[awakened53]

‘Green’ Sheffield City Council admits felling thousands of healthy trees during Labour-instigated £2.2billion street ‘improvement’ project


Sheffield City Council has issued a four-page apology to residents after an inquiry found it had behaved dishonestly during a dispute over the felling of healthy trees in the city in a £2.2billion street improvement project.

On March 6, the Sheffield Street Trees Inquiry Report by Sir Mark Lowcock found the council also misled the high court twice during the row – during which elderly residents were arrested and held for eight hours for trying to protect the trees.

In autumn 2016, council contractors dragged residents out of bed to move their cars at 4.45am to begin cutting down trees, before protesters arrived. The scenes were compared to ‘something you’d expect to see in Putin’s Russia’ by former Sheffield Hallam MP Nick Clegg.

The council issued an open apology to residents, particularly to those who campaigned against the unnecessary felling, for its ‘actions during the street trees dispute’.

‘The mistakes the Council made were set out very clearly by Sir Mark Lowcock, they should not have happened, and we apologise for them unreservedly,’ the council wrote.

On another occasion, the council applied for an injunction against Green member Alison Teal – one of its own councillors. She was taken to court for breaching the injunction but found not guilty.

The removal of trees, which became known locally as the ‘chainsaw massacre’, provoked scenes involving protesters, van-loads of police and arrests in some of the city’s leafiest middle-class suburbs.

The police came at five o’clock one Thursday morning, banging on doors to inform bleary-eyed homeowners that they needed to get out of bed and move their cars.

Residents who failed to comply were swiftly punished: within minutes, around ten vehicles were loaded on to lorries and towed away, past road blocks that now prevented access to either end of the street.

Inside this cordon, dissent was crushed. Three people who took umbrage at the pre-dawn raid were slapped in handcuffs, including a thirtysomething man and two grandmothers in their early 70s.

The elderly duo, a retired sociology professor called Jenny Hockey, and her neighbour Freda Brayshaw, a former teacher, were driven to the police station for questioning. It would be eight hours before they were released.

Sir Mark Lowcock concluded that the behaviour of the council ‘amounted to a serious and sustained failure of strategic leadership’.

In the apology, the council wrote: ‘An open apology to all residents of Sheffield, and beyond, for Sheffield City Council’s actions during the street trees dispute We are sorry for the actions that we took during the street trees dispute.

‘We recognise that this full apology, for some, is a long time coming, and we understand that due to the Council’s behaviour, some people will never forgive Sheffield City Council and have lost trust and faith in us.

Read More: Sheffield City Council publishes four-page apology letter after felling thousands of healthy trees during £2.2billion street improvement project

[awakened53]

POSTED BY RICHARD WILLETT - MEMES AND HEADLINE COMMENTS BY DAVID ICKEPOSTED ON 21 JULY 2023[/font][/size][/color]
The tick, tick, tick to fascism: Councils issue record fines for ‘busybody’ offences – including climbing trees


Councils have issued a record 13,000 fines for “busybody” offences that include shouting, climbing trees and picking up stones.
The number of £100 on-the-spot fines has nearly doubled in a year from 7,970 in 2021 to 13,443 in 2022, beating the previous pre-pandemic high of 10,400 penalty notices for breaches of public spaces protection orders (PSPOs).
Councils have been permitted since 2014 to introduce PSPOs and this has led to more than 2,000 new sets of crimes being created in public places across England and Wales.
PSPOs were designed to tackle serious anti-social behaviour but critics say the new law was drafted so loosely that it has been used to curb “normal” activities such as climbing trees, flying kites or children meeting up in groups of more than three.
Out of the 303 local councils that responded to Freedom of Information requests, 266 said they currently had at least one PSPO in place. Only 10 per cent of councils had never had a PSPO. The councils cumulatively had 2,003 PSPOs currently in place, of which some included more than 20 separate restrictions.
Shouting and swearing banned
Eight of the councils have banned shouting or making a noise, 11 have banned swearing or foul language, and 22 have placed restrictions on loitering. Seven of the councils barred busking and six criminalised feeding the birds, according to research by the Manifesto Club, a campaign group fighting the surge in new neighbourhood crimes.
Its report said: “Rather than regulating activities that are causing significant nuisance or harm, many of these PSPOs criminalise behaviour that is entirely normal.”
Two councils – Torfaen in Wales and Rugby [b]– [/b]have introduced orders banning the climbing of trees. Rugby council has also barred the flying of kites and made it a crime to remove any “soil, sand, shingle or rock”. Richmond has made it a crime to “remove or displace any stone, soil or turf without the express prior consent of the council”.


