by timetraveler at 02-17-2018, 09:42 AM
30 comments
Many of us are keen watchers of the skies.
As a photographer I have documented the ever increasing amount of chemtrails appearing over the last decade in the North of the UK. Often it is not until you inestigate the wider visible dynamic range of an image that you begin to see the depth of the spead and chemicals within them.
It would be interesting for us to colabourate and share our images here with times, dates and locations to see just how widespread this really is.
Here are 2 images taken a few hours apart in Rotherham, South Yorkshire UK. These images are some of the less destructive ones I have taken.
Looking forward sharing folks
As a photographer I have documented the ever increasing amount of chemtrails appearing over the last decade in the North of the UK. Often it is not until you inestigate the wider visible dynamic range of an image that you begin to see the depth of the spead and chemicals within them.
It would be interesting for us to colabourate and share our images here with times, dates and locations to see just how widespread this really is.
Here are 2 images taken a few hours apart in Rotherham, South Yorkshire UK. These images are some of the less destructive ones I have taken.
Looking forward sharing folks
by Steve at 02-16-2018, 11:33 PM
5 comments
Dr Richard Day was a Rockefeller (Elite bloodline) insider, who told a group of paediatricians in Pennsylvania in 1969 how America and the world was going to change in line with a global plan. What he said has since proved to be correct in virtually every detail. All these people knew what was planned because there is a knowledge base within the Elite network that is very different to the one in the public domain. Recording or taking notes at the meeting was forbidden, however one brave audience member managed to recall and divulge much of the debate. This is what he said -
Politics
He said that very few people really know how government works. Something to the effect that elected officials are influenced in ways that they don’t even realise and they carry out plans that have been made for them and they think that they are authors of the plans. But actually they are manipulated in ways they don’t understand.
He went on to say that most people don’t understand how governments operate and even people in high positions in governments, including our own, don’t really understand how and where decisions are made. One of the statements was having to do with change ... the statement was, ‘People will have to get used to the idea of change, so used to change, that they’ll be expecting change.
Nothing will be permanent.’ This often came out in the context of a society of ... where people seemed to have no roots or moorings, but would be passively willing to accept change simply because it was all they had ever known. ‘Everything has two purposes. One is the ostensible purpose which will make it acceptable to people and second is the real purpose which would further the goals of establishing the new system ...’ [He said] ‘People are too trusting, people don’t ask the right questions.’
Gobal economic dictatorship
The stated plan was that different parts of the world would be assigned different roles of industry and commerce in a unified global system. The continued pre-eminence of the United States and the relative independence and self-sufficiency of the United States would have to be changed.
This was one of the several times that he said in order to create a new structure, you first have to tear down the old, and American industry was one example of that ... this was especially true of our heavy industries that would be cut back while the same industries were being developed in other countries, notably Japan. And at this point there was some discussion of steel and particularly automobiles –I remember him saying that automobiles would be imported from Japan on an equal footing with our own domestically produced automobiles, but the Japanese product would be better.
Things would be made so they would break and fall apart, that is in the United States, so that people would tend to prefer the imported variety and this would give a bit of a boost to foreign competitors. One example was Japanese. In 1969 Japanese automobiles, if they were sold here at all I don’t remember, but they certainly weren’t very popular. But the idea was you could get a little bit disgusted with your Ford, GM or Chrysler product or whatever because little things like window handles would fall off more and plastic parts would break which had they been made of metal would hold up.
Your patriotism about buying American would soon give way to practicality that if you bought Japanese, German or imported that it would last longer and you would be better off. Patriotism would go down the drain then. The United States was to be kept strong in information, communications, high technology, education and agriculture. The United States was seen as continuing to be sort of the keystone of this global system. But heavy industry would be transported out [exactly what has happened].
Centrally-controlled money Money would become predominately credit. It was already ... money is primarily a credit thing but exchange of money would be not cash or palpable things but electronic credit. People would carry money only in very small amounts for things like chewing gum and candy bars. Just pocket sorts of things. Any purchase of any significant amount would be done electronically.
Earnings would be electronically entered into your account. It would be a single banking system. It may have the appearance of being more than one but ultimately and basically it would be one single banking system, so that when you got paid your pay would be entered for you into your account balance and then when you purchased anything at the point of purchase it would be deducted from your account balance and you would actually carry nothing with you.
Also, computer records can be kept on whatever it was you purchased so that if you were purchasing too much of any particular item and some official wanted to know what you were doing with your money they could go back and review your purchases and determine what you were buying.
There was a statement that any purchase of significant size like an automobile, bicycle, a refrigerator, a radio or television or whatever might have some sort of identification on it so it could be traced, so that very quickly anything which was either given away or stolen –whatever –authorities would be able to establish who purchased it and when. Computers would allow this to happen.
The ability to save would be greatly curtailed. People would just not be able to save any considerable degree of wealth. There was some statement of recognition that wealth represents power and wealth in the hands of a lot of people is not good for the people in charge so if you save too much you might be taxed. The more you save the higher rate of tax on your savings so your savings really could never get very far [see negative interest rates]. And also if you began to show a pattern of saving too much you might have your pay cut. We would say, ‘Well, your saving instead of spending. You really don’t need all that money.’ ... The idea being to prevent people from accumulating any wealth which might have long range disruptive influence on the system.
People would be encouraged to use credit to borrow and then also be encouraged to renege on their debt so they would destroy their own credit. The idea here is that, again, if you’re too stupid to handle credit wisely, this gives the authorities the opportunity to come down hard on you once you’ve shot your credit.
Electronic payments initially would all be based on different kinds of credit cards ... these were already in use in 1969 to some extent. Not as much as now. But people would have credit cards with the electronic strip on it and once they got used to that then it would be pointed out the advantage of having all of that combined into a single credit card, serving a single monetary system and then they won’t have to carry around all that plastic.
Microchipped people
So the next step would be the single card and then the next step would be to replace the single card with a skin implant. The single card [smartphone] could be lost or stolen, give rise to problems; could be exchanged with somebody else to confuse identity. The skin implant on the other hand would be not losable or counterfeitable or transferrable to another person so you and your accounts would be identified without any possibility of error. And the skin implants would have to be put some place that would be convenient to the skin; for example your right hand or your forehead [right on the third eye] ...
There was some mention, also, of implants that would lend themselves to surveillance by providing radio signals. This could be under the skin or a dental implant ... put in like a filling so that either fugitives or possibly other citizens could be identified by a certain frequency from his personal transmitter and could be located at any time or any place by any authority who wanted to find him. This would be particularly useful for somebody who broke out of prison. There was more discussion of personal surveillance [just look around at what is happening today].
Imposition of world system through nuclear war
If there were too many people in the right places who resisted this [world dictatorship], there might be a need to use one or two –possibly more –nuclear weapons. As it was put, this would be possibly needed to convince people that ‘We mean business’. That was followed by the statement that, ‘By the time one or two of those went off then everybody –even the most reluctant –would yield.’
He said something about ‘this negotiated peace would be very convincing,’ as kind of in a framework or in a context that the whole thing was rehearsed but nobody would know it. People hearing about it would be convinced that it was a genuine negotiation between hostile enemies who finally had come to the realisation that peace was better than war [This syncs with the Albert Pike letter in 1871 about three world wars and what would happen after the third one].
Engineered terrorism
There was a discussion of terrorism. Terrorism would be used widely in Europe and in other parts of the world. Terrorism at that time was thought would not be necessary in the United States. It could become necessary in the United States if the United States did not move rapidly enough into accepting the system [hence 9/ 11 to speed everything along]. But at least in the foreseeable future it was not planned ... Maybe terrorism would not be required here, but the implication being that it would be indeed used if it was necessary.
Along with this came a bit of a scolding that Americans had had it too good anyway and just a little bit of terrorism would help convince Americans that the world is indeed a dangerous place ... or can be if we don’t relinquish control to the proper authorities.
Population control and killing the elderly
Everybody has a right to live only so long. The old are no longer useful. They become a burden. You should be ready to accept death. Most people are. An arbitrary age limit could be established. After all, you have a right to only so many steak dinners, so many orgasms, and so many good pleasures in life. And after you have had enough of them and you’re no longer productive, working, and contributing, then you should be ready to step aside for the next generation.
Some things that would help people realise that they had lived long enough, he mentioned several of these. I don’t remember them all –here are a few: Use of very pale printing ink on forms that people ... are necessary to fill out, so that older people wouldn’t be able to read the pale ink as easily and would need to go to younger people for help.
Automobile traffic patterns –there would be more high-speed traffic lanes ... traffic patterns that ... older people with their slower reflexes would have trouble dealing with and thus, lose some of their independence.
A big item ... was elaborated at some length was that the cost of medical care would be made burdensomely high. Medical care would be connected very closely with one’s work but also would be made very, very high in cost so that it would simply be unavailable to people beyond a certain time. And unless they had a remarkably rich, supporting family, they would just have to do without care.
And the idea was that if everybody says, ‘Enough! What a burden it is on the young to try to maintain the old people,’ then the young would become agreeable to helping mom and dad along the way, provided this was done humanely and with dignity. And then the example was there could be like a nice, farewell party, a real celebration. Mom and dad had done a good job. And then after the party’s over they take the ‘demise pill’.
People won’t be allowed to have babies just because they want to or because they are careless. Most families would be limited to two. Some people would be allowed only one, and the outstanding person or persons might be selected and allowed to have three. But most people would [be] allowed to have only two babies.
Education
... Pressures of the accelerated academic program, the accelerated demands where kids would feel they had to be part of something –one or another athletic club or some school activity –these pressures he recognised would cause some students to burn out. He said ‘the smartest ones will learn how to cope with pressures and to survive. There will be some help available to students in handling stress, but the unfit won’t be able to make it. They will then move on to other things.’
In this connection and later on in the connection with drug abuse and alcohol abuse he indicated that psychiatric services to help would be increased dramatically. In all the pushing for achievement, it was recognised that many people would need help, and the people worth keeping around would be able to accept and benefit from that help, and still be super achievers. Those who could not would fall by the wayside and therefore were sort of dispensable –‘expendable’ I guess is the word I want.
