[Firestarter]

Strange but true, there is absolutely no evidence that the magical HIV virus causes AIDS. But according to the state media, this is an established “fact” nonetheless and if you don’t believe this nonsense you must be labelled a nutcase “conspiracy theorist”.
There is however evidence that the first “medicine” to treat AIDS, AZT, causes immune deficiency and death.
There are also many other causes of immune deficiency...
 
 
AIDS-discoverer Montagnier – HIV not THE cause of AIDS
Dr. Robert Gallo and Professor Luc Montagnier are the scientists credited with discovering AIDS. Luc Montagnier won the 2008 Nobel Prize for discovering HIV. Gallo couldn’t get the Nobel Prize because he had been caught in a few cases of scientific fraud too many...
 
In 2009, Montagnier made some statements in the "House of Numbers" documentary in an interview with Brent Leung - shocking because they come from one of the 2 men most credited with inventing that HIV causes AIDS.
 
Montagnier explains that it isn’t only HIV that causes AIDS as people with a good immune system can deal with HIV, and names some “co-factors” that (also cause AIDS), like:
Oxidative stress;
Contaminated water;
Bad nutrition.
 
If I understand correctly Montagnier claims that HIV is one of many factors that can cause AIDS; so he only tells part of the truth.
Montagnier doesn’t believe that any vaccine can prevent AIDS.
Here is an extract from the interview (6:52).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqnWEGyjUoE
 
See some quotes from the interview:

Leung: You talked about oxidative stress earlier. Is treating oxidative stress one of the best ways to deal with the African AIDS epidemic?

Montagnier: I think this is one way to approach, to decrease the rate of transmission, because I believe HIV we can be exposed to HIV many times without bring chronically infected, our immune system will get rid of the virus within a few weeks, if you have a good immune system; and this is the problem also of the African people.
Their nutrition is not very equilibrated, they are in oxidative stress, even if they are not infected with HIV; so their immune system doesn't work well already. So it's prone, it can, you know, allow HIV to get in and persist. So there are many ways which are not the vaccine, the magic name, the vaccine, many ways to decrease the transmission just by simple measures of nutrition, giving antioxidants - proper antioxidants - hygiene measures, fighting the other infections.
So they are not spectacular, but they could, you know, decrease very well the epidemic, to the level they are in occidental countries, western countries.
 
Leung: So if you have a good immune system, then your body can naturally get rid of HIV?
Montagnier: Yes.
 
Leung: Oh, interesting. Do you think we should have more of a push for antioxidants, and things of that nature, in Africa than antiretrovirals (AIDS drugs)?
Montagnier: We should push for more, you know, a combination of measures; antioxidants, nutrition advice, nutritions, fighting other infections - malaria, tuberculosis, parasitosis, worms - education of course, genital hygiene for women and men also, very simple measures which [are] not very expensive, but which could do a lot.
And this is my, actually my worry about the many spectacular action for the global funds to buy drugs and so on, and Bill Gates and so on, for the vaccine.
But you know those kind of measures are not very well funded, they're not funded at all, or they are, you know, it really depends on the local government to take choice of this, but local governments they take advice of the scientific advisors from the intelligent institutions, and they don't get this kind of advice very often.
 
Leung: Well there's no money in nutrition, right? There's no profit.
Montagnier: There's no profit, yes. Water is important. Water is key.

 
Here’s the full interview that shows that these statements weren’t taken out of context (1:02:04): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyPq-waF-h4
 
 
HIV doesn’t cause AIDS, other death causes, AZT kills
There are not only thousands of cases of HIV-positives that never develop AIDS, but even of AIDS without HIV: http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/kmreason.htm
 
 
According to 2 European studies from 2011 the most common causes of deaths in HIV-positive victims are not AIDS but cancer and liver failure: https://www.poz.com/article/hiv-deaths-mortality-20011-5126
 
 
In the following study 167 deaths occurred among 9,583 HIV-positive subjects; only 54 of these deaths were related to AIDS (32%). Neuhaus et al, Risk of All-cause Mortality Associated with Non-fatal AIDS and .. Infected with HIV (2011): http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2897168/pdf/nihms203665.pdf
 
 
From the Concorde trial evidence it’s clear that HIV-positive victims die (sooner) because of AZT; Seligmann et al “Concorde: MRC/ANRS...” (1994): http://davidcrowe.ca/SciHealthEnv/papers/123-Concorde.pdf
 
 
Much more children born to women poisoned with AZT in pregnancy get severely sick and die than of untreated (HIV-positive) future mothers. Rapid disease progression ... (1999): http://journals.lww.com/aidsonline/pages/articleviewer.aspx?year=1999&issue=05280&article=00008&type=abstract
 
 
In 1993 came a giant step for mankind in the treatment to AIDS with the results from the Margaret Fischl study comparing AZT and ddC (without placebo); the results were that 42% on AZT, 43% on ddC and 39% on AZT/ddC had progressed to serious illness or death. They claimed these dramatic results as evidence that AZT combined with ddC was superior (than AZT as monotherapy). From 1995 on the cocktail ARV was given to AIDS victims, so unsurprisingly the death rate dropped (ddC is less toxic than AZT).
 
It must be clear (even if you believe AIDS is caused by HIV) that the stories about AIDS (that I heard in the 1980s and 1990s) were meant to create hysteria. Neville Hodgkinson put together a lot information - AIDS: Scientific or Viral Catastrophe? (2003)http://www.immunity.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/JScE-article.pdf
 
 
E. Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al. conclude that  HIV is not the cause of AIDS, but people die because of AZT and the HIV-tests are not reliable Is a Positive Western Blot Proof of HIV infection (1993): http://virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/epwbtest.htm
 
 
Peter Duesberg
The main scientist that for many years has understood that AIDS is caused by toxic chemicals like AZT is Peter Duesberg, see for example the following article (he has published several books about the AIDS hoax).
The “AZT” medicine for AIDS was already discovered in the 1960s by Jerome Horwitz but rejected as a chemotherapy for cancer because it´s just too toxic: http://www.duesberg.com/subject/africa2.html
 
Following is a good article by Peter Duesberg, Koehnlein and Rasnick  from 2003.
Below are some excerpts from the paper, which show that:
1) AIDS isn’t caused by a contagious virus;
2) In Africa there is a correlation between malnutrition and AIDS;
3) There is a correlation between “recreational” drugs use and AIDS.
I’m not convinced (like Duesberg) that “recreational” drugs cause AIDS though...
 

However, the plethora of AIDS diseases was not, and still is not randomly distributed even among the different risk groups (table 2). For example, Kaposi’s sarcoma was exclusively diagnosed in male homosexual risk groups using nitrite inhalants and other psychoactive drugs as aphrodisiacs (Newell et al 1984; Haverkos et al 1985; Selik et al 1987; Duesberg 1988; Haverkos and Dougherty 1988; Beral et al 1990). Bacterial pneumonia was primarily diagnosed in children from mothers using psychoactive drugs during pregnancy (Novick and Rubinstein 1987; Duesberg 1988, 1992; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1997). Tuberculosis and pneumonia were, and still are more prevalent in intravenous drug users and “crack” (cocaine) smokers than in other risk groups (Lerner 1989; Duesberg 1992; Duesberg and Rasnick 1998).

(…)
In sharp contrast to its US/European namesakes, the African AIDS epidemic is randomly distributed between the sexes and not restricted to behavioural risk groups (Blattner et al 1988; Duesberg 1988; World Health Organization 2001a). Hence sub-Saharan African AIDS is compatible with a random, either microbial or chemical cause.
(…)
But, only 1 in 1000 unprotected sexual contacts transmits HIV (32–34) , and only 1 of 275 US citizens is HIV-infected (29, 30), (figure 1b). Therefore, an average un-infected US citizen needs 275,000 random “sexual contacts” to get infected and spread HIV – an unlikely basis for an epidemic!
(…)
But, in the peer-reviewed literature there is not one doctor or nurse who has ever contracted AIDS (not just HIV) from the over 816,000 AIDS patients recorded in the US in 22 years (30). Not one of over ten thousand HIV researchers has contracted AIDS. Wives of hemophiliacs do not get AIDS (35). And there is no AIDS-epidemic in prostitutes (36–38). Thus AIDS is not contagious (39, 40).
(…)
According to the article “the state’s top AIDS and HIV prevention officials came up with the smoking gun of all statistics: Gay men in California who use speed are twice as likely to be HIV-positive . . .” (Heredia 2003a).
(…)
The case for malnutrition and lack of drinkable water as the common denominator and probable cause of African AIDS in the HIV-era has been made by scientific (Mims and White 1984; Seligmann et al 1984; Konotey-Ahulu 1987a, b, 1989; Fiala 1998; Oliver 2000; Stewart et al 2000; Ross 2003) and non-scientific observers (Hodgkinson 1996; Shenton 1998; Malan 2001). The non-scientific observers even include the United Nations (Namango and World Food Program of the United Nations 2001) and president Mbeki of South Africa (Cherry 2000; Gellman 2000).
(…)
For example, the Lancet published in 1993 a Canadian epidemiological study, “HIV and the etiology of AIDS”, which found that 88% of AIDS cases in a cohort of male homosexuals at risk for AIDS had used nitrite inhalants and that 75–80% of the same cohort had also used “cocaine, heroin, amphetamines, lysergic acid dimethyl amide, or methylenedioxy amphetamine” (Schechter et al 1993). One of the subjects even passed away on an “overdose” of recreational drugs during the study. In addition an undisclosed percentage (but in 1993 certainly a high percentage, see above) was also prescribed the DNA chain-terminator AZT as anti-HIV drug (Duesberg 1993a, c). Thus not a single drug-free AIDS patient was identified. But, the study concluded, “drugs and sexual activity is rejected by these data” as causes of AIDS. Nevertheless, the authors acknowledged that their study “does not rule out a role for cofactors . . .”.
(…)
A sudden 10-fold increase in the mortality of HIV-positive British hemophiliacs, right after the introduction of AZT in 1987, made scientific headlines in 1995, because the increased mortality was attributed to HIV by the authors of the study, i.e. Darby et al (1995), as well as by the editor of Nature, “More conviction on HIV and AIDS” (Maddox 1995). Even the editor of the Lancet wrote an editorial asking, “Will Duesberg now concede defeat” (Horton 1995)? Darby et al based their conclusion on the sudden 10-fold increase of the hemophiliacs’ mortality in 1987, shown in figure 5, on the facts that the increased mortality was restricted to HIVpositive hemophiliacs and that the increase was independent of the degree of hemophilia (which is inversely proportional to the life expectancy of the patient).
(…)
Moreover, the mortality of hemophiliacs was steadily decreasing since the 1970s until 1987 – despite the presence of HIV (Duesberg 1995c)! Thus the only new risk of mortality, in and after 1987, was not HIV, but AZT. Darby et al even acknowledged “treatment, by prophylaxis against P. carinii pneumonia or with zidovudine (AZT), has been widespread for HIV-infected haemophiliacs since about 1989 (more accurately since 1987)”. The editor of Nature also pointed out that, “Darby et al failed to provide full details of the drug regimen followed” (Maddox 1995). The AZT-mortality hypothesis would of course also explain why the new hemophilia mortality was independent of the severity of the hemophilia, as Darby et al observed.

