People, take off your masks before you really make yourself sick!
http://themillenniumreport.com/2020/05/p...self-sick/
http://themillenniumreport.com/2020/05/p...self-sick/
Thread Rating:
|
Mask Wearing
|
08-14-2020, 11:37 AM
Fascist UK government now targeting non-mask wearers and protests (not BLM) with big fines – they are terrified of the people ceasing to obey as public anger at ever-gathering fascism is rising very fast
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-53772735 
SHARED - Kathy Nicol, FB
This will blow your mind. It’s about mask wearing and how wearing a mask spreads more diseases and is worse for you. Comes with 40 peer reviewed studies. This I did not know until now. This is not my work and credit goes to Rose for an outstanding amount of research and factual data. No photo description available. Rose Kunzmann Quote from Art Firstenberg, author of The Invisible Rainbow. He quotes numerous studies that show that even wearing a mask during an operation increases the rate of infection. If anyone knows of anything that industrial medicine got right in the past 150 years I would like to know about it. For now, whatever they tell you to do, do the opposite for your safety and health. Here is Firstenberg's article: ARTHUR FIRSTENBERG As a person who went to medical school, I was shocked when I read Neil Orr’s study, published in 1981 in the Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Dr. Orr was a surgeon in the Severalls Surgical Unit in Colchester. And for six months, from March through August 1980, the surgeons and staff in that unit decided to see what would happen if they did not wear masks during surgeries. They wore no masks for six months, and compared the rate of surgical wound infections from March through August 1980 with the rate of wound infections from March through August of the previous four years. And they discovered, to their amazement, that when nobody wore masks during surgeries, the rate of wound infections was less than half what it was when everyone wore masks. Their conclusion: 'It would appear that minimum contamination can best be achieved by not wearing a mask at all' and that wearing a mask during surgery 'is a standard procedure that could be abandoned.' I was so amazed that I scoured the medical literature, sure that this was a fluke and that newer studies must show the utility of masks in preventing the spread of disease. But to my surprise the medical literature for the past forty-five years has been consistent: MASKS ARE USELESS IN PREVENTING THE SPREAD OF DISEASE and, if anything, are unsanitary objects that themselves spread bacteria and viruses. # Ritter et al., in 1975, found that 'the wearing of a surgical face mask had no effect upon the overall operating room environmental contamination.' # Ritter and Wiley, in 1980, applied human albumin microspheres to the interior of surgical masks in 20 operations. At the end of each operation, wound washings were examined under the microscope. 'Particle contamination of the wound was demonstrated in all experiments.' # Laslett and Sabin, in 1989, found that caps and masks were not necessary during cardiac catheterization. 'No infections were found in any patient, regardless of whether a cap or mask was used,' they wrote. Sjøl and Kelbaek came to the same conclusion in 2002. # In Tunevall’s 1991 study, a general surgical team wore no masks in half of their surgeries for two years. After 1,537 operations performed with masks, the wound infection rate was 4.7%, while after 1,551 operations performed without masks, the wound infection rate was only 3.5%. # A review by Skinner and Sutton in 2001 concluded that 'The evidence for discontinuing the use of surgical face masks would appear to be stronger than the evidence available to support their continued use.' # et al., in 2001, wrote that 'surgical face masks worn by patients during regional anaesthesia, did not reduce the concentration of airborne bacteria over the operation field in our study. Thus they are dispensable.' # Figueiredo et al., in 2001, reported that in five years of doing peritoneal dialysis without masks, rates of peritonitis in their unit were no different than rates in hospitals where masks were worn. # Bahli did a systematic literature review in 2009 and found that 'no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative wound infection was observed between masks groups and groups operated with no masks.' # Surgeons at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, recognizing the lack of evidence supporting the use of masks, ceased requiring them in 2010 for anesthesiologists and other non-scrubbed personnel in the operating room. 'Our decision to no longer require routine surgical masks for personnel not scrubbed for surgery is a departure from common practice. But the evidence to support this practice does not exist,' wrote Dr. Eva Sellden. # Webster et al., in 2010, reported on obstetric, gynecological, general, orthopaedic, breast and urological surgeries performed on 827 patients. All non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries, and none of the non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries. Surgical site infections occurred in 11.5% of the Mask group, and in only 9.0% of the No Mask group. # Lipp and Edwards reviewed the surgical literature in 2014 and found 'no statistically significant difference in infection rates between the masked and unmasked group in any of the trials.' Vincent and Edwards updated this review in 2016 and the conclusion was the same. # Carøe, in a 2014 review based on four studies and 6,006 patients, wrote that 'none of the four studies found a difference in the number of post-operative infections whether you used a surgical mask or not.' # Salassa and Swiontkowski, in 2014, investigated the necessity of scrubs, masks and head coverings in the operating room and concluded that 'there is no evidence that these measures reduce the prevalence of surgical site infection.' # Da Zhou et al., reviewing the literature in 2015, concluded that 'there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination.' # Schools in China are now prohibiting students from wearing masks while exercising. Why? Because it was killing them. It was depriving them of oxygen and it was killing them. At least three children died during Physical Education classes -- two of them while running on their school’s track while wearing a mask. And a 26-year-old man suffered a collapsed lung after running two and a half miles while wearing a mask. # Mandating masks has not kept death rates down anywhere. The 20 U.S. states that have never ordered people to wear face masks indoors and out have dramatically lower COVID-19 death rates than the 30 states that have mandated masks. Most of the no-mask states have COVID-19 death rates below 20 per 100,000 population, and none have a death rate higher than 55. All 13 states that have death rates higher 55 are states that have required the wearing of masks in all public places. It has not protected them."
