someone else for not researching adequately if you had not exhaustively done so yourself. That would be hypocrisy.
The poll was to ask people's opinions on Tommy Robinson's previous form on standing up for women and was meant to be more of a gauge of people's reaction to the idea I'd posited. I was looking forward - as I indicated - to being informed by someone who KNEW better as I had no confidence whatsoever that Tommy Robinson had such a history or that research would reveal it. However people CLOSER to Tommy Robinson or who have followed him and his channel religiously MIGHT and that is why a Poll was an option.. To gauge response from people who might know a little more but didn't choose to share details. It might not be on the "public domain" at all.
You have provide no evidence to present in answer to my enquiry instead re-iterating detail of the nature of tge details of his offence and arrest easily accessed through rudimentary research and information I was in.no way contradicting or specifically alluding to. My observation is about his ethics. Why are you focusing on the detail of the offence ? Is it that that is all YOU know about and you think you can "show off" your grasp of the legalities; hijacking my thread to be tiresome and superior ? Next to each you reply to one 9f my posts try to keep it 9n topic please . Or maybe u wasn't clear enough ?
I'm NOT talking about his arrest. I'm QUESTIONING his Motives for wanting to COVER the story as I SUSPECT he is disguising his Zenophobia as Concern over Mysogynistic Rape Gangs.
But you tried to lecture me about specifics of the arrest and then saw fit to "crtivise" me for making a Poll for opinion .
Forgive me if I'm being defensive but I've been sorting out overgrown trees today and I small a little short tempered due to a painful wound on my finger.. I suffered a little prick.
I should do "research" instead of "polling"- well YOU don't seem to know if Tommy Robinson has a history of interest in Sexual exploitation of women judging by qgat tou DID post you certainly would have said so, and I presume you wouldnt criticise someone else for not researching adequately if you had not exhaustively done so yourself. That would be hypocrisy.
The poll was to ask people's opinions on Tommy Robinson's previous form on standing up for women and was meant to be more of a gauge of people's reaction to the idea I'd posited. I was looking forward - as I indicated - to being informed by someone who KNEW better as I had no confidence whatsoever that Tommy Robinson had such a history or that research would reveal it. However people CLOSER to Tommy Robinson or who have followed him and his channel religiously MIGHT and that is why a Poll was an option.. To gauge response from people who might know a little more but didn't choose to share details. It might not be on the "public domain" at all.
You have provide no evidence to present in answer to my enquiry instead re-iterating detail of the nature of tge details of his offence and arrest easily accessed through rudimentary research and information I was in.no way contradicting or specifically alluding to. My observation is about his ethics. Why are you focusing on the detail of the offence ? Is it that that is all YOU know about and you think you can "show off" your grasp of the legalities; hijacking my thread to be tiresome and superior ? Next to each you reply to one 9f my posts try to keep it 9n topic please . Or maybe u wasn't clear enough ?
I'm NOT talking about his arrest. I'm QUESTIONING his Motives for wanting to COVER the story as I SUSPECT he is disguising his Zenophobia as Concern over Mysogynistic Rape Gangs.
But you tried to lecture me about specifics of the arrest and then saw fit to "crtivise" me for making a Poll for opinion .
Forgive me if I'm being defensive but I've been sorting out overgrown trees today and I small a little short tempered due to a painful wound on my finger.. I suffered a little prick.