Read More: Councils issue record fines for ‘busybody’ offences – including climbing trees

[Steve]

Telegram - https://t.me/awakenedtravellers/4208

HM Revenue & Customs raked in more than £7 billion in Inheritance tax (IHT), from grieving families in the last tax year and more than 533,000 families face being caught in the IHT net over the next decade.

But that's not enough for the robbing criminal cartel that call themselves our Government. Oh no. Not only have they ruined almost everyone financially due to the last 3 years, and not only will they rake in further IHT from the excess deaths they keep ignoring and have caused with policies, now Jeremy Hunt wants to attack inherited pensions with a new death levy. This is being considered by the Government at the moment and could cost grieving widows and widowers up to an extra £13,000 in tax. 

Last month, HMRC published proposals to start taxing hundreds of thousands of inherited pension pots for the first time, but haven't really made it public, so the vast majority of people are unaware that any new rules that are approved will come into force as early as next April.

Whilst the PPE VIP fast lane contracts have made lords and ministers mates super rich, (alot by fraud too! ), and there is a big black hole in the Treasury accounts of BILLIONS, and whilst we continue to funnel millions upon millions to Ukraine, the shower of shit in Westminster want to raise yet another stealth tax to make your life even harder.

We have no adequate words to sum this up. It is simply theft. Where will the money go, because it won't come back to the public for anything, it will end up on ridiculous net zero projects or funding proxy wars. 

We are not represented by this Government, or any new one that might get in we may add. And as you know, the saying goes, "No taxation without representation".

THEFT THEFT THEFT - courtesy of the UK Government. 

https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/pens...ension.htm

[Steve]

Telegram - https://twitter.com/JamesMelville/status...11599?s=20

Tony Benn’s 5 key questions:

“What power have you got?
Where did you get it from?
In whose interests do you exercise it?
To whom are you accountable?
How do we get rid of you?

And if you can’t get rid of the people who govern you, you don’t live in a democratic system.”

[Steve]

The Energy Bill - THEY ARE COMING FOR YOUR HOUSE.

A new parliamentary bill is being rushed through parliament, only 9 MPs voted against it. 

If you want to look it up, the bill has the title:

‘A Bill to make provision about energy production and security and the regulation of the energy market, including provision about the licensing of carbon dioxide transport and storage; about commercial arrangements for industrial carbon capture and storage and for hydrogen production; about new technology, including low-carbon heat schemes and hydrogen grid trials; about the Independent System Operator and Planner; about gas and electricity industry codes; about heat networks; about energy smart appliances and load control; about the energy performance of premises; about the resilience of the core fuel sector; about offshore energy production, including environmental protection, licensing and decommissioning; about the civil nuclear sector, including the Civil Nuclear Constabulary; and for connected purposes’

It's a 446 page bill covering many areas of energy production, storage and usage but some sources have extracted a few key points noteworthy to the British householder 
(it's another instance where conspiracy theorists have been proved right):

Source 1
https://darntons.com/2023/09/07/read-....

Source 2
https://twitter.com/LoftusSteve/statu...

Source 3
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia...


#Energy #Green


https://youtu.be/c7aXELHwY-A?si=91cX0VkH7vfcl-hP

[Steve]

Traps 

( https://www.thesovereignproject.live/_files/ugd/d46470_3937f96e30de4f7685431aff71b6643d.pdf)

The system has been set up over thousands of years, and hides behind the legal fiction called government, which does not exist.


… Traps

The system has been set up over thousands of years, and hides behind the legal fiction called government, which does not exist.

These people, who hide behind this fiction, carry out scams and deceptions towards the people of this earth, which results in mass poverty, misery and war.

However these people hope you won’t dig too deep and discover the truth, and place many traps in case you should even try.

Note: a few government scams are sophisticated and arduous to comprehend, but many are surprisingly easy to grasp, if you are willing to see.

Here is a list detailing many of these traps.

Assumption

The entire system requires your consent and ignorance to just assume.

The people controlling the system consider your assumption as “consent”, and therefore can then act upon you.

