[awakened53]

Outrageous: UK Government plan to give immunity to ministers, spies and military involved in murder and torture abroad

Conservatives are among MPs battling to stop the government granting immunity to British ministers, spies and military personnel for involvement in murder and torture abroad.
Tory grandee David Davis is bringing a series of amendments to the National Security Bill, which has alarmed human rights groups and anti-war crime campaigners.
The proposed changes, aiming to strip out clauses granting legal immunity and restricting damages for torture survivors, will be debated in the House of Commons later on Wednesday.
In a move backed by the former justice secretary Robert Buckland, opposition MPs are also attempting to add a public interest defence into the Official Secrets Act to protect whistleblowers and journalists.
In a letter to the prime minister, a group of charities including Reprieve, Liberty, Amnesty International UK and Freedom From Torture questioned why the government would “seek to protect themselves and their officials” from prosecution for assisting or encouraging crimes abroad.
“It is unconscionable that the British government might shield ministers or officials from accountability,” the letter said.
“With no limits on what criminal activity the clause includes, this provision could be used to shield British ministers and officials from prosecution where they have encouraged or assisted extraordinary rendition, interrogations involving torture, or unlawful targeted killings.”

Read More: Government plan to give immunity to ministers, spies and military 

[awakened53]

They take your money all your life then tell you if can have any back – Pension age could rise to 68 several years EARLIER than planned in Treasury’s ‘big bazooka’ bid to save billions

The pension age could rise to 68 several years earlier than expected as part of the treasury’s ‘big bazooka’ bid to save billions. The retirement age is set to increase to 67 by 2028 and 68 by 2039. But ministers are said to be considering bringing this in as soon the mid-2030s. Workers who are now in their mid-50s could expect to wait an extra year before receiving their pensions, The Telegraph reports.
Whitehall officials look for inventive ways to secure public finances, raising the pension age has been dubbed a ‘big bazooka’ move that will raise tens of billions of pounds. It may also be a strong sign that those entering employment now could see their working lives extend up to their 70s. However, officials are said to be attracted to the idea of linking an older pension age with growing life expectancy.
Read more: They take your money all your life then tell you if can have any back –
Pension age could rise to 68 several years EARLIER than planned in Treasury’s ‘big bazooka’ bid to save billions

[Steve]

ARTICLE 61 OF MAGNA CARTA WAS INVOKED IN 2001- UNLAWFUL UK GOVERNMENT

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=McwS3daQyLI

[awakened53]

Crooks, Murderers and Idiots


[ol]
[li]Old people everywhere are treading very carefully these days. The elderly are especially vulnerable (because bones tend to break more easily) but they know the NHS has betrayed the public and will no longer help them if they fall and break a leg or hip. It’s like living in the Middle Ages.[/li]
[li]The UK Government has decided that log fires are bad for us. No, actually, log fires are bad for THEM. The conspirators don’t like log fires because they provide a little independence from the bastards who have deliberately raised energy prices. And what a coincidence it is that energy prices are higher than ever just as we enter the coldest and most unusual winter since records began.[/li]
[li]The idiot Kwarteng says he ‘got carried away’ with his budget. I haven’t seen any apologies but millions of people’s pensions were wrecked by Kwarteng’s stupidity. Thousands don’t know yet that half of their pension savings have disappeared. For example, D.S.Smith, the packaging company has been forced to lend its pension scheme up to £100 million as a result of the chaos. Kwarteng will not, of course, be punished for his arrogance and stupidity. Instead, he’ll doubtless make a mint out of speeches, books and high paying banking jobs.[/li]
[li]Someone we know found the world unbearable and tried to commit suicide. A relative found him unconscious and called an ambulance. Eight hours later the ambulance arrived. As I said a little earlier, it’s like living in the Middle Ages.[/li]
[li]The Home Office has announced that men who whistle at women will go to prison for two years. Before micro-aggression reared its ugly head some women quite liked wolf whistles. The police hardly ever catch criminals as things are. Now that they will spend their days chasing men who have whistled at women we can be pretty sure that no murderers, rapists or burglars will be caught. Is that really what the feminists really wanted? I suppose it must be.[/li]
Read More: Crooks, Murderers and Idiots[/ol]

https://vernoncoleman.org/articles/crook...and-idiots

[awakened53]

UK Magistrate sacked for using suffix “JP” in request for ICC to investigate crimes against humanity

https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/magist...49.article

[awakened53]

