Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
False Flag events through modern history
#1
After reading so much about previous false flag events going back to WW2 such as Reichstag and Pearl Harbour, and obviously leading up to 9-11 and 7-7 London bombings it is now hard to believe the mainstream regarding any "terror" event.
There are serious flaws in the reported stories of the Boston Bombings, Sandy Hook, Las Vegas shooting, Paris shootings and bombings, Westminster, Dunblane, Raul Moat,  the Derrick Bird shootings, Madrid bombings and the killing of Lee Rigby and even the Ariana Grande concert explosion in Manchester.
The real issue now is what can we believe when these stories are reported in the mainstream?
They only hang around for a couple of days and then they are not discussed again so the sheeple move on believing what they have been told.

What do you guys and girls think?
#2
The Israeli (Rothschild) enforcement arm Mossad is the world expert at what is called false flag operations – doing the deed and blaming it on others, and they were at the core of what happened on 9/ 11 to give the Rothschild Zionist neocons the excuse to start ticking target countries off their hit list.

They have a huge power over American society and contempt for Americans and American interests. Israel even attacked the USS Liberty in international waters during the Six Day War in June, 1967, which involved Israel, Egypt, and other Arab countries.

Egypt was blamed for the attack on the Liberty in another demonisation exercise, but it later emerged that the ship was hit by Israeli aircraft and torpedo boats. Thirty-four American crewmen were killed, more than 170 wounded and the ship was severely damaged.

Israel incredibly claimed ‘mistaken identity’ when the truth was exposed. Consequences for Israel? None. How could there be when the same Elite networks control America, Canada, Britain, the European Union, Australia, New Zealand and so on? ....
#3
I actually posted an online tribute about Sandy Hook shortly after it happened and a few weeks later I noticed that there were people saying it was fake. I thought they were completely crazy. Over the next three years I didn't really do much surfing on YouTube or on the Internet in general but came back to looking up information a lot more a couple of years ago. I noticed that there were still people talking about Sandy Hook being fake so I actually watched a film about it. To be honest I've been looking into it ever since and maybe became a bit obsessed with it.

I couldn't believe that anyone would fake something like that and yet there seemed to be so many things about it that didn't seem right. I've read articles, looked at documents and photographs, listened to interviews and podcasts and watched hours and hours of video footage. What I can't understand is why people have been persecuted for asking reasonable questions and why the authorities wouldn't just answer their genuine questions and concerns. It's not something I talk to anyone about because they would think I was mad, just as I did about those who questioned the official narrative until I started looking into it.

With this as with so many things we need to do our own research and find out for ourselves in order to try to get at the truth. Of course I can't know for sure the truth about Sandy Hook but I do have a lot of doubts about what we were told.
#4
I have my own scoring system for these false flags, after doing some research I put my own percentage on wither I think it's a false flag/hoax - i.e. 911 - 100% false flag, Diana murdered - 100%, man did not land on the moon - 80%, Sandy hook hoax - 90%, 7-7 London bombings - 100%. I guess we are all a bit scared that some will think we are mad, the usual answer when I mention my thoughts on any of these events is "oh your one of those conspiracy theorists" - all you can do is point them to the evidence but most won't bother to look. I think a lot of people just don't want to have to accept that we are being lied to on a daily basis.
#5
(01-28-2018, 07:58 PM)ContemplationInTranquility Wrote: I actually posted an online tribute about Sandy Hook shortly after it happened and a few weeks later I noticed that there were people saying it was fake. I thought they were completely crazy. Over the next three years I didn't really do much surfing on YouTube or on the Internet in general but came back to looking up information a lot more a couple of years ago. I noticed that there were still people talking about Sandy Hook being fake so I actually watched a film about it. To be honest I've been looking into it ever since and maybe became a bit obsessed with it.

