12-09-2021, 07:40 PM
Telegram Post -
You might have heard people say that COVID-19 was never isolated, but when you do a search to see what the internet has to say you find several fact-checker articles claiming that this is false. And indeed in the search results you find several studies claiming to have isolated the virus. Are they all lying? For the average person it must seem that those contesting this basic premise of the pandemic are crazy.
As is often the case with the "fact-checkers" the truth is obscured by distracting from the core issue: In the studies that claim to have isolated the virus, HOW was COVID-19 actually identified? If you look at this study which is one of the ones the purport to have isolated COVID they tell you how they know they isolated COVID-19: because they tested it with a PCR test.
"Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab and sputum samples were collected from symptomatic patients to detect SARS-CoV-2 by real-time reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR. RNA was extracted from clinical samples with a QIAamp viral RNA mini kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions."
Ah, but how was that PCR test developed? And what does it actually detect? Well that question is answered on page 41 of this document (CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel) currently still available on the FDA's website. The fact checkers admit that this document is legit, but they distract from the issue by saying that the virus has been isolated many times after the document was released. But look at what the document actually says:
“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen. “
The CDC created the test for COVID-19 without having an actual virus, and in fact mixed human cells and RNA from an undeclared source "to mimic a clinical specimen". Then other researchers used positive results from this same PCR test to declare that they had isolated COVID-19. Checkmate conspiracy theorists! This is circular logic at its worst.
Combine this with the fact that the CDC admits that their test cannot differentiate between COVID and the common flu (see here) and it becomes clear that they have created a testing protocol that can be used to define any flu-like virus as a COVID-19 "variant".
Does this prove that COVID-19 doesn't exist? No. But it does prove that their test is absolutely fraudulent. Other researchers may have isolated a virus of some kind, but if the only way that they determine that such a virus is "COVID" is by comparing it to a standard that didn't start with a clinical specimen in the first place, then their claims are dubious at best. With such an obvious fraud that undermines the entire premise, the burden of proof is on them, not the other way around. There are powerful interests that profit from this. If you want to establish motive do a search for "Milken Institute Fauci flu".
@StormCloudsGathering
https://t.me/c/1554273308/87850
You might have heard people say that COVID-19 was never isolated, but when you do a search to see what the internet has to say you find several fact-checker articles claiming that this is false. And indeed in the search results you find several studies claiming to have isolated the virus. Are they all lying? For the average person it must seem that those contesting this basic premise of the pandemic are crazy.
As is often the case with the "fact-checkers" the truth is obscured by distracting from the core issue: In the studies that claim to have isolated the virus, HOW was COVID-19 actually identified? If you look at this study which is one of the ones the purport to have isolated COVID they tell you how they know they isolated COVID-19: because they tested it with a PCR test.
"Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab and sputum samples were collected from symptomatic patients to detect SARS-CoV-2 by real-time reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR. RNA was extracted from clinical samples with a QIAamp viral RNA mini kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions."
Ah, but how was that PCR test developed? And what does it actually detect? Well that question is answered on page 41 of this document (CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel) currently still available on the FDA's website. The fact checkers admit that this document is legit, but they distract from the issue by saying that the virus has been isolated many times after the document was released. But look at what the document actually says:
“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen. “
The CDC created the test for COVID-19 without having an actual virus, and in fact mixed human cells and RNA from an undeclared source "to mimic a clinical specimen". Then other researchers used positive results from this same PCR test to declare that they had isolated COVID-19. Checkmate conspiracy theorists! This is circular logic at its worst.
Combine this with the fact that the CDC admits that their test cannot differentiate between COVID and the common flu (see here) and it becomes clear that they have created a testing protocol that can be used to define any flu-like virus as a COVID-19 "variant".
Does this prove that COVID-19 doesn't exist? No. But it does prove that their test is absolutely fraudulent. Other researchers may have isolated a virus of some kind, but if the only way that they determine that such a virus is "COVID" is by comparing it to a standard that didn't start with a clinical specimen in the first place, then their claims are dubious at best. With such an obvious fraud that undermines the entire premise, the burden of proof is on them, not the other way around. There are powerful interests that profit from this. If you want to establish motive do a search for "Milken Institute Fauci flu".
@StormCloudsGathering
https://t.me/c/1554273308/87850