[The Apprentice]

Here is an old video which explains how the abuse sytem works for and against those who rule and are ruled.

https://youtu.be/NcSLuMkOqac

[Steve]

FB POST -

If the Government really cared about people they would;

# Ban cigarettes - to reduce health risks

# Ban alcohol - to reduce health risks

# Limit fast foods - Or severely restrict the unhealthy ingredients and additives etc

# Legalise cannabis through edibles - replacement for alcohol & cigarettes

# Pay independent gyms around the nation so everyone could have a membership - this would boost overall general health, immune system, mental health and economy

# Supply the nation with vitamin D and Zinc from a British supplier

# Promote healthy eating, easy to make recipes & ban toxic foods and ingredients

The problem is, this would disrupt the big corporation profits who pull all the strings - Profit before people.




FB POST -

Copied and pasted from someone else:- 

Before you listen to Boris tonight, consider the following ...

Why did a Cambridge PCR test study of 10k people show 100% of their positives to be false?

Why are there many videos of empty hospitals?

Why are the Nightingale facilities being dismantled & closing?

Why is there video after video of people pretending to administer vaccines?

Why does 2020 have the 14th highest overall world death toll in last 30 yrs?

Why are there not masses of homeless dying from it on the streets?

Why does hardly anybody know anyone that's died only from it as opposed to with?

Why are any deaths being marked as Covid up to 28 days after a positive test? Particularly as we only have to isolate for 10-14days after one.

Why has it only taken the lives of 388 under 60s in the UK?

Asymptomatic transfer is now debunked, so why are we still using this data to enforce restrictions?

Why are we still using Neil Ferguson as our "expert" advisor, when he's failed to correctly predict pandemic numbers for the past 20 yrs?

Why are people being sent text messages from NHS saying they've tested positive when they didn't even turn up to the test centre?

Why are we pushing a rushed vaccine from a criminal enterprise that has broken records for claims, for a virus that is affecting literally nobody? That our immune system is dealing with on it's own in 99.8% of the case?

Why aren't we discussing healthy lifestyles, diets, vitamins C and D3 & Zinc etc....that can tackle this?

Why hydroxychloroquine being banned from shelves when it's been proven safe and effective against other conditions?

Why are we being assured this vaccine is safe when we have no proof? Same scenario with swine flu jab 1976. Thousands claimed damages, was GUARANTEED safe.

Why are the police being told to act unlawfully in dealing with anti lockdown protests? Yet leave BLM etc alone?

Why are we only hearing one-sided arguments from "experts"? No debates, no alternative perspectives being addressed by the media/gov. 

Why enforce lockdowns and masks when, by their own data, it's proven they don't work...potentially even cause more harm than good?

In Sept, Covid was the 19th highest cause of death. 19th!! Why are we not addressing the 18 others before it?

Why are we not informed about how long to wear a mask for before it becomes contaminated, which in turn is causing health issues like Bacterial Pneumonia?

Why are they're not specific bins for masks if this was so viralous?

Why are we told to use antibacterial santitiser when you need anti-viral to kill a virus?

Where has the flu gone? 20k less deaths this yr

Where has pneumonia gone? 17k less deaths this yr.

Commitee of 10k academics constantly ignored.

I know people that have tested both negative amd positive on the same day, how is this possible?

Why do the government and their officials keep breaking their own rules if they are certain of the severity of this virus?

Jan 2018 there was a flu outbreak that saw a 42% increase in deaths, why no  restrictions implemented?

Why shut down hospitality industry when it's been proven to only account for 5% of cases?

How are there still unoccupied beds in hospitals, when they're at capacity every winter?

Why do they insist on focusing on cases rather than deaths?

Why did we see videos in jan/feb/march of people dropping dead in the streets of china?

In July you were 3x more likely to die of flu and pneumonia than Covid.

Why, when they have already been caught in August exaggerating death figures, do you not think they'd do it again?

Why are they happy with their testing of this vaccine yet still need more time to trial cannabis?

