[Firestarter]

On 28 July 2020, the Rockefeller Foundation published the “Reset The Table” plan, preceding the "true cost of food" also by the Rockefeller Foundation in October 2021 (based on the Dutch "True Price" plan).
It describes how the lockdown has effectively plunged many Americans into poverty, which has resulted in food insecurity. Of course nowhere in the document it is argued that maybe possibly the lockdown should be ended (will we once again be locked down coming autumn winter?)...

You could never guess how they will use the COVID pandemic to put an end to hunger.
The most important way seems to be to introduce "true cost accounting", which means that we have to pay extra for the environmental damage caused by us eating food. The obvious thing that isn't "sustainable" in this scenario, are the useless eaters that will be taken care of one way or another.
This will then be combined by expanding control over who of the slaves will eat, by:
- Making us depend on food banks (as we cannot afford the higher prices of food).
- Control the food supply through regional food hubs and creating one single executive office to control food.
- Technology to track the food supply.

See some excerpts from this philantropic plan:

In many ways, Covid-19 has boiled over long-simmering problems plaguing America’s food system. What began as a public health crisis fueled an economic crisis, leaving 33 percent of families unable to afford the amount or quality of food they want. School closures put 30 million students at risk of losing the meals they need to learn and thrive.
(...)

Now schools like his are facing major financial and operational challenges as they approach an unprecedented school year in which even more students will need school meals.
Against this backdrop of both challenge and heroism, The Rockefeller Foundation sought out diverse perspectives on what this pandemic has revealed about the U.S. food system and how we can collectively meet this moment.
(...)

Our food system touches everyone and everything, and no one should be satisfied with the status quo. Whether you care most about child hunger or workforce protections, family farmers or fair wages, market efficiencies or racial equity, climate change or national security–all of us should be fighting for a food system that’s sustainable, nourishing, equitable, and just.
(...)

With 40 percent of Americans unable to access $400 even in times of emergency,5 there was an explosion in nutrition insecurity in states and neighborhoods across the country. Grace, a food bank in Summit, New Jersey, was soon feeding 515 families compared to 100 a month earlier. Demand at Feeding South Florida, the largest food bank in that agriculturally rich state, soared 600 percent.6 Navajo County, Arizona, is projected to have a nutrition insecurity rate of 26.2 percent.
Every measure of child hunger rose to levels not seen in decades. In April, the U.S. Census found that a third of households with children couldn’t afford to buy the amount or quality of food they wanted,8 a number that continues to hover around 28 percent. In 16.5 percent of households with children, parents are directly reporting that their children are not getting enough food—meaning that nearly 14 million children are going hungry on a regular basis.
(...)

Poor nutrition—driven by many factors, including lack of access to healthy food, insufficient incomes to afford high-quality diets, and targeted marketing of unhealthy food—is now the leading cause of poor health in the United States.
(...)

Apply true cost accounting—the consideration of not only immediate and direct costs, but also extended and indirect costs—in policy, legislative, and programmatic decision-making, and in public messaging;
(...)

Direct the purchasing power of large institutions along a values-based (equitable, ethical, sustainable) supply chain by incentivizing, requiring, or otherwise enabling institutions’ food procurement to prioritize producers and suppliers that embody these values.
(...)

We also need to invest in hard infrastructure such as regional food hubs; cold chain, mid-scale meat processing facilities; and other aggregation and distribution facilities.
(...)

True cost accounting” considers not just immediate and direct costs, but also extended or indirect costs (e.g., to human health, to the environment).
(...)

the Covid-19 crisis illustrated a clear need for a single executive office responsible for better coordination across government agencies and levels, as well as with community organizations that people know and trust.
(...)

A 2015 study by McKinsey found that agriculture was the least digitized sector in the United States.58 The data landscape of the food system remains complex and highly fragmented, with large concentrations of data from large farms and consolidated private supply chain industries, but little transparency of where food, or need, exists up and down the chain.

http://web.archive.org/web/2022030818245...Final2.pdf


Naturally the Kingdom of the Netherlands has gotten the the Global Co-ordination Secretariat (GCS) for the worldwide network of Food Innovation Hubs through control over the WEF for a mere EUR 651,000 in subsidy to the WEF...

https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewtop...132#p71132