[Steve]

Real war vs. phony war; turn on the news bubble machine -

“The CIA infiltrated the media.” That statement wore out its welcome decades ago. The media ARE the CIA.
The only proviso, if you want to call it that: most reporters are too stupid to realize who they slave for.
I mention this because we’re not getting war news, we’re getting CIA news…



https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022/03/...e-machine/

[Steve]

CDC/FDA smoking gun of smoking guns -

They confess: they had no virus when they concocted the test for the virus; they “contrived” a model by pretending to find what they wanted to find; it’s called a self-fulfilling prophecy.

This is the con and the crime that drove millions of lives, and economies, into ruin… 

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022/03/...y-confess/

[Steve]

Kissinger and depopulation -

by Jon Rappoport
April 7, 2022

(To join our email list, click here.)

Today I’m reposting a brief excerpt from a piece I wrote in November of 2014.

I do so because Klaus Schwab, the founder of the World Economic Forum, speaks and writes on and on about The Great Reset, a new normal, and how the world will change.

When he was young, Schwab’s mentor at Harvard was Henry Kissinger. The connection was highly significant.

From 2014—

The late well-known journalist, Alexander Cockburn, on the op ed page of the LA Times on September 8, 1994, in his piece “Real U.S. Policy in Third World: Sterilization: Disregard the ‘empowerment’ shoe polish—the goal is to keep the natives from breeding,” reviewed the infamous Kissinger-commissioned 1974 National Security Study Memorandum 200, “which addressed population issues.”

“…the true concern of Kissinger analysts [in Memorandum 200] was maintenance of US access to Third World resources. They worried that the ‘political consequences’ of population growth [in the Third World] could produce internal instability … With famine and food riots and the breakdown of social order in such countries, [the Kissinger memo warns that] ‘the smooth flow of needed materials will be jeopardized.’”



https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022/04/...opulation/

[Steve]

Behind Bilderberg, Trilateral, WEF: the Globalists have a major problem -

Lately, I’ve been posting articles about elite power groups and their historical connections to Russia.
Here is a piece that raises a problem these power groups have been facing—a problem that won’t go away.
I wrote and posted this article On June 10, 2015. Here it is:
Stay with me on this one. You’ll see what the powers-that-be are really worried about.
You can roll up Bilderberg, the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, the World Trade Organization, NAFTA, and the several current trade treaties nearing completion…you can insert all these Rockefeller Globalist forces into one great corporate agenda, and…
There is a problem. A problem for Globalism. This is, behind the scenes, what the titans of control are whispering about...



https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022/04/...r-problem/

[Steve]

Deadly: COVID vaccine smoking gun; AstraZeneca CEO reveals the secret -

The usual destructive effects of the vaccine are not enough—there must be greater destruction …

THE TRUTH COMES OUT.

Project Veritas has just released a leaked recording of a December 2020 Zoom call, during which AstraZeneca CEO, Pascal Soriot, stated that millions of people, whose immune systems are compromised, cannot receive the COVID vaccine:
“If you have an immune disease, lupus or some other immune condition, you cannot – or multiple sclerosis, you can’t be vaccinated. So, there are millions of people in the world that will need a protection that cannot be coming from a vaccine.”

https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/jon-ra...he-secret/

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022/04/...he-secret/

[Steve]

Open letter to FBI, NYT, WaPo: ongoing destruction of food processing plants across America -

I see no evidence you people are investigating or covering the string of food-processing-plant destructions across America.
Is there a problem? Do you think these accounts are fake?

Do you assume they’re unrelated?

Do you think it’s important to hide these events from the public?

Do you think the strong possibility of coordinated attacks on these facilities is merely a bad disaster movie turned out by Hollywood hacks? 

Do you want to feature “other reasons” for food shortages? Such as Russia? Putin? Truckers? COVID? Racism? The high costs of processing? Putin? Russia? My Aunt Martha? The man in the moon? Putin?
Do you seriously think the majority of Americans still have faith in your methods and agendas? …



https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022/04/...s-america/

[Steve]