Why do they only fact check Covid related content on social media?

Why are they not comparing the rise in cases to the rise in tests administered?


Copied and pasted

[Steve]

Alex Salmond claims Nicola Sturgeon misled the Scottish Parliament multiple times -

In an extraordinary attack on his successor as First Minister, he claimed she had ‘repeatedly misled’ the Scottish Parliament over her role in the handling of allegations against him.
If proven to be true, Mr Salmond’s claims are likely to force Ms Sturgeon to resign as First Minister and bring to an end her decades-long political career.

https://inews.co.uk/news/scotland/snp-al...p0n8U6Cp-Q

[awakened53]

Racially-aggravated assault, carrying loaded gun, incest and attempting to have sex with child under 13: List of crimes that will get you LESS time in prison than 10-year jail term for lying about going to Covid mutant hotspots

Racially-aggravated assault, carrying a loaded gun, incest and attempting to have sex with a child under the age of 13 are crimes that will receive a shorter jail term than for lying about going to Covid mutant hotspots.
Matt Hancock said yesterday that travellers who try to hide having been in high-risk countries could be jailed for up to 10 years. From Monday, all arrivals from 33 ‘red list’ countries will have to pay £1,750 to quarantine for 10 days in Government-designated hotels.
The Health Secretary unveiled the extreme borders crackdown while saying it was necessary to stop mutant strains entering the UK. 
But his announcement sparked backlash from former Supreme Court justice Lord Sumption, who branded the maximum prison sentence as ‘inhumane’, and ex-Attorney General Dominic Grieve, who described it as ‘draconian’.
The jail term is longer than the seven-year maximum penalties received for racially-aggravated assault (ABH or GBH), carrying a firearm in a public place, incest with a child under 13 and attempted sexual intercourse with a child under 13. 

Read More: Racially-aggravated assault, carrying loaded gun, incest and attempting to have sex with child under 13: List of crimes that will get you LESS time than new Covid rules

[awakened53]

Do Mandatory Masks and Vaccines Break the 10 Points of the Nuremburg Code?

Mandatory masks
continue to be the standard operating procedure for many counties, regions, districts, states and nations worldwide, as the COVID cult agenda progresses. In many places, while COVID vaccines are not yet mandatory, authorities are rushing to prepare to make them so, by setting up schemes like immunity passports, vaccine certificates and mandatory tracking databases which log who has taken the shot and who has not. Meanwhile, inherent sovereign human rights are being limited to those who acquiesce to tkae the shot. The insanity and absurdity of the COVID cult is all the more apparent when you realize that its mandatory or quasi-mandatory rules stand in contradiction to a very important set of principles decided upon in 1947. I refer to the Nuremburg Code, the set of 10 points that arose from the infamous Nuremburg Trials conducted in the aftermath of World War II. I am not passing judgement on how impartial those trials were, because I know they were mainly run by the US and the Allies (as the victors), who for obvious reasons did not press charges against American generals such as Eisenhower (who later became US President) for his POW camps inside of Germany and carpet-bombing of Dresden. Nonetheless, the trials produced the Nuremburg Code which enshrined the principle of informed consent – a principle which, in the advent of the COVID scamdemic, is now highly relevant and is continually being put to the test. This article will look briefly at each of the 10 points in the light of COVID restrictions and rules.
The 10 Points of the Code
This website gives a brief history of how the 10 points of the Nuremburg Code came into existence. Interestingly, although the code is an international ethical landmark, it is apparently still not enshrined in American or German national law. We must assume those governments via their secret agencies like the CIA wanted to keep the door open to conduct medical experimentation (such as bioweapon programs like weaponized ticks) upon their citizenry without technically breaking the law:

