[awakened53]

Moronic Sussex Police Threaten to Arrest Women’s Rights Campaigner if She Doesn’t Attend ‘Voluntary’ Interview After She Was Attacked by Trans Activists

Sussex Police have threatened a women right’s group founder with a hate crime arrest after a rally two months ago where her group was attacked by pro-trans activists. The Mail has the story.
The force told mother-of-four Kellie-Jay Keen an allegation made about her that she used “words or behaviour to stir up hatred on the grounds of sexual orientation” was now being investigated.
In an extraordinary phone call released by Standing For Women founder Kellie-Jay, one officer said she could be arrested if she did not attend a “voluntary” interview.
The turn of events seems particularly unusual given the same police force had previously investigated menacing messages sent against her before the Brighton rally.
They included many branding Ms Keen – who is also known as Posie Parker – a TERF and urging people to “Fight her by any means you see fit”.
Then at the Let Women Speak event on September 18th officers arrested two people after masked pro-trans campaigners clashed with rally attendees.
It prompted J.K. Rowling to tweet: “I see the Be Kind brigade are once more hiding behind their black masks, throwing smoke bombs, screaming ‘scum’ at women speaking up for their sex-based rights and howling abuse at lesbians for not doing d***.”
Last night Ms. Keen revealed Sussex Police had threatened her with arrest at her home by the Wiltshire force, calling it today a “most pernicious war on women”.
She said she would not be attending the ‘voluntary’ interview.
In the phone call conversation released online the Sussex officer told her: “Somebody has made an allegation against you about a hate crime. We do need to speak to you about that matter as part of our investigation. We do need to do is get you to come down to Brighton ideally so we can have a voluntary interview.”

Read More: Police Threaten to Arrest Women’s Rights Campaigner if She Doesn’t Attend ‘Voluntary’ Interview After She Was Attacked by Trans Activists

[awakened53]

‘It’s heresy!’. No – it’s INSANITY: Worshippers left ‘in tears’ as Cambridge dean claims Jesus was TRANSGENDER after row over Christ’s wound having a ‘vaginal appearance’


Church worshippers cried ‘heresy’ at the Dean of Trinity College as they left a sermon claiming Jesus may have been transgender ‘in tears’. But the view of a transgender Jesus is ‘legitimate’, according to Dr Michael Banner, the Dean who stepped in to defend the claim made at a Sermon last Sunday that Christ had a ‘trans body’. Dr Michael Banner, the Dean of Trinity College, was backing up junior research fellow Joshua Heath, who displayed Renaissance and Medieval paintings of the crucifixion depicting a side wound that he likened to a vagina in front of the congregation.

Read more: ‘It’s heresy!’. No – it’s INSANITY: Worshippers left ‘in tears’ as
Cambridge dean claims Jesus was TRANSGENDER after row over Christ’s wound having a ‘vaginal appearance’

[awakened53]

Man who said he identified as female jailed for sexual assault in station toilet


A “dangerous individual” who said he identified as a woman in an attempt to justify a sexual assault in a train station toilet has been jailed.

Ian Bullock attacked the woman in the toilets of Birmingham New Street station on March 21 last year as she washed her hands, after he entered the female toilets while wearing a hi-vis vest at around 7am.

After his victim left a cubicle, Bullock, 39, moved towards her and bent down, before sexually assaulting the woman, the British Transport Police (BTP) said on Tuesday.

The woman challenged Bullock and he left in silence, before attempting to disguise himself by taking off the hi-vis vest and placing a beanie hat on.

Read more: Man who said he identified as female jailed for sexual assault in station toilet

[awakened53]

Woman sexually abused by her father discovers they will be released from jail identifying as a woman – using transgender ‘legal loophole’ that could see child sex attackers cover up their past by adopting new gender identity


A young woman who was sexually abused as a child by her father was appalled to discover the attacker is due to be released after barely seven years in jail.

And she was astonished to hear that her father was now identifying as a woman and using the name Claire Fox.

Ceri-Lee Galvin, 24, was abused for nine years from the age of eight by Clive Bundy. Bundy was jailed for 15 years in 2016 but is now due for parole.

She has bravely chosen to waive her anonymity as a sexual abuse victim to raise awareness of a ‘legal loophole’ that potentially allows sex attackers like her father to cover up their past by adopting a new gender identity.

Ceri-Lee remembers being stunned by the revelation two years ago about her abusive father – who she remembers as ‘ultra-masculine’.

The victim liaison officer went on to tell Ceri-Lee that the only reason she was being informed about the name and gender change was because her father had given permission for this to happen.

The implication was that if her father had chosen not to tell her of the transition, she would have had no idea that Claire Fox was actually her abuser if the attacker had decided to contact her using the new name.

‘By being allowed to keep his change of identity a secret if he so wishes, my father Clive Bundy is being permitted to divorce himself and his name from the heinous crimes he committed against me,’ she says.

