Vaccine Damage - Printable Version

+- Forum (
+-- Forum: On Topic (
+--- Forum: Vaccination (
+--- Thread: Vaccine Damage (/showthread.php?tid=522)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

RE: Vaccine Damage - awakened53 - 10-22-2020

South Korea to continue flu vaccinations amid probe into deaths

Health authorities in South Korea said on Wednesday they plan to continue their flu vaccination program despite reports that five people died after receiving flu shots in the past week.
There is no reason to believe the government scheme was linked to the reported deaths, according to Jeong Eun-kyeong, the director of the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA). Officials will launch an investigation into the deaths of these five people and four others who had received the shots, Jeong said, adding that the program, which started at the beginning of September, will not be suspended.
The authorities, however, had already halted the vaccinations in September after some of about 5 million doses were partially exposed to temperatures outside the storage range during distribution. The vaccinations were intended for infants and children, and were not re-started until the middle of this month, amid growing concerns over their safety.
The five people who died in the past week after receiving shots include two senior citizens and a 17-year-old boy. The KDCA said the boy received a vaccine shipped by state-contracted vendor Shinsung Pharm, a distributor of vaccine bottles that were exposed to room temperature during shipment.

Read More: S. Korea to continue flu vaccinations amid probe into deaths

RE: Vaccine Damage - Steve - 10-22-2020

Brazilian volunteer in Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine trial DIES

A Rio de Janeiro man who was participating in the Oxford University trials of the AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine has died of complications from Covid-19, Brazil’s health authorities have announced...

RE: Vaccine Damage - The Apprentice - 10-22-2020

Systemic damage can only occur if we roll up our sleeves, we are too many to force such an experiment inside us, it is up to the individual to make a choice now, before the Hegalian dialect takes place and hold of anything that is good in our paradigm.

There are those, who I call the weak amongst society who have already taken the Kings Shilling and now look through their Hegalian Window, their futures are contracted to everything that is not really part of the natural world but foreign to it, like money and religion, along with those come laws to protect the instigators.

[Image: 50515289728_c015a5fd3b_b.jpg]looking through the Hegalian window. by apprentice 01, on Flickr

RE: Vaccine Damage - awakened53 - 10-23-2020

FDA Lets Pfizer Test Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine on U.S. Children

Americans have been following COVID-19 vaccine trial developments for weeks, watching companies jockey for frontrunner status like contestants in a reality TV show. And though participants in some of the studies (by ModernaOxfordJohnson & Johnson and Pfizer) have surfaced with reactions serious enough to pause several of the trials, market analysts remain “bullish” about the near-term prospects for approval of these liability-free products by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
On Oct. 16, Pfizer’s CEO indicated the company would likely file for FDA Emergency Use Authorization for its experimental BNT162b2 vaccine in late November. That statement came three days after Pfizer announced that it had received FDA permission to administer the unproven vaccine to children as young as 12, becoming the first company in the U.S. to include young participants in Phase 3 trials. In the UK, Oxford and AstraZeneca gained approval to test their vaccine in children aged 5-12 back in May, a couple of months before two of their adult clinical trial participants developed transverse myelitis.
To date, Pfizer has administered two doses of vaccine to almost 35,000 adult participants in five countries. Unworried by the dramatic side effects reported by some of these adults — including high fever, pounding headaches, body aches, exhaustion and shivering intense enough to crack teeth — more than 90 parents have already expressed interest in volunteering their teenagers.
Are these parents (perhaps left unemployed by coronavirus restrictions) tempted by the financial incentives offered to clinical trial participants, reportedly anywhere from $1200 to $2000? Otherwise, their motivation for wanting to throw their children into the experimental fray is unclear; as the director of the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital stated, “most of the time, what a coronavirus causes is a cold” that does not even make children “sick enough to where a parent says they need to go to a doctor.”

