[awakened53]

People who skipped their COVID vaccine are at higher risk of traffic accidents, according to a new study

If you passed on getting the COVID vaccine, you might be a lot more likely to get into a car crash.
Or at least those are the findings of a new study published this month in The American Journal of Medicine. During the summer of 2021, Canadian researchers examined the encrypted government-held records of more than 11 million adults, 16% of whom hadn’t received the COVID vaccine.
They found that the unvaccinated people were 72% more likely to be involved in a severe traffic crash—in which at least one person was transported to the hospital—than those who were vaccinated. That’s similar to the increased risk of car crashes for people with sleep apnea, though only about half that of people who abuse alcohol, researchers found.
The excess risk of car crash posed by unvaccinated drivers “exceeds the safety gains from modern automobile engineering advances and also imposes risks on other road users,” the authors wrote.
Of course, skipping a COVID vaccine does not mean that someone will get into a car crash. Instead, the authors theorize that people who resist public health recommendations might also “neglect basic road safety guidelines.”
Why would they ignore the rules of the road? Distrust of the government, a belief in freedom, misconceptions of daily risks, “faith in natural protection,” “antipathy toward regulation,” poverty, misinformation, a lack of resources, and personal beliefs are potential reasons proposed by the authors.
Read more: People who skipped their COVID vaccine are at higher risk of traffic accidents, according to a new study

[awakened53]

Excess deaths in 2022 among worst in 50 years

[b]More than 650,000 deaths were registered in the UK in 2022 - 9% more than 2019.[/b]
This represents one of the largest excess death levels outside the pandemic in 50 years.
Though far below peak pandemic levels, it has prompted questions about why more people are still dying than normal.
Data indicates pandemic effects on health and NHS pressures are among the leading explanations.
Is it Covid?
Covid is still killing people, but is involved in fewer deaths now than at the start of the pandemic. Roughly 38,000 deaths involved Covid in 2022 compared with more than 95,000 in 2020.
We are still seeing more deaths overall than would be expected based on recent history. The difference in 2022 - compared with 2020 and 2021 - is that Covid deaths were one of several factors, rather than the main explanation for this excess.


So what else might be going on?
The crisis in healthcare
A number of doctors are blaming the wider crisis in the NHS.
At the start of 2022, death rates were looking like they'd returned to pre-pandemic levels. It wasn't until June that excess deaths really started to rise - just as the number of people waiting for hours on trolleys in English hospitals hit levels normally seen in winter.
On 1 January 2023, the president of the Royal College of Emergency Medicine suggested the crisis in urgent care could be causing "300-500 deaths a week".
It is not a figure recognised by NHS England, but it's roughly what you get if you multiply the number of people waiting long periods in A&E with the extra risk of dying estimated to come with those long waits (of between five and 12 hours).
It is possible to debate the precise numbers, but it's not controversial to say that your chances are worse if you wait longer for treatment, be that waiting for an ambulance to get to you, being stuck in an ambulance outside a hospital or in A&E.
And we are seeing record waits in each of those areas.
In November, for example, it took 48 minutes on average for an ambulance in England to respond to a suspected heart attack or stroke, compared to a target of 18 minutes.

• England: Record number of ambulances queue outside A&E
  
  
• Northern Ireland: Inquiry into deaths after ambulance waits
  
  
• Scotland: Why is the NHS under so much pressure?
  
  
• Wales: NHS on a knife-edge, warns health leader
  

Lasting effect of pandemic
Some of the excess may be people whose deaths were hastened by the after-effects of a Covid infection.
A number of studies have found people are more likely to have heart problems and strokes in the weeks and months after catching Covid, and some of these may not end up being linked to the virus when the death is registered.
As well as the impact on the heart of the virus itself, some of this may be contributed to by the fact many people didn't come in for screenings and non-urgent treatment during the peak of the pandemic, storing up trouble for the future.