 
Peter Duesberg, Koehnlein and Rasnick  – The chemical bases of the various AIDS epidemics: recreational drugs, anti-viral chemotherapy and malnutrition (2003): http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/pddrchemical.pdf
 
 
No evidence that HIV causes AIDS
According to the “independent” Wikipedia:

On May 4, 1984, Gallo and his collaborators published a series of four papers in the scientific journal Science [14] demonstrating that a retrovirus they had isolated, called HTLV-III in the belief that the virus was related to the leukemia viruses of Gallo's earlier work, was the cause of AIDS.[15]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Gallo
 
This is what AIDS-whistleblower E. Papadopulos-Eleopulos had to say about this "evidence":

Although Gallo claims that in the four Science papers (Gallo et al., 1986) he and his colleagues "provided clearcut evidence that the aetiology of AIDS and ARC was the new lymphotropic retrovirus, HTLV-III", no such data were presented. (Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al., 1993b)

(…)
To be fair, in his 1984 Science papers Gallo did not make such a direct claim. He said HIV was the probable cause of AIDS. But even this conclusion is questionable. Even if Gallo's evidence was incontrovertible proof he had isolated a retrovirus he only managed to isolate it from 26 out of 72 AIDS patients. That's only 36 percent. And only 88% of 49 AIDS patients had antibodies.
There was no evidence. But two years later, when Gallo was defending the accusation he had used the French virus to discover his version of HIV, he was much more definite about his 1984 papers. He said they provided "clearcut" evidence that HIV is the cause of AIDS. And his opinion was no different in 1993.

 
Following are the 4 articles from 4 May 1984 of Gallo et al in Science. Like Papadopulos-Eleopulos concluded, these don’t even claim that HIV causes AIDS.
The first 3 articles make no claim whatsoever that HIV is the cause of AIDS.
 
The 4th paper (page 18) “Antibodies Reactive with Human T-Lymphotropic Retroviruses (HTLV-III) in the Serum of Patients with AIDS” M. G. Sarngadharan, Mikulas Popovic, Lilian Bruch, Jörg Schüpbach, Robert C. Gallo; is the most interesting one of these and this is THE only (according to Papadopulos-Eleopulos, Duesberg and Nobel laureate Kary Mullis) paper used by the state media as “evidence” that HIV is the cause of AIDS.
 
The only claim made is that there appears to be a relation between AIDS, homosexuality and HIV (that was named as HTLV-III). These are the most interesting quotes I found in the 4th article:

Serum samples from 88 percent of patients with AIDS and from 79 percent of homosexual men with signs and symptoms that frequently precede AIDS, but from less than 1 percent of heterosexual subjects, have antibodies reactive against antigens of HTLV-III.

(...)
These new isolates are designated HTLV-III and are described in the accompanyning reports (30-32). Here we describe the use of HTLV-III in an immunological screening of serum samples from patients with AIDS and pre-AIDS and from individuals at increased risk for AIDS.
(...)
Serum samples were obtained from patients with clinically documented AIDS, Kaposi’s sarcoma, sexual contacts of AIDS patients, intravenous drug abusers, homosexual men, and heterosexual subjects. These sera were tested for their reactivity to HTLV-III by means of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (34).
(...)
Because these 17 men had been seeking medical as¬sistance, they are not a representative sample of the homosexual population, and the high incidence of HTLV-III–specific antibodies in their sera may not reflect the true incidence in the homosexual population.
(...)
Among the positive serum samples from AIDS patients there appears to be a wide variation in antibody titer to HTLV-III. Generally, the titers in sera from patients with advanced AIDS are significantly lower than those in sera from newly diagnosed patients and patients with pre-AIDS. This is consistent with the idea that HTLV-III infection causes an initial lymphoid proliferation but eventually causes death of the target lymphocytes (OKT4+) leading to the abnormal T4+/T8+ ratios and loss of helper T-cell functions including antibody production by B cells.
(...)
In conclusion, we have shown a high incidence of specific antibodies to HTLV-III in patients with AIDS and pre-AIDS. Among the antibody-positive cases reported here a few are of particular importance with respect to the transmission of the disease.

 
Here are the 4 papers from 4 May 1984 of Gallo et al in Science: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.373.354&rep=rep1&type=pdf#page=4
 
 
Fiala - AIDS in Africa
I’ll end this first post with an interesting story about how the AIDS numbers were exaggerated in the 1990s by Christian Fiala. He focusses on the AIDS figures in Uganda and Tanzania to conclude that a heterosexually transmitted AIDS epidemic in Africa can only be regarded as cynical.
 
AIDS DEFINITION
In October 1985 in Bangui, Niger the World Health Organisation (WHO) published a definition of AIDS that was exclusively applicable to developing countries. In this definition AIDS is determined - not by testing for HIV, but based on symptoms, like: diarrhoea for more than one month, 10% weight loss, and cough for one month. These symptoms weren’t rare in a country like Uganda with 20 years of systematic destruction behind it. Tuberculosis in Uganda could officially lead to an AIDS diagnosis.
Half of the beds in the internal ward of the Makerere University Clinic in Kampala were occupied by "AIDS patients". From 1986 on Uganda's AIDS figures increased sharply and Uganda was declared the "epicentre of AIDS".
In Tanzania another (narrower) definition was used to diagnose “AIDS”. Then, for reasons unknown, "AIDS cases" in Tanzania were reported that didn’t fulfil the definition; see the following excerpt from a report by the Tanzanian health ministry from August 1990:

Of the 1,987 new cases registered, only 667 (33.6%) fulfilled the above mentioned criteria. Although 1,320 cases would not strictly qualify to be called AIDS cases, we have taken them as cases assuming that those who reported them just made an omission at the stage of compiling the forms.

In other words 2 third of the newly registered AIDS cases didn’t fulfil the definition for AIDS!
 
MULTIPLE DEFINITIONS
After the WHO definition had been in use for several years, the US Center for Disease Control (CDC) and the Pan-American Health Organisation (PAHO) concluded that the WHO definition of AIDS "may not be adequate for clinical work" because of "the potential inapplicability of that definition". This means that AIDS could also be diagnosed based on other criteria.
Since then, developing countries can choose between the 3 definitions to diagnose AIDS. They can also diagnose AIDS based on the tighter definitions used in the developed world. In international statistics, however, all the AIDS cases are summarised together, although their numbers are based on different definitions thus not comparable.
It must be clear that when a disease is diagnosed based on symptoms that can be caused by (other) diseases - the number of AIDS cases doesn’t mean a thing.
 
STATISTRICS
The number of new AIDS cases in Uganda and Tanzania increased every year until 1991. Since then the numbers have been dropping.
All AIDS cases worldwide are registered by the WHO in Geneva. As there is an unknown number that isn’t registered, the WHO multiplies the registered cases to estimate the "actual" figure. This multiplication factor increases year by year.
In 1996, the WHO multiplied the registered AIDS cases in Africa by 12; in 1997 by 17. In the last one and a half years alone (written in 1998), 116,000 new cases of AIDS in Africa have been registered with the WHO. The WHO estimated the new cases in Africa by a whole 5.5 million, thus multiplying the reported cases by 47.
It is also bizarre that the AIDS figures are presented cumulatively. In this way not the number of new cases are seen by the gullible public, but only the total amount. In this way even a small amount of new AIDS cases (which could lead to a dangerous conclusion that the AIDS epidemic is over) leads to an increase in the number of AIDS cases.
 
Christian Fiala – AIDS in Africa: dirty tricks (1998): http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/chrftricks.htm

[Firestarter]

Duesberg - Inventing The AIDS Virus

This post is not a full summary of the 724 pages book “Inventing The AIDS Virus” (1996) by Peter Duesberg, and Bryan Ellison. The real book is “only” 467 pages, the rest of the book are appendices (that don’t add much), Notes and the Index.
When I read it, I had already been investigating AIDS for some time and thought that the information on the EIS and virus hunters was realtively more interesting (than what I already kne about AIDS).
I’ll add a couple of links that have the benefit of brevity over the book (if you intend to read the book this doesn’t add much).


WHAT IS (THE CAUSE OF) AIDS?
To understand the true nature of AIDS it is helpful to distinguish between the 4 separate groups that have developed AIDS in high numbers: 1) Promiscuous homosexuals; 2) Drug addicts; 3) Haemophiliacs; 4) Africans.
Duesberg states that the cause of AIDS is drug use. He explains that all of the homosexuals were heavy users of (recreational) drugs; he specifically names “nitrite". While Duesberg makes strong arguments that drugs are the culprit, the real cause is more sinister. It is known that as part of the CIAs MKULTRA program experimental drugs were tested on unsuspecting people. I don’t think it’s too farfetched to conclude that the AIDS-victims were intentionally poisoned by putting some chemical weapon into their drugs. Then after they became ill the “AIDS-medicines” finish them off.
Duesberg specifically names that there were some 30 known Immune deficiency diseases, before AIDS was invented, that are since being labelled AIDS. He also specifically names that haemophiliacs suffered from immune deficiencies long before AIDS. The AIDS-syndrome includes the following diseases: brain dementia, diarrhoea, cancers (like Kaposi's sarcoma and cervical cancer), several lymphomas, pneumonia, cytomegalovirus infection, herpes, candidiasis and tuberculosis. Even low T-cell counts without clinical symptoms can be called "AIDS".
Duesberg unfortunately ignores the genocide against Africans under the guise of AIDS. He simply states that other death causes are labelled as AIDS.
Roughly 360,000 HIV positive Haitians have produced only a few hundred AIDS victims.


KOCH’S POSTULATES
Duesberg frequently refers to the fact that Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) as the cause of AIDS doesn’t meet the 4 scientific criteria of Koch’s postulates: 1) The microorganism must be found in abundance in all organisms suffering from the disease, but should not be found in healthy organisms; 2) The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased organism and grown in pure culture; 3) The cultured microorganism should cause disease when introduced into a healthy organism; 4) The microorganism must be reisolated from the inoculated, diseased experimental host and identified as being identical to the original specific causative agent.
On Wikipedia you can read that the state propaganda has simply thrown these scientific standards aside with “Koch’s postulates for the 21st century”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch's_postulates
The failure to kill T-cells, even under optimal conditions, is the Achilles' heel of the theory that HIV causes AIDS. The abundance of uninfected T-cells in AIDS patients is possibly the most important evidence against the many false claims for high viral "loads" or "burdens" in AIDS victims.