Read more: FDA Lets Pfizer Test Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine on U.S. Children

RE: Vaccine Damage - Steve - 10-26-2020

Singapore suspends using two flu vaccines after 48 patients die in South Korea -

RE: Vaccine Damage - awakened53 - 10-27-2020

How COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Are Rigged


[li]While vaccine makers insist any COVID-19 vaccine reaching the market will have undergone rigorous testing, the way trial protocols are designed suggests these vaccines will not have a significant impact on infection rates, hospitalizations or deaths[/li]
[li]Shockingly, preventing infection with SARS-CoV-2 is not a criterion for success in these vaccine trials. The only criterion for a successful COVID-19 vaccine is a reduction of symptoms shared by both COVID-19 and the common cold[/li]
[li]In AstraZeneca’s case, the interim analysis includes 50 vaccine recipients. The vaccine will be a success if 12 or fewer develop symptoms after exposure to SARS-CoV-2, compared to 19 in the 25-person control group[/li]
[li]At least two cases of transverse myelitis (severe inflammation of the spinal cord) has been documented in AstraZeneca’s trial, and the company temporarily halted its trial in September 2020. In October, Johnson & Johnson also paused its trial due to an undisclosed “unexplained illness” in one of its participants[/li]
[li]If the vaccine cannot reduce infection, hospitalization or death, then it cannot end the pandemic, which means everyone who takes the vaccine will be doing so in vain[/li]

There’s been a lot of talk lately about whether or not the fast-tracked COVID-19 vaccine will in fact be safe and effective. While vaccine makers insist that any vaccine reaching the market will have undergone rigorous testing, the way trial protocols are designed suggests these vaccines may leave a lot to be desired.
As reported[sup]1[/sup] by Forbes contributor William Haseltine, a former professor at Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health, while Moderna, Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson have all published their vaccine trial protocols in a rare display of transparency, “close inspection of the protocols raises surprising concerns.”
In a nutshell, the trial designs are such that the vaccines will get a passing grade even if their efficacy is minimal. Of course, we must also consider vaccine side effects and I’ve also written several articles about mounting safety concerns.

COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Rigged to Pass Efficacy Test
As noted by Haseltine, prevention of infection would typically be a critical endpoint of any vaccine trial. In other words, you want to ensure that when you take the vaccine, your risk of infection is significantly reduced.
However, when it comes to the COVID-19 vaccine, shockingly, preventing infection is not a criterion for success in any of these trials. The only criterion for a successful COVID-19 vaccine is a reduction of COVID-19 symptoms, and even then, the reduction required is minimal.
Quote:“We all expect an effective vaccine to prevent serious illness if infected. Three of the vaccine protocols — Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca — do not require that their vaccine prevent serious disease only that they prevent moderate symptoms which may be as mild as cough, or headache,” Haseltine writes,[sup]2[/sup] adding:
Quote:“The pharmaceutical companies intend to do trials ranging from 30,000 to 60,000 participants. This scale of study would be sufficient for testing vaccine efficacy.
Quote:The first surprise found upon a closer reading of the protocols reveals that each study intends to complete interim and primary analyses that at most include 164 participants. These companies likely intend to apply for an emergency use authorization (EUA) from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with just their limited preliminary results.”

To get a “passing” grade in the limited interim analysis, a vaccine must show a 70% efficacy. However, again, this does not mean it will prevent infection in 7 of 10 people. As explained by Haseltine:[sup]3[/sup]
[quote]“For Moderna, the initial interim analysis will be based on the results of infection of only 53 people. The judgment reached in interim analysis is dependent upon the difference in the number of people with symptoms … in the vaccinated group versus the unvaccinated group. Moderna’s success margin is for 13 or less of those 53 to develop symptoms compared to 40 or more in their control group.”
The other vaccine makers are basing results on a similar protocol, where only a limited number of vaccinated participants are exposed to the virus to evaluate the extent of their symptoms.
Johnson & Johnson’s interim analysis will include results from 77 vaccine recipients who have been infected with SARS-CoV-2, and if fewer than 18 of them develop symptoms of COVID-19, compared to 59 in the control group, the vaccine will be considered successful.
In AstraZeneca’s case, the interim analysis includes 50 vaccine recipients. The vaccine will be a success if 12 or fewer develop symptoms after exposure to SARS-CoV-2, compared to 19 in the 25-person control group.