We can see that the number of people starting treatment for blood pressure or with statins - which can help prevent future heart attacks - plunged during the pandemic and, a year later still hadn't recovered.
The largest jump in excess deaths was seen in men aged 50-64, most commonly caused by heart problems.
No evidence of vaccine effect
The rise in cardiac problems has been pointed to by some online as evidence that Covid vaccines are driving the rise in deaths, but this conclusion is not supported by the data.
One type of Covid vaccine has been linked to a small rise in cases of heart inflammation and scarring (pericarditis and myocarditis). But this particular vaccine side-effect was mainly seen in boys and young men, while the excess deaths are highest in older men - aged 50 or more.
And these cases are too rare - and mostly not fatal - to account for the excess in deaths.
Finally, figures up to June 2022 looking at deaths from all causes show unvaccinated people were more likely to die than vaccinated people.
While this data on its own can't tell us it's the vaccine protecting people from dying - there are too many complicating factors - if vaccines were driving excess deaths we would expect this to be the other way around.

[awakened53]

What happens in politics when you tell the truth – Schwab gofer Sunak leads condemnation of Tory MP who says ‘Covid’ fake vaccine is ‘the biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust’: Andrew Bridgen is suspended and warned he may have ‘blood on his hands’ by a party guilty of mass murder of UK citizens

Andrew Bridgen has had the Conservative Party whip removed after having “crossed a line” in his criticism of the Covid-19 vaccine.

The North West Leicestershire MP has been increasingly vocal in remarks questioning the coronavirus vaccine.

On Wednesday he tweeted an article on vaccines, adding: “As one consultant cardiologist said to me, this is the biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust.”

Chief whip Simon Hart said: “Andrew Bridgen has crossed a line, causing great offence in the process.

“As a nation, we should be very proud of what has been achieved through the vaccine programme. The vaccine is the best defence against Covid that we have.

“Misinformation about the vaccine causes harm and costs lives. I am therefore removing the whip from Andrew Bridgen with immediate effect, pending a formal investigation.”

Tory MP Michael Fabricant welcomed the decision, adding that his former colleague will have “blood on his hands” if his comments stop people public getting vaccinated.

“If this deters people from being vaccinated and causes deaths as a direct consequence, he’ll have blood on his hands. His tweets are wholly irresponsible.”

Earlier, former Cabinet minister Simon Clarke had condemned Mr Bridgen’s tweet referring to the Holocaust, calling it “disgraceful”.

Karen Pollock, chief executive of the Holocaust Educational Trust, called the comments “highly irresponsible and wholly inappropriate”.

Mr Bridgen is currently suspended from the Commons after he was found to have displayed a “very cavalier” attitude to the rules in a series of lobbying breaches.

MPs agreed at the start of the week to suspend Mr Bridgen for five sitting days from Tuesday.

Labour MP Christian Wakeford, formerly a Conservative, had also hit out at the North West Leicestershire MP over his comments.

Reacting to the removal of the whip, he said: “About time but it should have gone well before this.”

Read More: Andrew Bridgen stripped of Tory whip over Covid vaccine comments

[awakened53]

BBC accidentally admits ‘Covid’ fake vaccine is to blame for 2022 being Worst Year for Excess Deaths in Half a Century after ‘Journalists’ choose to LIE believing nobody would ‘mark their Homework’

However, the reporters, driven by ambition and a belief that they will not be held accountable, made the decision to conceal the truth behind why there were so many excess deaths last year.
They most likely thought the majority of the British public would be too lazy to “mark their homework”, so to speak.
But they didn’t count on an independent news organisation committed to reporting the facts that the mainstream refuse to fact-checking their quietly published article.
And we can reveal that the widely but most definitely unjustly trusted news source/propaganda arm of the Government known as the BBC, and its reporters, have knowingly lied about the safety of the vaccine and lied to you.
It was all going so well for the BBC and its reporters until they decided to unequivocally state that in no way shape or form is the Covid-19 vaccine responsible for a record-breaking year of death. They even provided a “source” to prove it and claimed that –
‘Figures up to June 2022 looking at deaths from all causes show unvaccinated people were more likely to die than vaccinated people.’
Source- BBC News
They then went on to state that –
”If vaccines were driving excess deaths we would expect this to be the other way around.”If vaccines were driving excess deaths we would expect this to be the other way around.
Source- BBC News
The problem for BBC News and its dishonest reporters is that The Expose has been analysing the source in question, which has been provided by a UK Government institution known as the Office for National Statistics (ONS) for months on end.
And we can reveal that mortality rates per 100,000 in every single age group, even children, in England and Wales were lowest among the unvaccinated in some age groups as early as 2021, and lowest among the unvaccinated in all age groups by May 2022 at the latest.
Therefore, BBC News has not only lied to the public, but they have also admitted in black and white that the Covid-19 injections are to blame for 2022 being the worst year for deaths in half a century by confirming that “if vaccines were driving excess deaths we would expect this to be the other way around (highest mortality rates among the vaccinated)”.
The moral of this story is of course, always check the official source. Specifically table 2.

