02-01-2018, 03:10 PM
(01-28-2018, 01:48 AM)awakened53 Wrote: After reading so much about previous false flag events going back to WW2 such as Reichstag and Pearl Harbour, and obviously leading up to 9-11 and 7-7 London bombings it is now hard to believe the mainstream regarding any "terror" event.
There are serious flaws in the reported stories of the Boston Bombings, Sandy Hook, Las Vegas shooting, Paris shootings and bombings, Westminster, Dunblane, Raul Moat, the Derrick Bird shootings, Madrid bombings and the killing of Lee Rigby and even the Ariana Grande concert explosion in Manchester.
The real issue now is what can we believe when these stories are reported in the mainstream?
They only hang around for a couple of days and then they are not discussed again so the sheeple move on believing what they have been told.
What do you guys and girls think?
The live reporting of these events causes issues when they try to get the story straight later. Tower 7 (I think!) being reported as collapsed by the BBC on Sep 11th despite being in the backdrop behind the journalist as well as the reports of Syrian passports of the suspected Paris shooters being found at the scene despite none of the alleged shooters being Syrian as two examples.
I think there will be a more coordinated effort to align broadcasters to stop these 'mistakes' from happening in future. The more of these things that happen, the slicker the production values will become and the harder they will be to spot.