The Templars’ influence over the Monarchs
The Templars had close relationships with most of the monarchs of the time, although less so in France. Given their immense wealth, the Templars ‘owned’ many of the kings who appeared to be in power, just as their Brotherhood successors own the governments of today. The Templars were close to Henry II of England (Ramses-Piso-Bush), the sponsor of Glastonbury. How interesting that Henry’s famous feud with the Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas à Becket, ended when two knights arrived from France to murder him in Canterbury Cathedral in 1170.
Henry’s son Richard the Lionheart (Ramses-Piso-Bush) was, in effect, a Templar himself, though not officially. He used their ships and preceptories and when he was forced to escape from England and the threats of his brother, John, he did so disguised as a Templar. He was protected by them and headed for the Holy Land crusades against the Muslim Saracens.
Richard sold Cyprus (a former Phoenician settlement) to the Templars and he was involved in negotiations between them and their Islamic version, the secret society called the Assassins. This word is now used to describe a killer and it derives from the Assassins particular method of ruling by fear and terrorism. Assassin is said to mean ‘user of hashish’ because they used the drug to trick and manipulate young men into killing for ‘God’ in the belief that this would secure their place in paradise. The name could also originate from the words hass (to destroy) and asana (to lay snares).
They waged an international terrorist war from their mountain headquarters at Alamut or Eagles Nest in Persia (Asia Minor/Turkey). Pottery decorated with pentagrams and the symbol of the female vulva have been found at this site and the Assassins wore white tunics with a red sash. The Assassins, who still continue today under different fronts, emerged from a sect founded by a Persian called Hassan Sabah (another very possible origin of the name) in 1090, the same period the Templars, Knights Hospitaller, and the Teutonic Knights were being formed. The Templars and the Assassins worked together although they appeared to be on different sides.
This is the way the public are still duped today into believing that because two groups war or oppose each other in public they must be on different sides. If you want to control the outcome of a game, you have to control both sides, but to get away with this you must kid the people that the two sides have different masters and goals. One of the most effective methods of manipulation by the Brotherhood is to create or infiltrate all sides and so control the outcome. The Templars were skilled in this.
While they were escorting Richard the Lionheart to the Crusades, they were supporting his brother and fierce rival, King John (Ramses-Piso-Bush). The Templars were behind the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215, thanks to the efforts of Aymeric de St Maur, the Templar’s Grand Master in England and King John’s closest advisor. The Magna Carta curtailed many powers of the monarchy, so increasing the Templars control and leading further down the road to the Agenda’s long term goal to introduce ‘democracy’: imprisonment disguised as freedom. Covert control instead of overt control.
That’s not to say that all the Templars were of negative intent, but as always in these secret societies there were many levels of knowledge and agendas. The French writer and researcher, Jean Robin, concluded that the Order of the Temple consisted of seven outer circles which were taught the ‘minor’ mysteries and three inner circles which worked with the ‘great’ mysteries. It is the same with Freemasonry and all secret societies today. The mass of the membership has no idea what their top levels know or the Agenda they are promoting.
Despite their wealth, the Templars were exempt from taxes (just like the tax-exempt foundations of the Brotherhood today) and they had their own courts. They controlled monarchs, people of influence, businesses and countries. Their method was to manipulate their ‘targets’ into a position of dependency, usually through blackmail or debt. In this way the Templars could then dictate their actions. Nothing changes.
Edward I borrowed substantial sums from the Templars while King John and Henry III were up to their necks in debt to them. All three were the Ramses-Piso-Bush bloodline. At one point, Henry pawned the Crown Jewels to the Templars to pay for military exploits. This is another ancient technique of the Babylonian Brotherhood still constantly used today. Manipulate wars, lend all sides the money to fight them, and pick up massive profits from the horrors you have secretly caused. You also lend the same countries money to rebuild their shattered societies and this makes them even more in your debt and further under your control. You can also use the war to remove leaders, take over lands, and redraw the boundaries in line with your Agenda. Look at the two world wars in the 20th century to see how it is done.
The English Crown Jewels at the time of King John were kept at the Templar’s London Temple and under John, Henry II, Henry III and Edward I, it was also one of four royal treasuries. The Templars collected the taxes for the Pope and the Crown, plus the taxation known as tithes. They were a private organisation with a secret agenda, collecting taxes from the people on behalf of others and a great slice of that money went straight to themselves in payment for interest on loans. Apparently they were ruthless with non-payers. Today these are still the methods used throughout the world.
The Templar vows of sobriety and chastity were often so much hypocrisy. One description for heavy drinking in medieval England was to ‘drink like a Templar’. When it came to the serious business of money, however, they were as ruthless with their own as they were with the populace. It is the same today when members of the Brotherhood and their lackeys step out of line. In France, the Templar centre in Paris was the leading royal treasury and the French monarchy was also in serious debt to them. But the French king, Philippe IV, or Philippe the Fair, decided, it seems, that he’d had enough and took steps to destroy the Templars in a purge against them in October 1307. Or at least that’s the official story. There is so much more to know before one can appreciate and understand what really happened and its relevance to the world events which followed.
