[Steve]

The World Health Organisation -

WHO's Tedros Adhanom Should be Tried for Crimes Against Humanity -


https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=yout...yD3o6_QGJI


The Crimes of Tedros Adhanom -

https://www.roughestimate.org/



Marxist UN WHO Boss Must Be Put on Trial, Critics Say -

https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-new...ritics-say



The Ethiopian Terrorist in Charge of the World Health Organization — Dr. Tedros Adhanom -

https://frankreport.com/2020/04/14/the-e...s-adhanom/

---

Telegram - https://t.me/NESARA_GESARA_QFS/4099

He is NOT vaccinated !! And admits it! He is therefore a phony !!  

Where is the outcry of outrage from the mainstream!!!? I just can't believe it, but he really says it in this video !!

WHO dictator Tedros tells the whole world to get vaccinated, but he himself is not vaccinated out of PROTES !! Yes, he really says this!!!! This really shows that rules only apply to the poor people and that those at the top are allowed to do what they want !!

[awakened53]

Member of Parliament confirms the UK will sign up to WHO’s Pandemic Treaty


Last week, Mark Fletcher, Member of Parliament for Bolsover, responded to a constituent’s email:

“Then Prime Minister Boris Johnson, alongside other world leaders, called for the creation of a pandemic treaty … the current target date for agreeing on the text of the new instrument is May 2024, at the World Health Assembly (WHA) … Over the next year, the UK will continue to work towards building a consensus on how the global community can better prevent, prepare for, and respond to future pandemics,” he wrote.

Fletcher’s reply implies that it is not only a fait accompli but that the UK is very much one of the significant, if not the major, driving forces behind the Treaty. 

Many things can be said about Fletcher’s response, not least of all his questionable statement: “A pandemic treaty [ ] would help … prevent a global pandemic, if this were to happen again.”   However, in this article, we want to draw your attention, again, to the fact that the Pandemic Treaty is not the only route WHO is pursuing in its quest to impose a global health dictatorship.  And, at this time, the Pandemic Treaty is the less urgent of the evils.

We have included a copy of Fletcher’s response at the end of this article.

Two weeks ago, in response to a petition, a debate was held in Westminster Hall on the World Health Organisation’s (“WHO’s”) proposed Pandemic Treaty.  As the petition and the parliamentary debate had done, many are focusing on the ratification of the ‘Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response Accord’, the so-called “Pandemic Treaty.”  However, there are two routes through which WHO is attempting to impose a global health dictatorship. One is the Pandemic Treaty and the other is the amendments to the International Health Regulations (“IHR”).
The two proposals aim to expand an international bureaucracy for health emergencies with an additional annual budget estimated by the World Bank at three times WHO’s current budget. This program is heavily backed by WHO’s major individual and corporate sponsors – entities that will directly benefit through the commodity-centred responses that are proposed.
Why is WHO following two routes and not just one?  Because if power and authority over much of the world cannot be gained through amendments to the IHR then WHO will rely on its Pandemic Treaty.
The proposed amendments to the IHR are a completely different set of proposals to the Pandemic Treaty that will not need to be signed into being by any government.  For the amendments to be adopted all that is required is a simple majority of the World Health Assembly (“WHA”). WHA can adopt regulations that are legally binding on WHO Member States unless they expressly reject them or “opt out.” The participation of national legislatures or other governmental bodies is not necessary.  The Pandemic Treaty, on the other hand, will require a two-thirds majority of the Member States present and voting in the Assembly for it to be adopted.
It is the proposed amendments to the IHR, wholly or in part, that could be adopted at the next WHA meeting in May 2023. Failing that, the IHR amendments could be adopted at the subsequent WHA meeting in May 2024; when the text of the Pandemic Treaty is scheduled to be agreed by Member States.
After reading the draft amendments to the IHR it becomes obvious that the proposed new powers sought by WHO, and the pandemic preparedness industry being built around it, are not hidden. The only subterfuge is the farcical approach of corporate media and politicians in many nations who seem to pretend that the proposals do not exist.
Read More: Member of Parliament confirms the UK will sign up to WHO’s Pandemic Treaty

[Steve]

Remember when we had sovereignty?

Are the MPs and Government throwing away our chance to remain a sovereign country?

https://youtu.be/dj6A4dJNenA

[awakened53]

The Plan: WHO’s Ten Years of Infectious Diseases (2020 to 2030), Leading to World Tyranny


Excess mortality is reported from Norway – and all over the western world or Global North. Excesses never heard before. In the ranges of between 15% and 25%. In some countries even higher. Worrisome. No clear causes can be detected.

See this.

Already more than a year ago [b]Dr. Michael Yeadon[/b], former VP Pfizer and Chief of Science at Pfizer, warned that [b]excess deaths will appear in the next 3-5 and even up to ten years[/b], because of the false and criminal, untested mRNA vaxxes.