HIV/AIDS NOT CONTAGIOUS
The mere fact that since the beginning of “AIDS” the epidemic has never really spread beyond the risk groups is evidence that the HIV virus doesn’t cause AIDS. If HIV would have been the cause of AIDS - and is sexually transmittable - in 10 years practically the whole world population would have been infected with HIV (so if you can read this, the official story was a lie).
After the immune system has made antibodies against HIV, it becomes dormant and can only infect the partner in unprotected sex in 1 out of 1000 cases. On the other hand: a pregnant mother has at least a 50% chance of passing HIV to the unborn baby.
There are some 5,000 wives of HIV-positive haemophiliacs in the USA. About 131 of these women have developed AIDS from 1985 to 1992 (2.6%).
Another interesting brain teaser is that the Phase II "double-blind, placebo controlled trial" for AZT was stopped before the planned 6 months duration, because the AZT group was doing so well. How could they know, if the study was blinded?


VIRUS HUNTERS - SMON
For me the most interesting part of this book is the description of the conflicting interests in medical “science”. I will ignore most of this here because it isn’t specific for AIDS.
What is very interesting in this context, because it resembles the AIDS hoax perfectly is the Subacute Myelo Optico-Neuropathy (SMON) epidemic that claimed thousands of Japanese victims in the 1950s and 1960s, because they were poisoned with the supposed medicine clioquinol.
In 1970 the neurology professor Tadao Tsubaki made the educated guess that SMON patients were dying because of clioquinol (instead of some virus). By July of 1970 he concluded: 96% of the SMON victims had taken clioquinol before the disease appeared and those with the most severe symptoms had taken the highest doses.
1971 saw only 36 cases, 3 in 1972, and 1 in 1973: http://www.primitivism.com/smon.htm


AZT KILLS – VAN LEEUWEN
In a Dutch study they found that AIDS-victims couldn’t stay on the drugs because AZT is too toxic. It was a study of 97 AIDS-victims that were followed for a maximum of 147 weeks (median follow-up period 67 weeks); 70 of these victims died (72%).
Because of AZT the haemoglobin levels and leukocyte counts declined significantly. 56 patients (57%) needed one or more blood transfusions just to survive (the first blood transfusion took place at a median of 26 weeks).
97 of the 91 victims were started on full dose AZT. In the first year of poisoning 68% and in the second year 87% of the patients had at least 1 decrease of the dose (the median for the first dose reduction was 24 weeks). In 65 patients (67%) 103 times the poisoning had to be interrupted. In 33 victims (34%) anemia was the reason for the dose reduction.
At the same time of the first dose reduction, this had to be followed by interrupting the poisoning in 40 cases (71% of the victims with a dose reduction). Only 40% of the victims could stay on AZT for 24 week (without interruptions).
To this date the Physician's Desk Reference quotes the low toxicity of AZT reported by Broder et al in 1986, although the real toxicity of the drug is one thousand times higher according to more than 6 independent studies.
Van Leeuwen et al. – Failure to maintain high-dose treatment regimens during long-term use of zidovudine … (1990): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article...8-0010.pdf


EXAMPLE – LINDSEY NAGEL
Duesberg describes only a few individual AIDS-victims. I repeat some of the atrocities about the adopted HIV-positive baby Lindsey that got poisoned with AIDS-medicine.

Before treatment: "She is [a] very bright, smiling and happy girl," noted the doctor. Lindsey was prescribed Septra, to be taken three times each week. Septra can cause "nausea, vomiting, anorexia," and "bone marrow depression," and also includes "rash, fever, [and] leukopenia" among its side effects.

A week later the doctor prescribed AZT (a chemotherapeutic drug designed to kill growing cells). Lindsey began swallowing a total of 120 milligrams of the drug every single day, in addition to her Septra. AZT kills dividing cells anywhere in the body-causing ulcerations and haemorrhaging; damage to hair follicles and skin; killing mitochondria, the energy cells of the brain; wasting away of muscles; and the destruction of the immune system and other blood cells.
The following month, the doctor strangely began praising Lindsey's "improvement." Upon reflection, the Nagels grew puzzled. What "improvement" could the doctor have meant, since Lindsey had suffered no medical problems at all before the treatment began? By the time Lindsey reached her first birthday on October 15, 1991, her adoptive parents began to lose patience. Becoming suspicious of their doctor for not admitting or discussing these “side effects”, Steve and Cheryl took Lindsey to Dr. Margaret Hostetter at the University of Minnesota clinic.

Hostetter immediately ended the Septra prescription, while increasing Lindsey's AZT dosage. At the Nagels' next visit she credited the baby girl's improvement to the AZT. In fact, she discussed plans to increase the AZT yet again. The doctor praised Lindsey's nonexistent progress at each visit. A few weeks later, the doctor had stretched the Nagels' patience by pressuring them to put Lindsey on ddI (a chemotherapy like AZT).
The tension finally erupted a few days after Lindsey's second birthday on October 15, 1992. Steve and Cheryl woke up one night to the tormented screams of their daughter. The muscle pains were unbearable. Leg massages, Tylenol-they used anything that would allow Lindsey to sleep again.
After the Nagels stopped poisoning Lindsey with AZT, she became a "new" child almost overnight. She started sleeping much better, including longer hours ... Her muscle cramps went away. She started eating at least 2-3 times as much every day as she had ever eaten before.

Dr. Hostetter verbally attacked the Nagels, as if they were 5 years old, "She also said that there are foster homes to provide care for children who were in Lindsey's predicament! (Living with parents who wouldn't give their daughter AZT)".
On October 15, 1995, Lindsey celebrated her fifth birthday-with HIV and without AZT -in excellent health. According to public health officials, she should already have died of AIDS because babies with HIV are supposed to survive only about two years.

Peter Duesberg, and Bryan Ellison - Inventing The AIDS Virus (1996) - 22.5 MB: http://www.whale.to/c/Inventing-the-AIDS...%20(1).pdf

[Firestarter]

Can anybody remember all of the horrible stories in the 1980s and 1990s by the state propaganda about the expected epidemic caused by AIDS? Of course over time the information about AIDS changed (when lies are exposed the media just invents new stories).
There is no AIDS “epidemic”...


No AIDS epidemic
According to the state media, in Africa women represent 60% of people living with HIV.
In the Netherlands the official numbers of confirmed HIV positive victims is: 11,616 gay men; 3659 straight men; 3591 women. That’s only 19% women…
This is a total of 18,866 HIV-victims on a Dutch population of 17 million; a little more than 0.1%.
According to the state propaganda another 2800 HIV positive patients are estimated in the Netherlands that have not yet been discovered.

Here are the numbers worldwide. At the end of 2015, there is an estimated 36.7 million people worldwide living with HIV/AIDS. Only 60% of HIV victims have already been sentenced to AIDS (the remaining 40%, or over 14 million, have simply been added for political reasons).

The majority of HIV victims are in low- and middle-income countries. Especially in sub-Saharan Africa, with an estimated 25.6 million HIV victims in 2015- that’s 70% of the total.
According to these statistrics there can be only 2 causes for AIDS: malnutrition or chemical weapons.

An estimated 35 million people have died from AIDS (since the beginning of the 1980s), including 1.1 million in 2015…
Since June 2016, 18.2 million HIV victims are poisoned with antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the world, up from 15.8 million in June 2015, 7.5 million in 2010, and less than one million in 2000: https://www.aids.gov/hiv-aids-basics/hiv...tatistics/

In one study 50 out of 75 children in Uganda in 1972/1973 were HIV-positive (67%); so you’d expect the same percentage of HIV-positive adults (and since 1972/1973 steadily rising). I remember stories that in some African countries more than 50% are HIV-positive. If this were true, you’d expect a lower world population of humans than of rhino’s (an estimated 29,000). Saxinger et al, Evidence for exposure to HTLV-III in Uganda before 1973 (1985): http://www.harvard.epiinformatics.com/AD...bodies.pdf

In 1985 the UK’s Royal College of Nursing predicted that one million people in Britain ‘‘will have AIDS in six years unless the killer disease is checked’’, in 2000 the official number of AIDS deaths totalled 263.
In Africa doctors are allowed to diagnose AIDS by symptoms like fever, cough, diarrhoea, or weight loss — the so-called Bangui clinical case definition. So in Africa diseases like malaria, tuberculosis or dysentery can be conveniently diagnosed as AIDS.
In nature monkeys do not develop AIDS after being infected with HIV; Silvestri et al, Understanding the benign nature of SIV infection in natural hosts (2007): http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles...733034.pdf

In the following study 167 deaths occurred among 9,583 HIV-positive subjects; only 54 of these deaths were related to AIDS (32%). Neuhaus et al, Risk of All-cause Mortality Associated with Non-fatal AIDS and Serious Non-AIDS Events among Adults Infected with HIV (2011):
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles...203665.pdf


Refusing AIDS-therapy
Over the years some HIV-positive victims didn’t take drugs, see the following quotes.
Dr. David Berner (1995)

Reflecting back on the numbers of diseases I treated in the fifties and sixties which now would be grounds for malpractice, I became skeptical about AZT, knowing it to be a cytotoxic agent.
(...)
I had the temerity to give [Duesberg] a call. I’ll never forget his initial remark. I told him my plight, and he said, ‘If you take AZT, you’ll be dead.’ I read his work and got introduced to other people who were skeptical about AZT.”
“I decided early on to add some vitamin therapies to my already healthy lifestyle, particularly the anti-oxidants beta carotene, ascorbic acid, and vitamin E. Despite my continuing excellent health for a 69 year old — I do a lot of hiking and mountaineering in the wilderness — I have still been pressured by well-meaning clinicians to start AZT ‘before it’s too late!’ I think it’s very difficult for these people to admit that they’re either partially or completely wrong.

Robert Bryant (1998)

Before Ryan White *) there was me. Same doctors, same hospital… [They told me to] take AZT... I said no to the doctors and I am alive. I have been black-balled by the press which made a hero out of White.
(…)
Some people have said that the virus does exist but it’s a harmless one. You’ll test positive for it, but it won’t cause any harm. I’m inclined to believe that. Because I’m not sick. It hasn’t hurt me, and it hasn’t hurt my [HIV+] brothers, and it hasn’t hurt my [HIV+] uncles. And it hasn’t hurt their kids, and it hasn’t hurt their wives.

*) Ryan White was a hemophiliac who died in April of 1990 of unstoppable internal bleeding after taking AZT.

Dr. Scott Gottlieb:

I was prescribed four days of ‘triple therapy’ with the latest protease inhibitors and other antiviral medicines… But those four days left me with a realistic view of what infected patients often face. Between nausea and aching pains in my bones, I felt febrile and weak. I was unable to exercise. After one day, I was no longer well enough to work, to go out with my friends or to eat a full meal without vomiting. While it is true that over time some people are able to tolerate the drugs better than others, for many patients these symptoms never go away. Many doctors and the pharmaceutical industry have failed to convey the human toll that ‘triple therapy’ takes…

According to 2 European studies from 2011 the most common causes of deaths in HIV-positive victims are not AIDS but cancer and liver failure (since AZT isn’t a monotherapy anymore but only part of the ART cocktail the death rate has decreased substantially): https://www.poz.com/article/hiv-deaths-m...20011-5126

Several studies show that much more children born to mothers poisoned with AZT in pregnancy get severely sick and die than of untreated (HIV-positive) mothers. Rapid disease progression in HIV-1 perinatally infected children born to mothers receiving zidovudinemonotherapy during pregnancy (1999): http://journals.lww.com/aidsonline/pages...e=abstract


Whistleblowers
I couldn’t find much information on on how AIDS-whistleblowers’ lives have been destroyed…
Here’s (the beginning of?) a list of AIDS-whistleblowers that faced some problems. I will not describe what their different stances are on the cause of AIDS.