Pfizer’s interim analysis is the smallest of the bunch, with just 32 vaccine recipients. Their success margin is seven or fewer vaccine recipients developing symptoms, compared to 25 in the control group. In the primary analysis, efficacy is set to about 60%, and at most, 164 volunteers will be included in that analysis.
Especially concerning are that those receiving the vaccine in these trials are young and healthy individuals who are not really at high risk of dying from COVID-19. This makes the results of these trials highly questionable in the far more vulnerable population of the elderly.
Trials Are Merely Testing Reduction of Common Cold Symptoms
As if that’s not eyebrow-raising enough, the minimum qualification for a “case of COVID-19” amounts to just one positive PCR test and one or two mild symptoms, such as headache, fever, cough or mild nausea. As noted by Haseltine, “This is far from adequate.”
All they’re doing is testing to see if this COVID-19 vaccine will minimize common cold symptoms. They are not actually ensuring the vaccine will prevent serious COVID-19 complications. Johnson & Johnson’s trial is the only one that requires at least five severe COVID-19 cases to be included in the interim analysis.
Quote:“One of the more immediate questions a trial needs to answer is whether a vaccine prevents infection. If someone takes this vaccine, are they far less likely to become infected with the virus?

[quote]These trials all clearly focus on eliminating symptoms of COVID-19, and not infections themselves. Asymptomatic infection is listed as a secondary objective in these trials when they should be of critical importance.
Quote:It appears that all the pharmaceutical companies assume that the vaccine will never prevent infection. Their criteria for approval is the difference in symptoms between an infected control group and an infected vaccine group. They do not measure the difference between infection and noninfection as a primary motivation,” Haseltine writes.[sup]4[/sup]
Severe illness and death are also secondary objectives in these trials, and none of them include failure to prevent hospitalization or death as an important barrier to success. The increasingly disappearing common sense tells us that if the vaccine cannot reduce infection, hospitalization or death, then it cannot end the pandemic, which means everyone who takes the vaccine will be doing so in vain.
Some COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Are Not Using Inert Placebos
In addition to all of that, some COVID-19 vaccine trials are using other vaccines as “placebo” rather than truly biologically inert substances such as saline, which effectively makes if far easier to hide any vaccine side effects. While Moderna is using a saline solution placebo,[sup]5[/sup] AstraZeneca is using injected meningococcal vaccine rather than a true placebo.[sup]6[/sup]
Another way AstraZeneca is masking potential side effects is by administering the vaccine along with certain drugs. In one of its study arms, subjects are given acetaminophen every six hours for the first 24 hours after inoculation. The pain and fever reducer could potentially mask and downplay side effects such as pain, fever, headache or general malaise.

In addition to masking side effects, it is widely recognized among literate natural medicine physicians that using acetaminophen during acute viral infections is not a wise strategy as it impairs the immune response to fight the infection.

As reported by Wired:[sup]7[/sup]
Quote:“The press release for … results from the Oxford vaccine trials described an increased frequency of ‘minor side effects’ among participants. A look at the actual paper, though, reveals this to be a marketing spin …
Quote:Yes, mild reactions were far more common than worse ones. But moderate or severe harms — defined as being bad enough to interfere with daily life or needing medical care — were common too.
Quote:Around one-third of people vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccine without acetaminophen experienced moderate or severe chills, fatigue, headache, malaise, and/or feverishness.