Consciousness, Art, and Psychiatry -

Art is a way of reaching life on another level.
When the first cave painter scratched an animal on a stone wall, he was undertaking a unique action. He was expressing his own consciousness beyond living his life.
He was inventing.
Suddenly, his experience had another use. It could be gathered up and transformed into painting, creation.
Civilizations rise and fall, come and go, and their fate is decided by untold millions of people who refrain from taking the path of the artist.
Through art, the chain of cause and effect, threading from past into present, breaks. Instead, imagination/consciousness invents new realities and new futures.
Energy conversion and liberation begin.
Many, many artists don’t realize the power they have in their hands. They persist in seeing themselves as “entitled to be crazy,” and this undercuts their own consciousness.
Many artists are so obsessed with commercial success and fame they’d dance at the end of a leash like a toy dog if they thought it would bring them recognition. This, needless to say, is debilitating.
So-called spiritual traditions tend to have a habit of depicting states of consciousness and enlightenment. They’re intent on describing the Reality behind reality.
Art makes no such claims. On its path, the artist invents many, many realities, and in doing so, he moves beyond all such descriptions.
For a culture to realize all these things, something quite different from propaganda and indoctrination would have to take place.
In this society, psychiatrists are the primary definers of mental states. Their efforts are accepted as official science.
The Psychiatric Political State is based on myths and fairy tales about distinct and separate disorders and “good treatment.”
One of the main psychiatric mantras gaining force? “Everyone at some time in their lives will experience a mental disorder.”
But an open secret has been slowly bleeding out into public consciousness for the past ten years. 
THERE ARE NO DEFINITIVE LABORATORY TESTS FOR ANY SO-CALLED MENTAL DISORDER.
And along with that:
ALL SO-CALLED MENTAL DISORDERS ARE CONCOCTED, NAMED, LABELED, DESCRIBED, AND CATEGORIZED by a committee of psychiatrists, from menus of human behaviors.
Their findings are published in periodically updated editions of The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), printed by the American Psychiatric Association.
For years, even psychiatrists have been blowing the whistle on this hazy crazy process of “research.”
Of course, pharmaceutical companies, who manufacture highly toxic drugs to treat every one of these “disorders,” are leading the charge to invent more and more mental-health categories, so they can sell more drugs and make more money.
Here is a mind-boggling twist. Under the radar, one of the great psychiatric stars, who has been out in front inventing mental disorders, went public. He blew the whistle on himself and his colleagues. And for years, almost no one noticed. 
His name is Dr. Allen Frances, and he made VERY interesting statements to Gary Greenberg, author of a Wired article: “Inside the Battle to Define Mental Illness.” (Dec.27, 2010).
Major media never picked up on the interview in any serious way. It never became a scandal.
Dr. Allen Frances is the man who, in 1994, headed up the project to write the (then) latest edition of the psychiatric bible, the DSM-IV. This tome defines and labels and describes every official mental disorder. The DSM-IV eventually listed 297 of them.
In an April 19, 1994, New York Times piece, “Scientist At Work,” Daniel Goleman called Frances “Perhaps the most powerful psychiatrist in America at the moment…”
Well, sure. If you’re sculpting the entire canon of diagnosable mental disorders for your colleagues, for insurers, for the government, for Pharma (who will sell the drugs matched up to the 297 DSM-IV diagnoses), you’re right up there in the pantheon.
Long after the DSM-IV had been put into print, Dr. Frances talked to Wired’s Greenberg and said the following:
“There is no definition of a mental disorder. It’s bullshit. I mean, you just can’t define it.”
BANG.
That’s on the order of the designer of the Hindenburg, looking at the burned rubble on the ground, remarking, “Well, I knew there would be a problem.”
After a suitable pause, Dr. Frances remarked to Greenberg, “These concepts [of distinct mental disorders] are virtually impossible to define precisely with bright lines at the borders.”
Frances might have been referring to the fact that his baby, the DSM-IV, had rearranged earlier definitions of ADHD and Bipolar to permit many more diagnoses, leading to a vast acceleration of drug-dosing with highly powerful and toxic compounds.
If I were an editor at one of the big national newspapers, and one of my reporters walked in and told me, “The most powerful psychiatrist in America just said the DSM is sheer b.s.,” I think I’d make room on the front page.
If the reporter then added, “This shrink was in charge of creating the DSM-IV,” I’d clear room above the fold.
If the reporter went on to explain that the whole profession of psychiatry would collapse overnight if the DSM was discredited, I’d call for a special section of the paper to be printed.
I’d tell the reporter to get ready to pound on this story day after day for months. I’d tell him to track down all the implications of Dr. Frances’ statements.
I’d open a bottle of champagne to toast the soon-to-be-soaring sales of my newspaper.
And then, of course, the next day I’d be fired.
Because there are powerful multi-billion-dollar interests at stake, and those people don’t like their deepest secrets exposed in the press.
And as I walked out of my job, I’d see a bevy of blank-eyed pharmaceutical executives marching into the office of the paper’s publisher, ready to read the riot act to him.
Dr. Frances’ work on the DSM-IV allowed for MORE toxic drugs to be prescribed, because the definition of Bipolar was expanded to include more people.
Adverse effects of Valproate (given for a Bipolar diagnosis) include: 
* acute, life-threatening, and even fatal liver toxicity;
* life-threatening inflammation of the pancreas;
* brain damage.
Adverse effects of Lithium (also given for a Bipolar diagnosis) include:
* intercranial pressure leading to blindness;
* peripheral circulatory collapse;
* stupor and coma.
Adverse effects of Risperdal (given for “Bipolar” and “irritability stemming from autism”) include:
* serious impairment of cognitive function;
* fainting;
* restless muscles in neck or face, tremors (may be indicative of motor brain damage).
Dr. Frances’ label-juggling act also permitted the definition of ADHD to expand, thereby opening the door for greater and greater use of toxic Ritalin (and other similar compounds) as the treatment of choice.
So what about Ritalin?
In 1986, The International Journal of the Addictions published a most important literature review by Richard Scarnati. It was called “An Outline of Hazardous Side Effects of Ritalin (Methylphenidate)” [v.21(7), pp. 837-841].
Scarnati listed a large number of adverse affects of Ritalin and cited published journal articles which reported each of these symptoms.