Note: Within the legal system there is a maxim of law: “For he who would be deceived, let him”.
This comes from the Latin phrase “Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur” meaning “The world wants to be deceived, so let it be deceived.”

However when you question someone’s claim or documentation, they often withdraw.

For if they told you directly, then your assumption has not been granted, and fraud has been committed against you.

Exemption

The word “exemption” means to be freed from an obligation or liability imposed by others with authority, usually through contract.

Therefore to use an exemption is to accept the obligation, and subsequent imposed authority, resulting in accepting the policy within a contract that may grant you exemption.

Religious exemption

The definition of Religious exemption is a legal privilege that exempts members of a certain religion from a “law”, regulation, or requirement by the state or government.

Note: you can never be exempt from law; otherwise the victim would be without justice.

A legal privilege is not a right, and it certainly is not your right; it is a clause within a contract that someone else controls.

If you do not control said contract, then the privilege, along with the exemption can be withdrawn at any time.

Religious Saviour

Although the choice to follow a religion is a personal one, there are dangers in doing so that are not quite so obvious to the average person of faith.

Throughout recorded history, many “religions” have either been started or taken over by people whose sole purpose is to gain wealth and power.

The usual trap is to instil fear, depression and anxiety that “all is lost”, into the followers, and then give “salvation” to them if they just followed the cult leader, usually in the way of penance.

However the danger of instil too much fear into the people is some will often feel they are without hope, and a man without hope is a very dangerous thing.

So, a “saviour” is often created, given false hope that “salvation” is coming, all the followers have to do is wait and continue to give penance until such time as the “saviour returns”.

This is a trap set up so you believe someone is going to save you, so you will not try and save yourself, with the modern day equivalent being QAnon, Anonymous and certain politicians.

Note: the word “religion” comes from the act of re-creating a legion of followers, after a collapse of society, older faith or war, with a Roman legion being made up of between 3,000 to 6,000 men.

Do not go looking for a saviour, as the saviour is found from within, it is you. 

Authority

When someone is making a claim to their “authority”, they are stating they have the power or right to give orders and make decisions over their subordinates.

The title “authorities” is often, yet incorrectly applied to a person or organization having political or administrative power and control, without contract.

Authority can only come from the individual, and to become a “subordinate”, they must willingly, and without coercion give their authority to another.

This is usually done through contract, when a person decides to work for someone else, resulting in limited authority being given to the boss, who is limited by the policies written within said contract.

If anyone should try and impose their authority onto you, without agreement or contract, then this is a violation of your rights and should be challenged.

Resistance

Although the word resistance can refer to the ability to not be affected by something or someone, usually adversely, within the legal world it means something else.

Resistance also refers to the “refusal to accept”, or comply with, something or someone, usually in the way of an order, rule or instruction.

However resistance is not required when there is no contract or agreement in place to the implied requirement to begin with, but the act of resisting now creates the obligation to comply.

Refusal

When someone offers you a service or product, do not say you refuse.

Saying you refuse indicates that you had a prior obligation to accept the service or product being offered, and you have now defaulted on your “prior obligation”.

For example: do not refuse a test, just decline the test. If you refuse, the one making the offer will continue as if you have now defaulted on a prior “obligated contract”.

The correct response would be to “decline the offer”, as this shows this is the first time the offer has been made, and therefore there cannot be any prior obligation within a contract to accept. If they persist, then they are without honour and you can make a counter claim against them.

Non-compliance

Compliance and being compelled refers to the obligated action or fact of complying with a wish or command given by another.

However the act of complying means you had a prior agreement to comply.

Therefore an act of “non-compliance” means you agree that you should follow the order or command, but you have chosen not to, resulting in the loss of your honour, and now the party issuing said order can act upon you.

Disobedience

The word disobedience means the failure, refusal or neglect to obey rules imposed by someone in authority.

However you can only disobey a rule if you had already accepted the obligation of the contract from where the rule is stipulated, and therefore the authority from the person issuing said rule.

Many people make the mistake of “disobeying” a baseless order, which inadvertently places them under obligation to follow, when they should have just questioned the obligation all along.

Civilian

Although the official narrative of the title “civilian” means a person not in the armed services, or a “non-combatant”, or “private citizen”, the true nature of this title dates back over 2000 years.

Before people were referred to as “civilians”, they were called “plebeians” within Ancient Roman society, who were a group of lower class commoners, under the rule and control of the upper class called Patricians.

