[Steve]

Top 15 unbelievable reasons that prove Global Warming might be a hoax

 Global Warming is the name given to the current belief that the earth’s temperature has been gradually increasing over the past few hundred years since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution.
The human impact on this is believed to only account for 10% of all the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, and as such, it is highly unlikely that we, as a species, are having a massive negative impact on the stability of the earth’s climate. In this article, we will be giving you 15 reasons that prove global warming might be a hoax.



https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/climat...be-a-hoax/

[Steve]

The Net Zero Agenda

Telegram - https://t.me/wideawakemedia/3562


Speaking at the EU's Beyond Growth Conference, President of the EU's executive branch, Ursula von der Leyen, comments on the Club of Rome's infamous 'Limits To Growth' report:

"[It came to] the conclusion: stop economic and population growth, or else our planet will not cope… [One] point that the report got right beyond any doubt… is the clear message that a growth model centred on fossil fuels is simply obsolete."

What is clear beyond any doubt is that it's impossible to run a prosperous first world economy without burning fossil fuels. But that's the entire point, as mentioned previously:

"The Net Zero agenda is merely a trojan horse through which unelected globalist bodies like the United Nations and World Economic Forum intend to deliberately de-industrialise the West, reducing its formerly prosperous economies to third world, neo-feudal plantations—utterly dependent on the aforementioned globalist bodies for their very survival."

@WideAwakeMedia

[awakened53]

Deliberately Exaggerating the Risks of Climate Change is Undermining Public Trust in Science and Destroying Young People’s Mental Health


Last March the Washington Post reported that climate change was raising flight turbulence risks. Earlier this month, the World Economic Forum repeated the story in a blog stating that “erratic” clear air turbulence is expected to increase by two or three times in the coming decades. Climate change is said to be making flights a lot bumpier. Not considered worthy of mention in either tale was a caveat pointing out that there has been no increase in accidents or injuries due to turbulence over the last 30 years. During this period, according to the International Civil Aviation Organisation, passenger numbers have quadrupled, meaning there has been a relative decline in harmful turbulence activity.

So where does all this deliberately alarmist guff come from? Both stories referenced the work of Professor Paul Williams of Reading University. He suggests that atmospheric dynamics have changed significantly since scientists first observed them via satellite data in the late 1970s. Using climate models and the RCP8.5 scenarios, he forecasts huge increase in clear air turbulence. Note the use of RCP8.5, the most extreme IPCC climate scenario along with the later variant SSP5-8.5. It assumes high greenhouse gas emissions causing 4-5C temperature rises within less than 80 years. Few scientists believe these climate pathways are remotely plausible, and even the IPCC refers to them as “low likelihood”. These reservations, however, are not shared with politicians, nor with the IPCC’s trusted messengers in the press.

Read more: Deliberately Exaggerating the Risks of Climate Change is Undermining Public Trust in Science and Destroying Young People’s Mental Health

[awakened53]

Antarctica Sensation: Ice Shelves Surrounding the Continent Grew in Overall Size From 2009-2019


The ice shelves surrounding Antarctica grew in overall size during the 11 years to 2019, according to dramatic new evidence published by three climate scientists from the University of Leeds. The growth was significant with overall shelf area increasing by 5,305 km2, adding 0.4% to the total shelf area in the 11 years under review. The paper has just been published by the influential European Geosciences Union, but it raises questions within the ‘settled’ climate science narrative, so it is highly unlikely to be covered by mainstream media

The Leeds researchers looked at satellite data to measure the annual calving position and area of 34 ice sheets accounting for 80% of the Antarctica coastline. They found reductions in the area on the Antarctica Peninsula and West Antarctica of 6,693 km2and 5,563 km2 respectively were outweighed by growth in East Antarctica of 3,532 km2and 14,028 km2 in the large Ross and Ronne-Filchner ice shelves. The largest retreat occurred on the Larsen C shelf when 5,917 km2 was lost in a single calving event that made alarmist headlines around the world. The largest increase, noted in slightly less media detail, was the 5,889 km2 advance on the Ronne platform.

Read more: Antarctica Sensation: Ice Shelves Surrounding the Continent Grew in Overall Size From 2009-2019

[awakened53]

Cult-owned landscape destroyer Starmer says he will force councils to find onshore windfarm sites as part of a push for green energy


Labour would force councils to identify sites for thousands of onshore wind turbines, under plans unveiled yesterday.

Sir Keir Starmer said local authorities would have to ‘proactively identify’ potential areas as part of a push for green energy.

Communities will also lose their veto over such projects, he said.

