The US and Britain want us to believe that Syria/Russia is definitely behind the latest chemical weapon attack, however, have a look at the article below and it puts a completely different perspective on the whole issue of CWs used in the Middle East in the last few years.
Caught red-handed
The London Daily Mail ran a story in January 2013 about leaked emails that confirmed plans for a chemical attack in Syria sanctioned by Washington that would be blamed on President Assad to justify a ‘humanitarian’ invasion of the country. The report was quickly removed from the Mail website.
What the story described was a classic Problem-Reaction-Solution. The report revealed details of allegedly hacked emails from the British and Dubai-based defence contractor Britam Defence revealing a plan ‘approved by Washington’ and organised through the American client state of Qatar to transport a chemical weapon (CW) to Syria that was clearly intended to be a Problem-Reaction-Solution to remove the Assad regime as they had been so desperate to do for so long.
Obama had said that a chemical attack by trigger military intervention and the on-the-team French President Francois Hollande followed suit. He agreed that the use of chemical weapons would be ‘a legitimate reason for direct intervention’. Israel naturally said something similar –any excuse for a war.
The emails were revealed by a German hacker and were alleged to be correspondence between David Goulding, the Britam Defence Business Development Director, and Philip Doughty, the company’s founder. This was the exchange:
Phil We’ve got a new offer. It’s about Syria again. Qataris propose an attractive deal and swear that the idea is approved by Washington. We’ll have to deliver a CW to Homs, a Soviet origin g-shell from Libya similar to those that Assad should have. They want us to deploy our Ukrainian personnel that should speak Russian and make a video record. Frankly, I don’t think it’s a good idea but the sums proposed are enormous. Your opinion? Kind regards David.
The United States, Britain and NATO work with a whole web of ‘private defence contractors’ who are nothing more than extensions of the military under other names –the infamous Halliburton, once headed by Dick Cheney, and Blackwater, later called Xe and now Academi, are the best-known, but there are so many others. Blackwater keeps changing its name to cover the tracks of its infamy.
Those that hacked the emails made it very much more difficult to get away with it in Syria and that’s why the mainstream media wouldn’t touch the story.
Caught red-handed
The London Daily Mail ran a story in January 2013 about leaked emails that confirmed plans for a chemical attack in Syria sanctioned by Washington that would be blamed on President Assad to justify a ‘humanitarian’ invasion of the country. The report was quickly removed from the Mail website.
What the story described was a classic Problem-Reaction-Solution. The report revealed details of allegedly hacked emails from the British and Dubai-based defence contractor Britam Defence revealing a plan ‘approved by Washington’ and organised through the American client state of Qatar to transport a chemical weapon (CW) to Syria that was clearly intended to be a Problem-Reaction-Solution to remove the Assad regime as they had been so desperate to do for so long.
Obama had said that a chemical attack by trigger military intervention and the on-the-team French President Francois Hollande followed suit. He agreed that the use of chemical weapons would be ‘a legitimate reason for direct intervention’. Israel naturally said something similar –any excuse for a war.
The emails were revealed by a German hacker and were alleged to be correspondence between David Goulding, the Britam Defence Business Development Director, and Philip Doughty, the company’s founder. This was the exchange:
Phil We’ve got a new offer. It’s about Syria again. Qataris propose an attractive deal and swear that the idea is approved by Washington. We’ll have to deliver a CW to Homs, a Soviet origin g-shell from Libya similar to those that Assad should have. They want us to deploy our Ukrainian personnel that should speak Russian and make a video record. Frankly, I don’t think it’s a good idea but the sums proposed are enormous. Your opinion? Kind regards David.
The United States, Britain and NATO work with a whole web of ‘private defence contractors’ who are nothing more than extensions of the military under other names –the infamous Halliburton, once headed by Dick Cheney, and Blackwater, later called Xe and now Academi, are the best-known, but there are so many others. Blackwater keeps changing its name to cover the tracks of its infamy.
Those that hacked the emails made it very much more difficult to get away with it in Syria and that’s why the mainstream media wouldn’t touch the story.