[quote]Close to 10 percent had a fever of at least 100.4 degrees, and just over one-fourth developed moderate or severe muscle aches. That’s a lot, in a young and healthy group of people — and the acetaminophen didn’t help much for most of those problems.”
Two Trials Paused Due to Safety Concerns
September 6, 2020, AstraZeneca paused its Phase 3 vaccine trial due to a “suspected serious and unexpected adverse reaction” in a British participant.[sup]8,[/sup][sup]9[/sup] The company did not initially divulge the nature of the adverse reaction, but it has since been revealed the volunteer developed severe inflammation of the spinal cord, known as transverse myelitis.[sup]10,[/sup][sup]11[/sup]
September 12, 2020, the British Medicines Health Regulatory Authority gave AstraZeneca the go-ahead to resume its Phase 3 trial in the U.K., after an independent review found it “safe to do so.”[sup]12,[/sup][sup]13[/sup] According to an AstraZeneca spokesperson, the incident was a case of undiagnosed multiple sclerosis.[sup]14[/sup]
Days later, September 19, 2020, The New York Times reported[sup]15[/sup] a second case of transverse myelitis had occurred in the AstraZeneca trial. According to one expert consulted by the NYT, the occurrence represented a “dangerous pattern,” and that a third incidence might shut down the vaccine trial indefinitely.
AstraZeneca, however, claims the two cases are “unlikely to be associated with the vaccine,” and that there’s “insufficient evidence to say for certain that the illnesses were or were not related to the vaccine.”[sup]16[/sup] October 21, 2020, it was reported[sup]17[/sup] that one of the volunteers in AstraZeneca’s Brazilian trial had died from COVID-19 complications, but that the trial would continue anyway.

October 12, 2020, Johnson & Johnson halted its trial due to “unexplained illness” in one of its participants.[sup]18,[/sup][sup]19[/sup] Like AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson has kept mum about the details of the illness, saying “it’s important to have all the facts before we share additional information.”
Side Effects Are Commonplace
The fact that more trials have not been halted is surprising considering the rate of side effects[sup]20[/sup] occurring in perfectly healthy volunteers. As reported in “Gates Tries to Justify Side Effects of Fast-Tracked Vaccine,” after the first of two doses of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, 80% of Phase 1 participants receiving the 100 microgram (mcg) dose developed systemic side effects.[sup]21[/sup]
After the second dose, 100% reported side effects ranging from fatigue (80%), chills (80%), headache (60%) and myalgia or muscle pain (53%).
Despite that, the 100-mcg dose was ultimately chosen to move on to Phase 3 trials.[sup]22[/sup] In the highest dosage group, which received 250 mcg, 100% of participants suffered side effects after both the first and second doses.[sup]23[/sup] Three of the 14 participants (21%) in the 250-mcg group suffered “one or more severe events.”
An October 1, 2020, report[sup]24[/sup] by CNBC reviews the experiences of five participants in Moderna’s and Pfizer’s SARS-CoV-2 vaccine trials. One of the participants in Pfizer’s vaccine trial “woke up with chills, shaking so hard he cracked a tooth after taking the second dose.”

A Moderna trial participant told CNBC he had a low-grade fever and felt “under the weather” for several days after his first shot. Eight hours after his second shot he was “bed-bound with a fever of over 101, shakes, chills, a pounding headache and shortness of breath. He said the pain in his arm, where he received the shot, felt like a ‘goose egg on my shoulder.’ He hardly slept that night, recording that his temperature was higher than 100 degrees for five hours.”[sup]25[/sup]
Two others reported similar side effects, and a third warned you would need to take a day off after the second shot. CNBC also noted that “as companies progressed through clinical trials, several vaccine makers abandoned their highest doses following reports of more severe reactions.”
Might Certain COVID-19 Vaccines Raise Risk of AIDS?
Disturbingly, a group of researchers are now expressing concern that some COVID-19 vaccine candidates might put certain people at a higher risk of acquiring HIV, the virus that causes AIDS.[sup]26,[/sup][sup]27,[/sup][sup]28[/sup]
Using the failed attempt to create an HIV vaccine as an example, researchers explain[sup]29[/sup] that the genetically engineered adenovirus, Ad5, used in the HIV vaccine trials, is the same one being used now in four COVID-19 candidates being studied in the U.S., Russia and Pakistan.
At the time of the failed HIV vaccine, scientists were unable to identify the exact reason why Ad5 seemed to increase the risk of HIV; it just inexplicably did. Interestingly, Dr. Anthony Fauci was the lead author on the HIV study,[sup]30[/sup] in which he questioned “whether the problem extends to some or all of the other recombinant vectors currently in development or to other vector-based vaccines.”