The most interesting story is about Professor Peter H. Duesberg.
In 1991, a government-appointed panel of scientists, decided not to renew Duesberg’s research grants. Before raising questions about the role of HIV in AIDS causation, Duesberg’s grant applications were never denied. Duesberg remains cut off from all NIH funding, and commutes to Germany to conduct his scientific work.
Dr. Kuritzkes demanded that denialists like Peter Duesberg be denied access to students and reported to authorities. WSJ reporter Marilyn Chase warned reporters not to unintentionally "exalt the position of denialists by making them seem like just some sort of independent intellectual contrarian whose views really should be heeded”.
On May 13, 2008, Semmelweis Society International (SSI) presented the Semmelweis "Clean Hands" Award to Professor Peter Duesberg and Investigative Journalist Celia Farber. Farber had interviewed Duesberg first in 1988: http://aidswiki.net/index.php?title=Docu...s_Duesberg
The NIH barred Farber from further contact with their scientists and labelled her a "threat to public health". In May 2008, Richard Jefferys - of the “independent” AIDS Activist group TAG - led the campaign to antagonise the SSI over the Farber/Duesberg awards. Clark Barker was hired by the SSI to investigate if Duesberg and Farber deserved the award. Immediately some former SSI-members told Barker that Duesberg and Farber are liars and responsible for millions of deaths by AIDS in Africa and insisted that he would stop the investigation. When Barker wouldn’t listen; on June 19th they initiated a "spam attack" against him: http://robertscottbell.blogspot.nl/2008/...s-egg.html

William R. Holub - After publishing an article in 1988 about AIDS, was blacklisted from work in both industrial biotechnology and academia. He lost his home, was forced into bankruptcy, and now supports his wife and children with a job handling toxic chemicals, supplemented by delivering newspapers.
Philip Artz Kees - Charges were brought against him in 1985 before the California Medical Board after he testified about the promiscuous administration of psychotropic drugs like haldol, prolixine and thorazine at Patton State Hospital. His medical license was suspended (revoked in 1992) throughout his 7 years of hearings, which led to bankruptcy.
Edward J. Wawszkiewicz – After publishing questions about the established AIDS thinking, was suddenly labelled "mentally ill" by the University in 1986, forced to stop teaching and with no salary and is now (1994) struggling to stay alive on food stamps.
Nathaniel S. Lehrman – Was critical of the official AIDS story since 1985. He was set up by his colleague, was persecuted for Medicaid fraud that this colleague had committed, lost his medical license. He was convicted in 1991 to 1-3 years in prison, $250,000 in "restitution" and a fine of $100,000 by a Health Department administrative judge: http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/newsletters/1994-01.pdf

Dr. Etienne de Harven was censored in France for trying to expose the AIDS fraud: https://fauxcapitalist.com/2013/07/27/fo...-and-aids/

Johan Van Dongen from the Netherlands discovered that Aids and Ebola were manmade. He lost his job at the University of Maastricht and his house: https://joelsavage1.wordpress.com/2015/1...al-crimes/


Whistleblower Willner – proves HIV doesn’t cause AIDS
Dr. Robert E. Willner was another AIDS-whistleblower. He published a book in 1994 “The Deadly Deception. The Proof That Sex And HIV Absolutely Do Not Cause AIDS”.
Here’s an interview with Willner about HIV/AIDS; he claims that HIV is not the cause of AIDS, AZT causes death and that “In New York and San Francisco only 7% of AIDS victims were HIV positive”: http://whale.to/c/conspiracy_nation.html

In 1993 Willner injected himself with HIV+ blood on the telescreen in Spain. He repeated this stunt several times.
On December 7, 1994 Willner injected himself with the blood of a HIV-positive victim to prove his point that HIV is harmless (see the picture). This video itself is pretty good - a group of some 30 people asking questions to Willner about AIDS: http://theunhivedmind.com/wordpress4/dr-...elf-on-tv/


Willner also favoured alternative treatment for cancer; so they suspended his medical license in 1990. It shouldn’t surprise us that he died on April 15, 1995 of a “heart attack”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Willner

The following video shows Dr. Biswaroop Roy Chowdhury, who explains that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS.
Like Robert Willner some 25 years ago, Chowdhury is prepared to inject himself with the blood of somebody sentenced to HIV-positive status...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EKhL36Qo0Ds

[Firestarter]

Papadopulos-Eleopulos

Here’s a summary of an article and interview by important AIDS-whistleblower Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos with important evidence that HIV isn’t the cause of AIDS.

In this paper Papadopulos-Eleopulos concludes that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS. To make reading a little easier first (this paper is not an easy read) a translation for 2 of the “scientific” words: “HTLV- III” is another name for HIV. “T4 cells” are the T-cells that according to the official story are destroyed by HIV (T8-cells aren’t effected by HIV).

In 1985, Gallo and his colleagues (Gallo et al., 1985) showed that in mitogenically stimulated lymphocyte cultures from AIDS patients or in cultures from healthy donors "infected" with HIV, there is a decrease in the total number of viable cells. However:
(i) the decrease in viable cells begins before a significant increase in reverse transcriptase activity (RT), that is, HIV expression;
(ii) the rate of cell loss remains the same even when the expression of HIV (RT), is maximum
(…)

According to Claude Ameisen and André Capron from the Pasteur Institute, not one of the mechanisms "proposed to account for these TH-cell defects, including: (1) immune suppression, or its opposite, hyperactivation and exhaustion of the TH cells, (2) inhibitory signals mediated by HIV viral or regulatory gene products, (3) autoimmune responses, (4) selective infection and destruction of memory TH cells, (5) syncytia formation between infected and uninfected cells, and (6) inappropriate immune killing of uninfected cells", is satisfactory
(…)

At present it is also known that:
(a) for the expression of HIV phenomena (RT, virus-like particles, antigen/antibody reactions), activation (mitogenic stimulation) is a necessary requirement (Klatzmann & Montagnier, 1986; Ameisen & Capron, 1991; Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al., 1992b);
(b) activation (stimulation) is induced by oxidation (Papadopulos-Eleopulos, 1982; Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al., 1992b);
Since both AIDS cultures and AIDS patients are exposed to mitogens (activating agents), all of which are oxidising agents (Papadopulos-Eleopulos, 1988), both apoptosis and the phenomena upon which the presence of HIV is based (viral-like particles, RT, antigen/antibody reactions (WB), "HIV-PCR- hybridisation"), may all be the direct result of oxidative stress and therefore their specificity questionable (Papadopulos-Eleopulos, 1988; Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al., 1992a; Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al., 1992b).
As far back as January 1985 Montagnier wrote, "....replication and cytopathic effect of LAV can only be observed in activated T4 cells
(…)

In considering the data from haemophiliacs, a group of British researchers, including the well known retrovirologist Robin Weiss, concluded in 1985: "We have thus been able to compare lymphocyte subset data before and after infection with HTLV- III. It is commonly assumed that the reduction in T-helper- cell numbers is a result of the HTLV-III virus being tropic for T-helper-cells. Our finding in this study that T-helper- cell numbers and the helper/suppressor ratio did not change after infection supports our previous conclusion that the abnormal T-lymphocyte subsets are a result of the intravenous infusion of factor VIII concentrates per se, not HTLV-III infection" (Ludlam et al., 1985)
(…)

one must conclude that:
(a) the decrease in the T4 cell numbers and increase in T8 cell numbers in "HIV infected" cultures and individuals is due to agents other than HIV; HIV is neither necessary nor sufficient for the induction of the above phenomenon;
(b) in vivo the above changes may not be due to a selective destruction of T4 cells and increased proliferation of T8 cells, but loss of T4 surface markers and acquisition of T8 surface markers

Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al. – “A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE HIV-T4-CELL-AIDS HYPOTHESIS” (1995): http://www.sidasante.com/themes/cd4/ept4cells.htm


The following interview of Papadopulos-Eleopulos (EPE) by Johnson (CJ) from 1997 is even more extreme. It comes to 4 conclusions that are bizarre if you’re a believer in the state propaganda on AIDS.
It’s better readable than the previous paper...

1 - HIV isn’t a virus at all.

Montagnier and Gallo published electron micrographs of a few particles which they claimed are a retrovirus and are HIV. But photographs don’t prove particles are a virus and the existence of HIV was not proven using the method presented at the 1973 meeting.
Montagnier and Gallo did use density gradient banding but for some unknown reason they did not publish any EMs of the material at 1.16 gm/ml which they and everyone afterwards call "pure HIV".
There are a few particles which the researchers claim are retroviral particles. In fact, they claim these are the HIV particles but give no evidence why. The band should contain billions and when you take an electron micrograph they should fill the entire picture. They bear only the vaguest resemblance to retroviral particles.
Let me repeat, there is no question of isolation. Gallo did not isolate a virus. There were no electron microscope pictures of a banded specimen that one would expect to show nothing but retroviral particles.

2 – HIV cannot be a retrovirus because it’s too large and doesn’t have knobs.

Retroviruses are incredibly tiny, almost spherical particles that have an outer envelope covered with knobs and an inner core consisting of some proteins and RNA.
All the AIDS experts agree that the knobs are absolutely essential for the HIV particle to lock on to a cell. As the first step in infecting that cell. So, no locking on, no infection. The experts all claim that the knobs contain a protein called gp120 which is the hook in the knobs that grabs hold of the surface of the cell it’s about to infect.(14) If HIV particles do not have knobs how is HIV able to replicate? And if it can't replicate, HIV is not an infectious particle.
Gallo and all other retrovirologists, as well as Hans Gelderblom who has done most of the electron microscopy studies of HIV, agree that retrovirus particles are almost spherical in shape, have a diameter of 100-120 nanometres and are covered with knobs.(12,13) The particles the two groups claim are HIV are not spherical, no diameter is less than 120nM, in fact many of them have major diameters exceeding twice that permitted for a retrovirus. And none of them appear to have knobs.

3 – The CDC uses a subjective definition for AIDS.

In fact, according to the CDC AIDS definition, you don’t even need to be HIV infected to be diagnosed as AIDS. That’s what I mean about being subjective. It’s like a physician seeing a patient with fever, diarrhoea, vomiting, weakness and shock and then declaring the cause is cholera. Sure it might be cholera but what about the dozens of other germs that cause a similar pattern?

4 – Haemophiliacs can’t be infected with HIV by donor blood.