But that is of no comfort to the thousands of families across the country who are still mourning the loss of loved ones as the truth about the catastrophic events of the past year comes to light.
And as the investigation into the Covid-19 vaccine scandal unfolds, it is clear that the consequences of this deception will be felt for years to come.
The devastation left in the wake of your Government’s actions, unelected powerful institutions’ actions, Big Techs’ actions and the Mainstream Media’s actions is unimaginable.
You cannot trust the BBC. And the UK Government has clearly confirmed that mortality rates per 100,000 are highest among the vaccinated in every single age group.
This means that people who have taken the Covid-19 vaccine have a higher chance of dying than the general population due to the intense damage it can do to the most vital organ in the human body, the heart, and the devastating decimation it does to the natural immune system.
Because this isn’t an isolated incident occurring in the UK, it’s occurring in every country where the Pfizer and/or Moderna vaccines have been administered.

Read More: BBC accidentally admits COVID Vaccine is to blame

[awakened53]

At the World’s Premier Infection Conference, Where Was the Debate About Vaccines, Masks and Lockdowns?


I spent last week at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID) in Copenhagen. ECCMID is the main international conference on infection. American meetings that were once pre-eminent have fragmented, becoming parochial; Asian rivals have failed to gain traction. Copenhagen was ECCMID’s comeback: 2020 was cancelled; 2021 was online and 2022 was a ghost. This time was ahead of 2019: 15,000 attendees; lecture halls overflowing and the biggest trade show I’ve seen in 40 years of international meetings.

I went with curiosity. Denmark ended all Covid restrictions a year ago, but the conference blurb promised anti-Covid measures. Delegates – mostly laboratory scientists and infection specialists – would be “offered” N95 masks. As luck would have it, I went with an incipient RTI (respiratory tract infection, i.e., a cold). This progressed inexorably into a hacking cough and a blocked nose.

Much was encouraging. Only 1 or 2% of my fellow infection specialists wore masks, and I saw only one in a contraption combining goggles, shield and mask. No one appeared perturbed by my symptoms, nor suggested I leave, wear a mask or do a test. A noted physician amiably diagnosed, “It’ll be Covid”, but sat beside me nonetheless. It was quite like the old days. Of course, it’s possible that only the blasé attended in person whilst the fearful attended online. It’s also possible that some folks avoided me so effectively that I was unaware of being shunned. But, even if both caveats are true, it’s beyond dispute that most professionals are now relaxed about Covid.

All that’s positive, for any reasonable person has to accept that the virus isn’t going anywhere. Virology textbooks must be rewritten to say that we have five ‘common cold’ coronaviruses not four, with SARS-CoV-2 the commonest.

Other developments left me less sanguine.

I’ve mentioned that huge trade show, at least double the area of the last pre-pandemic ECCMID in 2019. Many unfamiliar companies had PCR machines to sell. Friends from established companies told me that molecular diagnostics had ‘come of age’. Manufacturers have grown rich, I think.

Whether all this testing does any good is quite another matter. A sponsored-session speaker proudly described how she’d run a mobile virus testing service for New York Schools. I asked what it had achieved, given that New York had endured 18 months of school closures. Sweden, sans testing, had kept schools open throughout, without catastrophe, I pointed out. “What’s more, it now has the lowest excess mortality in Europe,” I added.