Education would be lifelong. Adults would be going to school. There’ll always be new information that adults must have to keep up. When you can’t keep up anymore, you’re too old. This was another way of letting older people know that the time had come for them to move on and take the demise pill. If you got too tired to keep up with your education, or you got too old to learn new information, then this was a signal –you begin to prepare to get ready to step aside.
He was already talking about computers in education, and at that time he said anybody who wanted computer access, or access to books that were not directly related to their field of study would have to have a very good reason for so doing. Otherwise, access would be denied.
Constant change
Nothing is permanent. Streets would be rerouted, renamed. Areas you had not seen in a while would become unfamiliar. Among other things, this would contribute to older people feeling that it was time to move on, they feel they couldn’t even keep up with the changes in areas that were once familiar.
Buildings would be allowed to stand empty and deteriorate, and streets would be allowed to deteriorate in certain localities. The purpose of this was to provide the jungle, the depressed atmosphere for the unfit. Somewhere in this same connection he mentioned that buildings and bridges would be made so that they would collapse after a while, there would be more accidents involving airplanes and railroads and automobiles. All of this to contribute to the feeling of insecurity, that nothing was safe.
Portrayal of violence (movies/ video games)
Violence would be made more graphic. This was intended to desensitise people to violence. There might need to be a time when people would witness real violence and be a part of it. Later on it will become clear where this is headed.
So there would be more realistic violence in entertainment which would make it easier for people to adjust. People’s attitudes toward death would change. People would not be so fearful of it but more accepting of it, and they would not be so aghast at the sight of dead people or injured people. We don’t need to have a genteel population paralysed by what they might see. People would just learn to say, well I don’t want that to happen to me. This was the first statement suggesting that the plan includes numerous human casualties which the survivors would see.
Food control
Food supplies would come under tight control. If population growth didn’t slow down, food shortages could be created in a hurry and people would realise the dangers of overpopulation. Ultimately, whether the population slows down or not the food supply is to be brought under centralised control so that people would have enough to be well-nourished but they would not have enough to support any fugitive from the new system. Growing one’s own food would be outlawed.
This would be done under some sort of pretext. In the beginning I mentioned there were two purposes for everything –one the ostensible purpose and one the real purpose, and the ostensible purpose here would be that growing your own vegetables was unsafe, it would spread disease or something like that. So the acceptable idea was to protect the consumer but the real idea was to limit the food supply and growing your own food would be illegal. And if you persist in illegal activities like growing your own food, then you’re a criminal.
Weather control
There was a mention then of weather. This was another really striking statement. He said, ‘We can or soon will be able to control the weather.’ He said, ‘I’m not merely referring to dropping iodide crystals into the clouds to precipitate rain that’s already there, but REAL control.’ And weather was seen as a weapon of war, a weapon of influencing public policy.
It could make rain or withhold rain in order to influence certain areas and bring them under your control. There were two sides to this that were rather striking. He said, ‘On the one hand you can make drought during the growing season so that nothing will grow, and on the other hand you can make for very heavy rains during harvest season so the fields are too muddy to bring in the harvest, and indeed one might be able to do both.’ There was no statement how this would be done. It was stated that either it was already possible or very, very close to being possible [in 1969].
Mass mind control
‘People can carry in their minds and act upon two contradictory ideas at one time, provided that these two contradictory ideas are kept far enough apart.’ And the other statement is, ‘You can know pretty well how rational people are going to respond to certain circumstances or to certain information that they encounter. So, to determine the response you want you need only control the kind of data or information that they’re presented or the kinds of circumstance that they’re in; and being rational people they’ll do what you want them to do. They may not fully understand what they’re doing or why.’
Telescreens
One more thing was said, ‘You’ll be watching television and somebody will be watching you at the same time at a central monitoring station.’ Television sets would have a device to enable this [smart TVs]. The TV set would not have to be on in order for this to be operative. Also, the television set can be used to monitor what you are watching. People can tell what you’re watching on TV and how you’re reacting to what you’re watching. And you would not know that you were being watched while you were watching your television.
How would we get people to accept these things into their homes? Well, people would buy them when they buy their own television. They won’t know that they’re on there at first. This was described by being what we now know as Cable TV to replace the antenna TV [the rush to digital TV is part of this]. When you buy a TV set this monitor would just be part of the set and most people would not have enough knowledge to know it was there in the beginning. And then the cable would be the means of carrying the surveillance message to the monitor.
By the time people found out that this monitoring was going on, they would also be very dependent upon television for a number of things. Just the way people are dependent upon the telephone today. One thing the television would be used for would be purchases. You wouldn’t have to leave your home to purchase. You just turn on your TV and there would be a way of interacting with your television channel to the store that you wanted to purchase. And you could flip the switch from place to place to choose a refrigerator or clothing. This would be both convenient, but it would also make you dependent on your television so the built-in monitor would be something you could not do without.
There was some discussion of audio monitors, too, just in case the authorities wanted to hear what was going on in rooms other than where the television monitor was, and in regard to this the statement was made, ‘Any wire that went into your house, for example your telephone wire, could be used this way.
Day was talking here about the World Wide Web which wasn’t ‘invented’ officially until 1989 by English scientist Tim Berners-Lee who ‘wrote the first web browser in 1990 while employed at CERN in Switzerland.’ Oh, really? So how did Richard Day know about it in 1969? Because ‘new’ technology is sitting in the wings all along waiting for the right time to be introduced. How did Day know about Telescreens or smart TVs many decades before they were ‘invented’? How did Orwell?
Human settlement zones
Privately owned housing would become a thing of the past. The cost of housing and financing housing would gradually be made so high that most people couldn’t afford it. People who already owned their houses would be allowed to keep them but as years go by it would be more and more difficult for young people to buy a house.
Young people would more and more become renters, particularly in apartments or condominiums. More and more unsold houses would stand vacant. People just couldn’t buy them. But the cost of housing would not come down. You’d right away think, well the vacant house, the price would come down, the people would buy it. But there was some statement to the effect that the price would be held high even though there were many available so that free market places would not operate.
People would not be able to buy these and gradually more and more of the population would be forced into small apartments. Small apartments which would not accommodate very many children [micro apartments]. Then as the number of real home-owners diminished they would become a minority. There would be no sympathy for them from the majority who dwelled in the apartments and then these homes could be taken by increased taxes or other regulations that would be detrimental to home ownership and would be acceptable to the majority [divide and rule].
Ultimately, people would be assigned where they would live and it would be common to have non-family members living with you. This by way of your not knowing just how far you could trust anybody. This would all be under the control of a central housing authority.
Have this in mind ... when they ask, ‘How many bedrooms in your house? How many bathrooms in your house? Do you have a finished game room?’ This information is personal and is of no national interest to government under our existing Constitution. But you’ll be asked those questions and decide how you want to respond to them [happening].
Disappearance of dissidents
When the new system takes over people will be expected to sign allegiance to it, indicating that they don’t have any reservations or holding back to the old system. ‘There just won’t be any room’, he said, ‘for people who won’t go along. We can’t have such people cluttering up the place so such people would be taken to special places,’ the inference being that at these special places where they were taken, then they would not live very long and ‘disposed of humanely,’ . The system was not going to support them when they would not go along with the system. That would leave death as the only alternative.
He said there would not be any martyrs meaning that the people would not be killed in such a way or disposed of in such a way that they could serve as inspiration to other people the way martyrs do. Rather more like ... ‘People will just disappear.’
The bringing in of the new system he said probably would occur on a weekend in the winter. Everything would shut down on Friday evening and Monday morning when everybody wakened there would be an announcement that the New System was in place. During the process in getting the United States ready for these changes everybody would be busier with less leisure time and less opportunity to really look about and see what was going on around them.
Richard Day also said that there would be mass movements. and migrations of people without roots in their new locations because ‘traditions are easier to change in a place where there are a lot of transplanted people, as compared to trying to change traditions in a place where people grew up and had an extended family, where they had roots.’
This is one of the prime reasons for orchestrating the mass migrations from the Middle East and Africa into Europe with the targeting especially of Germany which has such a sense of its own traditions and culture. Chancellor Merkel knows exactly what she is doing and why.
Day even said in 1969 that soccer would be promoted in the United States because it was an international game and would help to break down a sense of a unique culture underpinned by baseball and American football.
Politics
He said that very few people really know how government works. Something to the effect that elected officials are influenced in ways that they don’t even realise and they carry out plans that have been made for them and they think that they are authors of the plans. But actually they are manipulated in ways they don’t understand.
He went on to say that most people don’t understand how governments operate and even people in high positions in governments, including our own, don’t really understand how and where decisions are made. One of the statements was having to do with change ... the statement was, ‘People will have to get used to the idea of change, so used to change, that they’ll be expecting change.
Nothing will be permanent.’ This often came out in the context of a society of ... where people seemed to have no roots or moorings, but would be passively willing to accept change simply because it was all they had ever known. ‘Everything has two purposes. One is the ostensible purpose which will make it acceptable to people and second is the real purpose which would further the goals of establishing the new system ...’ [He said] ‘People are too trusting, people don’t ask the right questions.’
Gobal economic dictatorship
The stated plan was that different parts of the world would be assigned different roles of industry and commerce in a unified global system. The continued pre-eminence of the United States and the relative independence and self-sufficiency of the United States would have to be changed.
This was one of the several times that he said in order to create a new structure, you first have to tear down the old, and American industry was one example of that ... this was especially true of our heavy industries that would be cut back while the same industries were being developed in other countries, notably Japan. And at this point there was some discussion of steel and particularly automobiles –I remember him saying that automobiles would be imported from Japan on an equal footing with our own domestically produced automobiles, but the Japanese product would be better.
Things would be made so they would break and fall apart, that is in the United States, so that people would tend to prefer the imported variety and this would give a bit of a boost to foreign competitors. One example was Japanese. In 1969 Japanese automobiles, if they were sold here at all I don’t remember, but they certainly weren’t very popular. But the idea was you could get a little bit disgusted with your Ford, GM or Chrysler product or whatever because little things like window handles would fall off more and plastic parts would break which had they been made of metal would hold up.