CJ: I must confess I find it very hard to accept that haemophiliacs have not been infected through contaminated clotting concentrates. And I bet haemophiliacs do too.
EPE: Tell me this. If someone HIV positive is cut and bleeds how long does the blood remain infectious? Outside the body?
CJ: According to what I’ve read, for only a few hours at the most.
EPE: How is factor VIII made? All right I’ll tell you. It comes as a dry, flaky, yellowish powder and by the time it’s used it’s at least a couple of months old. Do you see the problem?
CJ: I do. If it’s dry and that old any HIV in it should be long dead.

Interview Papadopulos-Eleopulos (EPE) by Johnson (CJ) in 1997: http://www.theperthgroup.com/INTERVIEWS/cjepe.html


I add - which isn’t mentioned in the interview with Papadopulos-Eleopulos - that there is not one shred of evidence that HIV-antibodies exist (HIV isn’t even a virus!).

[Firestarter]

Epidemic Intelligence Service; Medavoy

The Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) has been dubbed the “medical CIA” by Peter Duesberg. It appears to me that the main objective of the EIS is to manipulate the news on health “care”.

Here you can find some of the health scares that have been promoted by the EIS, including Legionnaires’ disease, Ebola and Zika microcephaly: http://web.archive.org/web/2017120912235.../news.html

For more information on Zika: http://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewtopi...f=21&t=426

The following PDF shows some of the highlights of the EIS.
1951 - CDC establishes the EIS training program in response to the threat of biological warfare during the Korean War.

1955 - EIS officers trace 260 polio cases to unsafe vaccines made by a California pharmaceutical company (the Cutter incident).
For more information on polio (vaccines): http://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewtopi...=21&t=1151

1964 - CDC assigns an EIS officer to work on family planning, expanding the EIS’s work to global depopulation.

1976 - EIS officers help set up a field laboratory in Sierra Leone to investigate the cause of a deadly fever found in Lassa, Nigeria, in 1969. EIS officers in Zaire and Sudan investigate a mysterious fever. Of 318 people infected, 280 (90%) die; later dubbed Ebola after a nearby river.
1976 - CDC investigators with the help of more than 20 EIS officers blame the legionella bacteria for Legionnaires’ disease for the 1976 outbreak in Philadelphia. Retroactively also “outbreaks” in 1965 and 1968 are labelled Legionnaires’ disease.

1981 - An EIS officer and a Los Angeles physician publish an MMWR article describing the occurrence of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia among a total of 5 young gay males. This “epidemic” is later called AIDS, and blamed on the magical HIV virus.
1987 - EIS officers assist health departments in conducting HIV seroprevalence surveys. This helps health officials to monitor HIV infections and evaluate, prioritise and sentence Targeted Individuals to AIDS.

2003 - More than 100 EIS officers were involved in “investigating” the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) outbreak in China. I thought that communist China and the USA were sworn enemies…
2012 - CDC begins the Global Polio Eradication Initiative. EIS officers begin polio surveillance as part of CDC’s efforts, since then the incidence of paralysis in the developing world has increased considerably.
A Snapshot of public health achievements (2015),: https://www.cdc.gov/eis/downloads/eis-ti...ooklet.pdf

EIS was the brainchild of Alexander Langmuir. In 1949, the CDC was interested in expanding beyond its mandate for malaria control. Federal officials granted millions of dollars, and the first EIS class started in July 1951.
Nearly 2,000 EIS trainees occupy key positions in national and international health care. Former US Surgeon General William H. Stewart is a member, as are 2 other assistant Surgeon Generals. Jonathan Mann and Michael Merson, past and present heads of the World Health Organization's global AIDS Program, both trained with the EIS.
The New York Times’ chief medical correspondent, Lawrence Altman, is a member, like Bruce Dan, former ABC News medical editor and former senior editor of the Journal of the American Medical Association. Marvin Turck, the editor at the University of Washington'' Journal of Infectious Diseases, joined EIS in 1960.

In 1976 there were some troubles in getting the “swine flu” vaccine accepted by Congress, over some concerns of adverse effects.
Then in July 1976, in one of those strange coincidences, a group of pneumonia cases suddenly appeared in Philadelphia, days after American Legion members had returned home. On August 2, after receiving word of this outbreak, personnel in the CDC's swine-flu war room established contact with Jim Beecham, an EIS officer on assignment in the Philadelphia health department.
When the CDC personnel arrived, pre-positioned EIS members such as Beecham and top health adviser Robert Sharrar began following orders from the incoming CDC team.
With a nationwide hysteria rapidly developing, Congress quickly approved the “swine flu” vaccine. Some 50 million Americans were vaccinated over several months, producing at least 1,000 cases of severe nerve damage and paralysis, dozens of deaths, and nearly $100 million in liability claims.
Within days of the legislative approval, the EIS team finally acknowledged that the pneumonia was not related to swine flu. Later this was called Legionnaires’ disease.

In 1981, the White House was considering cutting the CDC budget by 23%, but then in one of those strange coincidences, AIDS arrived.
EIS officer Wayne Shandera, on active assignment in the Los Angeles health department, received a call from Michael Gottlieb, from the UCLA, about 4 patients with pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and serious immune deficiencies. Shandera had already heard about a 5th case. All 5 were young homosexuals; this was the official start of what later was called the Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) “epidemic”.
Shandera forwarded the data to his unofficial bosses at the CDC. New reports were trickling in of dying male homosexuals, most also suffered from a rare skin cancer known as Kaposi's sarcoma and Opportunistic Infections (KSOI). The task force that "investigated", was loaded with EIS members like Harold Jaffe and Mary Guinan.

Within just 11 days after the first report of AIDS appeared in June 1981, EIS member Donald Francis placed a telephone call to Myron Essex. Francis already “knew” that the new syndrome must be caused by a retrovirus - with a long latency period between infection and disease. Francis had already mapped out the entire future of the disease…
Any other cause than an infectious virus was completely ignored. EIS agents hunted down every heroin addict and blood transfusion recipient with illnesses, which were labelled immune deficiencies. EIS personnel scoured hospitals and monitored local health departments for patients, and within months found a handful of heroin users with opportunistic infections.
EIS member Bruce Evatt and Dale Lawrence tracked down a haemophiliac in Colorado, dying of internal bleeding, who also had pneumonia. EIS agent Harry Haverkos travelled to Florida and Haiti to find impoverished Haitians with tuberculosis. Instantly the heroin addicts, the haemophiliac, and the Haitians were all relabelled as AIDS, and the CDC trumpeted the news that AIDS had "spread" outside the homosexual community.

After Montagnier's paper on the “HIV virus” was published in 1983, Robert Gallo was pushed by the EIS to discover the same virus. He didn’t, but by April of 1984 Gallo was ready to announce having found a similar retrovirus, which he dubbed HTLV-III. By 24 April, EIS member Lawrence Altman in the New York Times named it the "AIDS virus".
In 1992, some scientists reported HIV-free AIDS cases. The unexplained AIDS cases were simply relabelled Idiopathic CD4+ Lymphocytopenia (ICL): http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/beeis.htm
(archived here: http://archive.is/QFPT3)


I’ve found an interview between Jon Rappoport and “Ellis Medavoy”. The problem is that “Ellis Medavoy” is a pseudonym, so we have to “believe” Rappoport that it’s real. The reason that I post a link to the description of the interview with “Medavoy” is that the narrative fits what happened in the 1980s with AIDS. I don’t believe that Rappoport could have made this up even if he tried...

Since 1987, Rappoport repeatedly talked to “Ellis”, who told him he was one of the spin doctors influencing the press with (false) information on AIDS that has since become the official story. “Ellis” said he quit because he saw that he was a pawn in a vast depopulation effort.
“Ellis” said:

When I got this assignment. I knew I was in some very important territory. The world was going to be told a lie, and they were supposed to believe that lie. Civilians, doctors, researchers, politicians - they all had to swallow the propaganda.

In 1983, a year before HIV (aka HTLV-III) was announced to the world as the official cause of AIDS, “Ellis” already knew that Robert Gallo would be the messenger for "some kind of retrovirus that would be said to be the driving force behind a global plague".
Gallo was selected for this task because they knew he would stop at nothing to become rich and famous.

In the spring of 1987, “Ellis” was informed that Peter Duesberg was a threat to the official story on AIDS. Duesberg argued that if the blood test to determine of somebody was HIV-positive found antibodies it would be unlikely that HIV would harm the patients. Based on this story it would be impossible to develop a vaccine against AIDS that would produce the same antibodies.
Duesberg's principal ally at the time was Harvey Bialy, the research editor of Bio/Technology, a sister publication of Nature.
Phillip Johnson not only agreed with Duesberg, but was better at presenting the arguments against HIV in speaking forums.

Arguably even more dangerous were the stories of people diagnosed as HIV-positive or even "full-blown AIDS" who were surviving quite well. They were rejecting the whole HIV story, stayed away from AZT, were exercising more, changed their diets and stopped taking drugs. These people were living testimonials that they could heal without big pharma and "doctors".
"Ellis" said:

A lot of what we did at this point was stop things from getting into print. That's often more important than planting lies. As far as Duesberg was concerned, I can tell you there were many newspapers and magazines who were ready to give his views some space. You know, maverick scientist rejects HIV as cause of AIDS.
So we began a coordinated effort to keep that from happening. We let the scientists at NIH, who had the most to lose if Duesberg could establish a credible beachhead, handle the PR on rejecting Duesberg's science. They engaged in some character assassination as well, which was fine. We, on the other side, got 'reliable sources' to go to those newspapers and magazines and tell them that to print anything good about Duesberg was DANGEROUS and IRRESPONSIBLE. That was our tack.

AIDS is a label given to a whole variety of disease conditions not caused by HIV in any way, direct or indirect. Immune suppression can be caused by all of the following: contaminated heroin; medical drugs (like corticosteroids); starvation; contaminated water; pesticides; intestinal parasites over treated with antibiotics; syphilis; massive drug taking (MDA) combined with many sex partners; vaccines given to people with weak immune systems.
Here’s probably the most interesting quote from “Ellis”:

These operatives knew, and had been briefed on this, that T-cells could actually vary all over the place, up and down, depending on factors like the time of day a person was given the test. It was another area of shoddy science, and they took advantage of it. I'll give you an example.
You've got some guy who has been told he's HIV positive, and so, even though he's not sick at all, he gets tested every few months for numbers of T-cells. Sooner or later, those numbers will go down on a test. If the doctor isn't really attentive, he'll tell the patient he is now officially diagnosed with full-blown AIDS, because those numbers are too low. If the patient hasn't been taking AZT yet, he will go for it now.

http://www.whale.to/b/rappoport11.html
(archived here: http://archive.is/FHyYK)

[Firestarter]

AIDS – caused by vaccines?

There are some theories that AIDS was caused by vaccines. As there are lots of possible causes for immune deficiency I’m not convinced, but I can’t rule this hypothesis out.