“On August 19, 1947, the judges of the American military tribunal in the case of the USA vs. Karl Brandt et. al. delivered their verdict. Before announcing the guilt or innocence of each defendant, they confronted the difficult question of medical experimentation on human beings. Several German doctors had argued in their own defense that their experiments differed little from previous American or German ones. Furthermore they showed that no international law or informal statement differentiated between legal and illegal human experimentation. This argument worried Drs. Andrew Ivy and Leo Alexander, American doctors who had worked with the prosecution during the trial. On April 17, 1947, Dr. Alexander submitted a memorandum to the United States Counsel for War Crimes which outlined six points defining legitimate research. The verdict of August 19 reiterated almost all of these points in a section entitled “Permissible Medical Experiments” and revised the original six points into ten. Subsequently, the ten points became known as the “Nuremberg Code.” Although the code addressed the defense arguments in general, remarkably none of the specific findings against Brandt and his codefendants mentioned the code. Thus the legal force of the document was not well established. The uncertain use of the code continued in the half century following the trial when it informed numerous international ethics statements but failed to find a place in either the American or German national law codes. Nevertheless, it remains a landmark document on medical ethics and one of the most lasting products of the “Doctors Trial.””

Nuremburg Code #1: Voluntary Consent is Essential
The first point of the Code is:

“The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.”

This point has already been broken many times over just with the introduction of mandatory masks alone. In the US, for example, masks are defined in several places as “medical devices” according to the FDA (Food and Drug Administration). The first piece of evidence is on the FDA’s website itself at this page that discusses masks and which is nested under the category Medical Devices as follows:

“Home / Medical Devices / Products and Medical Procedures / General Hospital Devices and Supplies / Personal Protective Equipment for Infection Control / N95 Respirators, Surgical Masks, and Face Masks”

The second piece of evidence is in the law: the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) which is US federal law enacted by Congress. It and other federal laws establish the legal framework within which FDA operates. The FD&C Act can be found in the United States Code (USC), which contains all general and permanent US laws, beginning at 21 USC 301. You can read it here. Look under Chapter II Definitions (pg.3) and scroll down to Section 201(h):“(h) The term “device” (except when used in paragraph (n) of this section and in sections 301(i), 403(f), 502©, and 602©) means an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, contrivance, implant, in vitro reagent, or other similar or related article, including any component, part, or accessory, which is — (1) recognized in the official National Formulary, or the United States Pharmacopeia, or any supplement to them, (2) intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, in man or other animals, or (3) intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals, and which does not achieve its primary intended purposes through chemical action within or on the body of man or other animals and which is not dependent upon being metabolized for the achievement of its primary intended purposes.”
Under this section, a mask meets the criteria required for being designated as a medical device, since it meets point (2), being an apparatus which is intended to prevent disease.
Did any politician ask the people of the world whether they wanted to wear masks and volunteer themselves to wear medical devices? No. There has been no voluntary or informed consent.
Nuremburg Code #2: Yield Fruitful Results Unprocurable By Other Means
The second point of the Code is:

“The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.”

We have to face reality that COVID measures such as mandatory masks or vaccines are a giant medical experiment. Many people have been suffering the ill effects of under-oxygenation due to prolonged mask wearing. The untested vaccines constitute the biggest worldwide experiment in human history, having been rushed to market in under 12 months when vaccines usually take 7-20 years to develop. As covered in previous articles, these so-called vaccines (actually mRNA devices) were not designed to stop transmission, elicit a direct immune response (as traditional vaccines do) nor to stop moderate to severe symptoms, so their risk-to- benefit ratio is massively high. Cloth masks made of bandannas and rags are utterly “random and unnecessary in nature.” Meanwhile, there are many other ways to produce “fruitful results” for society without this experimentation: educating people about the principles of natural health, boosting the immune system naturally and even supplementing with vitamin D (research has shown a connection between those acquiring COVID and vitamin D deficiency).
Nuremburg Code #3: Base Experiments on Results of Animal Experimentation and Natural History of Disease
The third point of the Code is:

“The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.”

This point has also been broken. Big Pharma companies skipped animal trials in their rush to get their “vaccines” to market.
Nuremburg Code #4: Avoid All Unnecessary Suffering and Injury
The fourth point of the Code is:

“The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.”

