[awakened53]

Sainsbury’s and Morrisons enforce mask-wearing in their supermarkets – the best reason possible to boycott both. We will remember forever who stood up for freedom and those that cooperated in its deletion

Sainsbury’s has joined Morrisons in enforcing the wearing of masks in its stores despite police officers expressing concerns over how breaking the rule will be challenged.
The supermarket giant confirmed it will post trained security guards at shop entrances to “challenge” any customers not wearing a mask or shopping in groups.
Chief executive Simon Roberts said: “I’ve spent a lot of time in our stores reviewing the latest situation over the last few days and on behalf of all my colleagues, I am asking our customers to help us keep everyone safe.
“The vast majority of customers are shopping safely, but I have also seen some customers trying to shop without a mask and shopping in larger family groups.
“Please help us to keep all our colleagues and customers safe by always wearing a mask and by shopping alone. Everyone’s care and consideration matters now more than ever.”

Read more: Sainsbury’s and Morrisons enforce mask-wearing in their supermarkets – the best reason possible to boycott both. We will remember forever who stood up for freedom and those that cooperated in its deletion

[awakened53]

HSBC says customers who refuse to wear a face mask will have their accounts withdrawn (You won’t be able to bank with HSBC? )

HSBC has issued a warning to customers as retailers step up coronavirus safety measures amid a further 1,243 deaths.
The lender – which also owns First Direct and Marks & Spencer bank – said customers who break the law could forfeit their bank account.https://a580b413d6a83ce327982eb562a61b61.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-37/html/container.html?n=0
Speaking to The Mirror, a spokesman said face masks are mandatory in all branches as per government guidelines.
Those who refuse to comply will be refused service and could have their bank accounts withdrawn.
Jackie Uhi, head of branch network, HSBC UK said: “Our branch colleagues are key workers, continuing to go to work in our branches every day so that customers who need them can access essential financial services.

Read More: HSBC says customers who refuse to wear a face mask will have their accounts withdrawn

[Paul C]

Whats hard for me to get my head around is the mindset of the public, I hear this a lot that  people are so annoyed because lots people are not social distancing, wearing masks, this is why there’s a rise in cases,  

Ok, I ask the question, please explain why Flu didn’t come around this year, 

Their reply: that’s because of Social Distancing, and wearing masks.

Talk about having it both ways

[Steve]

FB POST -


IMPORTANT MASK INFORMATION

From Anna de Buisseret

The Government has FAILED to conduct a Risk Assessment of the risks to the individual members of the public for the harms caused to them by mask wearing- or wearing a face covering.

Without such a Risk Assessment, the individual is NOT providing “informed consent” to wear a “medical device” (which a mask is as defined under the Medical Devices Regulations 2002).

A face “covering” falls to be regulated under the Consumer Protection Regulations. The Face Coverings Regulations are therefore - prima facie - unlawful and should not be enforced.

In the view of our legal team, the Face Coverings Regulations are ultra vires the Government’s powers but that legal argument is ongoing.

None of the supermarkets are providing their customers with a Risk Assessment either - so their customers are also not able to provide their “informed consent” to wearing a face covering/mask.

This is unlawful as “informed consent” must be obtained.

Anyone being asked to wear or use a medical device - such as a mask - should be medically assessed by an Occupational Health team for their INDIVIDUAL risk posed to them by wearing a mask.

Failure to conduct a Health & Safety Risk assessment is both a civil and a potentially criminal offence. Therefore both the Government and the supermarkets - and anyone else enforcing mask mandates in the absence of a full Health & Safety Risk assessment in the workplace -, is acting unlawfully and can be held PERSONALLY liable for the damage caused to the individual.

Legal challenges are already being run against the “mask perpetrators” to challenge this unlawful and harmful mask mandate and cases are already being won, and damages for harm caused paid out.

I’m a specialist disability discrimination lawyer who also has a stream of claimants lining up to bring legal claims for damages from this mask mandate. Countless people are being harmed by wearing a mask and others are being harmed from the discrimination they are enduring from being mask exempt.

The flood of litigation is going to be Tsunami-like!!! Be warned: perpetrators will be held to account. Anyone enforcing or imposing this mandate should be warned that they are acting unlawfully and will be held personally liable for the harm they cause.

I advise anyone harmed by this mask mandate in a work environment (which supermarkets are) to file a report of your harm to the Health & Safety team and ask them to conduct an investigation into whether the employer or supermarket or other “mask perpetrator “ has conducted a valid H&S Risk Assessment.

The local council’s Environmental Health Officer is responsible for ensuring that commercial premises in their area are safe for the public. This includes whether it’s safe for the public to be forced to wear a face covering or mask whilst in a supermarket or other commercial premises. Without a full Risk Assessment, no one should be required or forced to wear a face covering or mask - it’s a breach of the Health & Safety laws and a potentially criminal offence.If the employer or other “mask perpetrator “ hasn’t followed the law in forcing you to wear a mask, criminal investigations can follow under Health & Safety laws.

The Equality Act 2010 does not permit anyone to discriminate against a disabled person on the grounds of their disability.
Refusing entry to a shop or access to public services to a disabled person is prima facie disability discrimination. No evidence can be lawfully demanded. It’s a breach of both the right to privacy and the Equality Act 2010 to ask for medical evidence in this manner.

Masks worn by the public in community settings, do not prevent transmission of a virus particle as tiny as SARS-CoV-2: that’s what the scientific research evidence shows.