Leonard Horrowitz has written a book about the invention of AIDS in which he argues that Dr. Robert Gallo was making a virus like HIV/AIDS from Fort Detrick for many years. After Dr. Luc Montagnier in France discovered HIV and hoped it could be labelled the cause of AIDS, he sent the virus to Gallo. Gallo used the virus of Montagnier to claim being one of the first to discover it.
Horrowitz follows most arguments of Dr. Robert B. Strecker, that the “AIDS virus” is a retrovirus that´s been manmade by combining bovine leukaemia virus of cattle and visna virus of sheep. When Horrowitz found reports from Gallo from 1971, 1972 about modifying simian monkey virus by infusing them with cat leukaemia RNA, he thinks this is like making cancers as seen in people with AIDS.
I don’t believe that this is possible though that’t not even counting that he contradicts himself by claiming that Gallo made the HIV virus and then had to used the virus Montagnier found to claim he had discovered it...

In 1970 Dr. MacArthur was supplied with $10 million from the Department of Defense (DoD) to “produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired”.
On July 30th, 1977, the United States’ congress annotated Title 50, Chapter 32, Section 1520 for the DoD, that states that chemical and biological agents can be tested on humans.
In 1978 advertisements in New York, Los Angeles and San Francisco were issued specifically asking for promiscuous homosexuals. George W. Merck’s pharmaceutical company was involved in this experiment in which the participants were injected with HIV (according to Horrowitz). In 1981 the first stories in the media appeared about AIDS in homosexuals from the New York, Los Angeles and San Francisco areas.

In 1986 and 1987 AZT was approved rapidly, first in Great Britain, and then the USA. The commissions approving AZT had a lot of decision makers with financial ties to Burroughs Wellcome (the manufacturer of AZT, later merged with another company and renamed GlaxoSmithKline). John Lauritsen used the Freedom of Information Act to get information on the phases I en II trials in the USA and concludes from the evaluation of Ellen Cooper that many died in these trials on AZT.
Burroughs was fully owned by the Wellcome trust, at that time controlled by Lord Oliver Franks, among others director of the Rockefeller Foundation.

Leonard Horrowitz - EMERGING VIRUSES: AIDS & EBOLA (1996): http://ethosworld.com/library/Leonard-G....996%29.pdf


On July 30th, 1977, the United States Code annotated Title 50, Chapter 32, Section 1520 of the DoD was signed. This approves the testing of chemical weapons on human victims: “Use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents by Department of Defense; accounting to Congressional committees with respect to experiments and studies; notification of local civilian officials”.

For more arguments that AIDS was made in the USA see the following links: http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLE...AIDS3.html
http://www.whale.to/b/walker_azt.doc



On March 17, 1978 a nice memorandum was signed by Secretary of State Zbigniew Brezinski “NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM-46”. This led to recommendations on the US policy towards Black Africa.
Memorandum-46 was (is) a plan to discredit “black” people in general.
Because the state propaganda invented that the cause of HIV was sexual promiscuity and sharing needles for injecting drugs, convincing us that black Africans were often HIV-positive was in reality (also) a strategy to discredit them:

2. Special clandestine operations should be launched by the CIA to generate mistrust and hostility in American and world opinion against joint activity of the two forces, and to cause division among Black African radical national groups and their leaders
(...)
4. The FBI should mount surveillance operations against Black African representatives and collect sensitive information on those, especially at the U.N., who oppose U.S. policy toward South Africa. The information should include facts on their links with the leaders of the Black movement in the United States, thus making possible at least partial neutralization of the adverse effects of their activity (...)
(b) to elaborate and bring into effect a special program designed to perpetuate division in the Black movement and neutralize the most active groups of leftist radical organizations representing different social strata of the Black community: to encourage division in Black circles;
© to preserve the present climate which inhibits the emergence from within the Black leadership of a person capable of exerting nationwide appeal
(...)
(e) to support actions designed to sharpen social stratification in the Black community which would lead to the widening and perpetuation of the gap between successful educated Blacks and the poor, giving rise to growing antagonism between different Black groups and a weakening of the movement as a whole
(...)
(g) to take every possible means through the AFL-CIO leaders to counteract the increasing influence of Black labor organizations which function in all major unions and in particular, the National Coalition of Black Trade Union and its leadership including the creation of real preference for adverse and hostile reaction among White trade unionists to demands for improvement of social and economic welfare of the Blacks
(...)
This would promote the achievement of a twofold purpose:
first, it would be easier to control the activity of loyal black representatives within existing institution;
second, the idea of an independent black political party now under discussion within black leadership circles would soon lose all support.

http://www.finalcall.com/memorandum-46.htm


I have found a 11 May 1987 article in the London Times, that shows that argues that smallpox vaccination by the WHO could have been the cause of AIDS.

The Aids epidemic may have been triggered by the mass vaccination campaign which eradicated smallpox. The World Health Organization, which masterminded the 13-year campaign, is studying new scientific evidence suggesting that immunization with the smallpox vaccine Vaccinia awakened the unsuspected, dormant human immuno defence virus infection (HIV).

Some experts fear that in obliterating one disease, another disease was transformed from a minor endemic illness of the Third World into the current pandemic. While doctors now accept that Vaccinia can activate other viruses, they are divided about whether it was the main catalyst to the Aids epidemic.

But an adviser to WHO who disclosed the problem, told The Times: 'I thought it was just a coincidence until we studied the latest findings about the reactions which can be caused by Vaccinia. Now I believe the smallpox vaccine theory is the explanation to the explosion of Aids.' 'In obliterating one disease, another was transformed.'

Further evidence comes from the Walter Reed Army Medical Centre in Washington. While smallpox vaccine is no longer kept for public health purposes, new recruits to the American armed services are immunized as a precaution against possible biological warfare. Routine vaccination of a 19-year-old recruit was the trigger for stimulation of dormant HIV virus into Aids.

This discovery of how people with subclinical HIV infection are at risk of rapid development of Aids as a vaccine-induced disease was made by a medical team working with Dr Robert Redfield at Walter Reed. The recruit who developed Aids after vaccination had been healthy throughout high school. He was given multiple immunizations, followed by his first smallpox vaccination.

Two and a half weeks later he developed fever, headaches, neck stiffness and night sweats. Three weeks later he was admitted to Walter Reed suffering from meningitis and rapidly developed further symptoms of Aids and died after responding for a short time to treatment. There was no evidence that the recruit had been involved in any homosexual activity.

In describing their discovery in a paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine a fortnight ago, the Walter Reed team gave a warning against a plan to use modified versions of the smallpox vaccine to combat other diseases in developing countries.

(…)
The smallpox vaccine theory would account for the position of each of the seven Central African states which top the league table of most-affected countries; why Brazil became the most afflicted Latin American country; and how Haiti became the route for the spread of Aids to the US. It also provides an explanation of how the infection was spread more evenly between males and females in Africa than in the West and why there is less sign of infection among five to 11-year-olds in Central Africa.

Although no detailed figures are available, WHO information indicated that the Aids league table of Central Africa matches the concentration of vaccinations. The greatest spread of HIV infection coincides with the most intense immunization programmes, with the number of people immunised being as follows: Zaire 36,878,000; Zambia 19,060,000; Tanzania 14,972,000; Uganda 11,616,000; Malawai 8,118,000; Ruanda 3,382,000 and Burundi 3,274,000.

Brazil, the only South American country covered in the eradication campaign, has the highest incidence of Aids in that region. About 14,000 Haitians, on United Nations secondment to Central Africa, were covered in the campaign. They began to return home at a time when Haiti had become a popular playground for San Francisco homosexuals.

https://www.wanttoknow.info/870511vaccineaids
(archived here: http://archive.is/UWPdR)


I’ve searched for the referenced Robert Redfield “scientific” report that was referred to in the last article, but couldn’t find a freely viewable version – Redfield et al – Disseminated Vaccinia in a Military Recruit with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Disease (1987): http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJ...3123161106

[Firestarter]

Judy Mikovits – retroviruses in vaccines


This could be THE single most shocking “medical” story that I’ve heard in 2018...


Molecular biologist Judy Anne Mikovits was part of a scientific team that discovered xenotropic murine leukemia virus (XMRV) in many of the study subjects with cancer, motor-neuron disorders and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS).
In 2009, the team published this study, which understandably got very controversial. The team concluded that the XMRV retrovirus came from mice. This was probably caused by contaminated vaccines.

In October 2011, Mikovits was fired and subsequently arrested on 18 November, because she wouldn’t admit that her 2009 paper was a fraud for manipulation of data and theft (of her own notebooks).
The criminal charges against her were dismissed.

The paper was retracted 23 December 2011, with the excuse that the mouse retroviruses they found weren’t in the human blood, but were contaminants (which is unlikely): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judy_Mikovits


The following interview with Judy Mikovits is a good summary of what she has to say (12:15).
https://youtu.be/rhZETbXCqCM


Following is a transcript of an interview of Judy Mikovits by Wendy Myers.

They found retroviruses, similar to HIV, in patients with chronic fatigue Syndrome, which must have come in their bloodstream by vaccines.
A lot of diseases are caused by these mouse retroviruses, including AIDS and cancer.

In 2009, we published a paper showing retroviruses, viruses similar to HIV, were being isolated. We isolated them from patients with the disease also from their family members, also from people with cancer and autism.
And so these retroviruses now, HIV/AIDS-like viruses, are causing even worse than HIV/AIDS. They're causing these diseases which destroy your immune system and your brain, and the worst part about it is you don't die. You simply suffer for decades with no brain, in horrible pain, can't sleep, can't think, can't work. And the government had basically been calling these people crazy, because you look fine. You look pretty like you and me sitting here. And everybody says, "Oh, she can't be sick.”
(...)

Yeah, yeah, yeah. So we wrote the book Plague. Kent Heckenlively is a former attorney, and he had an injured daughter, a severely vaccineinjured daughter, in one of our family studies isolating these HIV/AIDSlike viruses. Well, my colleagues from HIV and the National Cancer Institute were all working with us at the Whittemore Peterson Institute, and they were finding a much bigger incidence of these viruses. And they're mouse viruses, so they're related to mice. They're mice endogenous retroviruses that have jumped into people, and that's how they cause disease. The HIV-like virus came from monkeys into people.
And one of my colleagues from HIV wrote a paper in January of 2011 and said, "The most likely way that mouse viruses got into human is vaccines and biological therapies." All of our biological therapies essentially since the early '90s or mid '80s are biological therapies that now we understood from my work and from his commentary paper were most likely entering humans from not only vaccines but our biological cancer therapies, because they're all made in mice.
(...)