None of the masks and “vaccines” (which indisutably cause suffering, injury and death) are necessary for many reasons:
– the COVID case and death count has been wildly inflated from the beginning;
– COVID is a repackaging scheme which reclassifies existing diseases to create the appearane of a new deadly disease and pandemic when there is none. See the work of people such as Dr. Genevieve Briand;
– the alleged novel virus SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated, purified and proven 100% to exist.
Nuremburg Code #5: No Experiment to be Conducted if There’s Reason to Think Injury or Death Will Occur
The fifth point of the Code is:

“No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.”

Is there an a priori reason to believe disabling injury or death will occur from the COVID not-vaccines? Given the past history of vacine injury, yes there is. Around 2 weeks ago on January 29th 2021, the CDC reported over 11,000 adverse reactions to the COVID vaccine, including 501 deaths and 10,748 other injuries, some of which were indeed disabling injuries. If you are not fainthearted, see these video clips and compilations (here, here, here and here) which show the horrible side effects of the vax.
Nuremburg Code #6: Risk Should Never Exceed the Benefit
The sixth point of the Code is:

“The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.”

From Big Pharma’s point of view, the risk doesn’t exceed the benefit. They are shielded from legal liability thanks to the 1986 NCVIA and other preparatory laws like the 2005 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act which paved the way for Big Pharma legal immunity. There’s no risk, and the profits are astronomical. For the average individual, on the other hand, the situation is exactly the reverse; there’s no benefit to taking a non-vaccine which doesn’t protect you from severe symptoms and which doesn’t stop transmission, but which could lead to serious and debilitating effects like paralysis and death.
Nuremburg Code #7: Preparation Must Be Made Against Even Remote Possibility of Injury, Disability or Death
The seventh point of the Code is:

“Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.”

No preparations have been made! The COVID vaccines are a giant worldwide human experiment, and every single participant is the equivalent of a human hamster or guinea pig. If you die, bad luck! Big Pharma will be sure to roll out their legal and PR departments and immediately question the connection bewteen their vax and your death. They will never, ever admit a connection, and even if they did, there are no legal consequences for them. There is no recourse.
Nuremburg Code #8: Experiment Must Be Conducted by Scientifically Qualified Persons
The eighth point of the Code is:

“The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.”

Doctors such as Dr. Stefan Lanka and Dr. Tom Cowan who challenge the mainstream narrative of virology – namely that contagious viruses exist and can infect you – would most certainly dispute that career bureaucrats like Dr. Anthony Fauci and Big Pharma scientists are truly qualified, but even if you accept that they are, the scientists that make the vaccines are not the ones administering them. It’s the regular nurses and doctors who are doing that. How many of them truly know what the non-vaccine is, what it does, the complete list of its ingredients and the full list of its long-term side effects? No one knows the latter, precisely because this is a giant experiment.
By creating unlawful mask mandates, politicians are playing doctor, putting themselves in the position of being medical experts by dictating health directives and medical interventions to the entire population. The people have not given consent for politicians, who are medically untrained, to act as their personal physicians.
Nuremburg Code #9: Anyone Must Have the Freedom to Bring the Experiment to an End At Any Time
The ninth point of the Code is:

“During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.”

Do you have the right to bring the insane COVID cult medical experimentation to an end? Of course you don’t! People are being discriminated against for not wearing masks by being deprived of their rights to freely travel, trade and work. People are being threatened with fines and prison for not wearing masks. People’s rights are being violated when they exercise their right to make thier own medical decisions by refusing the vax. There is no freedom for the COVID subject who is being experimented upon.
Nuremburg Code #10: The Scientist Must Bring the Experiment to an End At Any Time if There’s Probable Cause of it Resulting in Injury or Death
The tenth point of the Code is:

“During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.”