Your patriotism about buying American would soon give way to practicality that if you bought Japanese, German or imported that it would last longer and you would be better off. Patriotism would go down the drain then. The United States was to be kept strong in information, communications, high technology, education and agriculture. The United States was seen as continuing to be sort of the keystone of this global system. But heavy industry would be transported out [exactly what has happened].
Centrally-controlled money Money would become predominately credit. It was already ... money is primarily a credit thing but exchange of money would be not cash or palpable things but electronic credit. People would carry money only in very small amounts for things like chewing gum and candy bars. Just pocket sorts of things. Any purchase of any significant amount would be done electronically.
Earnings would be electronically entered into your account. It would be a single banking system. It may have the appearance of being more than one but ultimately and basically it would be one single banking system, so that when you got paid your pay would be entered for you into your account balance and then when you purchased anything at the point of purchase it would be deducted from your account balance and you would actually carry nothing with you.
Also, computer records can be kept on whatever it was you purchased so that if you were purchasing too much of any particular item and some official wanted to know what you were doing with your money they could go back and review your purchases and determine what you were buying.
There was a statement that any purchase of significant size like an automobile, bicycle, a refrigerator, a radio or television or whatever might have some sort of identification on it so it could be traced, so that very quickly anything which was either given away or stolen –whatever –authorities would be able to establish who purchased it and when. Computers would allow this to happen.
The ability to save would be greatly curtailed. People would just not be able to save any considerable degree of wealth. There was some statement of recognition that wealth represents power and wealth in the hands of a lot of people is not good for the people in charge so if you save too much you might be taxed. The more you save the higher rate of tax on your savings so your savings really could never get very far [see negative interest rates]. And also if you began to show a pattern of saving too much you might have your pay cut. We would say, ‘Well, your saving instead of spending. You really don’t need all that money.’ ... The idea being to prevent people from accumulating any wealth which might have long range disruptive influence on the system.
People would be encouraged to use credit to borrow and then also be encouraged to renege on their debt so they would destroy their own credit. The idea here is that, again, if you’re too stupid to handle credit wisely, this gives the authorities the opportunity to come down hard on you once you’ve shot your credit.
Electronic payments initially would all be based on different kinds of credit cards ... these were already in use in 1969 to some extent. Not as much as now. But people would have credit cards with the electronic strip on it and once they got used to that then it would be pointed out the advantage of having all of that combined into a single credit card, serving a single monetary system and then they won’t have to carry around all that plastic.
Microchipped people
So the next step would be the single card and then the next step would be to replace the single card with a skin implant. The single card [smartphone] could be lost or stolen, give rise to problems; could be exchanged with somebody else to confuse identity. The skin implant on the other hand would be not losable or counterfeitable or transferrable to another person so you and your accounts would be identified without any possibility of error. And the skin implants would have to be put some place that would be convenient to the skin; for example your right hand or your forehead [right on the third eye] ...
There was some mention, also, of implants that would lend themselves to surveillance by providing radio signals. This could be under the skin or a dental implant ... put in like a filling so that either fugitives or possibly other citizens could be identified by a certain frequency from his personal transmitter and could be located at any time or any place by any authority who wanted to find him. This would be particularly useful for somebody who broke out of prison. There was more discussion of personal surveillance [just look around at what is happening today].
Imposition of world system through nuclear war
If there were too many people in the right places who resisted this [world dictatorship], there might be a need to use one or two –possibly more –nuclear weapons. As it was put, this would be possibly needed to convince people that ‘We mean business’. That was followed by the statement that, ‘By the time one or two of those went off then everybody –even the most reluctant –would yield.’
He said something about ‘this negotiated peace would be very convincing,’ as kind of in a framework or in a context that the whole thing was rehearsed but nobody would know it. People hearing about it would be convinced that it was a genuine negotiation between hostile enemies who finally had come to the realisation that peace was better than war [This syncs with the Albert Pike letter in 1871 about three world wars and what would happen after the third one].
Engineered terrorism
There was a discussion of terrorism. Terrorism would be used widely in Europe and in other parts of the world. Terrorism at that time was thought would not be necessary in the United States. It could become necessary in the United States if the United States did not move rapidly enough into accepting the system [hence 9/ 11 to speed everything along]. But at least in the foreseeable future it was not planned ... Maybe terrorism would not be required here, but the implication being that it would be indeed used if it was necessary.
Along with this came a bit of a scolding that Americans had had it too good anyway and just a little bit of terrorism would help convince Americans that the world is indeed a dangerous place ... or can be if we don’t relinquish control to the proper authorities.
Population control and killing the elderly
Everybody has a right to live only so long. The old are no longer useful. They become a burden. You should be ready to accept death. Most people are. An arbitrary age limit could be established. After all, you have a right to only so many steak dinners, so many orgasms, and so many good pleasures in life. And after you have had enough of them and you’re no longer productive, working, and contributing, then you should be ready to step aside for the next generation.
Some things that would help people realise that they had lived long enough, he mentioned several of these. I don’t remember them all –here are a few: Use of very pale printing ink on forms that people ... are necessary to fill out, so that older people wouldn’t be able to read the pale ink as easily and would need to go to younger people for help.
Automobile traffic patterns –there would be more high-speed traffic lanes ... traffic patterns that ... older people with their slower reflexes would have trouble dealing with and thus, lose some of their independence.
A big item ... was elaborated at some length was that the cost of medical care would be made burdensomely high. Medical care would be connected very closely with one’s work but also would be made very, very high in cost so that it would simply be unavailable to people beyond a certain time. And unless they had a remarkably rich, supporting family, they would just have to do without care.
And the idea was that if everybody says, ‘Enough! What a burden it is on the young to try to maintain the old people,’ then the young would become agreeable to helping mom and dad along the way, provided this was done humanely and with dignity. And then the example was there could be like a nice, farewell party, a real celebration. Mom and dad had done a good job. And then after the party’s over they take the ‘demise pill’.
People won’t be allowed to have babies just because they want to or because they are careless. Most families would be limited to two. Some people would be allowed only one, and the outstanding person or persons might be selected and allowed to have three. But most people would [be] allowed to have only two babies.
Education
... Pressures of the accelerated academic program, the accelerated demands where kids would feel they had to be part of something –one or another athletic club or some school activity –these pressures he recognised would cause some students to burn out. He said ‘the smartest ones will learn how to cope with pressures and to survive. There will be some help available to students in handling stress, but the unfit won’t be able to make it. They will then move on to other things.’
In this connection and later on in the connection with drug abuse and alcohol abuse he indicated that psychiatric services to help would be increased dramatically. In all the pushing for achievement, it was recognised that many people would need help, and the people worth keeping around would be able to accept and benefit from that help, and still be super achievers. Those who could not would fall by the wayside and therefore were sort of dispensable –‘expendable’ I guess is the word I want.
Education would be lifelong. Adults would be going to school. There’ll always be new information that adults must have to keep up. When you can’t keep up anymore, you’re too old. This was another way of letting older people know that the time had come for them to move on and take the demise pill. If you got too tired to keep up with your education, or you got too old to learn new information, then this was a signal –you begin to prepare to get ready to step aside.
He was already talking about computers in education, and at that time he said anybody who wanted computer access, or access to books that were not directly related to their field of study would have to have a very good reason for so doing. Otherwise, access would be denied.
Constant change
Nothing is permanent. Streets would be rerouted, renamed. Areas you had not seen in a while would become unfamiliar. Among other things, this would contribute to older people feeling that it was time to move on, they feel they couldn’t even keep up with the changes in areas that were once familiar.
Buildings would be allowed to stand empty and deteriorate, and streets would be allowed to deteriorate in certain localities. The purpose of this was to provide the jungle, the depressed atmosphere for the unfit. Somewhere in this same connection he mentioned that buildings and bridges would be made so that they would collapse after a while, there would be more accidents involving airplanes and railroads and automobiles. All of this to contribute to the feeling of insecurity, that nothing was safe.
Portrayal of violence (movies/ video games)
Violence would be made more graphic. This was intended to desensitise people to violence. There might need to be a time when people would witness real violence and be a part of it. Later on it will become clear where this is headed.
So there would be more realistic violence in entertainment which would make it easier for people to adjust. People’s attitudes toward death would change. People would not be so fearful of it but more accepting of it, and they would not be so aghast at the sight of dead people or injured people. We don’t need to have a genteel population paralysed by what they might see. People would just learn to say, well I don’t want that to happen to me. This was the first statement suggesting that the plan includes numerous human casualties which the survivors would see.
Food control
Food supplies would come under tight control. If population growth didn’t slow down, food shortages could be created in a hurry and people would realise the dangers of overpopulation. Ultimately, whether the population slows down or not the food supply is to be brought under centralised control so that people would have enough to be well-nourished but they would not have enough to support any fugitive from the new system. Growing one’s own food would be outlawed.
This would be done under some sort of pretext. In the beginning I mentioned there were two purposes for everything –one the ostensible purpose and one the real purpose, and the ostensible purpose here would be that growing your own vegetables was unsafe, it would spread disease or something like that. So the acceptable idea was to protect the consumer but the real idea was to limit the food supply and growing your own food would be illegal. And if you persist in illegal activities like growing your own food, then you’re a criminal.
Weather control
There was a mention then of weather. This was another really striking statement. He said, ‘We can or soon will be able to control the weather.’ He said, ‘I’m not merely referring to dropping iodide crystals into the clouds to precipitate rain that’s already there, but REAL control.’ And weather was seen as a weapon of war, a weapon of influencing public policy.
It could make rain or withhold rain in order to influence certain areas and bring them under your control. There were two sides to this that were rather striking. He said, ‘On the one hand you can make drought during the growing season so that nothing will grow, and on the other hand you can make for very heavy rains during harvest season so the fields are too muddy to bring in the harvest, and indeed one might be able to do both.’ There was no statement how this would be done. It was stated that either it was already possible or very, very close to being possible [in 1969].