He elaborates. After all the boosters – 3 to 4 shots – the immune system has lost up to 80% of its defenses. Thus, people are more vulnerable to catching any kind of disease. Plus, myocarditis and sudden deaths are on the rise – even in young people, especially those who practice sport or are sports professionals.

In addition, graphene oxide injection and other concoctions being injected, cause all sorts of cancers, mostly in reproductive systems of men and women, as well as several types of cancers of the blood, of the eyes causing blindness… liver and kidney diseases… and much more.

In addition, these injections, called vaccines, also cause massive infertility. In some countries life-childbirth was down by up to 40% in 2022.

Dr. Yeadon warned that the diseases will be very difficult to trace back to the vaxxes, but that’s where the origin is.

A clear eugenics agenda, mass depopulation, unprecedented.

Genocide is a word that doesn’t meet the extent of the atrocity that’s behind what we are living through — what the cabal is carrying out.

The [b]UN Agenda 2030[/b], alias Klaus Schwab’s (WEF) [b]Great Reset[/b] and the nefarious, all-digitizing [b]4th Industrial Revolution[/b], also includes [b]an asset-stripping plan never seen and experienced before in human history.[/b] Assets of covid mandates-caused bankruptcies [b]are sucked upwards into the vaults of the financial oligarchs[/b] and the [b]Dark Invisible Financial Cabal[/b] – which is funding and orchestrating the WEF and which is in control of over 90% of the world’s mainstream media. See this.

The Agenda 2030 (originally called Agenda 21) was prepared by a very long hand, dating back 60 to a hundred years. Be aware, the Dark Invisible Financial Cabal acts as a cult. In order to be successful, it has to tell the people what it is up to.

Indeed, over the past several decades we have received many warnings of what to expect – namely [b]a Health Tyranny, enhanced by a fake Global Warming and Biodiversity Green agenda[/b].

The New Green is a fascist neoliberal, make-believe environmental protection farse. In reality – far from environmental protection. To the contrary. Yet, people throughout the world fall for it. Propaganda is deadly. We have to stop it.

Read More – The Plan: WHO’s Ten Years of Infectious Diseases (2020 to 2030), Leading to World Tyranny

[awakened53]

UK Plan to Fast-track Drugs Approved by ‘Trusted’ Regulators in Other Countries — One Step Closer to a ‘One Health’ World?


The U.K.’s drug regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), is weighing a plan that would result in what The BMJ has described as “near automatic sign off” for medicines “already approved by ‘trusted’ regulators in other parts of the world.”

The proposal is raising concerns among some medical experts.

According to a JD Supra article, these “new international recognitions routes” announced by the MHRA are intended for the quick “approval of medicines that are already authorised in Australia, Canada, the European Union (EU), Japan, Singapore, Switzerland or the United States.” The new “routes” are expected to begin by Jan. 1, 2024.

Medications already licensed in any of these “trusted partner” countries would receive “a fast-track U.K. application process.”

The plan builds on the MHRA’s existing European Commission (EC) Decision Reliance Procedureand also “complements the U.K. national authorisation process and accelerated access route, the Innovative Licensing and Access Pathway (ILAP).”

This procedure was introduced following Brexit to allow the MHRA to “rely” on drug approvals from the European Medicines Agency (EMA). If a drug has received EMA approval or a “positive recommendation,” the MHRA can then proceed with a “lighter touch” assessment and “accelerated decision from the MHRA within 67 days or less.”

In March, the U.K. government awarded the MHRA £10 million ($12 million) in funding “to help bring innovative new medicines and medical technologies to U.K. patients more quickly.”

Describing this new process as a “milestone,” JD Supra claimed it “is intended to result in faster access for U.K. patients to new innovative medicines.”

The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry said the process will reduce “the time delay for regulatory approval.”

Preorder Now! ‘Vax-

Regulators want to ‘please Big Pharma’
Medical and vaccines experts who spoke with The Defender, however, expressed concerns over safety risks associated with an expedited approvals process and a reduction in regulatory oversight.
Dr. Meryl Nass, an internist, biological warfare epidemiologist and member of the Children’s Health Defense (CHD) scientific advisory committee, told The Defender, “The process of ‘harmonizing’ laws and standards between countries — beyond just the EU countries — has been ongoing for years.”
However, “By saying that any friendly nation’s drug regulator decision can stand in your country — well, that obviously will turn into a race to the bottom,” she said, implying that there would be continuous increased pressure to hasten drug development and approvals.
Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center and co-author of the 1985 book “DPT: A Shot in the Dark,” told The Defender:
“Over the four decades that I have been an informed consent advocate in the U.S., I have watched Congress direct federal agencies to develop public-private business partnerships with pharmaceutical companies.


Read More: UK Plan to Fast-track Drugs Approved by ‘Trusted’ Regulators in Other Countries — One Step Closer to a ‘One Health’ World?