This point includes the phrase “probable cause” which is probably well-known to many people, especially Americans, since it is enshrined in the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution that protects people against searches and seizures unless the police have a warrant based on probable cause that that person has a committed a crime. Probable cause is legally considered to be a higher standard than “reasonable belief” or “reasonable suspicion” which is the wording used in other jurisdictions. Regardless, do you think any Big Pharma company has EVER voluntarily halted their vaccine rollout because of their “superior skill and careful judgment” that they might be harming people? No way! The profits are too great, and their line of defense is that some people may be injured or killed by the vaccines, but it’s all for the “greater good” of protecting society. As Martin Luther King said, “Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.”
Conclusion
Society is regressing right now. We are giving up hard-fought rights and freedoms out of fear. Collectively, we are forgetting that we have already long ago established fundamental human rights such as bodily autonomy, medical sovereignty and informed, voluntary consent. The Nuremburg Code is a stark reminder that we have been through all this before, and got through it to crystallize the lessons learned. We must remember Who We Are and stop this insane COVID medical experimentation – before it’s too late.
*****
Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles, author of the book Cancer: The Lies, the Truth and the Solutions and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com. Makia is on Steemit and Parler.
Sources:
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/covid-cult-and-the-10-stages-of-genocide/
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/not-a-vaccine-mrna-covid-vaccine-chemical-pathogen-device/
*https://www.ushmm.org/information/exhibitions/online-exhibitions/special-focus/doctors-trial/nuremberg-code
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/bioweapons-bioterrorism-lyme-disease-weaponized-ticks/
*https://www.ushmm.org/information/exhibitions/online-exhibitions/special-focus/doctors-trial/nuremberg-code#Permissible
*https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/personal-protective-equipment-infection-control/n95-respirators-surgical-masks-and-face-masks
*https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/us/us200en.pdf
*https://academic.oup.com/jcem/advance-article/doi/10.1210/clinem/dgaa733/5934827
*https://www.bitchute.com/video/3ihv9O0UBS4B
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/10-reasons-sars-cov-2-imaginary-digital-theoretical-virus/
*https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/deaths-injuries-following-covid-vaccine-cdc/
*https://www.bitchute.com/video/9KCxyj9zQ4N8
*https://www.bitchute.com/video/gofAFCyTH5qg
*https://www.bitchute.com/video/KpF6oEZ9TX36
*https://www.bitchute.com/video/kUNk3lTOn2po
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/9-simulations-drills-laws-prepared-for-the-coronavirus/
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/deep-down-virus-rabbit-hole-question-everything/

[awakened53]

Tories go to war over when to reopen pubs and restaurants as top Tory Sir Charles Walker warns Matt Hancock ‘Boris should sack you’ if he makes another gaffe like the 10-year jail terms fiasco (But why does Walker keep giving Jackboot Johnson a free ride? They ALL should be in jail)

The simmering Tory tensions over lockdown came to a head in spectacular fashion last week when venerable backbencher Sir Charles Walker encountered Health Secretary Matt Hancock in the Commons.
Sir Charles passionately believes that measures to limit the spread of the virus risk causing more harm than they prevent, particularly in terms of mental health; Mr Hancock has consistently argued that the protection of the NHSshould be the over-arching priority.
Sir Charles was enraged by the chaos over messages from Mr Hancock and Transport Secretary Grant Shappsover whether people should book a summer holiday – and by the decision to impose a ten-year jail sentence on people who flout strict new quarantine rules, a rule introduced without MPs getting a chance to vote on it.
So when Mr Hancock addressed a private meeting of the backbench 1922 Committee, of which Sir Charles is vice-chairman, he let rip at the Cabinet Minister, telling him that the Prime Minister’s ‘legs have been cut from underneath him as a result of the interventions’ by Mr Hancock and Mr Shapps, adding: ‘If the PM is let down again by his Secretaries of State, he should remove them from Cabinet’.
With ‘vaccines coming out of our ears’, as Sir Charles has put it, impatience on the party’s backbenches is growing.