Mass mind control
‘People can carry in their minds and act upon two contradictory ideas at one time, provided that these two contradictory ideas are kept far enough apart.’ And the other statement is, ‘You can know pretty well how rational people are going to respond to certain circumstances or to certain information that they encounter. So, to determine the response you want you need only control the kind of data or information that they’re presented or the kinds of circumstance that they’re in; and being rational people they’ll do what you want them to do. They may not fully understand what they’re doing or why.’
Telescreens
One more thing was said, ‘You’ll be watching television and somebody will be watching you at the same time at a central monitoring station.’ Television sets would have a device to enable this [smart TVs]. The TV set would not have to be on in order for this to be operative. Also, the television set can be used to monitor what you are watching. People can tell what you’re watching on TV and how you’re reacting to what you’re watching. And you would not know that you were being watched while you were watching your television.
How would we get people to accept these things into their homes? Well, people would buy them when they buy their own television. They won’t know that they’re on there at first. This was described by being what we now know as Cable TV to replace the antenna TV [the rush to digital TV is part of this]. When you buy a TV set this monitor would just be part of the set and most people would not have enough knowledge to know it was there in the beginning. And then the cable would be the means of carrying the surveillance message to the monitor.
By the time people found out that this monitoring was going on, they would also be very dependent upon television for a number of things. Just the way people are dependent upon the telephone today. One thing the television would be used for would be purchases. You wouldn’t have to leave your home to purchase. You just turn on your TV and there would be a way of interacting with your television channel to the store that you wanted to purchase. And you could flip the switch from place to place to choose a refrigerator or clothing. This would be both convenient, but it would also make you dependent on your television so the built-in monitor would be something you could not do without.
There was some discussion of audio monitors, too, just in case the authorities wanted to hear what was going on in rooms other than where the television monitor was, and in regard to this the statement was made, ‘Any wire that went into your house, for example your telephone wire, could be used this way.
Day was talking here about the World Wide Web which wasn’t ‘invented’ officially until 1989 by English scientist Tim Berners-Lee who ‘wrote the first web browser in 1990 while employed at CERN in Switzerland.’ Oh, really? So how did Richard Day know about it in 1969? Because ‘new’ technology is sitting in the wings all along waiting for the right time to be introduced. How did Day know about Telescreens or smart TVs many decades before they were ‘invented’? How did Orwell?
Human settlement zones
Privately owned housing would become a thing of the past. The cost of housing and financing housing would gradually be made so high that most people couldn’t afford it. People who already owned their houses would be allowed to keep them but as years go by it would be more and more difficult for young people to buy a house.
Young people would more and more become renters, particularly in apartments or condominiums. More and more unsold houses would stand vacant. People just couldn’t buy them. But the cost of housing would not come down. You’d right away think, well the vacant house, the price would come down, the people would buy it. But there was some statement to the effect that the price would be held high even though there were many available so that free market places would not operate.
People would not be able to buy these and gradually more and more of the population would be forced into small apartments. Small apartments which would not accommodate very many children [micro apartments]. Then as the number of real home-owners diminished they would become a minority. There would be no sympathy for them from the majority who dwelled in the apartments and then these homes could be taken by increased taxes or other regulations that would be detrimental to home ownership and would be acceptable to the majority [divide and rule].
Ultimately, people would be assigned where they would live and it would be common to have non-family members living with you. This by way of your not knowing just how far you could trust anybody. This would all be under the control of a central housing authority.
Have this in mind ... when they ask, ‘How many bedrooms in your house? How many bathrooms in your house? Do you have a finished game room?’ This information is personal and is of no national interest to government under our existing Constitution. But you’ll be asked those questions and decide how you want to respond to them [happening].
Disappearance of dissidents
When the new system takes over people will be expected to sign allegiance to it, indicating that they don’t have any reservations or holding back to the old system. ‘There just won’t be any room’, he said, ‘for people who won’t go along. We can’t have such people cluttering up the place so such people would be taken to special places,’ the inference being that at these special places where they were taken, then they would not live very long and ‘disposed of humanely,’ . The system was not going to support them when they would not go along with the system. That would leave death as the only alternative.
He said there would not be any martyrs meaning that the people would not be killed in such a way or disposed of in such a way that they could serve as inspiration to other people the way martyrs do. Rather more like ... ‘People will just disappear.’
The bringing in of the new system he said probably would occur on a weekend in the winter. Everything would shut down on Friday evening and Monday morning when everybody wakened there would be an announcement that the New System was in place. During the process in getting the United States ready for these changes everybody would be busier with less leisure time and less opportunity to really look about and see what was going on around them.
Richard Day also said that there would be mass movements. and migrations of people without roots in their new locations because ‘traditions are easier to change in a place where there are a lot of transplanted people, as compared to trying to change traditions in a place where people grew up and had an extended family, where they had roots.’
This is one of the prime reasons for orchestrating the mass migrations from the Middle East and Africa into Europe with the targeting especially of Germany which has such a sense of its own traditions and culture. Chancellor Merkel knows exactly what she is doing and why.
Day even said in 1969 that soccer would be promoted in the United States because it was an international game and would help to break down a sense of a unique culture underpinned by baseball and American football.
by Steve at 02-16-2018, 10:35 PM
1 comments
The Fabian Society is a highly significant strand in the secret society web, with its appropriate logo of the wolf in sheep’s clothing.
‘Fabian’ comes from ‘Fabius’, the Roman general Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus. His claim to fame was to wear down the enemy over long periods and avoid battles that could prove decisive either way. He and his troops would walk in and take over only when the enemy had been sufficiently weakened.
This is the very technique that has been used on humanity since the Elite hijack and continues in far reaching ways today. If you have access to the inner core of the Fabian Society you will know about the projected agenda for human enslavement.
Aldous Huxley taught French at Eton, the super-exclusive college near Windsor Castle just outside London where the royal children go and others from the most elite bloodline families. One of Huxley’s pupils was a boy called Eric Blair, later far better known as ... George Orwell. Huxley introduced Orwell to the Fabian Society and the knowledge they both accessed allowed them to so accurately portray a global Big Brother state based on total control and, in Huxley’s case, manipulation by genetics, drugs and mind control to impose the will of the Elite few on the human many. Huxley supported the ‘cause’ while Orwell worked almost to his dying day to expose it in 1984 (the year that marked the 100th anniversary of the Fabian Society).
The Fabian Society also established and still directs the London School of Economics, one of the foremost ‘education’ centres for developing and recruiting the bloodline operatives of the next generation. Dr Richard Day, a Rockefeller (bloodline) insider, told a group of paediatricians in Pennsylvania in 1969 how America and the world was going to change in line with a global plan. What he said has since proved to be correct in virtually every detail.
All these people knew what was planned because there is a knowledge base within the network that is very different to the one in the public domain. Another aspect to the way advanced knowledge was employed by the powers that colonised the world from their headquarters in Europe involves language (frequency, vibration). Whenever colonialists conquered a country they imposed their own language –this is why South Americans today speak Spanish or Portuguese while their original languages are marginalised, discouraged and even officially suppressed. The inner sanctums of the secret societies know that if you change the language you change the vibration (information fields) of the people and their society. English is the most effective vibrational prison within modern languages and so it has been promoted to worldwide prominence.
‘Fabian’ comes from ‘Fabius’, the Roman general Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus. His claim to fame was to wear down the enemy over long periods and avoid battles that could prove decisive either way. He and his troops would walk in and take over only when the enemy had been sufficiently weakened.
This is the very technique that has been used on humanity since the Elite hijack and continues in far reaching ways today. If you have access to the inner core of the Fabian Society you will know about the projected agenda for human enslavement.
Aldous Huxley taught French at Eton, the super-exclusive college near Windsor Castle just outside London where the royal children go and others from the most elite bloodline families. One of Huxley’s pupils was a boy called Eric Blair, later far better known as ... George Orwell. Huxley introduced Orwell to the Fabian Society and the knowledge they both accessed allowed them to so accurately portray a global Big Brother state based on total control and, in Huxley’s case, manipulation by genetics, drugs and mind control to impose the will of the Elite few on the human many. Huxley supported the ‘cause’ while Orwell worked almost to his dying day to expose it in 1984 (the year that marked the 100th anniversary of the Fabian Society).
The Fabian Society also established and still directs the London School of Economics, one of the foremost ‘education’ centres for developing and recruiting the bloodline operatives of the next generation. Dr Richard Day, a Rockefeller (bloodline) insider, told a group of paediatricians in Pennsylvania in 1969 how America and the world was going to change in line with a global plan. What he said has since proved to be correct in virtually every detail.
All these people knew what was planned because there is a knowledge base within the network that is very different to the one in the public domain. Another aspect to the way advanced knowledge was employed by the powers that colonised the world from their headquarters in Europe involves language (frequency, vibration). Whenever colonialists conquered a country they imposed their own language –this is why South Americans today speak Spanish or Portuguese while their original languages are marginalised, discouraged and even officially suppressed. The inner sanctums of the secret societies know that if you change the language you change the vibration (information fields) of the people and their society. English is the most effective vibrational prison within modern languages and so it has been promoted to worldwide prominence.
by Steve at 02-16-2018, 10:12 PM
86 comments
The idea of the cashless society is all about control. Cash is disappearing by the day and countries like Sweden are virtually cashless already.
Look at the consequences for Greece being locked into a single currency over which it has no control when the plan is for a global single currency. Greece today will be the world tomorrow, if we allow it to happen.
The introduction of the European single currency, the euro, was never an end in itself. It was only a step towards the goal of a single electronic global currency, just as the creation of the European Central Bank (ECB) was a step towards a world central bank.
For example, the euro’s job was just to mop up all the previous individual currencies in Europe like the deutschmark, lira, guilder, franc and peseta. It was always planned that the euro would eventually fail and open the way for a world currency.
A world central bank is now being called for by the Vatican, political leaders and financial manipulators like billionaire George Soros.