These Patricians ruled over the Plebeians using a bureaucratic system of “law” which over time became Civil Procedure Code, or “law”, which is controlled today by the BAR association.

Therefore anyone within the jurisdiction of this society was under the authority of “civil law”, and became a “Civilian”.

Civil Disobedience

There have been many calls for “Civil Disobedience” in retaliation against tyranny throughout history, however making the claim of “Civil” disobedience acknowledges “your title” and therefore position within a society.

This action is “acceptance” of operating within the jurisdiction of a society or “community” controlled by others, namely the state, and your agreement that you have no status, and therefore no rights, within it.
Meaning you have no right to disobey any command, and your actions have become threatening to the society you agreed to be a part of.

The result of which is you have now become an “Extremist”, meaning “the state”, which controls “the society” can now act upon you.
Why disobey when you had no obligation to start with? 

Civil Rebellion

Similar to Civil Disobedience, “Civil Rebellion” is the action or process of resisting authority, control or convention; however it can also be seen as a “call to action”.

A Rebellion is also applied to the act of armed resistance against an established government or leader.

Therefore to call for a “Civil” Rebellion, you are calling for “Civilians” with no right to rebel, to take up arms against the state; you have now become a “Domestic Terrorist”.

Lawful Rebellion

Referring to a “Lawful” Rebellion would suggest the right to this action, where the word “rebellion” is being used to oppose an unfounded authority or an illegitimate claim of dominance upon you, resulting in a direct threat being made against you without a prior agreement.

Meaning if a group, corporation or government where to make unfounded claims of authority, then you would have the “lawful” right to rebel and defend yourself.

This could work if the individual chose to use their own law, but many make the mistake of referencing the “law” from others, resulting in the loss of their sovereignty.

The most common mistake would be quoting the Magna Carta, which was a contract signed by a king and a group of barons.

The person trying to use this ancient contract today is not only operating in the wrong jurisdiction, but quoting a document that does not bear their signature.

Note: You cannot and do not get your rights from another’s contract, furthermore there is no document that can ever save you from tyranny.

Voting

The Plebtorial system which originated within Ancient Roman Society, developed and changed over time and became the Electoral system.

To give the Plebeians the illusion that they were in control, they were offered elections so it would appear they could choose who ran “their” government.

Note: of course the government was never the peoples, but those who owned the government, the Patricians, with all the candidates already preselected.

This deception begins with the ballot paper; when you register to vote, you hand over power of attorney.

You are asked to use black ink and mark an “X” in a box, which is the signature of a “simpleton”. This action declares you are “incompetent” to make a decision, and are asking those in control to decide for you.

If you think you can vote your way out of tyranny, then signing an “X” was the correct thing to do.
Note: if you own your own land and are therefore Sovereign, you elect, you don’t vote.

All you are doing when you go to the polling station, is recording your opinion within said poll, so the government can see what the general consensus of the people is, nothing more.

Constitution

In America on September the 17th 1787 twelve state delegates approved the constitution. These states now became constitutors.

A constitutor in civil law is one who by simple agreement becomes responsible for the payment of another’s debt.

A constituent is one who promises to pay the debt of another, meaning if you register to vote, within the electoral system, you have agreed to become the debtor to the state.

Note: A citizen does not have access to, nor is protected by, any constitution or “bill of rights”. 

Protests

The definition of the word “protest” means a statement or action expressing disapproval of or objection to something.

Within the legal system, this can be in the way of a written declaration, typically by a notary public, that a bill has been presented and payment or acceptance refused.

The word Protest is derived from the Latin word “prōtestārī” meaning “to declare publicly” and the root word “testārī” meaning “to testify” ergo Pro-test means to “testify publicly”.

However as “the public” has now become a controlled jurisdiction, to “protest” is no longer a right, but a “privilege” that can be revoked at any time by those who control the “general public” , “society” or “community”.

Furthermore, the very action of protesting indicates an obligation to adhere to the very issue you are protesting against.

This is why so many protests and petitions are organised and funded by the very corporate organisations you are protesting against, such as “big oil” and governments.

In simple terms you are accepting the “corporate authority”, and by protesting it you are strengthening it.

Petitions

A petition is a formal written request, typically one signed by many people, appealing to “authority” in respect of a particular cause.

However in most cases, when you sign a petition you have inadvertently accepted the obligation of the very thing you are petitioning against, when in fact you many have had no obligation in the first place, as there was no lawfully binding contract to begin with.

