[Firestarter]

Lunar dust

One of the many problems in a (real) lunar mission would be to get in and out of the lunar module. There would be problems that are comparable to being sucked out of plane by the difference in pressure (but the other way around). The way to solve this would be to depressurise (the inside of) the lunar module before exiting.

To make the door (hatch) better at keeping the vacuum “out” it would open to the inside of the module. This would make it much more difficult to get out of the lunar module.
See the hatch of the 13 Lunar Module turning to the inside.


The hatch was only 32 inches square wide and high. The height would be an even bigger problem than the width (especially with the backpack).
There should have been major concerns that those magical suits would tear getting in and out of the module.
There would (again) be the major problem of testing, because the space suits (on earth) weigh something like 200 pounds.

NASA made instruction manuals for just about any part of the mission but not for getting in and out of the Lunar Module. Not even on how to depressurise the lunar module before exiting and repressurising it after getting back from an excursion on the moon surface.

According to Apollo 15 astronaut they did training with the space suit and backpack in 1/6 gravity on earth (g). They could have only done that in a dropping plane, but NOT in vacuum and radiation comparable to that on the moon.
Maybe they could have put a model of a Lunar Module including hatch in the plane though:

I'm wondering if we ever did any ingress training at one-sixth g. I don't think we did[1]. I was just surprised that I had such difficulty [with LM egress and ingress on the moon], because I'd done a lot of practice in one g with the backpack on because, originally, in the LTA-8 tests -- for the thermal vacuum chamber -- they were going to use the PLSS under one-g conditions. You know, climb the ladder and go through the hatch, just like we do on the Moon. I'd done that several times and had no difficulty.

http://www.clavius.org/lmdoors.html
(archived here: http://archive.is/JAS03)


Another huge problem would be the lunar dust that would pile up in the lunar module every time the astronauts returned from an excursion on the moon surface. They could try to clean that with water, but that wouldn’t be very effective (I have experienced several holidays in a house on the beach covered with sand).
According to NASA this lunar dust has serious adverse health effects.
On later missions they reportedly brought a vacuum cleaner...

The Apollo 11 crew members reported:

Particles covered everything and a stain remained even after our best attempts to brush it off;
[d]istinct pungent odor like gunpowder [was] noted when helmet [was] removed.

During Apollo 12, the crew members noted several issues on dust in the lunar and central module:

Both LM and CM contaminated with lunar dust;
[LM] was filthy dirty and had so much dust that when I took my helmet off, I was almost blinded. Junk immediately got into my eyes;
[t]he whole thing was just a cloud of fine dust floating around in there.

On the way back in the CM the system could not handle the dust, so it was continuously spread inside the spacecraft by the system;
[w]e chose to remain in the suit loop as much as possible because of the dust and debris floating around;
[t]o keep our eyes from burning and our noses from inhaling these small particles, we left our helmet sitting on top of our heads

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adverse_he...t_exposure

[Steve]

WIKILEAKS RELEASES MOON LANDING CUT SCENES FILMED IN NEVADA DESERT -

https://www.facebook.com/629028566/posts...581723567/

[Steve]

Wikileaks release moon landing cut scenes from Nevada Desert
 -

https://t.me/officialcharliewardshow/4020

[GazBob]

The people who believe the moon landings are the same people who wear masks in their car whilst driving alone.

[Steve]

MOON LANDING DEATH BED CONFESSION


https://rumble.com/v1k252l-moon-landing-...ssion.html

[Steve]

Moon Photographs - Expert Analysis By A World Famous Photographer

From Gary Fong
I'm a world-famous photographer who photographed with Hasselblad Cameras for over twenty years. I was sponsored by Hasselblad and a lecturer at Hasselblad University. I also started up (and ran) Pictage, Inc., at the time the largest professional digital photo lab in the United States.  I photographed famous celebrities and politicians, so I know a lot about how to preserve and protect fragile photographic emulsions and films.

I'm also a graduate of UC Santa Barbara with a degree in Pharmacology, and was a UCLA Physics major prior to this.

I also held a de-commissioned Hasselblad lunar camera in my hands, and played with it. That is where I saw a lot of things that didn't make sense.
This video explores the possibility that the photographs that were shown to the public as photos from the moon could not have possibly be authentic, given the vast amount of information given to me.

This is not to say that man never landed on the moon, or that there is a "conspiracy", because I wasn't there, and I don't personally know any of the astronauts. But as a photographer who took millions of images on Hasselblad Cameras, and as an operator of a leading photo lab, I’m finding it impossibly hard to believe that the moon photographs could have been taken on the moon.

https://youtu.be/sDggkBUSZl8

[Firestarter]

The Apollo 11 video shows Buzz Aldrin turning transparent as he descends from the “lunar module”. Notice the black line that indicates the horizon (?!) through the astronaut.
To make it more interesting for the viewers at home, Buzz jumps up and down the ladder again.
At about 1:00 in the clip, a silhouette emerges out of nowhere behind Buzz's back. That can’t be Neil Armstrong, without his space suit, can it?