Look at the consequences for Greece being locked into a single currency over which it has no control when the plan is for a global single currency. Greece today will be the world tomorrow, if we allow it to happen.
The introduction of the European single currency, the euro, was never an end in itself. It was only a step towards the goal of a single electronic global currency, just as the creation of the European Central Bank (ECB) was a step towards a world central bank.
For example, the euro’s job was just to mop up all the previous individual currencies in Europe like the deutschmark, lira, guilder, franc and peseta. It was always planned that the euro would eventually fail and open the way for a world currency.
A world central bank is now being called for by the Vatican, political leaders and financial manipulators like billionaire George Soros.
by Greg D at 02-16-2018, 07:33 AM
2 comments
Luke 21:24 And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled. God promised blessings on Israel if they followed him, but they didn't. Lev 26:24 Then will I also walk contrary unto you, and will punish you yet seven times for your sins.
In 604 BC King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon, who himself had endured a seven times punishment in Daniel Ch 4 verse 25. Captured Jerusalem and took Judah (Jews), into captivity.
360 days is the average of a Solar and a Lunar year circuit. If then 360 years is a time, then applying that Biblical formula of seven times you are looking at a 2520 year time period, for the end of a times of the Gentiles, occupying Jerusalem. The last occupying force being that of the Ottoman Turks. The Turkish leader said “When the waters of the Nile flow into Palestine, then will a prophet of the Lord come and drive the Turks out of this land”. This seemed impossible at the time it was spoken. In order to supply our troops (British and Australian) crossing the desert, the waters of the Nile were brought by British engineers through a pipeline, which they laid under the Suez Canal and across the desert, and ‘the waters of the Nile flowed into Palestine. Not only so, but the great leader who drove the Turks out was named Allenby, which in its Arabic version Allah-en-Nebi (Nebi means prophet, and as everyone knows, ‘Allah’ means God), and by this Arabic name he was known throughout Palestine. Thanks in part to the Australian Light horse, miraculous Cavalry charge, which captured the wells of Beersheba.The British army lead by General Allenby reached Jerusalem which was occupied,by a Turkish army. Not wanting to destroy the city, he wrote to the king and asked what he should do, to which the king replied, pray about it. It was bought to the Generals attention a bible scripture.
Isaiah Ch 31:5 As birds flying, so will the LORD of hosts defend Jerusalem; defending also he will deliver it; and passing over he will preserve it. He decided to send a squadron of by-planes (described as flying swallows) to drop leaflets on the city, calling for their surrender, because Allenby translated as messenger of Allah, they surrendered the city without a shot being fired. On the 5th of December 1917, the day of the seven times punishment ended, a British leader (the British are the descendants of the ten other tribes of Israel), dismounted from his horse and walked through the Jaffa gate. He was humbled by the deliverance of the city and glorified God. Isaiah Ch 31 verse 5 was the scripture of the day in the English churches for that date. You could say this event is one of the biggest coincidences of all time or see the hand of an all powerful God at work.
In 604 BC King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon, who himself had endured a seven times punishment in Daniel Ch 4 verse 25. Captured Jerusalem and took Judah (Jews), into captivity.
360 days is the average of a Solar and a Lunar year circuit. If then 360 years is a time, then applying that Biblical formula of seven times you are looking at a 2520 year time period, for the end of a times of the Gentiles, occupying Jerusalem. The last occupying force being that of the Ottoman Turks. The Turkish leader said “When the waters of the Nile flow into Palestine, then will a prophet of the Lord come and drive the Turks out of this land”. This seemed impossible at the time it was spoken. In order to supply our troops (British and Australian) crossing the desert, the waters of the Nile were brought by British engineers through a pipeline, which they laid under the Suez Canal and across the desert, and ‘the waters of the Nile flowed into Palestine. Not only so, but the great leader who drove the Turks out was named Allenby, which in its Arabic version Allah-en-Nebi (Nebi means prophet, and as everyone knows, ‘Allah’ means God), and by this Arabic name he was known throughout Palestine. Thanks in part to the Australian Light horse, miraculous Cavalry charge, which captured the wells of Beersheba.The British army lead by General Allenby reached Jerusalem which was occupied,by a Turkish army. Not wanting to destroy the city, he wrote to the king and asked what he should do, to which the king replied, pray about it. It was bought to the Generals attention a bible scripture.
Isaiah Ch 31:5 As birds flying, so will the LORD of hosts defend Jerusalem; defending also he will deliver it; and passing over he will preserve it. He decided to send a squadron of by-planes (described as flying swallows) to drop leaflets on the city, calling for their surrender, because Allenby translated as messenger of Allah, they surrendered the city without a shot being fired. On the 5th of December 1917, the day of the seven times punishment ended, a British leader (the British are the descendants of the ten other tribes of Israel), dismounted from his horse and walked through the Jaffa gate. He was humbled by the deliverance of the city and glorified God. Isaiah Ch 31 verse 5 was the scripture of the day in the English churches for that date. You could say this event is one of the biggest coincidences of all time or see the hand of an all powerful God at work.
by Steve at 02-16-2018, 07:27 AM
4 comments
..... or no funding.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hXaCym8RjJ...e=youtu.be
... the above link has been deleted by YouTube (surprise surprise)
I’ve found a better link -
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Z8RduVKR8RTD/
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hXaCym8RjJ...e=youtu.be
... the above link has been deleted by YouTube (surprise surprise)
I’ve found a better link -
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Z8RduVKR8RTD/
by Steve at 02-15-2018, 10:49 PM
9 comments
Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, an instruction manual for agents of the conspiracy explaining how to mass mind control the population.
You look at the world and know that something is deeply wrong, but the question is what exactly? The world seems crazy, cruel and unjust, but why? - where does this ‘crazy’ come from?
As in the Matrix film, Morpheus said to Neo: You’re here because you know something. What you know you can’t explain, but you feel it. You’ve felt it your entire life, that there’s something wrong with the world. You don’t know what it is, but it’s there, like a splinter in your mind, driving you mad. It is this feeling that has brought you to me.
So many people today are at the stage where they can see that something is seriously amiss with the world, but they can’t put their finger on the what and the why. This engineered bewilderment was referred to in a document that came to light some decades ago called Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, an instruction manual for agents of the conspiracy explaining how to mass mind control the population.
The document was dated May 1979 and was apparently found in July 1986 in an IBM copier bought at a surplus sale. The quiet wars it talks about are the unseen wars on the human mind and the silent weapons are mental and emotional manipulations based on manufacturing situations to which the mind and emotions respond.
The document describes the diversion strategy which includes:
It also made the following point all those decades ago and this is precisely what is happening today: When the government is able to collect tax and seize private property without just compensation, it is an indication that the public is ripe for surrender and is consenting to enslavement and legal encroachment. A good and easily quantified indicator of harvest time is the number of public citizens who pay income tax despite an obvious lack of reciprocal or honest service from the government.
Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars describes how it is necessary in pursuit of collective enslavement to achieve ‘the consent of the people to labor and consequently assume a certain rank, position, level, or class in the social structure, i.e., to provide labor at various levels in the pecking order’ (know your place).
The document says that then each class, in guaranteeing its own level of income, controls the class immediately below and hence preserves the class structure. ‘This provides stability and security, but also government from the top’. It identifies a threat to the ‘sovereignty of the elite’ of the lower classes becoming more educated and demanding more of what the elite have, but ‘if this rise of the lower classes can be postponed long enough, the elite can achieve energy dominance, and labor by consent no longer will hold a position of an essential energy source’.
In other words, they replace the labour of the people with technology and then the people can go f*ck themselves. We are heading to that point so fast today. The writers of the document say that ‘until such energy dominance is absolutely established, the consent of people to labor and letting others handle their affairs must be taken into consideration, since failure to do so could cause the people to interfere in the final transfer of energy sources to the control of the elite’.
They say that it is essential to recognise that public consent was still an essential key (at the time it was written) to the release of energy in the process of ‘economic amplification’ (stealing the world).
So, it is essential that we withdraw our consent to all this en masse.
The document said of this ‘quiet war’ on the human psyche: It shoots situations, instead of bullets; propelled by data processing, instead of chemical reaction (explosion); originating from bits of data, instead of grains of gunpowder; from a computer, instead of a gun; operated by a computer programmer, instead of marksman; under the orders of a banking magnate, instead of a military general.
It makes no obvious explosive noises, causes no obvious physical or mental injuries, and does not obviously interfere with anyone’s daily social life. Yet it makes an unmistakable ‘noise’, causes unmistakable physical and mental damage, and unmistakably interferes with daily social life, i.e., unmistakable to a trained observer, one who knows what to look for.
The public cannot comprehend this weapon, and therefore cannot believe that they are being attacked and subdued by a weapon. The public might instinctively feel that something is wrong, but because of the technical nature of the silent weapon, they cannot express their feeling in a rational way, or handle the problem with intelligence. Therefore, they do not know how to cry for help, and do not know how to associate with others to defend themselves against it.
When a silent weapon is applied gradually to the public, the public adjusts/adapts to its presence and learns to tolerate its encroachment on their lives until the pressure (psychological via economic) becomes too great and they crack up. Therefore, the silent weapon is a type of biological warfare. It attacks the vitality, options, and mobility of the individuals of a society by knowing, understanding, manipulating, and attacking their sources of natural and social energy, and their physical, mental, and emotional strengths and weaknesses.
You look at the world and know that something is deeply wrong, but the question is what exactly? The world seems crazy, cruel and unjust, but why? - where does this ‘crazy’ come from?
As in the Matrix film, Morpheus said to Neo: You’re here because you know something. What you know you can’t explain, but you feel it. You’ve felt it your entire life, that there’s something wrong with the world. You don’t know what it is, but it’s there, like a splinter in your mind, driving you mad. It is this feeling that has brought you to me.
So many people today are at the stage where they can see that something is seriously amiss with the world, but they can’t put their finger on the what and the why. This engineered bewilderment was referred to in a document that came to light some decades ago called Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, an instruction manual for agents of the conspiracy explaining how to mass mind control the population.