“I’m not the Governor of New York,” she responded defensively. “He’s the one who shut the schools.” This was followed by the point that her service could also detect influenza, identifying children who ‘should’ be given Tamiflu. Given the questionable risk-benefit profile of Tamiflu in healthy children, I found this underwhelming.

Read More – At the World’s Premier Infection Conference, Where Was the Debate About Vaccines, Masks and Lockdowns?

[awakened53]

WHO ends the Covid Hoax with the biggest Lie of All


The World Health Organisation says that the covid-19 hoax is now over and claims that covid-19 killed an estimated 20 million people.

They might as well have claimed it killed 200 million or 2 billion.

This figure is a sick joke.

Anyone who claims that 20 million people died of covid-19 is a deluded fool, a misinformation specialist or a scaremonger trying to turn the world’s worst medical hoax (now faded) into a historical reality.

I would estimate, using official government figures, that covid-19 (which I’ve always said is the rebranded flu) killed considerably fewer than one million people world-wide in 2020 and 2021 (with figures for the two years combined). That is, less than 500,000 in each of those two years.

Since the WHO figures show that the ordinary un-marketed flu can kill 650,000 a year, and since there were virtually no flu deaths in 2020 and 2021, (it was reported in the mainstream media that flu had temporarily disappeared) it is clear that covid-19 was rather LESS deadly than a fairly unexceptional flu. I have already produced evidence showing that according to the UK Government’s own figures, covid-19 was no worse than the flu in the UK. And mortality figures show that death rates in 2020 were no worse than usual.

The WHO figure of 20 million deaths is based on absurd, false figures whereby patients who died after a positive (but useless) PCR test were listed as having died of covid-19 even if they had no symptoms of covid-19 and had died in a car crash, been run over by a bus or had died of heart disease. Governments around the world have admitted that figures were exaggerated. In some countries, hospitals were bribed to over-diagnose covid-19.

I would be happy to debate these figures with a senior WHO representative on live, national television or radio. But, I fear that it is a fair bet that, as usual, no one will agree to debate. They won’t debate because I am right and they are wrong and they know they will be embarrassed and that the whole covid hoax will be discredited. The media, unquestioning to the end will print and share the 20 million figure as though it were real. No TV or radio station dare allow a proper, live debate because they have spent three years telling lies.

Finally, if the covid-19 hoax is now officially over, why are doctors still giving covid-19 jabs? And why are health care staff routinely wearing face masks?

My three books containing the transcripts of all my videos about the covid hoax were published by Korsgaard Publishing.

Read More: WHO ends the Covid Hoax with the biggest Lie of All

[awakened53]

Covid: The destruction of medical ethics and trust in the medical profession, Part 1


This is the first of a two-part discussion by a consultant surgeon of the damage done by the government’s irrational Covid policies.  

WHEN it comes to the last three years, there is a lot I do not know. What I do know is that I have many questions. Was the ‘pandemic’ a ‘plandemic’? It certainly felt like it. Did the virus escape from a lab? What exactly is a virus? What precisely was the role of the US Department of Defense, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and Dr Anthony Fauci in the origins of SARS‑CoV‑2? Why would anyone in their right mind carry out gain of function experiments; isn’t this simply biowarfare by another name? Why did our Government, in lockstep with most other countries, introduce lockdowns, mask mandates and social distancing when there has never been any evidence to show their efficacy? Why were alternative, cheap and easily available therapeutics not considered, instead ridiculed and even banned? Surely in the presence of a lethal pandemic one would explore all options?

I do not understand why the UK introduced lockdown on March 20, 2020, when one day earlier the government had downgraded SARS-CoV-2 as no longer a high consequence infectious disease. I do not understand why certain billionaires and personalities held so much sway over domestic and international politics especially when it comes to health and in particular Covid policies. I do not understand why our governments would self-inflict such tremendous damage on their already weak economies through their Covid policies. And why did questioning the Covid narrative and government result in censorship and de-platforming on all major social media platforms? Why, if the masks worked, did we have to stand six feet apart? If standing six feet apart worked, why the need to wear masks? If both worked, why the need for lockdowns? If all three worked, why the need for a rushed vaccine? And make no mistake, it was rushed. If the vaccines were safe and effective then why the added ‘no liability’ clause? How, finally, can an experimental novel gene therapy can be called a vaccine?