Meaning the subject or cause you are petitioning against did not even apply to you, but through the very action of petitioning, now it does.

This is why most petitions against the “government” are actually set up by the very “government” you are “petitioning” against.

Note: a petition is an “appeal” which means in simple terms “begging”. You have lost you sovereign status and become subservient to a higher authority.

For example: If you petition against changes made to the “Human Rights Act” then you have accepted that “contract” or corporate policy, and are now bound by it, when it never even applied to you.

You have now agreed that your rights no longer belong to you, but are now controlled by the people who have written the “Human Rights Act”, who now have the power to change them at will. You have become a slave.

A lawful petition can only exist where a standing agreed upon contract already applies.

For example: If a group of people all sign a contract to work for a corporation, and the management of said corporation then “change the deal”, the group of people could “petition” against the changes to an existing contract.

However if you are petitioning against a change in policy regarding a contract you are obligated by, remember regardless of how many people signed said petition, the overall document is only considered as one voice and only carries the weight of “one person” in court.

Therefore it would be better to sue the management for breach of contract than petition, that way the workers retain their sovereign status.

Note: Most unions will not tell the workers this, and are usually working with the very corporation the union said they would protect the worker against.

Petitions are also set up and offered by governments to defuse a situation where the people are angry over a certain issue said government caused.

The way this works is those who sign have a sense they are acting against the issue and therefore are making a difference, when in fact they have not, and hence do not take the matter any further.

In short, only children or slaves beg, make appeals and petition. 

Complaints Procedure

To complain seems a legitimate action when something is either unsatisfactory or unacceptable; after all if you accepted a good or service you have certain expectations or standards which are accepted to you.

However to complain is one thing, but to accept another’s procedure to resolve such complaint is the trap.

Almost all corporations offer a “complaints procedure” department, however this is not done to assist you with your complaint, but to take control of the process and therefore determine the end result.

You have lost control of the situation, and as a result you will not be satisfied with the outcome.

Grievance Procedure

When working for someone else, and an issue arises, many people make a complaint to their immediate supervisor, which in turn usually leads to following the company’s “grievance procedure”.

This is a formal way for an employee to raise a problem with their employer concerning the actions of another employee.

However this action establishes you as an employee, which is a taxable human resource without rights.

Furthermore, if you initiate this “grievance procedure” you have lost the ability to direct the process and are at the mercy of the “senior management”, who have no obligation to conduct themselves fairly or justly.

Note: the primary goal of any senior staff is to protect the corporation from litigation, and not to help you.

Additionally you have now accepted the often convoluted grievance procedure rules and regulations, which are written in a way to entrap you further.

If someone has made a complaint against you, then you have the right to know who this person is within the private, but not as an “employee”.

If their name is not divulged, then the burden of proof and hereto the claim now becomes the responsibility of the supervisor you are dealing with, which you must deal within in the private.

Many people will opt for perceived simple solution of using a union, but just like petitions and protest, will only pull you into the legal system deeper, as most unions are usually working with the very corporation the union said they would protect you against.

Society

The general description of a “society” is a group of people living together in an ordered community or commune.

The official narrative regarding a society often includes the following:

 Shared Language.
 Customs and Traditions.
 Religion.
 Arts and Literature.
 Families.

But this is culture, not a “society”.

However the definition of a society is more accurately applied to an organisation or club formed for
a particular purpose or actively.

Within this organisation there is a hierarchical management structure, usually comprising of a board
of directors or committee, controlling the members.

And when were break down a society further, we see the trap, as it includes the following:

 Forms of government.
 Economic systems.
 Businesses.
 Regulatory system.
 A class or cast system.

Note: A society operates as a business using maritime law, requiring a membership for the rules of said society to apply to you.

Within this controlled class system, the family is considered the “basic unit” of society, which in turn forms communities, with many communities making a nation, which in turn is under the jurisdiction of a country controlled by the owners of said country.

Being part of a society obligates you to the social order or “new world order”, with the loss of your freedom.

Social Contract

The term “social contract” is often causally spoken about and accepted without any proof that said contract even exists.

For there to be a contract, then informed consent must be considered and accepted with the signing of said contract.

With a society being social control of the individual, an “imposed contract” can be implied. Never accept a contract without reading it first.