Read more: Tories go to war over when to reopen pubs and restaurants as top Tory Sir Charles Walker warns Matt Hancock ‘Boris should sack you’ if he makes another gaffe like the 10-year jail terms fiasco (But why does Walker keep giving Jackboot Johnson a free ride? They ALL should be in jail)

[awakened53]

I did actually receive this letter from Surrey Police via my child's School

Despicable letter to parents by establishment arse-licking Surrey Chief Constable Gavin Stephens – the effect of lockdown is terrible on children and the young but they must follow the rules anyway or they will be killing people. What a prat

Dear Parent/Carer,

In the spring of 2020 I wrote to parents and carers across Surrey to explain how The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions), (England) Regulations 2020 applied to children and young people. Little did we know then that almost a year hence we would find ourselves in the position we are today. Lockdown measures are still in place, many of you are juggling
the demands of home schooling, work and all of the other challenges in modern life. None of us know when the lockdown will end.
We do know that the impact on children and young people is huge, restricting their lives immeasurably, often with hour’s staring at a screen and little opportunity to exercise, see friends and explore. It is therefore really important that we all reinforce the message that the measures continue to be critical in order to protect friends, family, the NHS and the wider public.

There is light at the end of the tunnel with the rollout of the vaccination programme, but lives are still being put at risk by those who are breaching restrictions. Meeting with friends in groups prolongs the lockdown and increases the chance of spreading the virus.
Across Surrey we are seeing persistent ‘hot spots’ where children and young people gather – we see parties in homes and groups meeting in skate parks. This isn’t exclusive to children and young people but they can be part of the solution in helping us get control of the infection rate, by following the rules.
We would ask – “Do you know where your son or daughter spends their time?”
Officers and PCSOs are doing all they can to patrol ‘hot spots’ – engaging, explaining and encouraging anybody in breach of regulations to adhere to the rules. Where these approaches fail, we will use our policing powers to remove that child or young person and return them home. In circumstances where we find persistent and blatant rule breaking then
enforcement action will be taken against the parent or carer of that young person (under 18). For a first offence this is a £200 fine.
Download the full letter below:
SurreyPoliceletterforParentsandCarersFebruary2021pdfDownload

[Steve]

Matt Hancock acted unlawfully over Covid contracts, judge rules -

The Government unlawfully failed to publish details of billions of pounds’ worth of coronavirus-related contracts, the High Court has ruled....

https://metro.co.uk/2021/02/19/matt-hanc...-14111628/

[awakened53]

Fascist Dutch parliament extends curfew by emergency bill as government shuns court ruling of ‘Covid’ lockdown ‘illegality’

Dutch senators have voted overwhelmingly to pass an emergency act to continue a nationwide curfew, disregarding a judge’s ruling this week that the restriction violates the law as well as the rights of citizens.
The emergency bill passed in a 45-13 vote on Friday evening, according to local media, upholding the nightly curfew in the face of an ongoing legal challenge to the restrictions, intended to stem the spread of Covid-19.
While a lower court ruled in favor of Dutch activist group Viruswaarheid (Virus Truth) on Tuesday, deeming the 9pm curfew “not legitimate” and a “far-reaching violation of the right to freedom of movement and privacy,” the decision was swiftly reversed on a last-minute appeal from the government. The court reconvened on Friday to rule on the issue, but decided to take another week to reach a final verdict and is set to meet again on February 26.

Read More: Dutch curfew extended by emergency bill as government shuns court ruling of Covid lockdown ‘illegality’

[Steve]

Telegram Post -

British Conservative Party Donors have been awarded contracts for PPE (Surgical Masks, Plastic Aprons, Face Shields) worth over £500 Million Pounds

David Meller donated to the conservative party $60,000 - gets awarded PPE Contract worth over £163 Million Pounds

The longer these lockdowns continue the more money they will all make and once all the businesses go bankrupt they'll buy up all the land and premises cheap using the British Tax Payers own money which they awarded themselves from PPE contracts.

Speaking is 27 year old Zarah Sultana MP for Coventry South - make sure to retweet and share her video 
https://twitter.com/zarahsultana/status/...7610595330

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zarah_Sultana


https://t.me/themelkshow/192934