08-16-2020, 11:23 AM
42 peer-reviewed studies that show masks are neither safe nor effective (it’s about subjugation and control not health – except for destroying it)
1 T Jefferson, M Jones, et al. Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses. MedRxiv. 2020 Apr 7. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/...20047217v2 2 J Xiao, E Shiu, et al. Nonpharmaceutical measures for pandemic influenza in non-healthcare settings – personal protective and environmental measures. Centers for Disease Control. 26(5); 2020 May. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article 3 J Brainard, N Jones, et al. Facemasks and similar barriers to prevent respiratory illness such as COVID19: A rapid systematic review. MedRxiv. 2020 Apr 1. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/...1.full.pdf 4 L Radonovich M Simberkoff, et al. N95 respirators vs medical masks for preventing influenza among health care personnel: a randomized clinic trial. JAMA. 2019 Sep 3. 322(9): 824-833. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fu...le/2749214 5 J Smith, C MacDougall. CMAJ. 2016 May 17. 188(8); 567-574. https://www.cmaj.ca/content/188/8/567 6 F bin-Reza, V Lopez, et al. The use of masks and respirators to prevent transmission of influenza: a systematic review of the scientific evidence. 2012 Jul; 6(4): 257-267. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5779801/ 7 J Jacobs, S Ohde, et al. Use of surgical face masks to reduce the incidence of the common cold among health care workers in Japan: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Infect Control. 2009 Jun; 37(5): 417-419. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19216002/ 8 M Viola, B Peterson, et al. Face coverings, aerosol dispersion and mitigation of virus transmission risk. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.10720, https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2005/2005.10720.pdf 9 S Grinshpun, H Haruta, et al. Performance of an N95 filtering facepiece particular respirator and a surgical mask during human breathing: two pathways for particle penetration. J Occup Env Hygiene. 2009; 6(10):593-603. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1...0903120086 10 H Jung, J Kim, et al. Comparison of filtration efficiency and pressure drop in anti-yellow sand masks, quarantine masks, medical masks, general masks, and handkerchiefs. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2013 Jun. 14:991-1002. https://aaqr.org/articles/aaqr-13-06-oa-0201.pdf 11 C MacIntyre, H Seale, et al. A cluster randomized trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(4) https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577.long 12 N95 masks explained. https://www.honeywell.com/en-us/newsroom...-explained 13 V Offeddu, C Yung, et al. Effectiveness of masks and respirators against infections in healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Inf Dis. 65(11), 2017 Dec 1; 1934-1942. https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/65/ 14 C MacIntyre, Q Wang, et al. A cluster randomized clinical trial comparing fit-tested and non-fit-tested N95 respirators to medical masks to prevent respiratory virus infection in health care workers. Influenza J. 2010 Dec 3. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf...RQdhQlc8Wo 15 M Walker. Study casts doubt on N95 masks for the public. MedPage Today. 2020 May 20. https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousd...alth/86601 16 C MacIntyre, Q Wang, et al. A cluster randomized clinical trial comparing fit-tested and non-fit-tested N95 respirators to medical masks to prevent respiratory virus infection in health care workers. Influenza J. 2010 Dec 3. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf...RQdhQlc8Wo 17 N Shimasaki, A Okaue, et al. Comparison of the filter efficiency of medical nonwoven fabrics against three different microbe aerosols. Biocontrol Sci. 2018; 23(2). 61-69. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/bio...f/-char/en 18 T Tunevall. Postoperative wound infections and surgical face masks: A controlled study. World J Surg. 1991 May; 15: 383-387. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF01658736 19 N Orr. Is a mask necessary in the operating theatre? Ann Royal Coll Surg Eng 1981: 63: 390-392. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article...9-0009.pdf 20 N Mitchell, S Hunt. Surgical face masks in modern operating rooms – a costly and unnecessary ritual? J Hosp Infection. 18(3); 1991 Jul 1. 239-242. https://www.journalofhospitalinfection.c...0148-2/pdf 21 C DaZhou, P Sivathondan, et al. Unmasking the surgeons: the evidence base behind the use of facemasks in surgery. JR Soc Med. 2015 Jun; 108(6): 223-228. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480558/ 22 L Brosseau, M Sietsema. Commentary: Masks for all for Covid-19 not based on sound data. U Minn Ctr Inf Dis Res Pol. 2020 Apr 1. https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspect...sound-data 23 N Leung, D Chu, et al. Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks Nature Research. 2020 Mar 7. 26,676-680 (2020). https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-16836/v1 24 S Rengasamy, B Eimer, et al. Simple respiratory protection – evaluation of the filtration performance of cloth masks and common fabric materials against 20-1000 nm size particles. Ann Occup Hyg. 2010 Oct; 54(7): 789-798. https://academic.oup.com/annweh/article/54/7/789/202744 25 S Bae, M Kim, et al. Effectiveness of surgical and cotton masks in blocking SARS-CoV-2: A controlled comparison in 4 patients. Ann Int Med. 2020 Apr 6. https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-1342 26 S Rengasamy, B Eimer, et al. Simple respiratory protection – evaluation of the filtration performance of cloth masks and common fabric materials against 20-1000 nm size particles. Ann Occup Hyg. 2010 Oct; 54(7): 789-798. https://academic.oup.com/annweh/article/54/7/789/202744 27 C MacIntyre, H Seale, et al. A cluster randomized trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(4) https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577.long 28 W Kellogg. An experimental study of the efficacy of gauze face masks. Am J Pub Health. 1920. 34-42. https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/pd...PH.10.1.34 29 M Klompas, C Morris, et al. Universal masking in hospitals in the Covid-19 era. N Eng J Med. 2020; 382 e63. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372 30 E Person, C Lemercier et al. Effect of a surgical mask on six minute walking distance. Rev Mal Respir. 2018 Mar; 35(3):264-268. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29395560/ 31 B Chandrasekaran, S Fernandes. Exercise with facemask; are we handling a devil’s sword – a physiological hypothesis. Med Hypothese. 2020 Jun 22. 144:110002. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32590322/ 32 P Shuang Ye Tong, A Sugam Kale, et al. Respiratory consequences of N95-type mask usage in pregnant healthcare workers – A controlled clinical study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2015 Nov 16; 4:48. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26579222/ 33 T Kao, K Huang, et al. The physiological impact of wearing an N95 mask during hemodialysis as a precaution against SARS in patients with end-stage renal disease. J Formos Med Assoc. 2004 Aug; 103(8):624-628. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15340662/ 34 F Blachere, W Lindsley et al. Assessment of influenza virus exposure and recovery from contaminated surgical masks and N95 respirators. J Viro Methods. 2018 Oct; 260:98-106. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30029810/ 36 F Blachere, W Lindsley et al. Assessment of influenza virus exposure and recovery from contaminated surgical masks and N95 respirators. J Viro Methods. 2018 Oct; 260:98-106. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30029810/ 37 A Chughtai, S Stelzer-Braid, et al. Contamination by respiratory viruses on our surface of medical masks used by hospital healthcare workers. BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Jun 3; 19(1): 491. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31159777/ 38 L Zhiqing, C Yongyun, et al. J Orthop Translat. 2018 Jun 27; 14:57-62. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30035033/ 39 C MacIntyre, H Seale, et al. A cluster randomized trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(4) https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577 40 A Beder, U Buyukkocak, et al. Preliminary report on surgical mask induced deoxygenation during major surgery. Neurocirugia. 2008; 19: 121-126. http://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/neuro/v19n2/3.pdf 41 D Lukashev, B Klebanov, et al. Cutting edge: Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha and its activation-inducible short isoform negatively regulate functions of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. J Immunol. 2006 Oct 15; 177(8) 4962-4965. https://www.jimmunol.org/content/177/8/4962 42 A Sant, A McMichael. Revealing the role of CD4+ T-cells in viral immunity. J Exper Med. 2012 Jun 30; 209(8):1391-1395. https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/3420330 
08-17-2020, 12:10 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-17-2020, 05:05 PM by The Apprentice.)
