FB POST -
"There were no positive tests amongst 1,174 close contacts of asymptomatic cases."
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w
Note that what they call here "asymptomatic cases" in other peer-reviewed publications are called "false positive PCR tests", which have false positive test results above a Ct value of 24 (=Cycle threshold) when the inconsequentially small amount of viral material/fragment they detected does not contain any "living" viral material that can be replicated, hence this is "dead" or non infectious viral material.
Here is an example of a peer-reviewed study that established this maximum Ct value for infected/infectious "cases":
https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-art...38/5842165
Where they conclude:
"SARS-CoV-2 Vero cell infectivity was only observed for RT-PCR Ct < 24"
And also this peer-reviewed publication mentions this:
https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-art...91/5912603
While there is no standardized protocol on the maximum Ct value established by the WHO, and generally Ct values are between 35 and 45, which as is mentioned in that last publication at >35 Ct already have more than 97% false positives!
And then see and hear even Dr. Fauci admit that the PCR tests are completely unreliable, which form the false foundation of the global CONIT-911 planned-panic that allegedly justifies the deadly lockdowns, quarantines, curfews, violently enforced mask wearing and social distancing laws, closed schools, vaccine mandates and many other completely useless violations of our freedoms and rights:
https://mobile.twitter.com/vegsource/sta...0291147776
Are they REALLY all completely useless?
Yes, according to this peer-reviewed publication:
"Stringency of the measures settled to fight pandemia, including lockdown, did not appear to be linked with death rate."
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10....04339/full
And are those completely useless violations of our rights and freedoms REALLY even deadly?
Yes, according to this peer-reviewed paper they are the CAUSE of a historically unrivalled massacre involving HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DEATHS:
"The economic, food, and health systems disruptions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic are expected to continue to exacerbate all forms of malnutrition. Estimates from the International Food Policy Research Institute suggest that because of the pandemic an additional 140 million people will be thrown into living in extreme poverty on less than US$1·90 per day in 2020.
According to the World Food Programme, the number of people in LMICs facing acute food insecurity will nearly double to 265 million by the end of 2020.
Sharp declines are expected in access to child health and nutrition services, similar to those seen during the 2014–16 outbreak of Ebola virus disease in sub-Saharan Africa.
Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, UNICEF estimated a 30% overall reduction in essential nutrition services coverage, reaching 75–100% in lockdown contexts, including in fragile countries where there are humanitarian crises."
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lance...0/fulltext
Which was also stated in this peer-reviewed paper:
"Currently, more evidence becomes available that the lockdowns may have more negative effects than positive effects. For instance, many measures taken in a lockdown aimed at protecting human life may compromise the immune system, and purpose in life, especially of vulnerable groups. This leads to the paradoxical situation of compromising the immune system and physical and mental health of many people, including the ones we aim to protect. Also, it is expected that hundreds of millions of people will die from hunger and postponed medical treatments. Other side effects include financial insecurity of billions of people, physical and mental health problems, and increased inequalities. The economic and health repercussions of the crisis will be falling disproportionately on young workers, low-income families and women, and thus exacerbate existing inequalities."
https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/tra...#pageNum=1
"Exaserbating existing inequalities" is called "polarising fortunes" in this only positive effect of these otherwise useless and extremely deadly draconian measures, but this positive effect is merely serving the world's richest of the rich billionaires club, as this research by the World Bank established, aptly called "Riding The Storm":
"Wealth reaches new heights
Total billionaire wealth reached USD 10.2 trillion at the end of July 2020, touching a new high after the year’s V-shaped rebound in asset prices. This level surpasses the previous peak of USD 8.9 trillion, reached at the end of 2017. There are now 2,189 billionaires, up from 2,158 in 2017.
Polarizing fortunes
Fortunes are polarizing as business innovators and disruptors deploy technology to be among the leaders of today’s economic revolution. During 2018, 2019 and the first seven months of 2020, entrepreneurs in the tech, healthcare and industrials sectors pulled ahead.2 The COVID-19 storm accelerated the divergence."
https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/tra...40c13e7a72