Reflecting on that question, the researchers say they decided to go public with this information now, because Ad5 vaccines for COVID-19 might soon be tested in populations with high HIV prevalence, and they believe that informed consent about the HIV/AIDS risk should be part of the COVID-19 clinical studies.
Will COVID-19 Vaccine Be Mandatory?
According to one September 2020 poll,[sup]31[/sup] only 51% of Americans said they “definitely or probably” would get the COVID-19 vaccine when it comes out. Another survey[sup]32[/sup] found only 44% would take the first-generation vaccine even if they were paid $100. Mounting vaccine hesitancy was bemoaned in an October 1, 2020, article[sup]33[/sup] in the New England Journal of Medicine, and the answer, the article suggests, is to make it mandatory for all.
And, to entice compliance, the authors recommend implementing severe penalties for noncompliance, such as the suspension of employment and/or house arrest.
An October 19, 2020, article[sup] 34[/sup] by Wisconsin Public Radio also warns that if precedents hold, employers may have the right to force workers to get vaccinated. Potential exceptions might include certain medical issues, bona fide religious objections, and certain union contracts that bar vaccine requirements.
Operation Warp Speed recently selected Walgreens and CVS as nationwide partners in the coming vaccine distribution effort.[sup]35[/sup] Nursing homes and long-term care facilities around the U.S. can opt in by signing up to have either of these companies come and administer the vaccine to its residents and staff, once available.

So-called “health passports” are also becoming reality. Ireland, for example, has already begun its national trial. The Health Passport Ireland initiative uses an app to track and display results of COVID-19 testing. Vaccination status will be added once a vaccine becomes available.
Untold amounts of money are also being spent on programs to tag, track and trace the human population in the name of public health and safety. According to an article[sup]36[/sup] in the journal JAMA, the estimated cumulative costs of the COVID-19 pandemic related to lost output and health reduction amounts to more than $16 trillion in the U.S. alone, or about 90% of our annual gross domestic product.
“For this reason, policies that can materially reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2 have enormous social value,” the article claims. However, testing, tracing and isolation rules, all of which are promoted in this article, also have a price, and it’s one that any sensible person would reject, namely the loss of privacy and liberty.
As reported[sup]37[/sup] by The Last American Vagabond, governments are selling our freedom in the name of public health. Do we really want to live in a “biosecurity state”? These freedom-robbing strategies are being sold to us as the path back to normalcy, but the reality will be anything but normal.
As detailed in “The Global Takeover Is Underway,” the pandemic and the global response to it is far from accidental. Overwhelmingly, the evidence points to it being part of a much larger scheme to implement the last stages of a technocratic takeover.

I’ve also covered various aspects of this globalists agenda in “COVID Symptoms of Power: Tech Billionaires Harvest Humanity,” “Tech Billionaires Aiming at a Global Currency,” “Harvard Professor Exposes Surveillance Capitalism,” “How Medical Technocracy Made the Plandemic Possible” and “US Surveillance Bill 6666: The Devil in the Details.”
The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically widened the economic gap between average people and the wealthy elite,[sup]38,[/sup][sup]39[/sup] and continuing down the path we’re currently on will only make this disparity worse, not better.
The globalist plan isn’t about creating a better world for the average person, it’s about enslaving us so that we cannot reject or even resist what’s ultimately coming. Forced vaccinations are but one aspect of the plan that must be resisted at all c

RE: Vaccine Damage - Steve - 11-01-2020


via Ashiya, who knew Carly Lebrun....makes total sense why people are so complicit right now, and are unable to critically discern the deception from truth ....


from my friend Carly who died in suss circumstances last year .. Carly was a brilliant scientist who worked for DARPA and became a whistle blower .. RIP Carly .. thank you for all your cutting edge info and putting your life on the line ..
unsung hero and beautiful soul

..."So why does it seem like the PTB are doing so much out in the open now and getting away with it?

