The WEBSTER Report - Gas Electricity and Water are FREE!!
Why you should NOT "pay" for your gas, water or electric in a DEBT BASED economy....
https://youtu.be/ZammFU32SwM
…………………………………………………………………………………………………
Telegram Post - https://t.me/allmetersremoved/66643
Paul Webster has had a lot of success with utilities, he has done years of research and can stand in court and recite all this information from memory, so he is someone worth listening too. These are his words, not my opinion, so look him up if you are interested. Only take this action when you have the knowledge to do so and can defend your position.
1. Understand the not liable concept : utilities are already paid for : free
2. Invite the utility company to come and view safety of meters
3. Remove implied right of access through a notice and display
4. Ask for a bill and perform Not transferable etc and send back to the utility company
5. Keep receipts for proof of postage
Research evidence from the following to understand what you are doing. Can also be used as bundle if necessary for court;
• Bills of exchange 1882
• Stamp act 1981: the stamps you add to the bill/check makes sure that document is owned by you and they cant take control of it . Add a stamp on the back too incase they try to play with it.
• Consumer credit act section 123: under section 5: shows this section does not apply where the regulator agreement is non commercial : so we are not subject to it: we are not not liable !!!!
• Rights of entry under the gas and electricity boards act 1954 ; they use this for a criminal entry for taking us to a magistrates court for a criminal matter (warrant of entry) based under health and safety but it is actually a civil matter (monetary dispute to put a pay as u go meter in to make you pay or debt issue to pay when you are not liable to pay in the first place: the court would be committing fraud if they issue the warrant they should only issue it based on health and safety
• Gas act 1996 again health and safety issue they are applying under : point is there is no monetary dispute in these acts
• Top it off with the fraud act 2006 tells them our intentions are?!
• Contempt of court by Arch Bold which is through lord Diplock : shows no one can make a claim without proving it.
Why you should NOT "pay" for your gas, water or electric in a DEBT BASED economy....
https://youtu.be/ZammFU32SwM
…………………………………………………………………………………………………
Telegram Post - https://t.me/allmetersremoved/66643
Paul Webster has had a lot of success with utilities, he has done years of research and can stand in court and recite all this information from memory, so he is someone worth listening too. These are his words, not my opinion, so look him up if you are interested. Only take this action when you have the knowledge to do so and can defend your position.
1. Understand the not liable concept : utilities are already paid for : free
2. Invite the utility company to come and view safety of meters
3. Remove implied right of access through a notice and display
4. Ask for a bill and perform Not transferable etc and send back to the utility company
5. Keep receipts for proof of postage
Research evidence from the following to understand what you are doing. Can also be used as bundle if necessary for court;
• Bills of exchange 1882
• Stamp act 1981: the stamps you add to the bill/check makes sure that document is owned by you and they cant take control of it . Add a stamp on the back too incase they try to play with it.
• Consumer credit act section 123: under section 5: shows this section does not apply where the regulator agreement is non commercial : so we are not subject to it: we are not not liable !!!!
• Rights of entry under the gas and electricity boards act 1954 ; they use this for a criminal entry for taking us to a magistrates court for a criminal matter (warrant of entry) based under health and safety but it is actually a civil matter (monetary dispute to put a pay as u go meter in to make you pay or debt issue to pay when you are not liable to pay in the first place: the court would be committing fraud if they issue the warrant they should only issue it based on health and safety
• Gas act 1996 again health and safety issue they are applying under : point is there is no monetary dispute in these acts
• Top it off with the fraud act 2006 tells them our intentions are?!
• Contempt of court by Arch Bold which is through lord Diplock : shows no one can make a claim without proving it.