For every one of the following (selected and quoted verbatim) Ritalin effects, there is at least one confirming source in the medical literature:
* Paranoid delusions
* Paranoid psychosis
* Hypomanic and manic symptoms, amphetamine-like psychosis
* Activation of psychotic symptoms
* Toxic psychosis
* Visual hallucinations
* Auditory hallucinations
* Can surpass LSD in producing bizarre experiences
* Effects pathological thought processes
* Extreme withdrawal
* Terrified affect
* Started screaming
* Aggressiveness
* Insomnia
* Since Ritalin is considered an amphetamine-type drug, expect amphetamine-like effects
* Psychic dependence
* High-abuse potential DEA Schedule II Drug
* Decreased REM sleep
* When used with antidepressants one may see dangerous reactions including hypertension, seizures and hypothermia
* Convulsions
* Brain damage may be seen with amphetamine abuse.
A recent survey revealed that a high percentage of children diagnosed with bipolar had first received a diagnosis of ADHD. This is informative, because Ritalin and other speed-type drugs are given to kids who are slapped with the ADHD label. Speed, sooner or later, produces a crash. This is easy to call “clinical depression.”
Then comes Prozac, Paxil, Zoloft. These drugs can produce temporary highs, followed by more crashes. The psychiatrist notices the up and down pattern—and then produces a new diagnosis of Bipolar (manic-depression) and prescribes other drugs, including Valproate and Lithium.
In the US alone, there are at least 300,000 cases of motor brain damage incurred by people who have been prescribed so-called anti-psychotic drugs (aka “major tranquilizers”). Risperdal (mentioned above as a drug given to people diagnosed with Bipolar) is one of those major tranquilizers. (source: Toxic Psychiatry, Dr. Peter Breggin, St. Martin’s Press, 1991)
This psychiatric drug plague is accelerating across the land.
Where are the mainstream reporters and editors and newspapers and TV anchors who should be breaking this story and mercilessly hammering on it week after week? They are in harness.
And Dr. Frances is somehow let off the hook. He’s admitted in print that the whole basis of his profession is throwing darts at labels on a wall, and implies the “effort” is rather heroic—when, in fact, the effort leads to more and more poisonous drugs being dispensed to adults and children, to say nothing of the effect of being diagnosed with “a mental disorder.”
I’m not talking about “the mental-disease stigma,” the removal of which is one of Hillary Clinton’s missions in life. No, I’m talking about MOVING A HUMAN INTO THE SYSTEM, the psychiatric apparatus, where the essence of the game is trapping that person to harvest his money, his time, his energy, and of course his health—as one new diagnosis follows on another, and one new toxic treatment after another is undertaken, from cradle to grave.
The result is a severely debilitated human being (if he survives), whose major claim to fame is his list of diseases and disorders.
Thank you, Dr. Frances.
Here is a smoking-gun statement made by another prominent psychiatrist, on an episode of PBS’ Frontline series. The episode was: “Does ADHD Exist?”
PBS FRONTLINE INTERVIEWER: Skeptics say that there’s no biological marker—that it [ADHD] is the one condition out there where there is no blood test, and that no one knows what causes it.
BARKLEY (Dr. Russell Barkley, professor of psychiatry and neurology at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center): That’s tremendously naïve, and it shows a great deal of illiteracy about science and about the mental health professions. A disorder doesn’t have to have a blood test to be valid. If that were the case, all mental disorders would be invalid… There is no lab test for any mental disorder right now in our science. That doesn’t make them invalid. [emphasis added]
Without intending to, Dr. Barkley blows the whistle on his own profession.
So let’s take Dr. Barkley to school. Medical science, and disease-research in particular, rests on the notion that you can make a diagnosis backed up by lab tests. If you can’t produce lab tests, you’re spinning fantasies.
These fantasies might be hopeful, they might be “educated guesses,” they might be launched from traditional centers of learning, they might be backed up by billions of dollars of grant money…but they’re still fantasies.
If I said the moon was made of green cheese, even if I were a Harvard professor, sooner or later someone would ask me to produce a sample of moon rock to be tested for “cheese qualities.” I might begin to feel nervous, I might want to tap dance around the issue, but I would have to submit the rock to a lab.
Dr. Barkley is essentially saying to the PBS Frontline interviewer, “There is no lab test for any mental disorder. But if a test were the standard of proof, we wouldn’t have science at all, and that would mean our whole profession rests on nothing—and that is absurd, so therefore a test doesn’t matter.”
That logic is no logic at all. Barkley is proving the case against himself. He just doesn’t want to admit it.
Close to 50 years ago, psychiatry was dying out as a profession. Fewer and fewer people wanted to see a psychiatrist for help, for talk therapy. All sorts of new therapies were popping up. The competition was leaving medical psychiatry in the dust.
As Dr. Peter Breggin describes it in his landmark book, Toxic Psychiatry, a deal was struck. Drug companies would bankroll psychiatry and rescue it. These companies would pour money into professional conferences, journals, research. In return, they wanted “science” that would promote many mental disorders as biological/chemical facts, a gateway into the drugs. Everyone would win—except the patient.
So the studies were rolled out, and the list of mental disorders expanded. The FDA was in on the deal as well, as evidenced by their drug “safety” approvals, in the face of the obvious damage these drugs were doing.
So this is how we arrived at where we are. This was the plan, and it worked.
Under the cover story, it was all fraud all the time. Without much of a stretch, you could say psychiatry has been the most widespread profiling operation in the history of the human race. Its goal has been to bring humans everywhere into its system. It hardly matters which label a person is painted with, as long as it adds up to a diagnosis and a prescription of drugs.
Do people suffer, do they have problems, do they experience anguish and pain, do they make choices that sabotage their own interests, do they fall victim to external circumstances, do they long for relief? Of course.
But this has nothing to do with fraudulent psychiatric diagnoses.
It has to do with nutritional deficits, toxic drugs, toxic food and environmental chemicals, abuse, isolation, intimidation, and a whole host of other potential factors.
Psychiatry is trying to monopolize mental states and the understanding of the mind. It has no science, and it has no authentic conscience. It’s a pseudo-medical version of Orwellian politics, flying under the banner of a false professionalism.
Art liberates consciousness.