Well, they can do what ever they want because they own and control everythng. Including all government. They actually have since the Banker Act of 1933, when FDR sold the Bankers this country. They just get more and more bold, for a few reasons. First, they see how FUCKING STUPID the general public is, and they don't give a shit. I mean hell, they got away with 911, which is so fucking easy to prove and was such a weak, stupid story. But they have gotten away with it, and so much more. I mean, they have been spraying us like fucking insects right out in the open almost daily for over 10 years, and most average people don't even see it! So, if you were them, would you worry about covering anything up? Hell no. 

And the vaccines have a lot to do with it. In a nutshell, all vaccines contain Medium 199, which contains 2 ingredients that are a pharma version of Scopolamine, Devil's Breath. They are Hyroscine and Atroscine. If you know anything about Devil's Breath, it's the most potent mind numbing "date rape" type drug on the earth. 

So the Rockefellers have taken this street drug made from a flower down in S. America, and made it so potent, if someone gets their annual flu shot, their mind will be in a permanent altered state. Study Scopolamine. Basically, if I blow scopolamine into your face, I can ask you for your car keys, ATM card, pin number and anything else. You will give them to me, and remember nothing. 

It removes the part of you that controls self preservation, that makes you think, well shit, hell no, I'm not giving you that, becasue you will take my car and steal all my money. They have also mastered these chemicals so that the person will fight to death to protect their oppressor. 

Watch how the vaxxers fight against us. They use absolutely no logic with their argument that kid who aren't injected with poison are somehow a danger to their vaxed kids. It' ludacris, but they hate us, and get evil, defending the very people who are poisoning them. 

I have studied this so closely. It's mind boggling. And it's all in the damn vaccines. So these people, are literally incapable of seeing the chemtrails, or feeling that their beloved masters might be out to harm them.

And the crazy thing about Scopolamine, is that the person otherwise appears completely normal and lucid. So if I blow that shit in your face, nobody else will know that you are under the influence of anything.

There is a reason that you will never, and have never, heard anything about scopolamine (devil's breath) in the media. Good or bad, you will never hear a word about it. It's been the secret weapon of the CIA and Secret Service for years. They used to just use it on prostitudes around the world, so when they travel, they can use the girls, and the girls will remember nothing. 

But it's gone way past that now. It's their prized secret weapon. I got that information from a very close friend that I grew up with, that is in the Secret Service. That's how I started on this research path years ago. I knew that the vaccines had to have it in them, and they do, just disguised as a chemical name.

They didn't take a chance, spraying us out in the open like this, that maybe most people won't even see it. Come on, to think that is retarded. They knew that most wouldn't, because they were in control of it.  

What they didn't count on was us. The awake people, the star child/indigos.  That is what they did not count on, and we are a huge thorn in their side.  They still have us all pretty much by the balls, but it isn't over yet.  They target us and I'm afraid it will get much worse, but they certainly did not plan on so many of us being awake.  

And I guarantee that every awake person you know is not vaccinated, and every dumb ass who can see that for the past 10 years we have been sprayed like insects, has been vaccinated."

RE: Vaccine Damage - awakened53 - 11-07-2020

What COVID Vaccine Policymakers Can Learn From Botched Military Anthrax Vaccine Program