Class System

Class is a shortened word taken from classification, which is the operation of separating various entities or units, and categorising them within a set of definitions limited by margins or boundaries.

This set of definitions can be set up as a hierarchy which distinguishes between lower and higher importance.

A “social class” is the method of grouping people into a set of hierarchical social categories, with the most common being upper, middle and lower class.

This system of separating and valuing people is most evident within favoured and preferred communities.

Ask yourself this; who is putting you into a “class”? 

Community

The word community comes from the Latin communis, meaning “common, public, and shared”.

The first known or recorded use of the word community was in the 4th millennium BCE, and referred to a Civilization of Mesopotamia, which developed the first city-states.

Note: BCE stands for Before the Common Era, and refers to the Gregorian calendar.

Community also means “public”, municipal, and obviously communal, which became the foundation for communism. It means the opposite to private.

Note: Man is tribal, not communal. The word Tribunal comes from the world tribe, which is
“common law”. 

Countries

It is a common mistake to consider a country as a place where people live within an accepted culture; that would be called “land”.

For example: The name of England came from “the land of the Angles” or “Engla-Land”, which was the home of Germanic Tribes called “Angles”, who lived upon the land.

The name country came from the word county, which referred to a jurisdiction placed upon the land, usually by a king or monarch.

People who lived within this jurisdiction were considered “subjects” to the king, making them subject to his rule, where he would “count” the heads living upon the land, who would then became taxpayers.

Note: “Subject” is the title given to the person who has become subjugated; the act of subjugation refers to the action of bringing someone or something under domination or control.

A country is just a collection of counties, or “communities of taxpayers”, under subjugation of a king. Today it means under the jurisdiction of a corporation, which exists on paper only.

Note: Moving from one country to another, with a change in jurisdiction, can be done by the stroke of a pen.

Flags

With an understanding of what a country is, which is nothing more than a corporation, flags are nothing more than corporate logos.

Using a flag from one of these corporate countries within your own jurisdiction or business, places your private dominion under the jurisdiction, and therefore control of said corporate country.

Therefore you have just placed yourself within the authority of that flag, including all the rules, 
regulations, policies, taxes and legislation that come with it.

A white flag does not mean surrender; it means you are without flag and therefore not operating within the jurisdiction of corporate warfare.

Note: the word warfare comes from combining “war” with “fare”, where “fare” means “journey”, or more accurately the money you pay for the journey you make, ergo “the cost of war”.

Rights

Your rights are often given away through the deceptive use of words, to understand how we need to know the following:

Adjective meaning: An adjective is a word that describes a noun or noun phrase. The semantic role of an adjective is to change the information given by the noun.

Noun meaning: A noun is a word that generally functions as the “name” of a specific object or set of objects, such as people, places or actions, such as “Man”, “Home” or “Car”.

This means placing an adjective before a word, usually a noun, changes said word or noun. 

Therefore adding a word or “adjective” in front of the word “right” turns it into a title, and the
“right” into a privilege controlled by someone else, usually the people behind government. 

Meaning a word before the word “right” turns it into a titled privilege operating within maritime
law, such as:

 Human rights.
 Civil rights.
 Cultural rights.
 Religious rights.
 Gay rights.
 Minority rights.
 Miranda rights.

Only a Sovereign individual can have rights, as it is their authority that enforces it.

Caution should also be exercised regarding rights, as making open declarations to your rights will
make this appear as an invitation to contract by politicians, in the guise to “protect them”.

It is far safer to consider that “no one” has “rights”, or a right to something within your dominion, rather than you having a “right” to it, as the burden of proof is on the one making the claim to said right.

Rights protect you from the action of another, not to give you resources. 

Human Rights Act

Many people fight government over changes to “human rights” and most notably the “Human rights Act”.

However without the ability to read and see the truth, this is a futile fight and pointless. When we break down the language, we can see the trap as follows:

 Human: this is not referring to Man, but “colour of man”, which is a “monster without rights”.
 The combination of the word “human” and “right” now makes it a Title Privilege.
 The word “Act” means, “acting as law”, so therefore not law.

Your rights do not come from some else, for if they did you would be a slave. If your rights came from someone else, they can be taken away.

Sovereign Citizen

The official narrative regarding the title “Sovereign Citizen” is as follows:

“A member of a political movement of people who oppose taxation, question the legitimacy of government, and believe that they are not subject to the law and do not respect the authority of the police.”