![[Image: 50237612897_3d833135f7_h.jpg]](https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50237612897_3d833135f7_h.jpg) covid by apprentice 01, on FlickrTwo observation I gained as a former medic back in the mid 80's are, . When a new mask is worn it does not take long for the precipitation in ones breath before a phenomenon called Wetting Out begins to occur, where the precipitation in ones breath begins to block the pores of the mask, surgical masks are designed to be like this so any droplets are caught by the absorbant materials to prevent them from entering an open wound, during what is known as the aseptic technique, in other words a two member team of the medical staff creating a temporary barrier between patient and doctor/nurse, these are larger bodies like droplets of saliva and or hair etc from falling into the treated area, especially in operating theatre, this is all they can stop. One other thing to take into account is the fact that any barrier between face and the atmosphere can have detrimental effects to the normal flow of air and or breathing patterns, depending on the individual and their general health, and the more the face mask becomes wetted out the less effective it will be for the end user and inhibit the free flow of air into the body and when wetted out will readily spill out at the very poorly fitting sides, especially if you have a full beard. So what the boffins in the think tanks have done is, they have put out into the public realm the knowledge that there are masks that have a small release valve fitted that allows any excess air/Co2 that might build up inside the mask to be vented, this small one way valve helps to get rid of the dirty or exhailed air from inside the mask, and on the next inhail this valve closes again to prevent the atmosphere outside of the mask, say a dusty environment from re-ntering as you take you next breath inwards. However, this small valve would also let any and all viruses contained to be realesed directly into the atmosphere freely and be totally useless for this task, so you would be wasting your money buying such a mask, nothing can prevent a virus from entering the atmosphere, not one of these mask will prevent what the government is proposing. They must realize that the truth about face masks is now over hyped and their attempts at using them as a muzzle will shortly come to an end and people will be able to smile once again at each other.
08-17-2020, 04:10 PM
08-21-2020, 12:46 PM
Primary school becomes first in England to make children’s face masks mandatory
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article...masks.html
08-24-2020, 09:12 PM
Harmful effects of rebreathing CO2...
"Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a gas the body naturally produces as waste. We breathe in oxygen (O2) to fuel organs and tissues and the end product is CO2. The balance between these two gases is required for a healthy body. However, when we rebreathe CO2 it can have harmful and sometimes dangerous effects on the body. When CO2 levels are elevated in the body it is known as hypercapnia. Hypercapnia can occur for a number of reasons, one of which is rebreathing our own exhaled CO2. Rebreathing CO2 can lead to increased blood pressure, headaches, muscle twitches, rapid heart rate, chest pain, confusion, and fatigue. In extreme cases, if left untreated, hypercapnia can lead to organ damage and even have long standing effects on the brain." (FB)
09-03-2020, 10:49 PM
(08-24-2020, 09:12 PM)Steve Wrote: Harmful effects of rebreathing CO2... At sea level oxygen in air is roughly 21 percent, when you breath in and fill the lungs a healthy body absorbs about 4 percent of that oxygen and when we breath out again there is still 16 percent oxygen left, this is how we are able to use mouth to mouth resuscitation to kick start someone who has stopped breathing. Air also contains around 70 percent nitrogen which is also non poisonous like Co2, the real trouble begins when both gasses are rebreathed in a slowly but sure level over longer periods, this is what creates starvation of the lungs to use the available oxygen on intake. When people hyperventilate they take in too much oxygen and the cure is to breath into a plastic bag until the levels are once again balanced, but the body cannot recover if the levels of Nitrogen and Co2 are below a certain level, where organs like the kidneys can quickly become damaged. Depending on how good and effective a persons lungs are depends upon how much oxygen transfer in enabled, so those with lung problems can quickly be overcome by lack of enough oxygen.
WHO admits: no direct evidence masks prevent viral infection -
Story at-a-glance
https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/geopol...-infection https://articles.mercola.com/sites/artic...ction.aspx |
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 20 Guest(s) |
Created by: Mishar DESIGN
Powered by: MyBB