It’s time to re-evaluate recommendations related to the approval, mandating and monitoring of vaccines.
In 2002, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a report to Congress on the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program (AVIP), a mandatory program created by the military in the late 1990s.
The 55-page report detailed a litany of adverse reactions to the anthrax vaccine, and the subsequent mass exodus of military pilots and other highly valuable military personnel who refused the mandated vaccine.
Why revisit a report, written nearly two decades ago, on how the military handled the anthrax vaccine?
First, the report validates many of the concerns parents have voiced for decades about childhood vaccine schedules. It should serve as a warning to parents, especially in light of the rush to develop a COVID-19 vaccine. After all, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is directing the Childhood Immunization Program under the same dysfunctional decision-making paradigm as the one used by the military.
Second, the report’s insights into the military’s poor handling of the anthrax program are valuable today — when the threat of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine mandate looms large — for their potential to reshape our current approach to vaccines and mandates.
We’ve seen recently how a corrupt pharmaceutical industry, just by putting a few letters in the mail and incentivizing the media to broadcast panic, can manipulate officials at the highest level of the federal government into endorsing the need for fast-tracking a vaccine.
It’s time to re-evaluate how the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA), the Department of Defense (DOD) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) make recommendations related to the approval, mandating and monitoring of vaccines.
If government officials do undertake this re-evaluation process, they would do well to consider the GAO’s critique of the military’s handling of the anthrax vaccine — including the GAO’s assessment of how one man’s actions needlessly put an entire military population at risk of experiencing a dangerous reaction to an unproven vaccine.
1. Did the risk of anthrax justify mandating the vaccine for all military members?
The anthrax vaccine had been in development and limited use in the military since 1970. As of 1997, there was talk of making the vaccine compulsory for all 2.4 million military service members, including active duty and reserve personnel and civilian contractors.
2. Anthrax manufacturer fraudulently reported mild adverse reactions with low rates 
The GAO report documented that overall injuries, both localized and systemic, from the anthrax vaccine were double the reported rate from the manufacturer. The data also revealed that more serious and long-lasting adverse events were 100 times more frequent than the manufacturer reported.
“According to our survey results, the reported rate and severity of adverse events experienced by personnel who had received the anthrax shots were considerably higher than those published in the vaccine manufacturer’s product insert in use at the time of the survey or reported by DOD. For example, an estimated 84 percent of the personnel who had had anthrax vaccine shots between September 1998 and September 2000 reported having side effects or reactions. This rate is more than double the level cited in the vaccine product insert. Further, about 24 percent of all events were classified as systemic—a level more than a hundred times higher than that estimated in the product insert. The reaction rates from our survey were also consistent with the results of two earlier DOD studies of the anthrax vaccine. In addition, we found that most events were not being reported to either official or informal DOD channels, partly because most individuals were unaware of the reporting process for documenting any such occurrences.”

RE: Vaccine Damage - Steve - 11-09-2020

Coronavirus vaccine trial participants report day-long exhaustion, fever and headaches — but say it’s worth it...


  • High fever, body aches, headaches and exhaustion are some of the symptoms participants in Moderna and Pfizer’s coronavirus vaccine trials say they felt after receiving the shots.

  • While the symptoms were uncomfortable, and at times intense, they often went away after a day, sometimes less.

  • The phase three trials are a critical last step needed to get the vaccines cleared for distribution.

RE: Vaccine Damage - awakened53 - 11-10-2020

Pfizer to pay £50m after deaths of Nigerian children in drug trial experiment (2009)

A divorce case was all that passed for excitement at Richard P Altschuler’s “kinda small” lawyer’s office in West Haven, Connecticut, when the phone rang nine years ago. On the other end of the line, a world away in the heat of Nigeria, was Etigwe Uwo, a young lawyer with “an incredible story about Pfizer”. The Lagos attorney was going to take on the largest pharmaceutical company in the world in an unprecedented class action pitting African parents against an American corporate giant. And he needed help.
Mr Etigwe had chosen Mr Altschuler because, back in 1979, the Connecticut lawyer had successfully defended a friend of the Nigerian. The unlikely pair were about to embark on a marathon journey into the world of “big pharma”. Nine years on and their efforts have finally been rewarded with a reported $75m (£50m) settlement, the terms of which are likely to be released this week.
If it sounds like the script of a Hollywood blockbuster that’s because it was this story that prompted John Le Carre to write The Constant Gardener, according to Mr Altschuler.

Read More: Pfizer to pay £50m after deaths of Nigerian children in drug trial experiment