The document was dated May 1979 and was apparently found in July 1986 in an IBM copier bought at a surplus sale. The quiet wars it talks about are the unseen wars on the human mind and the silent weapons are mental and emotional manipulations based on manufacturing situations to which the mind and emotions respond.
The document describes the diversion strategy which includes:
- Media: Keep the adult public attention diverted away from the real social issues, and captivated by matters of no real importance;
- Schools: Keep the young public ignorant of real mathematics, real economics, real law, and real history;
- Entertainment: Keep the public entertainment below a sixth-grade level.
- Work: Keep the public busy, busy, busy, with no time to think; back on the farm with the other animals.
It also made the following point all those decades ago and this is precisely what is happening today: When the government is able to collect tax and seize private property without just compensation, it is an indication that the public is ripe for surrender and is consenting to enslavement and legal encroachment. A good and easily quantified indicator of harvest time is the number of public citizens who pay income tax despite an obvious lack of reciprocal or honest service from the government.
Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars describes how it is necessary in pursuit of collective enslavement to achieve ‘the consent of the people to labor and consequently assume a certain rank, position, level, or class in the social structure, i.e., to provide labor at various levels in the pecking order’ (know your place).
The document says that then each class, in guaranteeing its own level of income, controls the class immediately below and hence preserves the class structure. ‘This provides stability and security, but also government from the top’. It identifies a threat to the ‘sovereignty of the elite’ of the lower classes becoming more educated and demanding more of what the elite have, but ‘if this rise of the lower classes can be postponed long enough, the elite can achieve energy dominance, and labor by consent no longer will hold a position of an essential energy source’.
In other words, they replace the labour of the people with technology and then the people can go f*ck themselves. We are heading to that point so fast today. The writers of the document say that ‘until such energy dominance is absolutely established, the consent of people to labor and letting others handle their affairs must be taken into consideration, since failure to do so could cause the people to interfere in the final transfer of energy sources to the control of the elite’.
They say that it is essential to recognise that public consent was still an essential key (at the time it was written) to the release of energy in the process of ‘economic amplification’ (stealing the world).
So, it is essential that we withdraw our consent to all this en masse.
The document said of this ‘quiet war’ on the human psyche: It shoots situations, instead of bullets; propelled by data processing, instead of chemical reaction (explosion); originating from bits of data, instead of grains of gunpowder; from a computer, instead of a gun; operated by a computer programmer, instead of marksman; under the orders of a banking magnate, instead of a military general.
It makes no obvious explosive noises, causes no obvious physical or mental injuries, and does not obviously interfere with anyone’s daily social life. Yet it makes an unmistakable ‘noise’, causes unmistakable physical and mental damage, and unmistakably interferes with daily social life, i.e., unmistakable to a trained observer, one who knows what to look for.
The public cannot comprehend this weapon, and therefore cannot believe that they are being attacked and subdued by a weapon. The public might instinctively feel that something is wrong, but because of the technical nature of the silent weapon, they cannot express their feeling in a rational way, or handle the problem with intelligence. Therefore, they do not know how to cry for help, and do not know how to associate with others to defend themselves against it.
When a silent weapon is applied gradually to the public, the public adjusts/adapts to its presence and learns to tolerate its encroachment on their lives until the pressure (psychological via economic) becomes too great and they crack up. Therefore, the silent weapon is a type of biological warfare. It attacks the vitality, options, and mobility of the individuals of a society by knowing, understanding, manipulating, and attacking their sources of natural and social energy, and their physical, mental, and emotional strengths and weaknesses.
by Steve at 02-15-2018, 09:50 PM
0 comments
Here’s a Howard Hughes podcast on ex-government member Catherine Fitts and her intriguing views on the hidden world government and finance...
http://theunexplained.tv/paranormal-podc...stin-fitts
http://theunexplained.tv/paranormal-podc...stin-fitts
Forum: Front Page posts
by Front Page Posts at 02-15-2018, 10:27 AM
11 comments
Comment on Truther Industrial Complex Goes Into Overdrive After Florida School Shooting.. Post away!
Forum: Middle East
by Steve at 02-14-2018, 09:56 PM
168 comments
The State of Israel
Another Elite ambition during the First World War was to ensure the recognition by Britain of a Jewish homeland in what was then Arab Palestine. The political movement known as Zionism had been introduced to campaign for a Jewish homeland, but it is often misunderstood: all Jewish people are not Zionists and all Zionists are not Jewish. Zionism is not a religion or a race; it is a political movement consisting of people, Jews and non-Jews, who support the claim for a Jewish homeland. If you support that, you are a Zionist, too, no matter what your race or religious belief.
To say that Zionism is the Jewish race is like saying the British Labour Party is the English race. Zionism was founded in the last century by an atheist, Theodore Herzl, and it is used as a front for the Global Elite and a means to dupe Jewish people as a whole. The offer to recognise a homeland in Palestine was designed both to persuade the United States to enter the war and later to create ‘managed conflict’ and a situation of ‘divide and rule’ in the oil-rich Middle East.
More than twenty years after the First World War, on April 25th 1939, US Senator Gerald P. Nye of North Dakota revealed to the Senate some of the background to Britain’s recognition of a Jewish homeland and the First World War in general. He said he had been given some documents called ‘The Next War’. The title referred to the Second World War, which the writers of the documents already knew was going to happen. One volume, called ‘Propaganda in the Next War’, also discussed, in passing, how the American people had been tricked into fighting in World War I.....
..... It said:
“For some time the issue as to which side the United States would take hung in the balance, the final result was a credit to our British propaganda. There remain the Jews. It has been estimated that of the world Jewish population of approximately fifteen million, no fewer than five million are in the United States; 25% of the inhabitants of New York are Jews. “During the Great War we bought off this huge American Jewish public by the promise of the Jewish national home in Palestine, held by Ludendorf to be a master stroke of allied propaganda, as it enabled us not only to appeal to Jews in America, but to Jews in Germany as well.”
The Americans entered the war in 1917. The Balfour Declaration came on November 6th of that year, when Arthur (Lord) Balfour (Comm 300), the British Foreign Secretary and member of the Round Table’s inner elite, officially recognised Palestine as a homeland for Jewish people.
We need to look at this on many levels again. The propagandists may well have believed it was a ‘master stroke’ to bring America into the war, but what they didn’t know was that they were being manipulated to manipulate others. America was coming into the war anyway. A Jewish homeland in Palestine had been a long-time Elite strategy and the guise of bringing America into the war was used to encourage British politicians to accept it.
The Balfour Declaration was a terrible blow to the Arabs who had, under the leadership and promises of the Englishman, T.E. Lawrence (‘ Lawrence of Arabia’), fought on Britain’s behalf against the Turks and they played a crucial role in winning the war.
...... The Arabs were promised full post-war sovereignty and independence for their support and this was confirmed in official correspondence. Lawrence, a close friend of Winston Churchill (Comm 300), knew full well that he was lying to the Arabs he was leading. Some years later Lawrence said: “I risked the fraud on my conviction that Arab help was necessary to our cheap and speedy victory in the East, and that better we win and break our word, than lose… The Arab inspiration was our main tool for winning the Eastern War. So I assured them that England kept her word in letter and in spirit. In this comfort they performed their fine things; but, of course, instead of being proud of what we did together, I was continually bitter and ashamed.”
While Lawrence and the British were promising the Arabs independence, they were in the process of making a commitment to give away Palestine as a Jewish homeland. Lawrence, Milner, and Victor Rothschild all knew each other. The Balfour Declaration was not an announcement by the Foreign Secretary to the House of Commons. It took the form, appropriately, of a letter between Arthur Balfour (Comm 300), of the Rothschild-funded Round Table, and Lord Lionel Walter Rothschild (Comm 300), the representative of the English Federation of Zionists, which was set up with Rothschild money. It was written by the leading voice in Lloyd George’s wartime cabinet, the Round Table’s most influential figure, Lord Milner (who was made chairman of Rio Tinto Zinc by Lord Rothschild).
The Balfour Declaration was a decree by the Rothschilds/Global Elite and not part of any democratic process. Balfour’s letter to Lord Rothschild, believed by many to have been written by Lord Rothschild, in league with Alfred Milner, said:
“I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty’s Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet: His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours for the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine [what a joke!], or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country. I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.”
At the time less than one per cent of the population of Palestine was Jewish and yet this letter was to form the basis on which the post-war world was to be divided and Arab control of Palestine handed over. It had nothing to do with what was best for Jews, even though its architects, the Rothschilds, are Jewish if only in name. It was about the wider strategic oil and New World Order possibilities that a foothold in that part of the Middle East would offer.
Rabbi Marvin S. Antelman may well be correct when he links the House of Rothschild with the All-Seeing Eye clique which is seeking to destroy Judaism. Things may be done in the name of Jewish people as a whole, but they are not done for their benefit. Jewish people are used as fodder by the Elite and by many within the Jewish hierarchy.
Nor is it true that most Jewish people today have a genetic line back to ancient Israel, a claim used to justify the occupation of Palestine. For the same reason, the term ‘anti-Semitic’ is constantly misused. The colour and genetic line of a person’s physical body is not important as we are aspects of each other. But since many people use the genetics of their bodies to justify their actions, we might as well get the information right.
The word Semitic comes from the race of peoples in ancient Sumer from whom the biblical Jews claimed to have emerged. Sem or Shem, one of the sons of Noah in the Bible stories, is said to be of this line and the origin appears to have been the legend of ‘Shemjaza’, the ‘heavenly son and guardian angel of God’. According to several Jewish writers, including Arthur Koestler in his book, The Thirteenth Tribe, very few Jews today can trace their genetic ancestry back to the Semite line of this period and/ or the Semitic line in Palestine and Israel at the time of Y’shua (Jesus). Instead, they are the genetic descendants of a people of Turkish-Mongolian-Nordic ancestry called the Khazars who converted to the Jewish religion in 740AD.