Setting out his plans, Sir Keir also confirmed Labour would ban new oil and gas exploration in the North Sea, despite industry warnings that it would damage the economy and ‘throw workers under a bus’.
England has had an effective moratorium on new onshore windfarms since 2015, when planning rules were introduced to allow a single objection to block developments.
Labour pledged last year to end the ban and speed up the process. Sir Keir went further yesterday, suggesting that councils would be set targets for ensuring new windfarms were built.
The UK has almost 9,000 wind turbines generating around 15 gigawatts of energy. Sir Keir said Labour would more than double this to 35 gigawatts by 2030.
‘We have to have a mechanism where we can move forward,’ he said. ‘Otherwise you get to a situation where everybody says, ‘There ought to be more renewables but I just don’t want it near me.’ We have to have a situation where we can resolve that.’
He also triggered a fresh clash with unions after confirming during his speech in the Edinburgh port of Leith that he would ban new exploration in the North Sea.
Sir Keir has watered down his pledge slightly in recent days to say the party would allow exploitation of the giant Rosebank field if it is given a licence before the next election.
But industry experts have warned the wider ban on new licences will harm the economy.
David Whitehouse, chief executive of the trade body Offshore Energies UK, said: ‘Labour’s proposed ban on new exploration licences is too much too soon.
‘It would be damaging for the industry, for consumers and for the UK’s net-zero ambitions.
‘The figures are clear. The UK has 283 active oil and gas fields, but 180 will shut down by 2030.
‘If we don’t replace them with new ones, then production will decline much faster than we can build low- carbon replacements. It means the UK will become


Read More:  Sir Keir Starmer says he will force councils to find onshore windfarm sites as part of a push for green energy

[awakened53]

More climate scaremongering from the Woke-owned Guardian – pity no one told climate-pushing Gates, Bezos and Obama when they bought seafront properties which they visit in private jets


Not only is dangerous sea level rise “absolutely guaranteed”, but it will keep rising for centuries or millennia even if the world stopped emitting greenhouse gases tomorrow, experts say.
Rising seas are one of the most severe consequences of a heating climate that are already being felt.
Since the 1880s, mean sea level globally has already risen by 16cm to 21cm (6-8in). Half of that rise has happened over the past three decades.
It is accelerating, too: the ocean rose more than twice as fast (4.62mm a year) in the most recent decade (2013-22) than it did in 1993-2002, the first decade of satellite measurements, when the rate was 2.77mm a year. Last year was a new high, according to the World Meteorological Organization. It is no coincidence that the past eight years were the warmest on record.
The numbers might seem small. Even 4.62mm is just half a centimetre a year. So why did the UN secretary general, António Guterres, warn in February that the increase in the pace of sea level rise threatens a “mass exodus” of entire populations on a biblical scale?
A centuries-long time lag
Part of the problem is the that even if the world stopped emitting greenhouse gases immediately – which it will not – sea levels would continue to rise. Even in the best-case scenario, it’s too late to hold back the ocean.
The reason for this is not widely known, outside the science community, but is crucial. The systems causing sea level rise – specifically, the thermal expansion of the ocean and the melting of glaciers and ice sheets due to global heating – have a centuries-long time lag.
“The atmosphere changes quite rapidly but deep ocean circulation takes centuries,” says Prof Jonathan Bamber, director of the Bristol Glaciology Centre at the University of Bristol.
“As the heat sinks into the deep ocean, it takes centuries to be moved around and for a new equilibrium to be reached. Ice sheets also have a response time, so that if you change the thermometer tomorrow, it can take hundreds to thousands of years to reach an equilibrium.

Read More: ‘It’s absolutely guaranteed’: the best and worst case scenarios for sea level rise

[Steve]

Canada's 2001 Climate Predictions Revisited
12 Jun 2023 | Crystal Ball
[/url][url=https://twitter.com/share?text=Canada%27s%202001%20Climate%20Predictions%20Revisited%20-&url=https://climatediscussionnexus.com/videos/canadas-2001-climate-predictions-revisited/]
The “Canada Action Plan” Crystal Ball Check Revisited transcript

https://climatediscussionnexus.com/video...revisited/


John Robson:
For the Climate Discussion Nexus, I’m John Robson with another trip down memory lane, to Canada’s definitive 2001 climate change assessment and action plan. And also to our second-most-popular video, “Canada’s 2001 climate predictions. How did they do?“, which has had 400,000 views since being released in June 2019, and which we think some of our newer viewing and reading friends might have missed and might appreciate.
The main point here is that, if governments don’t know what’s happening, they can’t possibly know what to do about it. But it’s also important to note that if they were as sure 20 years ago as they are today, and were completely clueless back then, it calls into serious question how solid their understanding is today.
This video looks at the disastrously wrong predictions the Canadian government made about climate change at the turn of the century based on the climate models that they’d spent many millions of dollars developing. It was on the basis of those predictions that they wanted to convince the nation to rally behind their costly and impractical plans to slash energy use. Because, as we show, the predictions weren’t just wrong, they were all wrong in the same direction. There was a systemic bias in the direction of creating the impression of a climate crisis that the data just didn’t show.