State Power and ‘Covid’ Crimes

The three major controversies over pandemic management for the past three years have been lockdown measures, universal masking recommendations and mandates, and Covid vaccines.
The last was a pharmaceutical intervention using revolutionary new technology. The first two were radical departures from the existing scientific and policy consensus as encapsulated in official documents from the World Health Organisation (WHO) and in several national pandemic preparedness plans. They established the willingness of the state to dictate every aspect of people’s lives, down to the most ridiculous and absurd details.
For example, people were told when they could shop, the hours during which they could shop, what they could purchase, how close they could get to others and which direction they could move in by following arrows on the floor. Governments also stepped into nations’ bedrooms at home to dictate with whom people could and could not be intimate: a ukase that notoriously turned Professor Neil ‘Lockdown’ Ferguson himself into Professor Pantsdown.
Lockdowns thus proved the extent to which people would comply with state directives without deploying independent critical thinking and, like frogs in boiling water, their almost total lack of concern about the gradually increasing degree of infringements of civil liberties and personal freedoms.
Compliance with often idiotic rules was ratcheted up to another level still with mask recommendations-cum-mandates, with one additional notable feature. Governments were able to mobilise members of the public to exert peer pressure and societal coercion to enforce compliance, backed by often brutal police coercion against pockets of resistance and protest.
In retrospect, it’s doubtful if the degree of state and social coercion deployed to increase vaccine uptake would have been possible without the ground having first been prepared with lockdowns and masks.
Lockdowns were a euphemism for a wholesale shutting down of all social and most economic activities and locking up entire populations under de facto house arrest. They were imposed on and off for two years with the goalposts of justification shifting from flatten the curve in two to three weeks to protect the health system, wait for the vaccine and stop the new variant.
They were based neither on good science and best-practice medicine, nor were they commensurate with the age-stratified threat from the novel coronavirus to individual and public health. By contrast, the health, mental health, social, educational and economic harms caused by the lockdowns have locked in generational poverty and inequality within and among states.

Read More: State Power and Covid Crimes

[awakened53]

‘I can’t help that Covid happened,’ Sunak says as NHS faces record delays. Oh really? It was your response to ‘Covid’ that created a health catastrophe and your actions as Chancellor during ‘Covid’ that destroyed the UK economy. You can’t help what happened? You WERE what happened

The prime minister has blamed COVID-19 for hospital bed shortages and record A&E and ambulance delays plaguing the NHS.
Rishi Sunak insisted that improvements are being made to the health service already but that it is a “reality” that the pandemic contributed to a huge backlog in the system.
“I think it’s not right to ignore the impact that COVID had. The reality is that for two years the NHS had to stop doing lots of things that it normally does,” he told the BBC’s Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg show.
Read more: Sunak demands ‘bold and radical’ action to ease NHS crisis as more strikes loom
“Unsurprisingly, once we get back to normal, all of those treatments come back at a pace that was anticipated but is obviously very significant.
“Has the NHS had pressures before? Of course it has, but COVID has undeniably had an enormous difference, and it is wrong to ignore that.
“I can’t help that COVID happened, I can’t help that there are now thousands of people in hospitals who normally would not be there.”

Read more: ‘I can’t help that Covid happened,’ Sunak says as NHS faces record delays. Oh really? It was your response to ‘Covid’ that created a health catastrophe and your actions as Chancellor during ‘Covid’ that destroyed the UK economy. You can’t help what happened? You WERE what happened

[Steve]

They knifed him good and proper! 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTRcOGkMF5w

[Steve]

I’m allowed to rob you!

https://youtu.be/ngpsJKQR_ZE

[Steve]

OUR UNLAWFUL ESTABLISHMENT - 1 CAUSE ONLY


All the symptoms of our conditions of slavery stem back to one thing: Criminal Government
Here's the logic...

• The government, and the people within it are acting criminally according to law.
  
  
• The higher laws, Constitutional Law, is there to judge our administrative government itself and impose limitations on its powers
  
  
• Parliament is a government-controlled law-making mechanism - but not the kind of higher law that binds government itself. Legislation from parliament is not constitutional law.
  
  
• How does the average man feel confident in non-compliance? Knowing exactly how government is acting unlawfully and understanding the simple constitutional mechanisms that bind it.
  
  
• Nothing else can be addressed until considerably more people have clarity on Constitutional Common Law.
  
  
• The government has legitimacy only for the time that it is acting lawfully.
  
  
• The consent of the governed is specifically this: Government is allowed to exist only if the people remain in judicial and legislative authority over parliament and the monarch. That specifically means through Common Law Trial by Jury in which the people have the power to ignore government-created law if they feel that would be appropriate.
  

That is essentially the solution at the mechanical level only. At a deeper level, there is clearly a lot more to this! Understanding one's own shadow, self-reflection, examining one's own emotions and psyche and understanding the greater arcana in the esoteric is also critical. But the above is the simplest answer at our visible, 'every-day' level.



https://www.commonlawconstitution.org/ne...cause-only