Masks can INCREASE the risk of transmission if not face-fitted and fit-tested for the individual wearer as leakage occurs.

Masks can INCREASE the risk of secondary bacterial and fungal infections due to incorrect putting on and taking off of the mask, incorrect storage and lack of sterilisation of the contamination collecting on the surfaces of the mask.

These contaminates are then inhaled: the moisture and humidity of the mask is a perfect breeding ground for bacteria and fungus which multiply in the mask fibres.
These are then inhaled deeply into the lungs where they multiply further, along with the loose fibres of the mask which collect in the lungs.

Secondary bacterial lung infections are a major risk factor from inhaling bacteria into the lungs. Secondary bacterial lung infections were the major cause of death in the Spanish Flu. They had cloth mask mandates then too. See a correlation??

Masks cause multiple organ damage - some of which is irreparable and permanent.

Masks cause social, cognitive, emotional and psychological harm too.

Have YOU been fully informed of all the harms that wearing a mask causes to YOU??

Have YOU had a H&S Risk Assessment by an Occupational Health Team for the risks posed to you - as an individual- for mask wearing?? If not, how do YOU know what the risks are?? How are YOU providing YOUR individual informed consent to wearing this medical device without a full H&S Risk Assessment?? You’re not able to.
You’re simply guessing that it won’t harm you in the absence of a full Risk Assessment.

I have 55 pages of scientific research evidence proving the many harms caused to the mask wearer.

I’ve prepared a detailed Risk Assessment and a Health & Safety Risk Assessment on mask wearing for any of you who would like to be informed of the harms and risks of mask wearing.

There are a team of around 70 of us professional lawyers, medics, Health & Safety inspectors, industrial hygienists, psychologists, scientists and others who are collaborating to raise legal challenges against the unlawful and harmful mask laws and mandates and policies. Our evidence is therefore drawn from top experts in their fields

[awakened53]

Behaviour ‘scientist’ and Communist Party member advising the government on how to manipulate the behaviour of the population demands tighter lockdown restrictions as she has from the start including mandatory masks. How long are we going to take this calculated manipulative bullshit from Susan Michie?

A scientist advising the Government on coronavirus has called for tighter lockdown restrictions, describing the current rules as “the problem” amid rising infections and deaths.
Professor Susan Michie, director of the Centre for Behaviour Change at UCL, said an “overwhelming” number of people were sticking to lockdown rules as she questioned how Government messaging was being targeted at the public.
It comes after the Government launched a new advert that asks people to “look in the eyes” of frontline medical workers and Covid-19 patients and tells them to stay at home.
“The advert, the Government messages and Priti Patel talking about fines is all on the basis that the main problem is that people aren’t adhering to the rules that exist,” Prof Michie told Times Radio.
“But actually all the data show that the overwhelming number of people are sticking to the rules with one exception which is self-isolation.
“In fact I would say that it’s not so much people not sticking to the rules, but it’s the rules themselves that are the problem.”

Read more: Behaviour ‘scientist’ and Communist Party member advising the government on how to manipulate the behaviour of the population demands tighter lockdown restrictions as she has from the start including mandatory masks. How long are we going to take this calculated manipulative bullshit from Susan Michie?

[awakened53]

WHO now saying You do not need to Wear a Mask

In a telling admission made on January 22, 2021, the World Health Organization now say there is no scientific medical reason for any healthy person to wear a mask outside of a hospital. Sadly, our corrupt politicians and mainstream media only relate the bad news.
If you do not have any respiratory symptoms, such as fever, cough, or runny nose, you do not need to wear a medical mask. When used alone, masks can give you a false feeling of protection and can even be a source of infection when not used correctly.
Watch the video of the press announcement at www.who.int


Read More : WHO now saying You do not need to Wear a Mask

[Blackcat69]

can't find the clip where it says this ? have listened to the video from 22nd - plus the WHO website still recomends mask wearing ! if you can direct me better to the clip where this is said it would be appreciated, thanks

[awakened53]

can't find the clip where it says this ? have listened to the video from 22nd - plus the WHO website still recomends mask wearing ! if you can direct me better to the clip where this is said it would be appreciated, thanks

I have watched the 22nd and 25th videos and cannot seem to find it..
it may have been removed from their website

The link was from davidicke.com

I will keep looking to see what I can find

[Blackcat69]

Wouldnt surprise me if they were ordered to take it down, if the mask goes then so does all the control (fear)

[awakened53]

Brain-Dead Doctor Tells NBC Americans Should Consider Wearing FOUR Face Masks (He’s obviously been doing that for far too long)

Doctor Scott Segal told NBC News that Americans should consider wearing FOUR face masks if they want the most effective protection against spreading COVID-19.
Yes, really.
As we highlighted yesterday, Dr. Fauci advised Americans to begin wearing two masks, saying that it “makes common sense” for more than one layer to be more effective.
However, Fauci was outdone by researchers at Virginia Tech, who said that two face masks only provide 50-75% efficacy and that three masks should be worn to achieve 90% effectiveness.
But why stop at 90 per cent?
According to Dr. Scott Segal, chair of anesthesiology at Wake Forest Baptist Health in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, even that may not be enough.
“If you put three or four masks on, it’s going to filter better because it’s more layers of cloth,” Segal told NBC News.


Read more: Brain-Dead Doctor Tells NBC Americans Should Consider Wearing FOUR Face Masks (He’s obviously been doing that for far too long)