05-30-2018, 03:06 PM
Richie
Read your article and listened to your summary of this case. While you may have a point on the protection of sensitive cases such rape (though I think in this/these grooming/rape cases there is more it this than meets the eye.) you have not mentioned the fact the same Judge (presiding over the grooming case) issued the gag order of Tommy's arrest and imprisonment and admitted that he hadn't seen all the alleged footage. The ban was a farce (and a gift) as the streaming of the event outside of the court had already gone around the globe via Facebook. Also the judge did not take the previous offence into consideration in his judgement, apparently said that he would have given him the sentence regardless of the previous conviction. It is this particular ban/gag order that alarmed me and others as this has Gulag undertones. I believe that this whole thing of banning coverage is more about covering up exposure of the paedophile/sex abuse rings in higher circles and coming down on anyone who dares talk about or raises it to the wider public. There's a woman (Melanie Shaw - whistle blower on Nottingham sex abuse case ) in Peterborough Prison, sedated in solitary confinement.
Based on what I have seen through interviews of Tommy on mainstream and independent media (+ loosing his businesses and money) I need some serious convincing that he is just out to make a name for himself and a stooge. I think your blind dislike for him prevents you from getting the views of one of the people working with him (who believed what mainstream media said about Tommy) who was in the court room as well as, on the wider issue, the Sikh charity dealing with abductions and rape of their children by these sort of gangs but I doubt if you would do that.
Are you willing to get him on your show to talk about/debate theses issues you raise so that both of you can reach an understanding on the bigger picture? Can't fight the elite if we are all bitching about each other and calling each other names.
Read your article and listened to your summary of this case. While you may have a point on the protection of sensitive cases such rape (though I think in this/these grooming/rape cases there is more it this than meets the eye.) you have not mentioned the fact the same Judge (presiding over the grooming case) issued the gag order of Tommy's arrest and imprisonment and admitted that he hadn't seen all the alleged footage. The ban was a farce (and a gift) as the streaming of the event outside of the court had already gone around the globe via Facebook. Also the judge did not take the previous offence into consideration in his judgement, apparently said that he would have given him the sentence regardless of the previous conviction. It is this particular ban/gag order that alarmed me and others as this has Gulag undertones. I believe that this whole thing of banning coverage is more about covering up exposure of the paedophile/sex abuse rings in higher circles and coming down on anyone who dares talk about or raises it to the wider public. There's a woman (Melanie Shaw - whistle blower on Nottingham sex abuse case ) in Peterborough Prison, sedated in solitary confinement.
Based on what I have seen through interviews of Tommy on mainstream and independent media (+ loosing his businesses and money) I need some serious convincing that he is just out to make a name for himself and a stooge. I think your blind dislike for him prevents you from getting the views of one of the people working with him (who believed what mainstream media said about Tommy) who was in the court room as well as, on the wider issue, the Sikh charity dealing with abductions and rape of their children by these sort of gangs but I doubt if you would do that.
Are you willing to get him on your show to talk about/debate theses issues you raise so that both of you can reach an understanding on the bigger picture? Can't fight the elite if we are all bitching about each other and calling each other names.