The Khazars lived in lower Russia between the Black and Caspian Seas. They were between the Christian and Islamic worlds and their leader chose to accept the Jewish faith to avoid being swamped by the empires of the perceived alternatives. Most Jews today, Koestler says, originate from these people, not the Semitic line. In fact, to call someone ‘anti-Semitic’ is, more accurately, to call them ‘anti-Arab’, because more members of the old Semite race are Arab than are Jewish! After the breakup of the Khazar empire by the thirteenth century, the people who adopted the Jewish faith either stayed on in Russia or, in the case of the majority, moved on into what became the Balkans, Lithuania, Poland, and Germany.
The language known as Yiddish emerged from these events. It is a mixture of Hebrew, Polish, and German. The name Rothschild came from the Red Shield, the symbol of the Khazar “Jews” in eastern Europe (German: rotes schild = red shield). The Rothschild family have no more an historic link to Palestine than an eskimo. The ‘Jewish’ hooked nose does not originate from the biblical Israel. It has its genetic origins in the Caucasus. The classic Jewish face of Y’shua (Jesus) is a myth. He would not have looked anything like that because he was not born in Lower Russia.
As Koestler wrote, “Anthropology concurs with history in refuting the popular belief in a Jewish race descended from the biblical tribe”. The Jewish-born Christian bishop, Hugh Montefiore, said in the Church Times of January 24th 1992, that: “Anti-Semitism is built on a powerful racial myth, accepted by Jews and anti-Semites alike”. Yet it is members of the genetic stream which has no connection whatsoever with Palestine, Palestine, who were behind the creation of Israel and today’s continued suppression of Palestinian rights.
The Jewish writer Alfred M. Lilienthal goes further. He says there is no such thing as a Jewish “race”. To be “Jewish” is to follow the Jewish religious faith and has nothing to do with race because, he says, people of endless races converted to the Jewish faith over thousands of years, so creating a vast cocktail of different genetic streams who called themselves Jewish. In his courageous book, What Price Israel?, Lilienthal points out: “The most persuasive argument the Jewish nationalist could advance for Zionism is based on the hypothesis of a ‘Hebrew-Semitic race’. But most members of such a ‘race’ would be found amongst the Arabic peoples of the Middle East, the overwhelming majority of whom do not profess the Jewish faith.
The Arabs, bitter enemies of the Israelis who have returned to their reported ‘racial home’, most closely resemble those Jews who are indigenous to Palestine and the Middle East; for they are of poorer Hebrew-Israelite blood than most of those who have been ‘ingathered’… The allegation that Arabs are anti-Semitic is somewhat ludicrous. “… it is, in fact, the unanimous conclusion of all anthropologists, from Weissenberg, Hertz and Fishberg (themselves Jews), to Boas, Ripley, Mead, Pittard and others that wherever Jews are found, they closely resemble the people amongst whom they live.
Even those of common family names supposedly traceable to the ancient Hebrew tribes, such as Levites (Levi) and Kohanim (Kohn, Coehn, Cohn) have little physical resemblence to one another. There is not one racial characteristic common to all who profess to be Jews.”
Such subtleties evaded Lloyd George (Comm 300), who was a passionate advocate of a Jewish homeland in Israel. When you look at what he wrote on the subject in the 1920s, either he was trying to mislead the populace or he himself was being seriously misled. In his book, Is It Peace?, he accepts without question that Jewish people had an historical right to Palestine. He says that only with their brilliance and commitment could it become a ‘land of milk and honey’ again because, basically –if you put his words in simple terms –the Arabs were too stupid to do that. But it is when he outlines Zionist intentions for Palestine that his claims can be shown to be breathtakingly naïve or calculated to mislead. Even more likely, the endless means through which he could have been blackmailed over his private life and personal corruption acted to ‘focus’ his mind. As they say, “When you have got someone by the balls, their hearts and minds will follow”.
Lloyd George condemns the opponents of the Balfour Declaration for suggesting that the Zionist leaders were seeking to establish “a Jewish oligarchy in Palestine that will reduce the Arab inhabitant to a condition of servitude to a favoured Hebrew minority”. The best answer to that charge, he said, was to be found in a memorandum submitted by the Zionist Association to the League of Nations. With the hindsight of more than seventy years, It’s doubtful if even Lloyd George would now quote that memorandum as confirmation that the opponents were wrong.
It said: “The Jews demand no privilege, unless it is the privilege of rebuilding by their own efforts and sacrifices a land which, once the seat of a thriving and productive civilisation, has long been suffered to remain derelict. They expect no favoured treatment in the matter of political or religious rights. They assume, as a matter of course, that all the inhabitants of Palestine, be they Jews or non-Jews, will be in every respect on a footing of perfect equality. They seek no share in the Government beyond that to which they may be entitled under the Constitution as citizens of the country. They solicit no favours. They ask, in short, no more than an assured opportunity of peacefully building up their National Home by their own exertions and of succeeding on their merits.”
The Jewish and Arab populations of Israel will be in every respect on a footing of perfect equality? They expect no favoured treatment in the matter of political or religious rights? Really?
Chaim Herzog, the President of Israel, had a rather different view some years later, when he said that the Arabs cannot be “participants in any way in a land that has been consecrated to our people for thousands of years. To the Jews of this land there cannot be any partner”. There, that’s more like it! Jewish people as a whole (the faith) have been victims of Zionism (the political movement), which is controlled by the Global Elite. It is time Jewish people (who are innocent and unaware of the background) realised how they, their minds and their emotions are being used in ways that serve a longer-term plan for centralised control, and not themselves and their children.
This is certainly true of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith which was formed in the United States in 1913. From that time to this, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) has operated as an intelligence unit which brands as “anti-Semitic” anyone who challenges or questions the Global Elite. But was it set up for the benefit of Jewish people? No, no. It was formed to protect the New York gangsters!
In the early years of the last century, Thomas Bingham, the New York City Police Commissioner, began a determined challenge to the mobsters. Among them was Arnold Rothstein, the mentor of Meyer Lansky who would later be the godfather of the organised crime syndicate which helped to fund and arm the Jewish terrorist underground in Palestine and later did the same for the State of Israel itself. Lansky was also a key player in the assassination of President Kennedy. The New York mobsters responded to Bingham’s investigation by branding him an anti-Semite. This character demolition was so successful that it forced him out of office and ended the investigation of the mob.
These attacks were coordinated by a committee set up by an attorney called Sigmund Livingston. In 1913 this committee was given a formal title –The Anti-Defamation League. Today it is an arm of the Israeli/ Global Elite intelligence agency, Mossad, and has been at the heart of some horrific events, including the Kennedy assassination. The ADL is there to help the Global Elite and the terrorists who have controlled Israel, not to protect Jewish people from prejudice. Anything but, in fact.
Another Elite ambition during the First World War was to ensure the recognition by Britain of a Jewish homeland in what was then Arab Palestine. The political movement known as Zionism had been introduced to campaign for a Jewish homeland, but it is often misunderstood: all Jewish people are not Zionists and all Zionists are not Jewish. Zionism is not a religion or a race; it is a political movement consisting of people, Jews and non-Jews, who support the claim for a Jewish homeland. If you support that, you are a Zionist, too, no matter what your race or religious belief.
To say that Zionism is the Jewish race is like saying the British Labour Party is the English race. Zionism was founded in the last century by an atheist, Theodore Herzl, and it is used as a front for the Global Elite and a means to dupe Jewish people as a whole. The offer to recognise a homeland in Palestine was designed both to persuade the United States to enter the war and later to create ‘managed conflict’ and a situation of ‘divide and rule’ in the oil-rich Middle East.
More than twenty years after the First World War, on April 25th 1939, US Senator Gerald P. Nye of North Dakota revealed to the Senate some of the background to Britain’s recognition of a Jewish homeland and the First World War in general. He said he had been given some documents called ‘The Next War’. The title referred to the Second World War, which the writers of the documents already knew was going to happen. One volume, called ‘Propaganda in the Next War’, also discussed, in passing, how the American people had been tricked into fighting in World War I.....
..... It said:
“For some time the issue as to which side the United States would take hung in the balance, the final result was a credit to our British propaganda. There remain the Jews. It has been estimated that of the world Jewish population of approximately fifteen million, no fewer than five million are in the United States; 25% of the inhabitants of New York are Jews. “During the Great War we bought off this huge American Jewish public by the promise of the Jewish national home in Palestine, held by Ludendorf to be a master stroke of allied propaganda, as it enabled us not only to appeal to Jews in America, but to Jews in Germany as well.”
The Americans entered the war in 1917. The Balfour Declaration came on November 6th of that year, when Arthur (Lord) Balfour (Comm 300), the British Foreign Secretary and member of the Round Table’s inner elite, officially recognised Palestine as a homeland for Jewish people.
We need to look at this on many levels again. The propagandists may well have believed it was a ‘master stroke’ to bring America into the war, but what they didn’t know was that they were being manipulated to manipulate others. America was coming into the war anyway. A Jewish homeland in Palestine had been a long-time Elite strategy and the guise of bringing America into the war was used to encourage British politicians to accept it.
The Balfour Declaration was a terrible blow to the Arabs who had, under the leadership and promises of the Englishman, T.E. Lawrence (‘ Lawrence of Arabia’), fought on Britain’s behalf against the Turks and they played a crucial role in winning the war.
...... The Arabs were promised full post-war sovereignty and independence for their support and this was confirmed in official correspondence. Lawrence, a close friend of Winston Churchill (Comm 300), knew full well that he was lying to the Arabs he was leading. Some years later Lawrence said: “I risked the fraud on my conviction that Arab help was necessary to our cheap and speedy victory in the East, and that better we win and break our word, than lose… The Arab inspiration was our main tool for winning the Eastern War. So I assured them that England kept her word in letter and in spirit. In this comfort they performed their fine things; but, of course, instead of being proud of what we did together, I was continually bitter and ashamed.”