Psychiatry, parading as non-political science, is a toxic prison of the mind.

WARNING: Suddenly withdrawing from psychiatric drugs can cause horrendous, even life-threatening effects. Withdrawal should be done gradually under the supervision of a qualified professional who completely understands the situation. See Breggin.com for more information.
 
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/09/...sychiatry/

[Steve]

Hideous liars lying about guns: what people don’t know, don’t want to know, are too naïve to believe, and are too scared to say -

by Jon Rappoport

May 26, 2022
(To join our email list, click here.)
(The latest Episode of Rappoport Podcasts — Episode 9 — “The Monkeypox Outbreak—Is It Real?” — is up. It’s a blockbuster. To listen, click here. To learn more about This Episode of Rappoport Podcasts, click here.)

“After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn’t do it. I sure as hell wouldn’t want to live in a society where the only people allowed guns are the police and the military.” — William Burroughs
We’re looking at a grotesque con here. A hustle. And the predatory politicians lying about guns know they’re lying. They’re disgusting. Repulsive. Sane people can smell the stench rising from them miles away.
First of all, 99% of the people who own guns—I don’t care what kinds of guns—don’t shoot other people. They don’t.
So a legitimate politician who has eyes to see and is honest—there are a few—would say this:
“I’m going to show you where most of the gun crimes in America are committed. I’m talking about murder, I’m talking about wounding, I’m talking about armed robberies, and I’m also talking about places where the residents live under constant daily fear of people shooting guns.”
This would clear the air…

https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/jon-ra...ed-to-say/

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022/05/...dont-know/

[Steve]