[Steve]

Climate Fraud exposed by 3 experts! - Solutions inside

https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/geopol...ns-inside/





When the squarest most law abiding citizens become aware of the massive fraud that is happening from our government (covid, climate, sogi123) and realize that our government is acting as a domestic terrorist under its own laws section 83.1 of the criminal code, and stops obeying the tyrannic government, WE WIN.
This video obliterates the climate change bullshit narrative, and offers you the solution at the end. The solution, is whatever this government wants us to do, we do not do it. Anything they push, we decline. Anything they want, its a big fat no. Nothing they are pushing is in our best interests, and in fact are genocidal laws. We are undergoing the largest genocide in recorded human history. The proof is everywhere.
Join us and help us get Awake Freedom TV into millions of homes:
https://createchanges.thrivecart.com/rok...akecanada1
Download directly onto your Roku Enabled Devices:
https://channelstore.roku.com/en-ca/deta...freedom-tv
Be sure to leave us a 5 star review.
Add your rumble channel to Awake Freedom TV:
https://awakefreedom.tv/?/register/content
Become an Awake Freedom TV affiliate and get paid to help our fundraising to get our TV channel on:
Roku (done)
Amazon Fire TV
Apple TV
Android phones
Apple phones
Website mirror of app
And then our own freedom stick.
As you can see we need lots of fundraising to accomplish all the tech build outs we need to do.
Join our affiliate program here:
https://awakefreedom.tv/?/register/affiliates



……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………


Beyond Insanity: White House Wants To Block Sunlight To Save Planet From ‘Global Warming’

Apparently the White House does not realize that every plant, every tree, every living thing including human beings needs the sun to survive.” — Felicity Arbuthnot, Global Research, July 5, 2023

***

Despite the European Commission’s recent warning that large-scale interventions such as solar engineering to reverse ‘climate change’ could have “unintended consequences,” the White House published a new report Friday indicating that the Biden administration wants to manipulate planetary systems to block the sunlight to save the planet.

The congressionally mandated report released by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy shows the Biden administration is very eager to explore “geoengineering” methods to block sunlight because they allege the planet is burning and there’s an imminent climate crisis that will destroy the world.

Massive Shipment of Explosive Chemicals Disappears in Mojave Desert, Investigation Underway

“A program of research into the scientific and societal implications of solar radiation modification (SRM) would enable better-informed decisions about the potential risks and benefits of SRM as a component of climate policy, alongside the foundational elements of greenhouse gas emissions mitigation and adaptation,” the White House report said. 

The report continued, “SRM offers the possibility of cooling the planet significantly on a timescale of a few years.”  

In a statement, the White House said, “There are no plans underway to establish a comprehensive research program focused on solar radiation modification.”

There is no official government policy that was attached to the report. The administration noted Congress ordered the report.

The report was released one day after the European Commission outlined the potential risks and “unintended consequences” of manipulating planetary systems to fight global warming.

The commission warned:

In the context of accelerated global warming, deliberate large-scale intervention in the Earth’s natural systems (referred to as “geoengineering”), such as solar radiation modification, is attracting more attention. However, the risks, impacts and unintended consequences that these technologies pose are poorly understood, and necessary rules, procedures and institutions have not been developed. 

Some of these risks include:

These technologies introduce new risks to people and ecosystems, while they could also increase power imbalances between nations, spark conflicts and raises a myriad of ethical, legal, governance and political issues. 

Blocking the sun’s rays globally with artificial particles in the name of ‘climate change’ is gaining traction. However, there’s too much risk involved that could possibly harm biodiversity and agriculture on a global scale. The fact that this technology could alter global weather patterns and the Biden administration wants to explore it — is frightening.

… and Mr. Burns from the animated television series The Simpsons tried this… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3LbxDZRgA4&t=7s

https://www.globalresearch.ca/beyond-ins...ng/5824770

[Steve]

Climate Change Crime – Depopulation In the Name of Human Rights
By Peter Koenig
Global Research, July 13, 2023

 

About a week ago, the UN Human Rights Czar in Geneva issued a stern warning – “Up to 80 million people will be plunged into hunger if climate targets are not met”.

These are the words of Volker Turk, the head of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, Switzerland. He spoke at a Human Rights event, and highlighted as principal cause for this coming calamity – what else – “climate change”. He said, 

“extreme weather events were having a significant negative impact on crops, herds and ecosystems, prompting further concerns about global food availability.”

This is immediately proven by never-before-in-history extreme floods in Vermont, USA, by extreme droughts in Europe and Central – Western USA and by enormous, never-before experienced – forest fires in Canada. More is already announced – extreme Monsoon rains in India, and possibly Bangladesh. What a coincidence. Except, there are no coincidences. Droughts and gigantic flashfloods, in calculated interchange. No coincidences.

Most people of this globe just simply cannot believe how evil some non-people are. The Covid crime and the vaccination genocide was not enough to open their eyes, that their governments cannot be trusted, that they are sold, either by money or by threats, to an extreme evil power, a Depopulation, a Eugenics Cult which is behind it all.

Mr. Turk went on claiming, 

“More than 828 million people faced hunger in 2021, and climate change is projected to place up to 80 million more people at risk of hunger by the middle of this century.”

[...]

 

The article, Climate Change Crime — Depopulation in the Name of Human Rights, can be read on globalresearch.ca.

Read in browser

[Steve]

Awakening Channel: Nobel Prize-Winning Scientist Exposes there is No Climate Crisis

https://new.awakeningchannel.com/there-i...t-exposes/