Although a true sovereign is capable of seeing through the official propaganda, the following issues with this statement are as follows:

 Being sovereign is not political, but a status of life, which is that of having supreme authority and control over one’s life.
 Sovereignty is not a belief system, but truth in fact.
 The “law” that is referred to is nothing more than corporate policy without contract and
therefore no obligation to comply.
 The police are a private “For-Profit” Corporation in the business of selling debt to the
general public in the guise of fines, based upon bogus and unfounded rules and regulations.
 Citizen means “slave to the city” meaning that the title “Sovereign Citizen” is an oxymoron.

You cannot be both sovereign and a slave.

The tactic is to create a baseless hypothesis and then apply a title to it, and then use said title to try
and strawman the argument without attempting to even tackle it.

This is nothing new within the corrupt political game played by people who hide behind the legal
fiction called government. 

Criminal Record

To “record” is the act of documenting data or to chronicle the history of a particular subject or person, resulting in the creation of a database for reference in due course.

Creating a “criminal record” is to produce a database of a person’s previous criminal convictions; however what constitutes a “criminal conviction”?

Furthermore, who is doing the recording of said database, and under what authority?

Regardless of your life choices and any indiscretions you may have carried out, who did you give permission to that allows them to record, store and share the history of your life?

Moreover, a “criminal record” is actually “policy violation” from unfounded contracts, issued by corporations, which can be repeatedly brought up to further hinder your life, and is usually subjected to the poor only.

Note: It should also be noted that a “criminal record” is only applied to your corporate birth certificate, operating within the lower public realm or jurisdiction of a “democracy”.

This is why the rich and powerful never get convicted or sent to prison. 

Credit Rating

The definition of a credit rating is as follows; “A credit rating is an evaluation of the credit risk of a prospective debtor, predicting their ability to pay back the debt, with an inherent forecast of the likelihood of the debtor defaulting”.

With the knowledge of the corporate birth certificate, enslaving newly born babies into lifelong debt slaves, the phrase “credit rating” takes on a whole new meaning.

It is the corporation, in the name of your surname, or “slave name” that is being “rated”.

However, we should consider the obvious, when did you give authority for a credit rating to even be
carried out, and by whom? 

No Fly List

The official narrative regarding the “The No Fly List” describes it as a database controlled by the United States Federal Government and maintained by the “Terrorist Screening Center” using an algorithmic ruleset, issued by various government agencies and airlines to decide who to allow and deny to board airline flights, under the guise of “national security”.

However this “official narrative” is quickly defeated when it becomes apparent that what is truly being said; the list is for people so dangerous they should never be allowed to fly on an airplane, yet so innocent that they cannot be arrested.

This conflict of narratives exposes the truth; taking away your right to travel if you do not do as you are told.

However, and this should be obvious:
 Who’s list?
 Who’s authority?

When did you give your authority to be added to this list, and who did you give permission to?

Defund the Police

Various groups and movements have called for the “defunding of the police”, and are promoted heavily by many main stream media outlets and publications.

However this is an orchestrated propaganda psyop set up to manipulate the general public to move in the opposite direction.

A “psyop” is short for the phrase Psychological Operation or Warfare, which is the term given to the action of government’s influencing the perceptions and attitudes of an individual or group, often foreign but become increasingly domestic.

Based on the ill-conceived and incorrect assumption that the police deal in law, and are there to “protect the people”; most individuals consider defunding the police a bad idea.

Usually based on the left-right divide, people who are unable to critically think and cannot see the deception are easily persuaded to go against the opposing side.

This results in the refunding of the police, which often includes them being granted more “powers” given to them by government.

Note: the amount of political power is dependent on the number of brainwashed slaves. The truth is the police have no authority, nor does the government, but people with a slave mentality have just given away theirs.

Note: it should also be noted that from the earliest conception of the police, they have been working with organised crime. The “criminals” create the “problem”; the police are there to “solve” the “problem”.

The police, courts, lawyers and “criminals” are all working together against you for money.

It is a scam and a racket, designed to generate billions in revenue while simultaneously suppressing the poor and weak, referred to as the “citizen” or “slave to the system”.

If you think you are safe by giving away your sovereignty, rights and authority to another, you never will be.

Court

Within the modern day “justice system” the “courts” operate within three basic jurisdictions:

1. Bank
2. Maritime 
3. Religious

Each one is set up to extort money from you.
This is done by setting up a constructed trust in your name, where you a tricked in agreeing to be surety for a bond.