New Podcast: mass shootings and the psychiatric drug connection

The Involvement of the CIA’s MKULTRA Mind Control Program
by Jon Rappoport
June 7, 2022
(To join our email list, click here.)
I hope those of you who haven’t yet subscribed to my substack will do so and listen to this vital podcast.
With mass shootings breaking out across America, the psychiatric drug connection is being ignored.
Instead, we’re now supposed to believe every shooting is politically motivated, or simply committed by “crazy” persons.
There are many reasons why people commit these horrific crimes.
20 years ago, the public began to wake up and realize a number of psychiatric drugs were pushing people over the edge into homicidal and suicidal violence.
One of the shooters in the tragic Columbine school murders was on an antidepressant known to have such horrendous effects.
Eventually, though, press reports on mass shooters were wiped clean of any hint that these drugs might be involved. Naturally, pharmaceutical advertisers didn’t want their products indicted in murder…

https://jonrappoport.substack.com/p/part...sychiatric

https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/jon-ra...onnection/

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022/06/...onnection/

[Steve]

A new point about the missing virus -


by Jon Rappoport
June 8, 2022
(To join our email list, click here.)
(Episode 11 of Rappoport Podcasts — “Mass Shootings and the Psychiatric Drug Connection; The Involvement of the CIA’s MKULTRA Mind Control Program” — is now posted on my substack. It’s a blockbuster. To listen, click here. To learn more about This Episode of Rappoport Podcasts, click here.)
Actually, this is a point I’ve made before, but now I’m boiling it down to the bare essentials.

Here we go:
If you were a) honest and b) the head of a major public health agency, there is something you would do, before declaring COVID a worldwide pandemic requiring extraordinary measures (e.g., lockdowns).
You would carry out a study.
A study to confirm that a newly discovered virus (SARS-CoV-2) really exists and is causing illness and death on a global scale.
After all, that is the claim. So wouldn’t you want to prove it’s true? Wouldn’t you feel compelled to do that—rather than just SAY it’s so?
This study wouldn’t focus on 20 or 30 or 50 patients. Those numbers are far too small. We’re not talking about the assertion of a minor viral outbreak. This is supposedly a titanic disaster.
You would gather together a few thousand people, at minimum.
All these people have been diagnosed with the purported pandemic infection.
You would take tissue samples from these patients and analyze them. You would test them for the presence of the new virus.
How could you NOT?
—And yet, such a study WAS NEVER DONE.
NEVER.
Try making excuses for that omission.
We’re talking about science on such a basic level, a child would understand it. You say X is causing a global pandemic—so test for the presence of X. Test for it in a sufficient number of people. Immediately.
Since you’re claiming more than a billion people could become infected, surely you should test at least a few thousand people, to make sure you’re right.
THIS WAS NEVER DONE as one complete study.
Now, we could certainly argue about the kind of test you should run to see if the virus is present. Is the test accurate? Is it reliable? Is it relevant? Of course. I’ve covered that subject exhaustively. But here I’m putting all that aside. The point is, you WOULD test for the virus.
Even the staunchest most rabid defenders of the existence of SARS-CoV-2 would have to agree, if they were being honest.
In other articles, I’ve offered much proof that SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t exist—but here I’m just making the most basic of points: RUN THE STUDY, DO THE TEST.
So what do I get in the way of replies from the “defenders?” They completely ignore the need for the wide-ranging study I’m demanding; and instead they persist in offering up small studies that focus on three patients, 40 patients—as if that is sufficient for declaring a global pandemic and wreaking massive destruction, by lockdowns and other measures.
They keep insisting these little minor studies are sufficient. Why? Because that’s all they have. So they pretend they’re doing good science.
They’re not.
They’re faking it.
Some of them know they’re faking it.
Here’s an analogy anyone should be able to understand. Putting aside lying and cheating and fabricating in doing studies, when a company wants to gain approval from the FDA for a new drug or a new vaccine, how many people do they enroll in their clinical trials, to prove safety and efficacy?
THOUSANDS.
Not three, or 50.
Pfizer enrolled 30,000 people in their clinical trial of the RNA COVID vaccine.
Why didn’t they just enroll 40?
Because they couldn’t get away with it.
I’m talking about standard research practice here.
So why doesn’t the same standard practice apply to proving the existence of a virus that is supposedly causing widespread illness and death across the world?
The rabid defenders of the virus also try to make this point: since millions and millions of people have tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, this proves the virus exists and is causing terrible damage.
This is what I call “after the fact” proof.
By that standard, Pfizer would have been able to market its COVID vaccine without any clinical trials at all.
No. The proof required for a major medical/scientific assertion comes WHEN THE ASSERTION IS FIRST MADE, before all sorts of brutal measures are taken that are based on that assertion.
The rabid defenders of the virus twist and distort science to fit their agenda—and then claim OF COURSE everybody knows the virus exists.
You buy what they’re selling at your own peril. They have their story and they’re telling it over and over.
They’re naked, walking in the rain, pitching you raincoats.


https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/jon-ra...ing-virus/