Telegram Post -
Holidays Abroad ...
So apparently it's now "illegal" to go on holiday abroad....
Legal= subject to commercial contract.
Legislative rules written down on a piece of paper do not apply unless YOU personally consent by way of contract.
UK GOVERNMENT PLC is a corporate fiction, an IT. I, a woman am not owned by IT, am not a citizen of IT, have no obligations with IT, and do not reside in IT.
My body and all that I own and claim is my exclusive property. I, a woman am not property of the man who sometimes ACTS as Prime minister 'Boris Johnson' (Public servant), have no obligation/ contract with Boris Johnson or any other man/woman/entity/agent of UK GOVERNMENT PLC.
"Honourable" In the United Kingdom there is no such jurisdiction as 'honourable' needless to say that as we are not encumbered by a nobility, there is no such distinction 'honourable' in Great Britain as all man and women are equal in the eyes of the law.
I, a woman am not property of any man, woman, corporation and have no contract with ant man woman or corporation.
UK GOVERNMENT PLC is attempting to administrate my property without right by claiming any such jurisdiction over I.
UK GOVERNMENT PLC is a Trespasser.
UK GOVERNMENT PLC is meaningless without my CONSENT.
If this applies to YOU then YOU may travel to and from wherever YOU and whenever YOU wish.
Look inside the cover of your 'passport' and read what it says!
https://t.me/officialcharliewardshow/14751
Service Providers ...
So, there appears to be service providers walking around knocking on doors harassing people and making threats of extortion.
(Please see my post from a few days ago regarding how to deal with these unwelcome visitors)
Remember they deserve NO explanation whatsoever.
Once they have been made aware they are not welcome they are TRESPASSING if they fail to leave.
Ok, The only way a piece of paper can apply to you, me or anybody else is if you are property of its author or there is a TRUE contract in place. (I made a post last week on the elements of a contract).
Telling me a CORPORATION is going to fine me is like telling me MICKEY MOUSE is going to fine me!
Here is an example:
MICKEY MOUSE has made a demand for payment, but has not presented Stacey Evans with a bill which is recognised under the Bills and Exchange Act 1882, which must also have a signature in wet ink. MICKEY MOUSE cannot raise a bill because there is no commercial arrangement in place between MICKEY MOUSE and Stacey Evans under which a true bill can be raised.
For Stacey Evans to respond by paying without a bill signed in wet ink it would be a direct contravention of the Bills and Exchange Act 1882. In addition to this as there is no commercial arrangement and bill presented this would also be a contravention of the Fraud Act 2006. Stacey Evans is not in the habit of knowlingly conspiring to fraud, this action would also create a liability against Stacey Evans.
Regardless of the legislation or policies of MICKEY MOUSE or DISNEY LAND PLC any commercial activity would constitute as an act of fraud without commercial agreements in place beforehand.
Now read it again and swap MICKEY MOUSE with 'UK GOVERNMENT PLC' or your local 'COUNCIL' or your local 'POLICE'.
They are no different than MICKEY MOUSE, DONALD DUCK or RONALD MC DONALD.
They are all CORPORATIONS.
Same goes for BORIS JOHNSON PM, MARK DRAKEFORD MINISTER, NICOLA STURGEON and all the rest of the MP'S and CORPORATE EMPLOYEES. While they hold their TITLE they are just a CORPORATION, unless they are going to accept the liability in their private capacity as the man or a woman ACTING in the capacity of (whomever), NO they will NOT.
All men and women are CREATED EQUAL therefore no man or woman has authority over another, remember that!
Now what is this fictitious census fine that people are worrying about !
It is nothing but a scare tactic.
NO CONTRACT- NO OBLIGATION
https://t.me/officialcharliewardshow/14750
Holidays Abroad ...
So apparently it's now "illegal" to go on holiday abroad....
Legal= subject to commercial contract.
Legislative rules written down on a piece of paper do not apply unless YOU personally consent by way of contract.
UK GOVERNMENT PLC is a corporate fiction, an IT. I, a woman am not owned by IT, am not a citizen of IT, have no obligations with IT, and do not reside in IT.
My body and all that I own and claim is my exclusive property. I, a woman am not property of the man who sometimes ACTS as Prime minister 'Boris Johnson' (Public servant), have no obligation/ contract with Boris Johnson or any other man/woman/entity/agent of UK GOVERNMENT PLC.
"Honourable" In the United Kingdom there is no such jurisdiction as 'honourable' needless to say that as we are not encumbered by a nobility, there is no such distinction 'honourable' in Great Britain as all man and women are equal in the eyes of the law.
I, a woman am not property of any man, woman, corporation and have no contract with ant man woman or corporation.
UK GOVERNMENT PLC is attempting to administrate my property without right by claiming any such jurisdiction over I.
UK GOVERNMENT PLC is a Trespasser.
UK GOVERNMENT PLC is meaningless without my CONSENT.
If this applies to YOU then YOU may travel to and from wherever YOU and whenever YOU wish.
Look inside the cover of your 'passport' and read what it says!
https://t.me/officialcharliewardshow/14751
Service Providers ...
So, there appears to be service providers walking around knocking on doors harassing people and making threats of extortion.
(Please see my post from a few days ago regarding how to deal with these unwelcome visitors)
Remember they deserve NO explanation whatsoever.
Once they have been made aware they are not welcome they are TRESPASSING if they fail to leave.
Ok, The only way a piece of paper can apply to you, me or anybody else is if you are property of its author or there is a TRUE contract in place. (I made a post last week on the elements of a contract).
Telling me a CORPORATION is going to fine me is like telling me MICKEY MOUSE is going to fine me!
Here is an example:
MICKEY MOUSE has made a demand for payment, but has not presented Stacey Evans with a bill which is recognised under the Bills and Exchange Act 1882, which must also have a signature in wet ink. MICKEY MOUSE cannot raise a bill because there is no commercial arrangement in place between MICKEY MOUSE and Stacey Evans under which a true bill can be raised.
For Stacey Evans to respond by paying without a bill signed in wet ink it would be a direct contravention of the Bills and Exchange Act 1882. In addition to this as there is no commercial arrangement and bill presented this would also be a contravention of the Fraud Act 2006. Stacey Evans is not in the habit of knowlingly conspiring to fraud, this action would also create a liability against Stacey Evans.
Regardless of the legislation or policies of MICKEY MOUSE or DISNEY LAND PLC any commercial activity would constitute as an act of fraud without commercial agreements in place beforehand.
Now read it again and swap MICKEY MOUSE with 'UK GOVERNMENT PLC' or your local 'COUNCIL' or your local 'POLICE'.
They are no different than MICKEY MOUSE, DONALD DUCK or RONALD MC DONALD.
They are all CORPORATIONS.
Same goes for BORIS JOHNSON PM, MARK DRAKEFORD MINISTER, NICOLA STURGEON and all the rest of the MP'S and CORPORATE EMPLOYEES. While they hold their TITLE they are just a CORPORATION, unless they are going to accept the liability in their private capacity as the man or a woman ACTING in the capacity of (whomever), NO they will NOT.
All men and women are CREATED EQUAL therefore no man or woman has authority over another, remember that!
Now what is this fictitious census fine that people are worrying about !
It is nothing but a scare tactic.
NO CONTRACT- NO OBLIGATION
https://t.me/officialcharliewardshow/14750