[Firestarter]

Let’s assume again that an alt-media person gains a good following and refuses to be bought. Obviously the PTB have a variety of tools to mess with them, such as smearing them in the MSM. But if they’re becoming a serious problem and it’s considered likely they may reveal highly secret information, I would imagine that more direct action would be taken, such as threatening them if they don’t keep a lid on it.

It’s doubtful that anybody, who is successfully exposing the truth will ever get a sizeable following.
Of course there are people, who try but simply don’t have enough understanding of how it all works or don’t have the time to do proper research.

Websites, blogspots, Youtube channels are taken down.
Sometimes tricks like these are even used to give the preferred “conspiracy theorist” (like Alex Jones, David Icke or Mike Adams) some additional publicity.

A good idea is to look at multiple sources in order to achieve a balanced view on any given subject. Here’s a list of reliable sources where there is less chance that they follow a particular narrative or agenda –

http://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/e.../websites/

The problem is that those “multiple sources” aren’t really “multiple” at all! The mainstream and alternative media are filled with stories that are basically copies of each other, with some minor changes to them.
When you read the same (wrong) story from multiple outlets, it sounds a lot more convincing. Then when you’ll read a story that comes much closer to exposing the truth, you’ll probably discard it, because it is “different”.

In my opinion the only way to get a better understanding of the "New World Order" is to read good books. I don't know how to advise others on how to see the difference between "realiable" or "unreliable" conspiracy theories...
The following long essay from the Nexus Magazine that you seem to favour is a good introduction on the "Round Table" (or Milner's Kindergarten of Knight of the Garter Alfred Milner) - A short history of the Round Table (2005): https://danielsolis.cz/?mdocs-file=2538


And then there are those wonderful internet “search” engines that are actually designed to hide the real scandals.
I’ve started threads on my posts/threads being blatantly deleted from the internet search results on several forums. I’ve also been attacked by trolls for making such a ridiculous claim: https://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.p...924&page=2
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread....orld/page2

Yesterday, I did an internet search with Google.nl, Yahoo.com, Duckduckgo.com, Bing.com and Qwant.com with:

The Ambassador commented on our distinguished visitors, Ronald Reagan, George Bush and Margaret Thatcher, and commented that Teheran seems to be the site for an opposition parties congress

This should the following thread on the Anglo-American support for Ayatollah Khomeini and Saddam Hussein in the 1970s and 1980s, but none of them find it (I’ve checked only the first 5 pages of Yahoo results): https://forums.richieallen.co.uk/showthr...340&page=2