What I do know, as a surgeon who qualified 25 years ago, is quite a lot about medical ethics and informed consent. Medical ethics are the moral principles by which doctors must conduct themselves, that govern the practice of medicine. The four pillars of medical ethics are Non-maleficence (to do no harm), Beneficence (doing good), Autonomy (giving the patient the freedom to choose freely, where they are able) and Justice (ensuring fairness).

Read More – Covid: The destruction of medical ethics and trust in the medical profession, Part 1

[awakened53]

Prepare for a Disease “Even Deadlier” than Covid, WHO Chief Warns

The planet should be ready for a disease “even deadlier” than Covid, the head of the World Health Organisation warned yesterday. Even deadlier than 0.2% fatality rate? Goodness. Fortunately, we have the WHO to lock us in our homes till the vaccines are ready. The Mail has the story.

Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told the World Health Assembly forum that the threat of another public health crisis could not be kicked “down the road”.
He also claimed that, despite the darkest days of the pandemic being consigned to history, a doomsday Covid variant with the power to send the world back to square one could still spawn.
In Geneva, Switzerland, Dr Tedros said : “The threat of another variant emerging that causes new surges of disease and death remains. And the threat of another pathogen emerging with even deadlier potential remains.”
He was speaking as the WHO unveiled a new global scheme to spot and track the most dangerous pathogens at an annual meeting of its 194 member states.
No specific diseases were named. But ‘Disease X’ — a place-holder given to a devastating pathogen not yet discovered — is on the UN agency’s list of pressing threats.
Dr. Tedros’s comments come after the WHO earlier this month declared that Covid was no longer a public health emergency of international concern.
Instead, the virus is now considered an “established and ongoing health issue”.
It marked a major step and came three years after a cluster of Chinese residents in the city of Wuhan came down with a mysterious illness in December 2019.
At the WHA’s 76th meeting, the WHO launched the International Pathogen Surveillance Network (IPSN). It will give all nations access to genomic sequencing to identify and respond to emerging disease threats using genomics.
Genomics – the study of the genetic material found in a virus – helps scientists spot mutations that can make a pathogen more infectious or deadly.

Scientists can then develop treatments and vaccines that work against them, while nations can mount a timely response.

Read More: Prepare for a Disease “Even Deadlier” than Covid, WHO Chief Warns

[awakened53]

‘Covid’ [Lack of] Inquiry Shows its Hand by Requiring ‘Covid’ Tests



Laura Dodsworth is the author of the Sunday Times bestseller A State of Fear: how the U.K. Government weaponised fear during the COVID-19 pandemic. This article first appeared on her excellent Substack page, which is well worth subscribing to.

The first COVID-19 inquiry public hearing will be held today, following the preliminary hearings which began in February. The inquiry will call witnesses to give evidence under oath and they will then be questioned by barristers and the chair, Baroness Hallett.

There is no deadline for the inquiry’s conclusion. It is an eye-wateringly expensive investigation, currently estimated to cost £114 million, but it will potentially run to more than the Bloody Sunday inquiry which was nearly £200 million. Sixty-three lawyers are working directly for the inquiry and a further 100 are named as representatives. MP Graham Stringer has commented that this is a “very expensive and very bloated” inquiry and it may be used to “kick things into [the] very long grass”.

It is important not to pre-judge the outcome of the inquiry, but it has been increasingly difficult to be hopeful for the inquiry’s fairness and value for money. After the imbalance of the modules and core participants, the first serious dark cloud to descend was the lamentable list of 150 questions put by Baroness Hallett to Boris Johnson. Now, they are only questions and we don’t have the answers yet, but to give you an idea, question 45 was particularly chilling:

45. To what extent did the U.K. Government have regard during the period January to March 2020 to the response of other countries to COVID-19? Did you consider taking more stringent measures in response to COVID-19 such as those seen in, for example, Taiwan, Singapore, New Zealand etc.? What, if any, assumptions were made about how such measures would (or would not) work in the U.K.?