‘I was abused as a child by a man who now identifies as a woman and I only know because he allowed them to tell me. It’s just appalling that his right to privacy seems to over-rule any rights I have as a victim.’

Women’s rights activists have already raised concerns about the ease with which violent male criminals can self-identify as a woman – and recent cases have highlighted the issue.

A rapist who carried out sexual attacks as a man named Adam Graham in 2016 and 2019 sparked a heated debate earlier this year after changing gender and name to Isla Bryson while waiting to stand trial at the High Court in Glasgow.

Read More: Woman sexually abused by her father discovers they will be released from jail identifying as a woman

[awakened53]

Ludicrous GP surgery asks parents if their BABY is trans: Outrage over ‘insane’ gender options on patient registration form


GP surgery faced fierce backlash today over its registration form — which asks parents whether their newborns are trans or non-binary.

The practice in Birmingham also offers parents the choice of registering their baby’s gender as ‘other’ or ‘not stated’.

Woodgate Valley Health Centre insisted the form was used by new patients of all ages wishing to register, not just newborns.

MailOnline understands the form is not part of national NHS policy. Instead each surgery can decide to add extra gender options to their forms.

Taking to Twitter, one woman attached a screenshot of the registration form that a friend who had recently given birth was presented with.

Under its gender options, the surgery offers ‘male (including trans man)’, ‘female (including trans woman)’, ‘non-binary’, ‘other (not listed)’ or ‘not stated’.

The post sparked backlash among social media users, with one claiming ‘that’s insane’.

Another labelled the move ‘beyond out of control’.

A third user commented: ‘How on earth can a baby express any opinion on their “gender identity”?’ ludicrous

Read more: Ludicrous GP surgery asks parents if their BABY is trans: Outrage over ‘insane’ gender options on patient registration form

[awakened53]

---

The Demonisation of Kathleen Stock


In my Spectator column this week I’ve written about my trip to the Oxford Union on Tuesday to see Kathleen Stock being interviewed by the Union President in front of a packed debating chamber. Indeed, there were more people inside the chamber than there were protestors outside, which was heartening to see. Here’s how it begins:

It had been billed as the most controversial debate of the year, with even Rishi Sunak intervening to say that Kathleen Stock, who had been invited to the Oxford Union, should not be no-platformed. But if you were sitting in the Union’s debating chamber on Tuesday evening – as I was – the huge kerfuffle seemed baffling. For an hour and a half, the former philosophy professor talked almost exclusively about toilets.
To be fair, she was given little choice. It was more of an interview than a debate, in which the president of the union fired questions at her. Roughly 90 per cent of them were about women’s lavatories. In particular, he wanted to know why she objected to trans women being allowed to use “the Ladies”. Professor Stock patiently explained that trans activists don’t just want men who have fully transitioned to be able to access women’s spaces, including refuge centres, but any man who self-identifies as a woman, even a great hairy brute. She had no desire to ‘erase’ trans women, she said, or to deny them their rights – something the scores of protestors outside were accusing her of. Rather, this was a ‘safeguarding’ issue. It was about protecting women from predatory men who ‘self-ID’ to invade their spaces.

It seems extraordinary that this has become such a polarising issue, given that, according to the latest census, only 0.1 per cent of the population identify as trans women. No doubt the percentage among 18- to 24-year-olds is higher, and some of the protestors outside identified as trans, but still. Why were temperatures running so high, both in the lead-up to this event and on the night? As the mild–mannered philosopher set out her stall, the demonstrators made as much noise as they could, hoping to drown out her words. ‘Trans rights are human rights,’ they screamed, although no one, least of all the speaker, was denying that. Why has this generation of student activists chosen access to women’s toilets as the hill to die on?

Read More: The Demonisation of Kathleen Stock

[awakened53]

Boys aged eight are sent home with ‘puberty kit’ including pantiliners and maxi pads by Connecticut Elementary School after being shown videos about gender identity


Parents in Granby, Connecticut, are furious after elementary school students were shown a video discussing gender identity and sent home with puberty kits.

Parents at the Wells Road Intermediate school say their 3rd, 4th, and 5th graders were shown the video, in which children discuss identifying outside the gender binary and wave pride flags around.

‘Pride means you should be able to be free. All my life I never really felt like a boy and I don’t really feel like a girl. So I’d rather be both,’ says one child in the video called Simon who identifies as he/they.

Many parents believe their children are too young to be learning about these topics and claim they were not warned about the Pride month programming in advance.