I couldn't believe that anyone would fake something like that and yet there seemed to be so many things about it that didn't seem right. I've read articles, looked at documents and photographs, listened to interviews and podcasts and watched hours and hours of video footage. What I can't understand is why people have been persecuted for asking reasonable questions and why the authorities wouldn't just answer their genuine questions and concerns. It's not something I talk to anyone about because they would think I was mad, just as I did about those who questioned the official narrative until I started looking into it.

With this as with so many things we need to do our own research and find out for ourselves in order to try to get at the truth. Of course I can't know for sure the truth about Sandy Hook but I do have a lot of doubts about what we were told.

I think that the way the Authorities in US acted whenever they have been challenged sums it all up. They attack anyone who dares question the official narrative and have pretty much refused to answer questions. There were 2 videos that I saw that made my mind up. The first was a picture of one of the kids who allegedly died in Sandy Hook that was also shown as a victim of a shooting in Pakistan nearly a year later. It was the exact same picture with the same clothes on. And the second was a video, which I believe is still on Youtube, of one of the victims fathers who went on camera and turned on the tears about changing the gun control laws etc but was shown off camera laughing and joking with another father seconds before he went out in front of the camera. That sealed it for me along with the fact that no one has ever seen a body

(01-28-2018, 10:43 PM)jeff55 Wrote: I have my own scoring system for these false flags, after doing some research I put my own percentage on wither I think it's a false flag/hoax - i.e. 911 - 100% false flag, Diana murdered - 100%, man did not land on the moon - 80%, Sandy hook hoax - 90%, 7-7 London bombings - 100%. I guess we are all a bit scared that some will think we are mad, the usual answer when I mention my thoughts on any of these events is "oh your one of those conspiracy theorists"  - all you can do is point them to the evidence but most won't bother to look. I think a lot of people just don't want to have to accept that we are being lied to on a daily basis.

You are totally correct. I think that some people don't want to think about it, so they do not give it the time of day. But in all fairness they are not going to be the people that listen to this show and read the alternative media. One of my friends argues like mad with me when we get talking and he refuses to accept 9-11 and 7-7 were false flag. Yet another friend has gone away and read up on certain things and he now swinging towards alternative media. I don't  really care if some people refuse to believe it as it will be to their loss in the end but I do try and at least "convert" close friends and family.
I do like your system though, think I may start scoring a few myself
#6
Fantastic fake report that CNN put out during the gulf war.
They aired this tosh and actually expected people to believe it
It is so badly made it is essential viewing.. enjoy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isMtxbPdvzg
#7
(01-28-2018, 01:48 AM)awakened53 Wrote: After reading so much about previous false flag events going back to WW2 such as Reichstag and Pearl Harbour, and obviously leading up to 9-11 and 7-7 London bombings it is now hard to believe the mainstream regarding any "terror" event.
There are serious flaws in the reported stories of the Boston Bombings, Sandy Hook, Las Vegas shooting, Paris shootings and bombings, Westminster, Dunblane, Raul Moat,  the Derrick Bird shootings, Madrid bombings and the killing of Lee Rigby and even the Ariana Grande concert explosion in Manchester.
The real issue now is what can we believe when these stories are reported in the mainstream?
They only hang around for a couple of days and then they are not discussed again so the sheeple move on believing what they have been told.

What do you guys and girls think?

The live reporting of these events causes issues when they try to get the story straight later.  Tower 7 (I think!) being reported as collapsed by the BBC on Sep 11th despite being in the backdrop behind the journalist as well as the reports of Syrian passports of the suspected Paris shooters being found at the scene despite none of the alleged shooters being Syrian as two examples.  

I think there will be a more coordinated effort to align broadcasters to stop these 'mistakes' from happening in future.  The more of these things that happen, the slicker the production values will become and the harder they will be to spot.
#8
I’ve noticed recently with the increase in better technology & HD the police have started pushing the “if you are involved in a terror attack, don’t video it, don’t take photos-just run” even my kids at school have been told if you see a terror attack- RUN!
Inciting fear & terror!
I can’t say how I’d react if I was caught up in something like this but the 1st thing is like to think I’d do is turn on the camera/video & stand still!