The Templars had close relationships with most of the monarchs of the time, although less so in France. Given their immense wealth, the Templars ‘owned’ many of the kings who appeared to be in power, just as their Brotherhood successors own the governments of today. The Templars were close to Henry II of England (Ramses-Piso-Bush), the sponsor of Glastonbury. How interesting that Henry’s famous feud with the Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas à Becket, ended when two knights arrived from France to murder him in Canterbury Cathedral in 1170.
Henry’s son Richard the Lionheart (Ramses-Piso-Bush) was, in effect, a Templar himself, though not officially. He used their ships and preceptories and when he was forced to escape from England and the threats of his brother, John, he did so disguised as a Templar. He was protected by them and headed for the Holy Land crusades against the Muslim Saracens.
Richard sold Cyprus (a former Phoenician settlement) to the Templars and he was involved in negotiations between them and their Islamic version, the secret society called the Assassins. This word is now used to describe a killer and it derives from the Assassins particular method of ruling by fear and terrorism. Assassin is said to mean ‘user of hashish’ because they used the drug to trick and manipulate young men into killing for ‘God’ in the belief that this would secure their place in paradise. The name could also originate from the words hass (to destroy) and asana (to lay snares).
They waged an international terrorist war from their mountain headquarters at Alamut or Eagles Nest in Persia (Asia Minor/Turkey). Pottery decorated with pentagrams and the symbol of the female vulva have been found at this site and the Assassins wore white tunics with a red sash. The Assassins, who still continue today under different fronts, emerged from a sect founded by a Persian called Hassan Sabah (another very possible origin of the name) in 1090, the same period the Templars, Knights Hospitaller, and the Teutonic Knights were being formed. The Templars and the Assassins worked together although they appeared to be on different sides.
This is the way the public are still duped today into believing that because two groups war or oppose each other in public they must be on different sides. If you want to control the outcome of a game, you have to control both sides, but to get away with this you must kid the people that the two sides have different masters and goals. One of the most effective methods of manipulation by the Brotherhood is to create or infiltrate all sides and so control the outcome. The Templars were skilled in this.
While they were escorting Richard the Lionheart to the Crusades, they were supporting his brother and fierce rival, King John (Ramses-Piso-Bush). The Templars were behind the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215, thanks to the efforts of Aymeric de St Maur, the Templar’s Grand Master in England and King John’s closest advisor. The Magna Carta curtailed many powers of the monarchy, so increasing the Templars control and leading further down the road to the Agenda’s long term goal to introduce ‘democracy’: imprisonment disguised as freedom. Covert control instead of overt control.
That’s not to say that all the Templars were of negative intent, but as always in these secret societies there were many levels of knowledge and agendas. The French writer and researcher, Jean Robin, concluded that the Order of the Temple consisted of seven outer circles which were taught the ‘minor’ mysteries and three inner circles which worked with the ‘great’ mysteries. It is the same with Freemasonry and all secret societies today. The mass of the membership has no idea what their top levels know or the Agenda they are promoting.
Despite their wealth, the Templars were exempt from taxes (just like the tax-exempt foundations of the Brotherhood today) and they had their own courts. They controlled monarchs, people of influence, businesses and countries. Their method was to manipulate their ‘targets’ into a position of dependency, usually through blackmail or debt. In this way the Templars could then dictate their actions. Nothing changes.
Edward I borrowed substantial sums from the Templars while King John and Henry III were up to their necks in debt to them. All three were the Ramses-Piso-Bush bloodline. At one point, Henry pawned the Crown Jewels to the Templars to pay for military exploits. This is another ancient technique of the Babylonian Brotherhood still constantly used today. Manipulate wars, lend all sides the money to fight them, and pick up massive profits from the horrors you have secretly caused. You also lend the same countries money to rebuild their shattered societies and this makes them even more in your debt and further under your control. You can also use the war to remove leaders, take over lands, and redraw the boundaries in line with your Agenda. Look at the two world wars in the 20th century to see how it is done.
The English Crown Jewels at the time of King John were kept at the Templar’s London Temple and under John, Henry II, Henry III and Edward I, it was also one of four royal treasuries. The Templars collected the taxes for the Pope and the Crown, plus the taxation known as tithes. They were a private organisation with a secret agenda, collecting taxes from the people on behalf of others and a great slice of that money went straight to themselves in payment for interest on loans. Apparently they were ruthless with non-payers. Today these are still the methods used throughout the world.
The Templar vows of sobriety and chastity were often so much hypocrisy. One description for heavy drinking in medieval England was to ‘drink like a Templar’. When it came to the serious business of money, however, they were as ruthless with their own as they were with the populace. It is the same today when members of the Brotherhood and their lackeys step out of line. In France, the Templar centre in Paris was the leading royal treasury and the French monarchy was also in serious debt to them. But the French king, Philippe IV, or Philippe the Fair, decided, it seems, that he’d had enough and took steps to destroy the Templars in a purge against them in October 1307. Or at least that’s the official story. There is so much more to know before one can appreciate and understand what really happened and its relevance to the world events which followed.