This bond is then used to support the trust, which is referred to as the Res or trust body. With this trust in place the court is about to generate thousands, if not millions in credit.

Note: it should be noted that if you accepted the bond for value, the trust would collapse and so would the court, along with all the charges.

However if you “go to court” you are entering someone else’s court, and have lost your sovereign status. 

This is the trap.

This scam could not exist if enough people knew the truth, which is only a Sovereign can hold court, which is you.

Coup D’état

Coup D’état is French for “stroke of state” and means a sudden, violent and “unlawful” seizure of power from government, more commonly known as a coup.

Many people believe they have to overthrow government, and have even attempted to do so, often resulting in death, a failed attempt and then imprisonment for life, or even execution.

However a “government” is just a corporation with no contract with the individual private natural person, so by carrying out a coup would be considered an “unlawful” act against the shareholders of said corporation.

Moreover if you’ve accepted the title citizen or even subject, then it is an act of war, which will be met with violence.

When you actually realise how the system works, you’ll see there’s no need for a coup, you just walk away from the game.

Prosecute Government

Although not quite as violent as a Coup D’état many people opt to “sue government” over “regulations”, but again this is a mistake.

Although hard to accept, the people behind “the system” cannot actually force you to do anything, and require your “consent”.

Now, this is where the deception occurs, because although they cannot act without your “consent”, they have no compunction in using fraud, deception, lies and even coercion to get it.

The way these people defraud you into “accepting” is by applying all these rules, regulations and policies to your corporate birth certificate, which in itself is a fraud.

The people behind government will never divulge this, as it would expose the scam, they just hope you assume that all those “laws” apply to you; basically you are self-imposing these regulations or corporate policies.

Therefore the very act of starting litigation against the “government” shows you have already accepted the obligation to follow them; meaning you have already lost.

Acts and Statutes

When “acts and statues” are quoted in paperwork sent by various corporations, the person who sent it is hoping you just accept them.

However when “acts and statutes” are quoted you must question this and ask the sender if they are administrating the act or statute upon you.

No one will ever admit to this as this makes them liable for their actions of administrating something upon you, which you did not authorise.

Further to this, ask to see the signed document by you allowing that person to administrate the “act or statute” upon you; it doesn’t exist.

Therefore do not fight regulations, and inquire if you are obligated to obey them, and who is going to administrate them, and under what authority.

Miranda Act

Sometimes referred to “Miranda Rights”, the Miranda act is a “police caution” that is spoken within many corporate country jurisdiction, when someone is detained or “arrested”.

The typical spoken caution is as follows:

“You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will and can be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney, and if you cannot afford one, they will be provided for you.”

However this is not spoken to protect you, but to entrap you.

The clue is in the title Miranda Act; “act” means it is “acting” as law, so not law. It’s nothing more
than a corporate policy.

Note: If someone else is telling you what your rights are, you have none.

The most damning part of the Miranda act is; “You have the right to remain silent” - the trap is if you stay silent the police will take this as acceptance as you acquiesced. This is a form of pseudo-tacit agreement.

Note: When someone says “you cannot take the law into your own hands” means you never had the right to the law in the first place.

---

….. Continued

Sham Documents

People are scammed and deceived into requesting and paying for documentation that they do not even need. This scam is perpetuated because you were just born into it, and it seems it has always been this way; it hasn’t.

All these sham documents require a form of “registration”, meaning you are literally handing over control of whatever the thing is that “requires” the document.

Furthermore you are also unknowingly entering into a jurisdiction controlled by someone else, and accepting corporate polices you do not even know.

Here are a few examples:

 Passport.
 “Passport” means to pass from port to port, and the concept of a worldwide
passport was created after the 1st World War.
 When you register for a passport, it identifies your corporation and not you.
Furthermore you are now a “postman” carrying a “document” and operating within
the postal union.
 The passport restricts you from travelling, not assists you.
 To travel is a right; therefore under what authority are you asking to have the
[color=#333333][size=small][font=Tah

[Steve]

Is the UK Driving Test failing people on purpose?


My guest today claims that the DVSA, the government body responsible for testing new drivers so they are competent for a licence is failing people by 50% deliberately. 


https://youtu.be/ouDGrDXWH5I?si=riVPmbb13UlidbP-