I too used to think sandyhook hoax was ridiculous & you can’t get a whole town to lie& parents etc but I’m judging these freaks by my own standards (Unpsychopathic!!) (is that even a word?? Lol)

After investigating SH after a long time ignoring it & after knowing 9/11 etc were false flags I now don’t trust any media, govt, whatsoever! I question everything!

Ps: I don’t know about Manchester but I strongly believe Charlottesville was a hoax after watching the footage!
#9
Hi Charlotte

There is some good detail on the Westminster attack and Manchester attack here

http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main....242&part=2

(02-01-2018, 05:11 PM)Charlotte4711 Wrote: I’ve noticed recently with the increase in better technology & HD the police have started pushing the “if you are involved in a terror attack, don’t video it, don’t take photos-just run” even my kids at school have been told if you see a terror attack- RUN!
Inciting fear & terror!
I can’t say how I’d react if I was caught up in something like this but the 1st thing is like to think I’d do is turn on the camera/video & stand still!

I too used to think sandyhook hoax was ridiculous & you can’t get a whole town to lie& parents etc but I’m judging these freaks by my own standards (Unpsychopathic!!) (is that even a word?? Lol)

After investigating SH after a long time ignoring it & after knowing 9/11 etc were false flags I now don’t trust any media, govt, whatsoever! I question everything!

Ps: I don’t know about Manchester but I strongly believe Charlottesville was a hoax after watching the footage!
My wife used to say the same to me about sandy hook. "Surely the whole town cannot be involved???" But I showed her a video where a lot of the mothers from the school were being interviewed and they were saying that they did not recognise any of the victims parents being interviewed  on  TV, they hadn't seen them around the town and they children didn't recognise the alleged child victims either.
Anyone who tried to get FOI from the government was denied and even attempts to find any property owned by any of the families involved turned up blank. It seems that they were only in SH for the shooting and funeral and disappeared soon after.
I don't believe any of them now tbh as the evidence of lies and deception is just overwhelming and there always seems to be another connection with the with the place or person too.
#10
Assassinations and Conflict, War and Revolution - Problem Reaction Solution principle 


The Cuban example here is the blueprint continually used by hidden forces/the elite and can be seen on so many levels. 

Financially, wars and revolutions are very profitable for the bankers and suppliers. But there are wider reasons behind this. 

If you want nations to give up their sovereignty and hand over decisions and power to a world authority, it won’t just happen. You have to make it happen by causing conflict between nations on the principle of problem-reaction-solution.

The covert force which is responsible for all those apparently unconnected events is also at large in the national and global political arena. The hidden hand of the Elite and its pyramid of deception can be shown to be behind a stream of officially unconnected political assassinations and scandals. 

For instance, what apparent link can there be between the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963, the Oklahoma bomb in 1995, the Vietnam War, and the drugs-for-arms operation during the Reagan-Bush administration in the 1980s, known as Iran-Contra? 

What could be the connection between the assassinations of Martin Luther King and Malcolm X, the Watergate scandal which brought down Richard Nixon, the Bay of Pigs invasion against Castro’s Cuba in 1961 which did much to discredit John F. Kennedy, the removal of Margaret Thatcher as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom in 1990, and the suppression of information about the UFO phenomenon which has been identified since the war? 

The answer is the Elite and the cult of the All-Seeing Eye. The same force has been behind all of these events and countless others which, on the surface and in the media, are not connected in any way. 

These political assassinations and events were part of the same ongoing plan, which removes anyone who gets in the way, either by physical or character assassination. 

Understanding this is important because one method through which the human mind is diverted from seeing these connections is for each event to be promoted as a ‘one-off’. 

This is done by the ‘lone assassin/no conspiracy’ approach. The same strategy is used when each national civil war and revolution is said to be confined only to that country, and not part of a world revolution instigating trouble across the planet toward a common end.
  


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)