Read more: Boys aged eight are sent home with ‘puberty kit’ including pantiliners and maxi pads by Connecticut Elementary School after being shown videos about gender identity

[awakened53]

Twelve-year-olds are being taught about anal sex in school while nine-year-olds are told to ‘masturbate’ for homework: The shocking lesson plans used by teachers in UK classrooms


Twelve-year-olds are being taught about anal sex in school while nine-year-olds are told to ‘masturbate’ for homework: The shocking lesson plans used by teachers in UK classrooms



Schoolchildren are being taught about anal sex and orgasms before they have reached puberty and set ‘masturbation’ as homework, secretive lesson plans reveal.
Many teachers are ‘indoctrinating’ children with scientifically false claims about biological sex, presenting gender as fluid and furthering a narrative that people can be born in the wrong body.
It comes as the NHS is facing a mass legal action from 1,000 families who claim their children were rushed into taking life-changing puberty blockers’ by the Tavistock Centre.
MailOnline has found graphic teaching material — including a sex manual for pre-teens — being taught to children in classes around the UK.
It follows a concerned mother being denied the right to see the content of the lessons being taught to her 15-year-old daughter in her Relationships and Sex Education (RSE) classes, which became compulsory three years ago.
Despite a judge refusing Clare Page the right to see the material, MailOnline can reveal that a wealth of questionable teaching resources are already available online.
Colouring books, word searches and cartoon drawings have also been given to young girls and boys by ‘activist teachers’ in their ‘overarching mission to sexualise children in the name of inclusion’.
Since September 2020, Relationships Education has been compulsory in primary schools and RSE mandatory in secondary schools. The change left many teaching staff seeking guidance.
The void was filled by charities — some harbouring unconventional views on biological sex and sharing material on their websites that references underage sex.



Read more: Twelve-year-olds are being taught about anal sex in school while nine-year-olds are told to ‘masturbate’ for homework: The shocking lesson plans used by teachers in UK classrooms

[awakened53]

Bank of England says people of any gender identity can be pregnant



The Bank of England has said that people of any gender identity can be treated as pregnant as it pledged to dedicate a floor of its office to offering gender-neutral lavatories.

The embattled central bank introduced a new “family leave” policy in June 2021 that included the gender-neutral term “birthing parent”, according to its 2022 submission to the charity Stonewall, which campaigns for gay, lesbian and transgender rights.

Officials said that this meant “the parent who is/was pregnant with the child but includes persons of any and all gender identities”.

The application added that Threadneedle Street’s parental bereavement leave policy “talks about parents without specifying gender”, The Times reported.

The views, expressed in its 2022 submission to be included in Stonewall’s list of the 100 top employers that was first reported by The Times, also included a pledge to ensure the seventh floor of its London headquarters offered only gender-neutral lavatories.

The Bank has already introduced a pledge to staff to pay for gender reassignment treatment using private medical insurance.

It comes as Andrew Bailey, the Bank’s Governor, faces heavy criticism for failing to get a hold on Britain’s stubbornly high inflation rate.

The latest official figures showed that core inflation, which strips out volatile food and energy prices, unexpectedly jumped to 7.1pc in May, while the consumer prices index remained unchanged at 8.7pc.
Last year, the Telegraph revealed that Threadneedle Street dished out more than £200,000 on private consultants to create a mission statement for the Bank that would “define the essence of the organisation”. It also faced criticism for spending £50,000 of public money on a “more inclusive” logo.
Stonewall is advising nearly one in five FTSE 100 companies, despite being dropped as a partner by civil servants and the equalities watchdog amid concerns over its trans rights guidance.
The group has come under fire for its controversial advice, including recently suggesting that many nurseries are not doing enough to help children “recognise their trans identity”.
The Bank came 57th in Stonewall’s annual list of best employers last year after submitting a 103-page application.
Its submission also stated that every employee at the Bank was expected to set a diversity and inclusion objective each year and be assessed on it. The Bank of England employs around 4,000 staff.
The Bank of England said: “The Bank is committed to being an inclusive place to work for all of its colleagues who are all dedicated to delivering monetary and financial stability.”


Read More: Bank of England says people of any gender identity can be pregnant

[awakened53]

Fury as Transgender activist who served 30 years in jail for attempted murder tells cheering crowd at Trans Pride march ‘if you see a TERF, punch them in the face’


A transgender activist who served 30 years in jail for attempted murder has told the crowd at a Trans Pride march if they saw a ‘TERF’, they should punch them in the face.

Sarah Jane Baker was one of the speakers at the Trans+ Pride event in London yesterday and used her speech to call for violence against those critical of trans ideology.

She told the cheering crowd: ‘I was gonna come here and be really fluffy and be really nice and say yeah be really lovely and queer and gay… Nah, if you see a TERF, punch them in the f****** face.’

Baker’s speech incited fury on social media and users called for Trans Pride to take a stance against the violence.

Labour MP Clive Lewis shared people’s anger over the comment and wrote: ‘Advocating violence against others is wrong & this is no exception. But as you’ll be aware violent language and actions are not unique to one side on this issue.

Read more: Fury as Transgender activist who served 30 years in jail for attempted murder tells cheering crowd at Trans Pride march ‘if you see a TERF, punch them in the face’