So chronic fatigue syndrome is really a big closet disease. It's a shameful stigma name because in America, you can't be tired. And they do the same thing, blame the victim, and just say you're crazy, and oh, suck it up and get up and go work. And when these devastating viruses hit your brain, you're literally destroyed. So what our book does is walk through my arrest, my jailing. So it opens with my arrest. And so I get held in jail for five days without seeing a lawyer, with all of my constitutional-

On a fake charge without a warrant, without anything. I was called a fugitive from justice, but you can be a fugitive if there's no crime.
(…)

The truth is essentially every vaccine is contaminated and/or they're making them out of backbones of retroviruses. And the sad truth is that the retroviruses stay in your genome for generations, and the murine leukemia, the gammaretroviruses from mice, can infect stem cells. So generations, grandma can have MECFS, and child can get it from grandma, inherit the sequence, and then the vaccines amplify it because there are many, many more viruses in there. Because the retroviruses, you don't have to have the particle, you just have the sequence. So anywhere there is animal cell line or cellular material, the sequence is only 8000 base pairs. It's called a provirus. And the provirus needs your cells in order to make a particle and be infectious and transmissible, and that's a really important part. But we're injuring literally thousands, tens of thousands, millions of base pairs of DNA in every single vaccine containing cow retroviruses, mouse retroviruses, pig retroviruses. And in fact, if you look at the CDC excipient list for the RotaTeq, the RotaTeq vaccine. They list two pig retroviruses in there, and they say, "Oh, but they don't do anything to humans." By definition, if you inject an animal retrovirus in a human, and it is expressed, it will hurt you.
(...)

Well, it's interesting, because we all have retroviruses that are immune system has crippled. They're called endogenous retroviruses, so they're not infectious and transmissible. And so meaning they're just silenced, and your immune system has kept them silent. And you have to keep them silent. So really it becomes a big conundrum. You don't want to test and say, "Do I have a retrovirus?" We know that you have lots of retroviruses, and there are pieces and parts and components of those retroviruses in every vaccine. And what we've learned now is you don't have to have an infectious retrovirus, just the components, just the pieces and parts, just the envelope gene, and the glyphosate in vaccines, or the mercury, or the aluminum that actually cripple the parts of the immune system that keep them silent. So it's literally a time bomb because we all have retroviruses, but mine are silent. Mine aren't turned on, because I'm 60 years old, and most 60-year-olds only got two vaccines. So it's not just a vaccine, it's the shear numbers of these things. And it's not just the components and the retroviral elements in the vaccines, it's the mercury. Because every time you get one, it's like throwing gasoline on a fire. So the kids get sicker and sicker and sicker.

Mikovits also discovered that her superiors were committing fraud.

Yes. And I also uncovered that my supervisors were misappropriating federal funds, and they were also selling al diagnostic test that hadn't been properly validated for the family of viruses. And so I discovered this huge criminal ring surrounding the University of Nevada, Harry Reid, Harvey Whittemore. And basically, they were using this discovery.
Harvey Whittemore had been embezzling money from his business partners, and they caught him. And they were threatening to kill him

And he had lied to the FBI about a election fraud with regard to Harry Reid, so Harry Reid wasn't actually legally elected. And they were paying people basically to donate to his campaign. So lots of other things going on there. And I had discovered this. In late August and early September, I discovered the scientific fraud and the misappropriation of federal funds by actually the first author on our paper, who was basically taking the money out of the research lab and putting it in the company, which is a big, big no-no, and not doing his job. And he was being paid for it. And so they were taking our data and using it.

AIDS couldn’t have been caused by HIV.

So the hope, and that's why we put the story in the book about Magic Johnson, because my PhD thesis, the dogma at the time I was doing my research, was that all our therapies in HIV were made towards the T-cell. And it was let yourself get sicker and sicker and don't use these dangerous drugs, because they're too dangerous, and they'll kill you.
Well, what my research showed we knew only one in 10,000 T-cells was infected. And I said something else is the orchestrator. So the orchestrator of the disease turned out to be the macrophage, the brain microglia, and what's the biggest damage from aluminum? The brain microglia, the macrophages all over your body. You have different microglia, different macrophage subsets that do different specialized things. Like fatty liver is our microglia in our liver, the Kupffer cells getting sick. And that's all the toxins, all the poisons, things like that.

I believe that there is only one way to keep ourselves mentally and physically healthy:
Good nutrition;
Keep away from toxics;
Regular exercise.

I don’t believe in wonder medicines, but in preventing disease instead, but Suramin is probably better than the AIDS drugs that are used these days.
Mikovits claims that Suramin is a cure for autism, but Bayern took it away from the kids.

Well, as natural products. So you can use teas. You can use herbs. You can use 100-year old Bayer drug called suramin, S-U-R-A-M-I-N, and that drug is 100-year-old drug, and we know how to use it safely. And so an investigator, and I won't use his name, in San Diego, did a small clinical trial in autism with suramin used properly.
We used to do a lot of research in the early '80s. It was one of our first HIV drugs. We pulled everything off the shelf that made sense that might work. And so suramin actually was curative for autism. And Bayer, the drug company, took it away from the kids. You cannot get it. It can heal these kids like Kent Heckenlively's daughter who hasn't spoke a word and is desperately I'll. She looks like an AIDS patient, because that's what she is. And he can't get the drug. And so this just happened in the last year. So our book is revealing when you cure a disease, you know what caused it.

And so suramin was actually the reason why we didn't use it in HIV is what did it work best on? Oh, the gammaretroviruses from mice. The retroviruses that we found from mice. And so HIV is a different family of viruses, so the suramin drug worked best on the family of viruses we isolated and discovered associated with all of these diseases.

https://zl8r4yljp7281pio28kcrwnb-wpengin...script.pdf


Here’s a longer interview with Judy Mikovits (1:15:35).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6HPe-s1V2o


Following is the retracted 2009 study.
Of the 101 test subjects with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) that were analysed, 68 (67%) contained XMRV.
XMRV was only found in the blood of 8 out of 218 (3.7%) healthy people.
They verified that it was highly improbable that they had detected a laboratory contaminant.

The XMRV sequences were more than 99% similar to those previously reported for strains of XMRV in prostate cancer tumours.
The XMRV sequences were very similar to mouse strains.

After infecting T and B cells with XMRV, it was found that the cells of the CFS patients reacted differently to the XMRV than the (blood of) healthy individuals.
These results make it more probable that the immune response of the CFS patients to XMRV is different than for healthy people.

J.A. Mikovits et al. – Detection of an Infectious Retrovirus, XMRV, in Blood Cells of Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (2009): https://www.researchgate.net/publication...e_syndrome


Following is a later 2010 article in which Mikovits defends the earlier 2009 study.
They detected XMRV in more than 75% of 101 patients with CFS by 5 different methods.
It is simply not possible that the blood samples used were contaminated with mouse retroviruses as the WPI and NCI labs where the analysis with PCR was done had never worked with mouse tissues.

J.A. Mikovits et al. – Detection of an Infectious Retrovirus, XMRV, in Blood Cells of Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (2010): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3073172/


In 2014, Mikovits co-authored, "Plague: One Scientist’s Intrepid Search for the Truth about Human Retroviruses and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome" with Kent Heckenlively.
Following is an article written by Heckenlively to promote the book,

In 2012, a group headed by Ian Lipkin came to the conclusion that there is no association between XMRV and patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).
In a strange twist, they excluded patients with the following conditions: 1) HIV virus; 2) Hepatitis B or C virus; 3) Treponema pallidium (tapeworm); 4) B. burgdorfieri (Lyme disease spirochete); 5) Illness associated with fatigue; 6) Abnormal serum characteristics; 7; Abnormal thyroid functions.
There were no good objective reasons to exclude these “kind” of people. Micro-biologist Gerwyn Morris explained that this is like "looking for HIV, but excluding homosexual males, IV drug users, and those who'd received a blood transfusion". So they intentionally manipulated the study...

In 2013, Lipkin said in a public conference call with CDC that they found retroviruses in 85% of the sample pools but didn’t know whether this 85% is “clinically significant or not”.
This manipulated study was used to do no follow-up research on the findings of Mikovits and her team of scientists: http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/plague-...-must-read
(archived here: http://archive.is/WDsxv)


For more information on vaccines: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewtop...=21&t=1346

[Firestarter]

AIDS vaccines; PrEP

Ever since the HIV causes AIDS hoax has been pushed by the media, big pharma has been working hard to get a vaccine accepted. Surprisingly without success. For more than 20 years the eugenics movement has been pushing for vaccination for AIDS – The global HIV vaccine pipeline.
By now they have started poisoning teenagers with HPV vaccines, even though HPV doesn´t cause cancer.

The following is from the “Pipeline Report global antiretroviral treatment (ART) guidelines” from July 2016. This also includes information on Tuberculosis.
In 2015 it was recommended to poison all HIV positive people with ART.
According to Polly Clayden, 40% of children on ART don’t get enough, and developing “new antiretroviral drugs and appropriate formulations for children continues to be far too slow”.

They want to harmonise (abolish?) regulations to speed up approval for new ART poisons and HIV vaccines.
They want to expand free condoms and lubricant, counselling, and access to AIDS testing and treatment.
“Education” should promote and facilitate participation in clinical trials.
Manipulation of research to make “evidence that interventions could benefit immunologic non-responders (INRs) even if they fail the cure research context”.

I read in this report:

Currently ongoing and planned cure-related clinical trials are not expected to lead directly to a cure, but rather to define pathways which when further developed and possibly combined may lead to sterilizing or functional cure

I read here that sterilisation of the population is an objective of AIDS-treatment: http://www.pipelinereport.org/2016/executive-summary
(archived here: http://archive.is/YeF4C)

The following report by the International Aids Vaccine Initiative (IAVI), is also relevant, because it proves that the focus in HIV-vaccination is on women.
If my theory is correct that the objective of HIV-vaccination is depopulation by sterilisation, the focus would obviously be on young women and girls...

The IAVI has performed a 2 year, $210 million pilot program launched by: US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Nike Foundation.
This program focuses on “hot spots” in 10 countries where HIV incidence is highest among girls and young women.

They specifically focus on the girls and young women in east and south Africa, because these are supposedly infected at rates 2 to 5 times higher than boys and men their age, with the non-existent HIV virus.
82% of all adolescents (ages 10-19) with HIV reside in Africa.
Globally, half of adults infected with HIV are women. In Africa women represent 60% of HIV positive victims.

Adolescent girls, should be vaccinated as pre-adolescents before the onset of sexual activity (before they can produce more unwanted children...).
The UNAIDS-Lancet Commission calls for efforts to expand access to HIV/AIDS treatment particularly among women and girls, including development of an AIDS vaccine.

The number of new HIV infections and AIDS-related deaths is declining globally: http://www.iavi.org/what-we-do/advocacy/...ds-vaccine


PrEP
After the highly toxic AZT was quickly approved for an AIDS-medicine, it was also quickly advised for HIV-positive victims, without any symptoms of AIDS.
We have really come full circle as in 2018 the ARV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) is pushed for HIV-negative promiscuous gays (and some other “high-risk” individuals)…

PrEP was first a treatment for HIV-positive victims, but now this PrEP (a blue pill sold as Truvada) has become the miracle drug that will prevent HIV-infections. PrEP is now instead ONLY given to HIV-negative people and NOT to HIV-positive victims. This requires an HIV-test (get your test now!)…
In The Matrix movie (1999) the blue pill represents “blissfull ignorance”!
I haven’t found a single story that tries to explain how PrEP could prevent an infection with the (magical) HIV “virus”. I neither have found any good story that exposes PrEP for the fraud it is (besides stories on adverse effects).