Why not Sweden? It did not impose strict lockdowns or close schools for under 16s and currently has the one of the world’s lowest excess mortality figures. This inquiry appears to favour stringency above existing pandemic planning, minimum economic and social disruption and low excess deaths.

But there was worse to come. If you thought that the curtain had closed on Covid safety pantomime, think again. Broadcaster Julia Hartley-Brewer has tweeted that the COVID-19 inquiry policy is for staff and visitors to take weekly lateral flow tests if they attend daily, and test in advance for individual days. The inquiry’s Covid policy goes further than Government recommendations, asking those who test positive to stay away. The largely pointless face masks are welcome. The air will be purified, sanitising stations available and a “disinfectant fogging treatment will be used on the surfaces in the hearing room, viewing room and other rooms each evening”.

While some of the attendees who have lost loved ones to Covid may appreciate these gestures, they are nevertheless gestures. The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry, for instance, does not publish such a “thorough” Covid policy.


https://dailysceptic.org/2023/06/13/covi...vid-tests/

[awakened53]

The pantomime act is wearing thin


As more evidence emerges that covid injections cause long covid-like symptoms, seizures in children, prion disease and cancer as well as new research showing that the body produces toxic spike proteins two years after being injected, a global alliance of regulators – representing 38 medicines regulatory authorities – issue a statement that covid “vaccines” have a good safety profile.

Between covid, public sexual perversion, failing economies and the war in Ukraine the godless Western “liberalisation” has failed. This pantomime act is wearing thin.

In the real world, a ‘Living Archive’ has been launched to record our stories of what really happened so future generations know what they did to us.

The story of Pfizer, a pharmaceutical empire and corporate corruption: Over the past three years, Pfizer has managed to avoid scrutiny of its previous criminal conduct and is universally portrayed in corporate media as a benevolent enterprise whose mission is to nobly service humanity.  To set the record straight, this article embarks on a comprehensive historical examination of this company.

UK government “nudge unit” says “fear-based” messaging necessary for “wrongly calibrated” people: The head of the UK’s Behavioural Insights Team, or the “nudge unit,” Professor David Halpern said that the populace would respond obediently to new “stay at home” orders since they “kind of know what the drill is.”  He defended the use of “fear-based” messaging in critical circumstances, noting that sometimes it is necessary to “cut through,” especially if you think people are “wrongly calibrated.”  Read more HERE and HERE.

Ombudsman finds ‘culture of cover-up’ in NHS: [Note: this report is not related to covid, but then again why wouldn’t it also be?] There is a “culture of cover-up” in the NHS and “ingrained defensiveness” when it comes to patients being harmed or suffering avoidable death, the health ombudsman said as he published a damning new report.  Rob Behrens, health service ombudsman for England, told a briefing:

“There is a culture of cover-up – there is no point pretending that everybody is nice and does the right thing.  Because on the basis of the evidence that I see, patients have been lied to, their care plans have been altered after they died, and there are a whole series of incidents where people do not know what went on and hospitals are reluctant to disclose this.  You can call it what you like but it is a cover-up.”

Pfizer-BioNTech covid injection produces the toxic spike protein in human body even after 2 Years: At the end of June 2023, research commissioned by Pascal Najadi, a former Swiss banker who has been vaccine-injured, reveals the permanence and continuous production of spike proteins in the body after 2 years.  It confirmed the tremendous alteration of the DNA in Najadi’s blood.  The study also openly denounces that this perverse mechanism of DNA alteration would be at the basis of the development of serious forms of cancer which in the USA have been defined as “turbo-cancers” due to the rapidity with which the pathology evolves until death.  Read more HERE or the original article in Italian (English translation using Google) .

Spike protein and The Warburg Effect: A recent paper proving what Walter Chestnut hypothesised years ago, that the spike protein induced “cancer without tumours,” noted that the Spike Protein is inducing the Warburg Effect in cells. This is causing them to overproduce proteins, “clogging” the cell.  The Warburg Effect is a major inducer of cancer.

Read more: The pantomime act is wearing thin