While Lawrence and the British were promising the Arabs independence, they were in the process of making a commitment to give away Palestine as a Jewish homeland. Lawrence, Milner, and Victor Rothschild all knew each other. The Balfour Declaration was not an announcement by the Foreign Secretary to the House of Commons. It took the form, appropriately, of a letter between Arthur Balfour (Comm 300), of the Rothschild-funded Round Table, and Lord Lionel Walter Rothschild (Comm 300), the representative of the English Federation of Zionists, which was set up with Rothschild money. It was written by the leading voice in Lloyd George’s wartime cabinet, the Round Table’s most influential figure, Lord Milner (who was made chairman of Rio Tinto Zinc by Lord Rothschild).
The Balfour Declaration was a decree by the Rothschilds/Global Elite and not part of any democratic process. Balfour’s letter to Lord Rothschild, believed by many to have been written by Lord Rothschild, in league with Alfred Milner, said:
“I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty’s Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet: His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours for the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine [what a joke!], or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country. I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.”
At the time less than one per cent of the population of Palestine was Jewish and yet this letter was to form the basis on which the post-war world was to be divided and Arab control of Palestine handed over. It had nothing to do with what was best for Jews, even though its architects, the Rothschilds, are Jewish if only in name. It was about the wider strategic oil and New World Order possibilities that a foothold in that part of the Middle East would offer.
Rabbi Marvin S. Antelman may well be correct when he links the House of Rothschild with the All-Seeing Eye clique which is seeking to destroy Judaism. Things may be done in the name of Jewish people as a whole, but they are not done for their benefit. Jewish people are used as fodder by the Elite and by many within the Jewish hierarchy.
Nor is it true that most Jewish people today have a genetic line back to ancient Israel, a claim used to justify the occupation of Palestine. For the same reason, the term ‘anti-Semitic’ is constantly misused. The colour and genetic line of a person’s physical body is not important as we are aspects of each other. But since many people use the genetics of their bodies to justify their actions, we might as well get the information right.
The word Semitic comes from the race of peoples in ancient Sumer from whom the biblical Jews claimed to have emerged. Sem or Shem, one of the sons of Noah in the Bible stories, is said to be of this line and the origin appears to have been the legend of ‘Shemjaza’, the ‘heavenly son and guardian angel of God’. According to several Jewish writers, including Arthur Koestler in his book, The Thirteenth Tribe, very few Jews today can trace their genetic ancestry back to the Semite line of this period and/ or the Semitic line in Palestine and Israel at the time of Y’shua (Jesus). Instead, they are the genetic descendants of a people of Turkish-Mongolian-Nordic ancestry called the Khazars who converted to the Jewish religion in 740AD.
The Khazars lived in lower Russia between the Black and Caspian Seas. They were between the Christian and Islamic worlds and their leader chose to accept the Jewish faith to avoid being swamped by the empires of the perceived alternatives. Most Jews today, Koestler says, originate from these people, not the Semitic line. In fact, to call someone ‘anti-Semitic’ is, more accurately, to call them ‘anti-Arab’, because more members of the old Semite race are Arab than are Jewish! After the breakup of the Khazar empire by the thirteenth century, the people who adopted the Jewish faith either stayed on in Russia or, in the case of the majority, moved on into what became the Balkans, Lithuania, Poland, and Germany.
The language known as Yiddish emerged from these events. It is a mixture of Hebrew, Polish, and German. The name Rothschild came from the Red Shield, the symbol of the Khazar “Jews” in eastern Europe (German: rotes schild = red shield). The Rothschild family have no more an historic link to Palestine than an eskimo. The ‘Jewish’ hooked nose does not originate from the biblical Israel. It has its genetic origins in the Caucasus. The classic Jewish face of Y’shua (Jesus) is a myth. He would not have looked anything like that because he was not born in Lower Russia.
As Koestler wrote, “Anthropology concurs with history in refuting the popular belief in a Jewish race descended from the biblical tribe”. The Jewish-born Christian bishop, Hugh Montefiore, said in the Church Times of January 24th 1992, that: “Anti-Semitism is built on a powerful racial myth, accepted by Jews and anti-Semites alike”. Yet it is members of the genetic stream which has no connection whatsoever with Palestine, Palestine, who were behind the creation of Israel and today’s continued suppression of Palestinian rights.
The Jewish writer Alfred M. Lilienthal goes further. He says there is no such thing as a Jewish “race”. To be “Jewish” is to follow the Jewish religious faith and has nothing to do with race because, he says, people of endless races converted to the Jewish faith over thousands of years, so creating a vast cocktail of different genetic streams who called themselves Jewish. In his courageous book, What Price Israel?, Lilienthal points out: “The most persuasive argument the Jewish nationalist could advance for Zionism is based on the hypothesis of a ‘Hebrew-Semitic race’. But most members of such a ‘race’ would be found amongst the Arabic peoples of the Middle East, the overwhelming majority of whom do not profess the Jewish faith.
The Arabs, bitter enemies of the Israelis who have returned to their reported ‘racial home’, most closely resemble those Jews who are indigenous to Palestine and the Middle East; for they are of poorer Hebrew-Israelite blood than most of those who have been ‘ingathered’… The allegation that Arabs are anti-Semitic is somewhat ludicrous. “… it is, in fact, the unanimous conclusion of all anthropologists, from Weissenberg, Hertz and Fishberg (themselves Jews), to Boas, Ripley, Mead, Pittard and others that wherever Jews are found, they closely resemble the people amongst whom they live.
Even those of common family names supposedly traceable to the ancient Hebrew tribes, such as Levites (Levi) and Kohanim (Kohn, Coehn, Cohn) have little physical resemblence to one another. There is not one racial characteristic common to all who profess to be Jews.”
Such subtleties evaded Lloyd George (Comm 300), who was a passionate advocate of a Jewish homeland in Israel. When you look at what he wrote on the subject in the 1920s, either he was trying to mislead the populace or he himself was being seriously misled. In his book, Is It Peace?, he accepts without question that Jewish people had an historical right to Palestine. He says that only with their brilliance and commitment could it become a ‘land of milk and honey’ again because, basically –if you put his words in simple terms –the Arabs were too stupid to do that. But it is when he outlines Zionist intentions for Palestine that his claims can be shown to be breathtakingly naïve or calculated to mislead. Even more likely, the endless means through which he could have been blackmailed over his private life and personal corruption acted to ‘focus’ his mind. As they say, “When you have got someone by the balls, their hearts and minds will follow”.
Lloyd George condemns the opponents of the Balfour Declaration for suggesting that the Zionist leaders were seeking to establish “a Jewish oligarchy in Palestine that will reduce the Arab inhabitant to a condition of servitude to a favoured Hebrew minority”. The best answer to that charge, he said, was to be found in a memorandum submitted by the Zionist Association to the League of Nations. With the hindsight of more than seventy years, It’s doubtful if even Lloyd George would now quote that memorandum as confirmation that the opponents were wrong.
It said: “The Jews demand no privilege, unless it is the privilege of rebuilding by their own efforts and sacrifices a land which, once the seat of a thriving and productive civilisation, has long been suffered to remain derelict. They expect no favoured treatment in the matter of political or religious rights. They assume, as a matter of course, that all the inhabitants of Palestine, be they Jews or non-Jews, will be in every respect on a footing of perfect equality. They seek no share in the Government beyond that to which they may be entitled under the Constitution as citizens of the country. They solicit no favours. They ask, in short, no more than an assured opportunity of peacefully building up their National Home by their own exertions and of succeeding on their merits.”
The Jewish and Arab populations of Israel will be in every respect on a footing of perfect equality? They expect no favoured treatment in the matter of political or religious rights? Really?
Chaim Herzog, the President of Israel, had a rather different view some years later, when he said that the Arabs cannot be “participants in any way in a land that has been consecrated to our people for thousands of years. To the Jews of this land there cannot be any partner”. There, that’s more like it! Jewish people as a whole (the faith) have been victims of Zionism (the political movement), which is controlled by the Global Elite. It is time Jewish people (who are innocent and unaware of the background) realised how they, their minds and their emotions are being used in ways that serve a longer-term plan for centralised control, and not themselves and their children.
This is certainly true of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith which was formed in the United States in 1913. From that time to this, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) has operated as an intelligence unit which brands as “anti-Semitic” anyone who challenges or questions the Global Elite. But was it set up for the benefit of Jewish people? No, no. It was formed to protect the New York gangsters!
In the early years of the last century, Thomas Bingham, the New York City Police Commissioner, began a determined challenge to the mobsters. Among them was Arnold Rothstein, the mentor of Meyer Lansky who would later be the godfather of the organised crime syndicate which helped to fund and arm the Jewish terrorist underground in Palestine and later did the same for the State of Israel itself. Lansky was also a key player in the assassination of President Kennedy. The New York mobsters responded to Bingham’s investigation by branding him an anti-Semite. This character demolition was so successful that it forced him out of office and ended the investigation of the mob.
These attacks were coordinated by a committee set up by an attorney called Sigmund Livingston. In 1913 this committee was given a formal title –The Anti-Defamation League. Today it is an arm of the Israeli/ Global Elite intelligence agency, Mossad, and has been at the heart of some horrific events, including the Kennedy assassination. The ADL is there to help the Global Elite and the terrorists who have controlled Israel, not to protect Jewish people from prejudice. Anything but, in fact.
Welcome, Guest
|
You have to register before you can post on our site. |
Search Forums
Forum Statistics
|
Members: 14,961 Latest member: Margo Forum threads: 1,539 Forum posts: 15,282 |
Online Users
|
There are currently 287 online users. 1 Member(s) | 282 Guest(s) Bing, Facebook, Google, Yandex, RichardSeics |
Latest Threads
|
Flat Earth?
Last
by Steve 30 Replies |
|
Cancer
Last
by Steve 34 Replies |
|
The Antarctic
Last
by Steve 16 Replies |
|
Vladimir Putin
Last
by Steve 31 Replies |
|
The Man Made Climate Chan...
Last
by Steve 208 Replies |
|
Warmongers
Last
by Steve 8 Replies |
|
Electric Vehicles / Drive...
Last
by Steve 16 Replies |
|
Know The Law
Last
by Steve 63 Replies |
|
Cashless Society / Global...
Last
by Steve 86 Replies |
|
State of Israel
Last
by Steve 168 Replies |