In many ways the Apollo moon landing footage that was broadcast "live" all around the globe, was the most important "evidence" that it happened. According to NASA, the tapes of the first Apollo 11 moon landing were erased to safe costs.
Just look at the poor quality of this footage which, makes it difficult for me to understand how anybody could've believed this sh*t...


The videos of the second moon landings, Apollo 12, got even worse! Now according to NASA, astronut Alan Bean accidentally pointed the camera towards the Sun, making the screen go "black" and then they broadcast "astronauts" doing the moonwalk in a studio!

Fortunately, the TV networks had a back-up plan. While continuing to carry the live voices of the astronauts, CBS switched to a studio where two actors dressed in spacesuits simulate the Moonwalk.
NBC, meanwhile, commissioned puppeteer Bil Baird to build astronaut marionettes. Baird (who would train Muppet creator Jim Henson) operated the puppets from an overhead gantry above a simulated lunar landscape. Despite having the word “simulation” on the screen, Baird is quoted as saying that many viewers never realised it wasn’t real.

.
Maybe they did this to show contrast to "normal" gravity?
Starting at 5:40 is the "simulation"...
https://youtu.be/7_II3gYd3LE

This wasn't the only unbelievable strange thing happening for which they needed a "back-up plan" to make the hoax more interesting for the masses...
After the launch from earth, most electrical systems in the rocket crashed. Then they had some sort of magical "SCE" button to save the day. Are there really people who believe this?!?

“Then this young man from a little college in Oklahoma named John Aaron, who was at that point around 25, I'd guess, made a call,” says Griffin.
“He says: ‘Tell him to try SCE to Aux’ – I had never heard of the switch and I said, ‘What?’”
Aaron repeated the instruction. Griffin turned to the Capcom (capsule communicator) responsible for talking to the crew, Jerry Carr.

“So, I tell him to say. ‘Try ‘SCE to Aux’ and Carr said ‘What?’…at that point, Aaron said ‘Try SCE to auxiliary’, so that’s what he transmitted to the crew.”
But Conrad had never heard of the switch either. “Try FCE to Auxiliary?” he says to the ground, and then to his crewmates: “What the hell is that?”
Fortunately, Bean knew the switch – it was right in front of him. SCE stands for Signal Conditioning Equipment, the system that processed spacecraft sensor data for transmission to the ground.

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20191...m-disaster

[Firestarter]

Some "conspiracy theorists" have argued that wires were used to make it appear that the astronuts were really walking on the moon in low gravity.
The poor quality of the films would surely make this easier to fake. In contrast the photos were of a high quality, showing how easy it would have been, if there were actually astronauts on the moon, to make high quality video...

It doesn't make much sense to me to have the astronuts wired in to simulate one-sixth gravity as preparation for a moon. It does however make sense that they needed to train for moon landing videos that were made in a studio, using a wire system to simulate low gravity.
See Alan L. Bean preparing for the upcoming Apollo 12 lunar landing movie, strapped into a one-sixth gravity simulator in Building 29 at the Manned Spacecraft Center.

https://www.space.com/40712-alan-bean-ap...hotos.html
(https://archive.is/KX37D)


Here's a video of low-gravity simulation using wires...
This really looks like slow motion, just like the Apollo moon landings videos that were sold to us as the "real thing" (will the video stay up and running for once?!?).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2SBetDGrp00


If somebody would have fallen down on the moon, because of vacuum, a tiny hole in those magical suits would mean instant death. Those suits would severely hamper movement.
If somebody would fall down in a wired one-sixth gravity simulator, it would look something like this...

[Firestarter]

The following (long) documentary touches on some of the most important evidence that no American astronuts ever went to the moon...
The most important information added tot this thread is the analysis of the video footage and photos. Including interviews with some Italian professional photographers, whose comments are hard to explain otherwise that the photos that were supposedly taken "on" the moon were faked in a studio right here on earth (more than 3 1/2 hours).
https://youtu.be/KpuKu3F0BvY


Wires, lost technology and more NASA BS...
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Z6BgMt0GQP5K/


NASA has also admitted that they can't get working spacesuits by 2024...
So what in hell were they wearing from 1969 to 1972: https://spacenews.com/lunar-spacesuits-w...4-landing/

[Firestarter]

NASA's Space Power Facility (SPF), thermal vacuum chamber with a 40 ton, 40 feet diameter door, 122 feet (37 m) high and 100 feet (30 m) in diameter is currently the largest in the world.
It is the updated vacuum chamber that was already in use in 1969.


Strangely no radiation weapons to create sunlight, but instead they use "background heating and cooling", which is fine to make it as cold as space in the shade, but NOT comparable to the intense radiation of the sunlight (not even in the updated chamber in 2022!): https://www.space.com/20535-nasa-vacuum-...scope.html

They would have needed something like the above round door (of course a lot smaller, and turning to the inside) for the lunar module instead of this flimsy hatch.

See the hatch of the 13 Lunar Module turning to the inside.

.
There is however another much smaller testing facility that supposedly does simulate the harsh conditions near the sun.
Too small to test the magical space suits, let alone the lunar or main module (and as far as I can tell not in use in 1969): https://www.madeinalabama.com/2016/07/na...e-hazards/