It is claimed that when promiscuous gays take PrEP daily it is almost 100% effective in preventing an HIV-positive test. I haven’t found a single trial on PrEP that proves it prevents, or delays, AIDS (but instead only if it prevents HIV-positive tests)…
The following 2016 report is the “best“ scientific-looking on PrEP that I found. No placebo was used, so the trial is worthless…

They took 544 HIV-negative gay men who had anal intercourse without a condom in the previous 90 days. About half of them got the daily PrEP tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine and the others nothing (for “control”).

The participants were enrolled between 29 November 2012 and 30 April 2014. Based on early “evidence” of effectiveness, the trial steering committee quickly recommended on 13 October 2014, that all participants would get PrEP, effectively stopping the evaluation of PrEP. Just like the AZT trials…

The “evidence” was that only 3 subjects in the group on PrEP got an HIV-positive test versus 20 in the “control” group. HIV-positive was decided based on the (unreliable) HIV antigen–antibody test. Although they were also tested with the HIV RNA test, these results were ignored for some (unexplained) reason...
There were 28 adverse events caused by PrEP, the most common: nausea, headache, and arthralgia.

Sheena McCormack – Pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent the acquisition of HIV-1 infection (PROUD): effectiveness results from the pilot phase of a pragmatic open-label randomised trial (2016): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4700047/

[Firestarter]

Edmonston-Zagreb vaccine – immune suppression

There are many, many causes of immune suppression. This dirty history shows that an "experimental" vaccine administered in high doses caused immune deficiency...
Thousands of babies in the Third World were injected with the Edmonston Zagreb (EZ) measles vaccine in an experiment by the CDC and Johns Hopkins University to overwhelm their natural maternal antibodies and replace them with vaccine-induced antibodies. It shouldn´t be surprising that this caused chronic immune suppression.

The experimental Edmonston-Zagreb vaccine was first injected into infants in Mexico, Haiti, Senegal, and Guinea-Bissau.
The measles vaccine caused suppression of the children's immune system for six months up to three years. As a result, the (immunodepressed) children died from diseases in greater numbers than children who had not been positoned with the vaccine (from apparent causes like infections, diarrhea and malnutrition that usually kill babies in the third world). Because African girls were given twice the dose of boys, they suffered a higher death rate.

In the 1980s, the World Health Organization (WHO), had declared measles a life-threatening illness in Third World countries. They recommended that the EZ measles vaccine would be injected - in doses 10 to 500 times the standard - in infants younger than 15 months old. The EZ vaccine studies were sponsored by the CDC, United States Agency for International Development (USAID), and the Johns Hopkins University.
In Haiti, the study was done on a population that included HIV-positive infants, so basically these vaccines could “prove” that HIV causes AIDS...

In October 1989, WHO declared the EZ vaccines a success and recommended the high-titer EZ vaccine to Third World infants from six months of age.
From 1989 to 1991, Kaiser Permanent, the LA County Department of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), injected more than 1500 six-month old black and Hispanic babies in inner city Los Angeles with experimental vaccines. The parents did sign something for consent, but they weren´t informed paper that it was an experimental vaccine, associated with increased mortality.
This trial included the same Edmonston-Zagreb vaccine that had already killed almost 1 in 13 infants before their second birthday in studies in Senegal, Guinea Bissau and Haiti. At least one baby in the LA County experiment died before the age of 2 years.
The study was halted in October 1991...

In January 1990, the directors of one of the African sites notified WHO and CDC of a link between increased mortality and the EZ vaccine. In April 1990, director of the Senegal site Dr. Goran, alerted the WHO to the problem of increased mortality but was simply ignored.
In January 1991, Goran presented the mortality data at an international meeting of the vaccine team. He expected that the rest of the team would admit, ‘Oh my God, yes, he’s right, the vaccine is causing deaths’. But his data was set aside and the studies continued.
Goran decided that he had no choice but to publish his data. When it appeared in The Lancet in October 1991, the Johns Hopkins team quickly confirmed that Goran might be right. The WHO called for an independent analysis of mortality for a meeting in June 1992.
In June 1992, it couldn’t be denied anymore that children were dying in large numbers from the EZ measles vaccine. The WHO pulled the EZ vaccine off the market.
By then, the EZ vaccine had already been used in about two dozen countries, from Bangladesh to Zanzibar, in “studies” involving at least 15,000 children. Nobody knows how many of those children died.

Because the deaths by the "high titre" Edmonston-Zagreb measles vaccine only started after 6 months and continued until 4 years after vaccination (did it really stop?), it surprises me that they found out at all.
And if similar death-causing vaccines, that start 6 months after vaccination, are given to children now, I don’t see how anybody could ever blow the whistle (maybe call it AIDS)...

If it wasn´t for the brave Dr. Goran these sick epxeriments with the dead causing EZ vaccine, would have continued.
The press hardly covered this, and when they did they only reported on the fact that in the LA study the parents weren´t told that the vaccine was experimental. They only mentioned as “sort of an afterthought” that the vaccine had caused deaths in Third World countries. The CDC and Kaiser even got the chance to tell that there had only been one death, unrelated to the vaccine.

According to Worth Coolie Prost:

We should be very alarmed about this for two reasons in particular, the first being that if the mainstream press hadn’t touched Tuskeegee we never would have known about it. And secondly, we should be alarmed because precisely the same government agencies, research institutions, and very often even the same researchers are... doing AIDS vaccine research in Third World countries and in the United States.
The same folks who did the EZ measles vaccine - this non-story - are doing HIV vaccine research. There’s been no accountability, no disclosure... Why should we expect different behavior now? And if the press doesn’t cover it, how will we know when things go wrong?

http://www.whale.to/v/ez2.html
(archived here: http://web.archive.org/web/2018091319284...v/ez2.html)

[Firestarter]

Trioxidal & Interferon

I’ve found 2 stories on supposed “cures” for AIDS – Trioxidal and Interferon. I have a hard time believing in “miracle drugs” though...
I haven’t found evidence that either of them has any (positive or negative) effect on AIDS. Interferon could be the key in understanding the disease AIDS. The pharmaceutical establishment has claimed that HIV is the cause of AIDS, but the role of interferon is unknown to most of us...


Trioxidal, Robert Vesco
Robert Vesco bought IOS in 1970 for less than $5 million, and looted it of $220 million in funds.
After he escaped the US to evade the charges brought against him, he first settled in Costa Rica, where he invested some $11 million to become “friends” with President José Figueres.
Vesco also befriended nephew of President Richard M. Nixon, Donald A. Nixon Jr., and gave $200,000 to the Nixon campaign illegally through US Commerce Secretary and chief fund-raiser Maurice Stans.
In 1978, Vesco was forced to leave for the Bahamas. In the years that followed he hop scotched to several countries, including Antigua and Nicaragua, before settling in Cuba in 1982.

Vesco eventually became an enemy of the Castro government, when he was accused of defrauding a state-run biotechnology laboratory in a project that involved Donald Nixon, and sentenced to 13 years. This was about the production of the miracle medicine Trioxidal (TX) that would cure cancer, AIDS, arthritis and even the common cold.
TX is illegal in the US. They worked on TX at the Labiofam plant; its president is Gloria Castro (a relative of Fidel's) and Fragga Castro (Fidel's nephew): https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-enter...91664.html
(archived here: http://archive.is/v8JjH)

I haven’t found any more information on Trioxidal (there is a lot of interesting on Robert Vesco, but not in the context of this thread)...


Interferon
In 1992, the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced that it would test the AIDS-drug interferon, because of the common believe within the black community that it’s a cure for AIDS. The study included several hundred patients treated with low doses of interferon.
Physicians, who prescribe interferon in low doses, reported that it makes HIV-positive people “feel better”.
Other drugs like Immuviron and the similar Kemron were also used in the US black community for years.

An important advocate for interferon is Abdul Alim Mohammad, medical director of a non-profit organisation affiliated with the Nation of Islam.
Interferon, was formerly marketed under the name Immunex and in 1992 renamed as Immuviron – sold for about $1,500 for a six-month supply.
Mohammad said in an interview:

We talked to physicians, patients and the like. We were really convinced after 10 days that it was very effective.

In 1992, interferon was approved by the FDA for several diseases, including a rare form of leukaemia and Kaposi's sarcoma, a type of cancer that afflicts many AIDS patients.
In these treatments interferon is taken by injection in large, expensive doses, costing up to $270 per day for treatment: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/l...be594a60f4

Unfortunately I didn’t find a single placebo controlled trial on the treatment of AIDS-victims.

There’s even a Hollywood movie about AIDS-victim Ron Woodroof that found out that AZT is highly toxic and looked for alternative treatment (including interferon) that he sold to other AIDS-victims – Dallas Buyers Club (2013).
Woodroof got into legal problems with the US FDA. Woodroof died in 1992, which was 7 years later than the doctors first predicted.
Woodroof himself chose Peptide T for AIDS-treatment.

The state media understandably criticised the film for endorsing “pseudoscience” (as opposed to the proven deadly toxicity of AZT?).
They invented new characters for the movie to advertise the LGBT-agenda: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dallas_Buyers_Club

The reason that I think understanding interferon is important is the relation with HIV and AZT-poisoning, while interferon is an accepted therapy for HIV-positive victims with Kaposi’s sarcoma and Hepatitis B and C.
The FDA first approved interferon alpha for the treatment of hepatitis C in 1991.

Interferon is produced in response to viral infections as a first line of defence and also has widespread effects on the immune system.
Interferon was found in abundance in HIV-positive victims. It seems illogical that injecting them with large amounts of interferon, when they already had more than enough, would benefit them.

AZT removes interferon from the body in the first week on AZT, and reappears promptly when AZT is discontinued.
Some of the adverse effects of interferon are actually quite similar to the reported effects of AIDS: 1) CD4 loss; 2) leucopoenia; 3) low white and red blood counts; 4) high beta2microglobulin counts; 5) an increase in serum triglycerides: http://aidsperspective.net/blog/?p=118
(archived here: http://archive.is/m5s3q)

Interferon can have serious adverse effects.
Interferon can increase zidovudine's effectiveness, so that a much lower dose of zidovudine (AZT) is needed: https://www.medicinenet.com/interferon/article.htm

The following study (without placebo) claims that some 1/3 of the AIDS-victims with Kaposi's sarcoma benefitted (had a positive “response”) from interferon treatment:

Overall, 36 (35%) of 103 evaluable patients had either a complete (1 1 patients) or partial (25 patients) response to interferon alfa-2b. The respective response rates of the low-, intermediate-, and high-dose groups were 33%, 28%, and 45%. However, these groups were not evenly balanced for known prognostic factors.

Volberding et al – Treatment of Kaposi’s sarcoma with interferon alpha-2b (Intron A) (1987): https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf...0.CO%3B2-5